Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
US immigration from 1919-29
US immigration from 1919-29
The Chinese Exclusion Act impact
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: US immigration from 1919-29
In the United States we offer citizenship for all those who wish to join our nation. Although it is not easy, before WW2 and Japanese wishing to obtain citizenship had to jump through many hoops. The first law that came into effect was “The Gentlemen’s Agreement”. The gentlemen’s agreement was an unofficial treaty that protected both the United States and Japan. Japan had just defeated China in 1895, then defeating Russia in 1905. Japan demonstrated that they were not to be messed with and established themselves as a world power. During this time that Japan was establishing dominance of the Asia. The United States had just passed the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, which caused labor shortages in the Unites States, primarily in the west coast. As many Japanese saw this as an opportunity to make money, many left Japan …show more content…
and traveled to Hawai’i and California. As waves of Japanese immigrants flooded into the United States they were met with discrimination. Anti Japanese leagues were started and school children were segregated. In order to diffuse tension between the United States and Japan, President Theodore Roosevelt met with the Japanese government and created the Gentlemen’s agreement, which assured the United States and Japan's relationship by both countries limiting immigration and creating a friendship between nations avoiding war. Following the Gentlemen’s Agreement of 1907, in 1913 California enacted the California Alien Land law, which prohibited any alien from owning land. Following the footsteps of California, other states such as Arizona in 1917;Louisiana in 1921; New Mexico in 1922; Idaho in 1923; Montana in 1923; Oregon in 1923; Kansas in 1925; and Utah in 1943 all passed similar if not even harsher laws preventing Japanese Americans from owning land. In 1943 the Arkansas legislature enacted the Anti Japanese land law which directly targeted and prevented Japanese Americans, which were lawful citizens, as well as non-naturalized Japanese. Even though this act violates the fourteenth amendment, the state used a loophole that these Japanese descendants were ineligible to naturalize, thus making the law valid in Arkansas. But the law could not apply to any resident that lived in Arkansas at the time due to the fact that Arkansas’s constitution states, “No distinction shall ever be made by law between resident aliens and citizens in regard to possession, enjoyment or descent of property.”(Dudley O. McGovney,8) In total eleven states enact laws that limit or prohibit Japanese descendants or Japanese Americans from owning land. While some states were still enacting anti Japanese land ownership laws, the United States government passed the Johnson-Reed act or the Immigration act of 1924.
This act limited the amount of immigrants that were allowed to enter the United States based off their country of origin. For this act a quota was created for each race. This quote only supplied 2% of all of peoples that wished to immigrate to the United States, but completely excluded all Asian immigrants. The uncertainty of a national security threat caused by World War one, made congress open to this act and eventually was a great driving force for it. Following the footsteps of the 1907 immigration act that required a literacy test for all those over the age of 16, it also included the “Asiatic barred zone”. There was no need to bar the Japanese from entering the United States due to the gentlemen’s agreement, but the United States eventually did formally exclude the Japanese with the 1924 immigration act. With protest from Japan regarding the violation of the Gentlemen’s Agreement, the United States focused on regulating immigration rather than protecting bonds between the US and
Japan.
During the 1900’s, it was common for people to immigrate to America. They saw it as a land of freedom and opportunity. Some thought that this was a great way for the US’ economy to boom, but some thought otherwise. With the shortage of jobs, many believed that the immigrants were stealing their precious jobs. Because of the competition over jobs, immigrants became the new public enemy to many. Immigrants such as the Japanese. The Japanese had already been through some racial discrimination, but it wasn’t until World War II that it got much worse. During the war the US decided it was best to be neutral, but the longer the war went on for, The more the US’ neutrality was on the verge of breaking. It wasn’t until December 7, 1941, that the US
The United States had an open door policy on immigration from the nations beginning until 1921. During that time, between 1790 and 1920, the population grew by 102 million. That’s about one million new immigrants each year for 130 years. Most of these immigrants were from European countries. In 1921 Congress passed the Quota Act which put a cap of 360,000 new immigrants per year. Congress did this because the public was concerned about the number of new immigrants and how it would affect the country. This act also favored immigrants from England, Germany, France, and Scandinavia over those from Asia, Africa, and southern Europe.
In 1777, the Articles of Confederation were written and became our first plan for governing the United States. They were founded on the ideals of Federalism – limited government, upholding the authority of state governments and equality between states. At the time, this form of government was crucial to prevent tyranny, in addition to organizing and effectively fighting the Revolutionary War. It also allowed us to borrow money, operate a military, ban slavery in the west, and create new states. There are current proposals to replace the Confederation with updated system outlined in the “Constitution.” But, should we even consider making changes? After all, Patrick Henry said, "The Confederation, this despised government, merits, in my opinion, the highest encomium--it carried us through a long and dangerous war; it rendered us victorious in that bloody conflict with a powerful nation; it has secured us a territory greater than any European monarch possesses--and shall a government which has been thus strong and vigorous, be accused of imbecility, and abandoned for want of energy?" If it got us through the revolutionary war, surely it can still suffice, right?
