Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Do not restrict advertising to children
Do not restrict advertising to children
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Do not restrict advertising to children
The courts ruled that freedom of advertising constitutes a part of freedom of speech. Therefore, commercial speech is entitled to some constitutional protection, and should be regulated more strictly than any other form of expression. The Supreme Court has defined commercial speech as speech directly related to the economic interests of the speaker and its audience, as well as speech which proposes a commercial transaction. Although a state cannot regulate first amendment speech because of the content of the speech. A state may prohibit commercial speech based on its content, because issue advertisements may be economically motivated. As well as relate to matters of public concern. The distribution of false advertising, advertising of …show more content…
illegal goods, and truthful advertising is controlled by state authorities. Especially, if public interests are jeopardized. Federal Regulator Agencies Numerous federal government regulatory agencies are authorized to assist with enforcement of laws governing commercial speech.
These agencies have developed policies and guidelines to control the advertising industry. The Federal trade commission is the agency responsible for regulating the advertising market. Initially, the FTC was created to eliminate unfair competition in commerce. Recently, the FTC’s has focused their attention on consumer protection. The FTC’s duties are primarily performed by the Bureau of Consumer Protection. Which protects consumers against unfair, deceptive, or fraudulent practices in the marketplace. This bureau assists companies with interpreting and complying with the law. Also, the FTC emphasizes the significance of regulating advertising to children, advertising of particular goods like drugs, alcohol, and on-line advertising. The FTC may threaten penalties or demand that unlawful activities are discontinued. Some organization may be required to publish corrective advertising and civil penalties can be imposed. “On March 29 this year, the Federal Trade Commission filed a lawsuit against Volkswagen, which claimed that the car company had deceived customers with the advertising campaign it used to promote its supposedly "Clean Diesel" vehicles, according to a press release. In 2015, it was exposed that VW had been cheating emissions tests on its diesel cars in the US for the past seven years. The FTC alleged that …show more content…
"Volkswagen deceived consumers by selling or leasing more than 550,000 diesel cars based on false claims that the cars were low-emission, environmentally friendly."( Heilpern) Another authorized entity that provides regulation is the Federal Communications Commission, which regulates advertising by mass media. The FCC resolves consumer claims about the content and airing timing of advertisements on TV and radio. The FCC also governs political programming rules and rules about junk advertising send via fax machine. The FCC may impose sanctions, which include revoking broadcasting license, imposing a fine, and filing a court action seeking civil or criminal judgement. Also, the FCC deals with obscene, indecent, or profane advertising. Better Business Bureau’s main responsibility is to certify businesses, that meets the organization accreditation standards. This responsibility includes a commitment to make an unbiased effort to resolve any consumer complaints , as well as organizations disputes. Local BBBs resolves thousands of cases each year. The cases are settled by the means of arbitration or mediation . BBB accreditation standards include a standard for trust, code of business practices, and code of advertising. Also, BBB has created partnerships with the American Advertising Federation, the Association of National Advertisers, and the National Advertising Review Council. The mission of this alliance is to foster honesty and accuracy in national advertising through voluntary self-regulation. It’s necessary to protect citizens from all forms of false advertising.
Regardless if the message is delivered on television or online. Strict regulations should be enforced. Consumers should not have to decide if the message is true. Many messages are simply designed to deceive, which can result in substantial loss for hard working citizens and financial gain for corporation that engage in this practice. The weight loss industry is notorious of puffery. This industry had use unrealistic claims to capture the attention and the dollars of many consumers, without any repercussion. Therefore, federal regulator agencies must continue education and protect citizen of all ages, so that false and inappropriate content does not harm innocent
citizens.
This is an increasingly concerning factor in the growing national epidemic of obesity. Adverts often mask foods that are unhealthy by emphasising their positive nutritional features – such as dietary fibre and protein. While at the same time ignoring its negative features – including the high amounts of saturated fat and sugar content. In some cases, even products that mention any alleged health benefits are usually outweighed by the health risks associated with consuming the product, that they just fail to mention. In summary, big businesses are using recurring and manipulative persuasive techniques on vulnerable consumers to try to convey the false message of health and nutrition in products when they are in fact more harmful than helpful.
