Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of protecting nature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of protecting nature
The book that I chose to read was called The Future of Life written by influential scientist Edward O. Wilson. The theme of this book by far was the emphasized importance of our Earth’s abundant biodiversity and how its loss can impact many aspects of our lives. Wilson also expertly showed the glory and beauty of many of the currently threatened and endangered species such as the sumatran rhino that can cause those with a weak heart wince at how its adorable mannerisms (such as being shy) will be lost forever. By appealing to the reader’s logic and empathy, Wilson was able to relate biodiversity as being a huge issue and result of the current environmental issues that we face but do not see such as deforestation, habitat loss, invasive species, …show more content…
The book was very well written on a scientific level and also was able to communicate He made it a point to address both sides of the environmental argument before introducing his worldview of how biodiversity and the economy and the event should work. An example he made for the preservation of biodiversity was that the unique traits found in the rarer species on earth help produce so many useful pharmaceutical and scientific products that have changed the face of science such as the thermophiles found in the Geysers of Yellowstone National Park that allowed for the possibility of PCR (polymerase chain reaction). Some of the solutions that he offered included immediately salvaging the world’s hotspots, keeping intact the five remaining frontier forests, ceasing all logging of old-growth forests everywhere, letting secondary native forests recover, concentrating on lake and river systems, defining the marine hotspots in the world (such as coral reefs) and giving them as much priority as terrestrial habitats, mapping the world’s biodiversity, ensuring all the world’s ecosystems are protected, efficiently using biodiversity to benefit the world economy as a whole, initiating restoration projects, increasing the capacity of zoos and botanical gardens to ensure the survival of endangered species, preparing to clone species when all other preservation methods fail, and by supporting population planning by incorporating plans for low ecological footprints. I believe that many of the solutions that he has offered are highly optimistic, since it requires our current static society to actually participate actively to change the course of our planet. But the ones that I do believe will work especially is the one about supporting population planning by incorporating plans for low ecological footprints and the idea that we should efficiently use the world’s biodiversity to benefit local populations.
As soon as the novel begins, we are introduced to the concept of saving the environment. The book begins with the narrator explaining his life-long dream of helping the world. He says that the cultural revolution of the 1960’s contributed to his ambition. However, as time went on he
“If you want to think about why humans are so dangerous to other species, you can picture a poacher in Africa carrying and Ak-47/ better still, you can picture yourself, holding a book on your lap” (Kolbert 266). This excerpt alone sets up the dark narrative that lies within The Sixth Extinction. It is uncomfortable to think about the impact that humans have on the environment on a global scale; however, it is nearly unbearable to recognize individual actions such as reading a book, directly contribute to the devastation of the earth.
Author, researcher, and the world’s foremost expert on ants, Edward O. Wilson satirically compares two opposing groups in his book “The future of Life”. In his book he notes the similar critical and hypocritical natures the two share when using their stereotypes to classify the other. Wilson takes the extremes of these two environmentalist groups and essentially uses writing to make them face each other, displaying their hypocrisy using similar syntax styles and diction, showing us how the two groups, while advocating for two different things, share a similar language that ironically puts them ever so closer to each other. Wilson goes about comparing these two groups by having the two sides opposing each other in order to show the flaws in their logic and ideals by having them sit out in the open, so to speak.
Elliot Sober's main point in this essay is about how could justify the environmentalism theories because they have some difficulties in reasoning their objectives and solutions. He illustrates about this difficulties and then he suggests some ways that can help to reason correctly about environmental concerns. He explains his points about some philosophers theory that try to give reasons about preserving the species and the environment. He tries to clarify about the ignorance argument that this argument suggests we must preserve every endangered species that it can be useful for human. Sober criticizes this opinion because sometimes a valuable species was known not to be valuable previously. Therefore he suggests that we should not because of human preference try to keep a species or keep not. The Slippery Slope Argument, that environmentalists affirm that every extinction is important significantly because it is possible arguing that none of species can be important that much then it will turn to a slippery slope argument. Sober mentions about the fact that If we consider a value for diversity therefore each species have value so we can value diversity without overemphasizing the position of each species separately. The Appeals to What is Natural, that is about what is natural to or what is domesticated or artificial. Sober claims that this distinction is meaningless because we believe that human beings also are part of the nature and what human makes also is part of
... position is very radical. He thinks civilization has brought disorder and has distance the human beings from nature. It is true that the ambition to dominate the planet has caused some people to destroy natural resources, increase the levels of contamination and lose the respect for our own nature. However, I cannot disregard all the progresses that humans have done through out the years, which have helped improve the quality of our life. The respect for nature has to continue along with the growth of our knowledge.
