Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Benefits and problems associated with urbanization
A short note on Ebenezer Howard's concept of garden city
Benefits and problems associated with urbanization
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Benefits and problems associated with urbanization
In England, in the late nineteenth century, with the tremendous growth of the urban population, Ebenezer Howard came up with an innovative proposal: join the advantages of town and country in one space, thus creating a space with better quality of life for the residents. With major influences of the Arts and Crafts period, the garden cities of Ebenezer Howard were successful when executed and they influenced buildings worldwide.
Howard, with his proposal, intended to resolve the problems arising from urbanization, such as poverty, homelessness, garbage collection, water and sewage networks, unplanned housing, pollution, lack of entertainment, and the destruction of the environment. He believed that the integration of town and country would ensure the combination of the advantages of urban living and quality of life of the field.
The theory was proposed by the publication of the book Garden Cities of To-morrow. The author proposed more than harmony between man and nature, in fact he introduced a policy to maintain the social balance, threatened by the sordid conditions of urbanization of English folk layers during the nineteenth century. This concept of urbanization beyond plan forms, functions, financial and administrative resources of an ideal, healthy and beautiful city mainly considers the satisfaction of the masses, controlling their concentration in metropolitan centres. Initially, Howard uses diagrams to warrant the creation of a garden city.
This diagram shows the advantages of country life and city life, also showing the disadvantages, then makes the combination of the two and mount one place with advantages. This diagram, better known as "The Three Magnets" also brings people in the center and just below the question "W...
... middle of paper ...
...n urban areas. These two cities have failed to achieve the autonomy that Howard wanted and eventually became cities of London.
The concept of garden cities ended up not applicable, which meant they had the opposite effect than was intended, the suburbanization. Even the attempt to approach the countryside became not applicable and ended up being replaced by new modern architectural models. These models made use of the entire area for the construction of buildings, aiming the practicality, since the urban population kept growing and so did their requirements.
It's important to realize that an integrated life between town and country is quite possible and that the first step has been taken with the proposals of Howard. But as all pioneer projects, the Garden Cities also has its points that do not apply and should be rethought to have greater applicability nowadays.
There are a few problems that led to the deterioration of London's down town. The creation of the suburbs and subsequent businesses that defined themselves by the fact that they catered strictly to the suburb population played a huge role of depreciating the importance of downtown.
In his book Modern Civic Art, Robinson discussed various ways to beautify the city from avenues to small streets, the tenements, the administrative center, and the furnishings of the streets, comprehensive planning, parkways and so forth. Some of his ideas were only good on paper at that time but as the city evolved most of them have now come into fruition. He explained that the backyard should be as beautiful as the front of the house as well as the inside. (Robinson, 1903 p. 241)
“Could suburbs prosper independently of central cities? Probably. But would they prosper even more if they were a part of a better-integrated metropolis? The answer is almost certainly yes.” (p. 66)
During the last half of the 1800’s and the early part of the 1900’s urban population in western Europe made enormous increases. During this period France’s overall population living in cities increased twenty percent, and in Germany the increase was almost thirty percent. This great flow of people into cities created many problems in resource demands and patterns of urban life. These demands created a revolution in sanitation and medicine. Part of this revolution was the redesigning of cities. G.E. Baron Von Haussmann was the genius behind the new plans for the city of Paris.
The method of the research starts by examining the basic evolution of The Town and Country Planning act of Britain. Dutt (1970) defines the levels of the administrative structures and explains how the subdivisions of planning actors are working together. He states that the British regional planning approach has two scales: “city-regional and national” (p. 323). Author describes the chronology of the planning evolution in three parts: t...
Again, this section will give a working definition of the “urban question’. To fully compare the political economy and ecological perspectives a description of the “urban question” allows the reader to better understand the divergent schools of thought. For Social Science scholars, from a variety of disciplines, the “urban question” asks how space and the urban or city are related (The City Reader, 2009). The perspective that guides the ecological and the social spatial-dialect schools of thought asks the “urban question” in separate distinct terminology. Respected scholars from the ecological mode of thinking, like Burgess, Wirth and others view society and space from the rationale that geographical scope determines society (The City Reader, 2009). The “urban question” that results from the ecological paradigm sees the relationship between the city (space) as influencing the behaviors of individuals or society in the city. On the other hand...