As America continued to recruit workers from other countries, they continually worried about an immigration problem. In 1924, the Federal government passed the Immigration Act which officially barred further immigration from Asia and Europe to the U.S.
Stetson Conn (1990) wrote “For several decades the Japanese population had been the target of hostility and restrictive action.” It was easy for the government to take advantage of the Japanese-Americans because they were already the target of aggression. Since the Japanese population was already in such a low position in society, taking advantage of their circumstances was easy for the government. The Japanese found themselves having to defend their presence in a country that was supposed to be accepting; this also happened to the Chinese before the Japanese. (Terry, 2012)
Japanese immigration created the same apprehension and intolerance in the mind of the Americans as was in the case of Chinese migration to the U.S at the turn of the 19th century. They developed a fear of being overwhelmed by a people having distinct ethnicity, skin color and language that made them “inassimilable.” Hence they wanted the government to restrict Asian migration. Japan’s military victories over Russia and China reinforced this feeling that the Western world was facing what came to be known as “yellow peril”. This was reflected in the media, movies and in literature and journalism.4 Anti-Oriental public opinion gave way to several declarations and laws to restrict Japanese prosperity on American land. Despite the prejudice and ineligibility to obtain citizenship the ...
-The 1921 Immigration Act was the first to include any quantitative restrictions on immigration. The Asian “barred zone” was upheld, but all other immigration was limited to three percent of the foreign-born population of any given group in the United States at the time of the 1910 census.
In response to the World War I for the following years from the flow of immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe. Congress of United States passed a law to limit immigrations, which named Immigration Act of 1924 or the Johnson-Reed Act. The Immigration Act of 1924 was an Act use to limit the big number of immigration entry to the United States. The Immigration Act of 1924 only provided two percent immigration visas from 1980s national census. Asians were not allowed to immigrate to the United States.
... it legal for non-white immigrant to become naturalized citizens. Many of those Japanese born immigrants who were held in concentration camps could now apply for citizenship status.
The Good Friday Agreement The Good Friday Agreement was agreed to try and settle the conflicts in Northern Ireland, the agreement was reached on Friday the 10th of April. Voting on the 22nd Of May 1998 resulted in a majority in favor of the Good Friday Agreement. The agreement consisted of changes in the constitution, it was decided that there would be no change in the condition of N.Ireland without consent of the greater part, North and South, Article 2 and 3 of the Republican constitution have been altered to coincide with this principle of consent. The Government in N.Ireland was also changed; a new N.Ireland assembly was setup, a majority of Nationalists and Unionists is needed for all assembly choices. North-South bodies where also setup as well as a British-Irish council.
Even before the attack on Pearl Harbor, there was still tension between Japanese-Americans and other United States citizens. Laws like the “Gentlemen’s Agreement,” a way of restricting Japanese immigration, was put into place in 1908 in fear of a “future Japanese ‘takeover’” (Hata and Hata, 7). After the attack on Pearl Harbor, growing hysteria filled the country and Japanese-Americans feared for their future. About a year later, Franklin D. R...
This discrimination initially began with the Naturalization Act of 1790, allowing free white-men of “good character” naturalization while excluding Native Americans, indentured servants, free Blacks, and Asians. In addition to extreme acts, the Chinese Exclusion Act, signed in 1882, had prohibited the Chinese from entering our country. Another example of the racism Asian-Americans faced occurred during World War II due to the war’s propaganda and the slurs that came about as a result of the war. The historical background of Asian-Americans and racism not only left scarring tendencies, but managed to transcend into modern society within a lower degree.
in WWII. The rights of the Japanese as American citizens were taken away and this can happen
The earliest form of racial discrimination against Asian Americans was encountered during the California Gold Rush. The Gold Rush attracted Chinese immigrants who came to California to fill the high demand for laborers. However, as more and more Chinese immigrated to California and the lower-paying labor jobs were filled, the Chinese began filling higher-paying positions typically held by Whites. As a result, an anti-Chinese Movement was formed followed by the enactment of the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 which prevented any additional Chinese immigration into the United States. Essentially, Chinese were discriminated against by the Whites due to fear of the Chinese taking over their jobs. After World War II, the federal government ended the 1882 ban on Chinese immigration and gave citizenship to Chinese Americans born abroad (Charles and Guryan 507).
What can The Four Agreements be stated as? I can say that they are similar to a proverb of life. As we progress, The Four Agreements can be used as a passage to a new and improved life. Before we can use these agreements and place them into life, we have to know each and every agreement. Each agreement has it’s own meaning and can change your way of thinking in a diverse way.