In your essay “Island Civilization: a Vision for Human Occupancy of Earth in the Fourth Millennium”, several proposals are brought up with seemingly impossible solutions to the problem of environmental decay that is currently consuming, endangering and threatening our planet. Dr. Nash, you believe that humans have to do what they are capable of in order to restore the planet to its “natural” once prosperous condition. When humanity came into the picture, it began to manipulate the environment for its own personal benefits. The essay makes the point that the world is not ours to destroy and take from, but rather that people live alongside nature without disturbing it. You state that your proposal may be controversial due to some major changes, and that the ” whole purpose of this essay is to put forward for discussion a strategy for occupation of this planet that will work in the very long run, and for all the natural world.” The concepts brought up are quite controversial, and for that reason your points are arguable.
At the beginning of Chapter 11 in Neil Postman’s book, he reminds us that there are two representations of how a culture maybe withered. He writes that a culture either becomes almost like a high security prison or a culture can become just like a mockery.
Nordhaus, Ted, and Michael Shellenberger. Break Through: From the Death of Environmentalism to the Politics of Possibility. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2007. Print.
For my book I chose to read The Body by Stephen King. This novel is about four young boys taking a journey to find a body somewhere in the woods that is at the county line. This story is about more than just four boys going on an adventure its about them becoming closer to each other and learning real life lessons along the way. The four boys are all going into their first year of middle school so this is a time in their life when they learn things that will help them in life.
Thence, it will be made clear to you the proper procedures of stripping Mother Earth of her treasures. Also, should you wish to obtain a break from environmental exploitations, there are great places in cyberspace such as www.therainforestsite.com and www.tree4life.com/ingles/ingles.htm where you may effortlessly click your way to saving rainforests. However, I am confident that there will not be any objections to my modest proposal. There. I have too long digressed, and therefore shall return to my subject.
(7) Adams, W. M. The Future of Sustainability: Re-thinking Environment and Development in the Twenty-first Century. Rep. The World Conservation Union, 22 May 2006. Web. 23 Oct. 2013.
Having considered both sides of the argument surrounding the Endangered Species Act, it seems logical to conclude that, despite the fact that they Endangered Species Act could stand some improvement in terms of the speed of the bureaucracy that governs it, the Act itself is quite sufficient as is as long as it is administered to the full extent of its power. There is a growing tendency in government, however, to undermine the strength of the Endangered Species Act by making decisions on when and where to apply it a political matter rather than an ecological matter (Munro, 2010). To do this is to insure that ultimately it will not just be the environment and the wile organisms that live in it that will lose, it will be mankind as well.
== = = Human beings are dependent on the Earth's diversity of species for our survival. Wild species play a vital role in the maintenance of the planets ecological functions, yet everyday on the planet 40-100 species become extinct.
A human induced global ecological crisis is occurring, threatening the stability of this earth and its inhabitants. The best path to address environmental issues both effectively and morally is a dilemma that raises concerns over which political values are needed to stop the deterioration of the natural environment. Climate change; depletion of resources; overpopulation; rising sea levels; pollution; extinction of species is just to mention a few of the damages that are occurring. The variety of environmental issues and who and how they affect people and other species is varied, however the nature of environmental issues has the potential to cause great devastation. The ecological crisis we face has been caused through anthropocentric behavior that is advantageous to humans, but whether or not anthropocentric attitudes can solve environmental issues effectively is up for debate. Ecologism in theory claims that in order for the ecological crisis to be dealt with absolutely, value and equality has to be placed in the natural world as well as for humans. This is contrasting to many of the dominant principles people in the contemporary world hold, which are more suited to the standards of environmentalism and less radical approaches to conserving the earth. I will argue in this essay that whilst ecologism could most effectively tackle environmental problems, the moral code of ecologism has practical and ethical defects that threaten the values and progress of anthropocentricism and liberal democracy.
Nowadays it is common to read articles in newspapers and magazines regarding biodiversity issues. Human beings have been knowingly and unknowingly destroying biodiversity since their existence. Biodiversity is the measure of the variety of species of animals living in an area. Forests are usually areas with high biodiversity while deserts are the opposite. Human beings have always destroyed biodiversity either by deforestation, or by some other means. Biodiversity depletion is a natural phenomenon. But the present levels of biodiversity depletion are many times higher than the natural rate. Recently the levels of loss in biodiversity have started causing global concern. Some of the main causes for loss in biodiversity are alteration of habitats, increasing levels of pollution and human population growth.