Although Urban sprawl may seem to be a great opportunity to expand our living quarters and get people out of the city, when you divulge deeper you find that there are many concerning problems that place it as at a high risk of destroying our nation. Just some issues that arise with Urban Sprawl include elevated risk of water and air pollution through increased car dependency, more traffic fatalities, higher taxes, increased run off into rivers and lakes, harmful effect on the human health including diseases, loss of natural habitats, wildlife and open space. Every year, Urban sprawl consumes and demolishes unmeasurable amounts of forests, farmlands, woodlands and wetlands while creating social dysfunction, hidden debts of unfinished infrastructure and environmental
Second is, Limit of Town and to be specific it was about the size. The growth of towns to be limited, in order that their inhabitants may live near work, shops, social centers, and each other and also near open country. Third is, Amenities which an internal texture of towns to be open enough to permit of houses with private gardens, adequate space for schools and other functional purposes, and pleasant parks and
Frank Lloyd Wright was perhaps the most influential American architect of the 20th century and one of the greatest to ever live. What was well known about Wright was that he was deeply ambivalent about cities and metropolis centers. His key criticism of large cities was that the advancing technologies had rendered the cities, which were created industry and immigration in the late 19th and early 20th Century, completely obsolete. He famously quoted that, “ The present city…has nothing to give the citizen…because centralization have no forces of regeneration”. Instead, Wright envisioned decentralized settlements (otherwise known as suburban neighborhoods) that would take advantage of the mobility offered by the automobile, telephones, and telegraphic communication. Because of the rise of the suburban complexes in the post WW2 era, this is where Wright first got the reputation has being a prophet for the architecture world.
Jacobs includes work from nineteenth-century Utopians with their rejection of urbanized society and their inheritance of eighteenth century romanticism. On page 489, Jacobs clarifies that to see complex systems of functional order as order, and not ask chaos, takes understanding. She analyzes the what a citys structure consists of mixture of uses and that the “skeleton” of a city structure are on the fundamentally the wrong track. It must be understood that streets provide the principal visual scenes in
Imagine having to choose to reside in one place for the rest of your life. Which would you opt for? Some people would argue that the hyperactive lifestyle that a big city has to offer has more benefits than living in the country. However, others would contend that the calm and peaceful environment of the countryside is much more rewarding. Several people move from the city to a farm to get away from the hustle and bustle. Likewise, some farmers have traded in their tractors and animals to live a fast paced city life. Of course, not all large cities are the same nor are all of the places in the country identical. Realizing this, ten years ago, I decided to hang up the city life in Indiana to pursue a more laid back approach to life in rural Tennessee. Certainly, city life and life in the country have their benefits, but they also have distinguishable differences.
In addition, Howard's proposal can also help reduce the need for agricultural product movements. The city will be surrounded by agricultural land and green space, which can accommodate many urban needs in terms of food supply and thus absorb some of the city's waste products. Therefore, the concept of urban parks can help achieve sustainable development.
The Urban Village approach claims that the convenient walking distance usually defines the size, a 10 minute walk from one side of the urban area to the other (up to 900 m across) [18]. Thus an urban development area could be around 0.4 km2 say 600x600m , the maximum distance between the dwelling and different services as shown in (Figure 2-14); it illustrates that the comfortable walking distance is between 800 m to 1600 m; and using the car if the travel time is between 30 minutes to 1 hour 30 minutes44, that there is an approval that the walking distance between the services and any dwelling in a neighborhood must not exceed 10 to 15 minutes which refer to 400 m to 800 m (figure
... architectures would led to a more organic organization beneficial to the people that choose to make their lives in this city. Although this model of a sustainable city is not a perfectly closed loop, it lays the foundation for one that is. Over time, with constantly evolving and improving technology and new methods of design from the scale of products to buildings, the gaps in the loop could be closed, and a “true” sustainable city could be fully realized.
There are many benefits to living in a big city. These places usually offer great employment opportunities and various forms of entertainment. There are movie theaters, shopping malls, and restaurants, all within walking distance of one another. These cities are also home to hundreds of thousands of people. These people live in tiny apartments or small houses, separated by only a few feet. Although they have many things available to them, city life can become stressful and overbearing. Life in the country offers more privacy, peace, and safety. Many people are starting to realize that the comforts of country living outweigh the benefits of city life.