Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Literary analysis in movie
Differences between a book and a movie
Differences in cultural
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Literary analysis in movie
The Giver is an interesting story about a 12 year-old boy named Jonas. This story takes place in a utopian community where everything is the same, this includes color, clothes, hairstyles, and choices. One thing that is definitely not the same is the book and the movie.
In the book, Jonas’s friends Fiona and Asher get assigned to the job of Caretaker of the Old and Head of Recreation, while these are normal jobs Jonas’s is not. He is selected (a quite rare thing to happen) to be a Receiver of Memory. This means that after school he goes to the Annex room to meet with the previous Receiver, now known as the Giver. The Giver passes memory’s down to the receiver of the world before the Sameness.
There are many differences between the book and the movie although these differences are annoying at first, they prove to be useful in making the movie a good movie. First off one of the biggest problems I had was the fact that the actors for what I thought were going to be 12 year-olds look like they are 18. I later realized they did this because in the movie they are 18, even further I realized that they did this because the book is all about learning complex emotions, and that’s not going to be accurately portrayed through the words of a
…show more content…
This fact may seem as if but in fact the book says that they don’t understand ‘downhill’ as they have never felt the feeling of height which implies that everything, and I mean everything is flat. This conflicts because if you are even sticking your head out a window on the second floor you have a feeling of height, let alone a massive building probably 70’ tall. Although this does not align with the book at all, if everything were nothing more than one story tall in the movie, it would look quite boring to viewers
Have you ever read a book and watched its movie and thought that the movie was nothing like the book? The Giver’s story was not adapted well onto the big screen. There were many changes that were made, some of which completely altered the whole course of the storyline. For example, Fiona working at the Nurturing Center instead the House of the Old and the characters taking injections instead of pills also changed the way Jonas acted especially towards Fiona throughout the entire movie Some of the many trivial changes that were made did not affect the movie as much.
For example, Mama goes to the bank in the movie and is given a hard time about paying her mortgage, but this did not happen in the book. Another major difference is that the school bus scene, where the Logan kids played a trick on the white kids, was not shown in the movie, even though it was an important part of the story. There are some character changes as well. Lillian Jean, Jeremy, R.W, and Melvin are Simms’ in the book, but in the movie they are Kaleb Wallace’s children. However, the main plot difference is how the movie starts in the middle, summarizing everything from the first part of the book very briefly. Additionally, many scenes are switched around and placed out of order. Altogether, the plot and character changes contribute to my unfavorable impression of the
Jonas, the protagonist, is assigned the job of holding memories for the community. This is so that not everyone has to experience sad or painful memories. The Giver's job is to transmit these memories to Jonas and, in doing so, reveals the wonders of love, and family, and pain, and sorrow to this young boy. Jonas begins to resent the rules of sameness and wants to share these joys with his community. After receiving his first memory, Jonas says, "I wish we had those things, still." (p. 84)
Overall, the movie and book have many differences and similarities, some more important than others. The story still is clear without many scenes from the book, but the movie would have more thought in it.
The Giver is about a boy named Jonas who was chosen to be the community’s next Receiver of Memory. He lived in a community where everything was chosen for the citizens, and everything was perfect. During Jonas' training, he realized that the community was missing something and that there was more in the world. Jonas wanted everybody to know that. The Giver book was then made into a movie. Though the two were based with the same story plot, there are three important differences that results with two different takes on the same story. The three main differences between the book and the movie are Asher and Fiona's Assignments, the similarity all Receivers had, and the Chief Elder's role.
Throughout the history of the world, there has been many societies. All these societies had similar structures and ideas, but they all are different by their own special traditions and ways of life. Similarly, both our society and the society in The Giver share similar ideas, but they are different in certain areas. For example, they both celebrate birthdays and have family units, but they have their own way of doing so. Based on the celebration of birthdays and the formation of family units, our society is better than the society in The Giver by Lois Lowry.
There are many differences between The Giver book and movie. Some of them are major changes that made a difference in parts of the story. Others are minor changes that did not really change anything. Although the two have slight differences the book and the movie have the same meaning and convey the same message. The three major similarities and differences between the book and the movie are that Jonas, Asher, Fiona and the other young characters are aged up in the movie, Fiona was interested in working at the Nurturing Center instead of the House of Old, and that Jonas released the memories in both movie and book at the end.
The book and the movie were both very good. The book took time to explain things like setting, people’s emotions, people’s traits, and important background information. There was no time for these explanations the movie. The book, however, had parts in the beginning where some readers could become flustered.
The Giver: Analysis of Jonas On the surface, Jonas is like any other eleven-year-old boy living in his community. He seems more intelligent and perceptive than many of his peers, and he thinks more seriously than they do about life, worrying about his own future as well as his friend Asher’s. He enjoys learning and experiencing new things: he chooses to volunteer at a variety of different centers rather than focusing on one, because he enjoys the freedom of choice that volunteer hours provide. He also enjoys learning about and connecting with other people, and he craves more warmth and human contact than his society permits or encourages. The things that really set him apart from his peers—his unusual eyes, his ability to see things change in a way that he cannot explain—trouble him, but he does not let them bother him too much, since the community’s emphasis on politeness makes it easy for Jonas to conceal or ignore these little differences.
As December approaches Jonas feels apprehensive because this year his group will be given their assignments (Lowry 9). He is chosen as the receiver of memory. While this position holds high honor it is also a painful load to hold. Jonas will hold all memories of the past. Receiving memories is not like watching a movie, as Jonas soon expe...
The Giver is actually one of my all-time favorite books, so I’ve looked into why she left the book so inconclusive in the past. The Giver is basically about a boy named Jonas who lives in a perfect society. He lives in a household with his two parents and his little sister Lilly. When he becomes a 12, he goes through a huge ceremony and all the elders assign them their jobs. In this community, there is no lying, stealing, racism, pain, sunlight or color. Jonas was chosen to be The Receiver, and he didn’t know what to do because this job was such a big deal. Jonas then goes through training with the current Receiver, who is now The Giver. Training consists of The Giver passing down the memories from when the community was not what it is today. Memories that are passed down are things that are normal to us. Memories of sun, snow, pain, and sorrow.
Imagine a world with no color, weather, or sunshine. The Giver is a book by Lois Lowry and is based on a utopia where no one makes choices, feels pain, or has emotions. The book takes place in a community where all of this is true. The story is about an 11-year old soon to be 12 year-old named Jonas who is unsure of which job he will get when he is 12. Jonas changes throughout The Giver and as a result, tries to change the community.
The Giver is such a great book, but is such a weird movie. I’m going to review both the book and movie to show you what I mean.
The Giver portrays three very important themes. One of which is we should always question something we don’t agree with, the other being we are all individual and being individual is a good thing and the last one being love is important and needed to help you get through the rough times in life. Some people might not realize one of these themes but once they do the way they look at themselves, others and the world changes. Examples of these themes are evident throughout the story and Lois Lowry does a great job emphasizing them.
Let’s analyze the leniency that The Giver made to the movie. Rather than make jonas 12 years old like Lois Lowry did in the book, the producers made Jonas an 18 year old graduating high school. Besides that, the movie made Fiona a Nurturer instead of a Caretaker of the Old and Asher a Pilot instead of becoming Assistant Director of Recreation. Also in the movie Jonas gets a shot every morning to keep away the Stirrings while in the book he takes a pill every morning. Infact, one of the biggest changes in the movie is that Fiona becomes Jonas’s girlfriend. Furthermore, I believe there was a volume of changes made to the movie and now we shall see if that is good or