As the rising epidemic of obesity has attracted considerable media attention, so has the promotion for maintaining healthy wellbeing. Tom Naughton’s documentary, Fat Head, is a stellar model of this media attention. It examines the exact cause of weight gain, and the reliability of the Government’s nutritional guidelines. The contention of Fat Head is that the U.S Government and Morgan Spurlock (the creator of Super Size Me) present misleading information. However, Naughton’s bias becomes apparent through the careful selection of film techniques, and the silencing of certain characters, who may express opposing viewpoints. The ideal audience of this documentary, parents and concerned parties such as medical professionals, are invited to agree that the U.S Government and Spurlock are deceptive.
The free-market economy is based on supply and demand. The idea is that products will be manufactured and sold at adjusted levels such that a fair market price is maintained. In other words the selling price of an item will vary based on the demand and supply of that item, adjusting as economic conditions change. Advertising has a large effect on how the free-market functions. Alan Goldman, in an excerpt from Just Business (1983, found in Honest work by Ciulla, Martin and Solomon), justifies advertising in the free-market economy using four main arguments, that “it is consistent in a free- market economy”, ”it is not wasteful of economic resources”, “it provides certain indirect social benefits”, and it is “a valuable source of information” (Goldman, 1983, p.301). Goldman claims that for each one of these reasons there is a necessary and immediate need for advertising if our market economy is going to function properly and we will discuss his arguments below.
In Nancy Hall's "Obesity Lawsuits" (2004) essay, Hall is determined to address the problem constantly growing and silently taking lives in America every day, obesity. The author goes on to argue that people should not be suing "fast food companies" (Hall, 2004, p. 113), but rather look at themselves to blame for becoming obese. Americans need to think about their own decisions routinely, exercise to keep the extra weight off and choose meals that are healthier (Hall, 2004). The authors thesis states: "Listening to the subtle nuance emerging from legal debate, we can hear a discernable message that clearly spells out the desperate need for further study, public awareness, and education on obesity in America" (Hall, 2004, p.114). Even though Nancy Hall is not educated on obesity nor holds a degree in Health Sciences, the article is still persuasive because of the emotion placed into words pursued by direct and solid facts laid out on paper (Hall, 2004).
Obesity has become a growing epidemic in the United States of America. Federal agencies, authors of diet books, and others have offered advice on how to lose weight but none seem to work since the epidemic is still on the rise. In the article “The Feds’ Fib about Low-Fat,” Michael Fumento argues that the low-fat myth government agencies have inadvertently promoted can be deceiving and not healthy for the individual. This article is a syndicated column that has appeared in newspapers around the country, therefore allowing for a diversified audience. The audience of this article includes adults from all over the country who are concerned about the low-fat controversy and adults who are up-to-date on the latest political issues. Fumento claims
...ance, there needs to be organizations that limit food advertising; just as was done with cigarettes. Even though it is evident that fast-food companies are winning the marketing battle, their success depends solely on their returning customers. Should people stop eating the tempting fast food, and start making time in their day for exercise, not only would fast food companies suffer greatly, but we might have a chance to veer away from our heavy fates. Most importantly, media productions that educate people on the truths of the fast food industry should continue to focus on the risks and consequences of obesity, particularly on groups most susceptible to targeting from fast-food companies? marketing campaigns: minorities and children. With increased education and a pro-active stance on regular exercise, people can start to reverse the trend of obesity in America.
Some people do not know all that much about exercise and dieting. They do not know healthy ways to eat, and they don’t realize that one can’t get the “Perfect Body” in just a few days. These people are possibly victims of Fitness Myths. “In 2002, the Federal Trade Commission released a report that shared a review of 300 weight-loss ads promoting 218 different products. They found the rampant use of false or misleading claims” (FTC, 2003) Misleading fitness products can be particularly damaging. If one is mislead into purchasing a product and the product doesn’t work as it was advertised, not only have you wasted your money, but also the product may have physically hurt your body. FTC chairman Timothy Muris talks about the advertising and promotion tactics of the fitness industry “ads that make claims and promises that are clearly implausible and patently false run in all forms of media, with the notable exception of network TV” (FTC, 2003). Misleading advertisements are common among all forms of media. Although TV commercials may be more powerful in their persuasion, an obvious reason for this is that TV advertisements show more misleading commercials. A technique frequently used in commercials to make them seem credible is that “many deceptive ads run in highly respected publications and they are perceived to be credible”(FTC, 2003). Therefore if the TV program you are watching, while the commercial is being played, seems credible, consumers tend to believe that the products advertised during the episode are also trustworthy.
Established in 1914, the Federal Trade Commission is an independent regulatory agency in the United States. Its main role is to create a fair and competitive business trade in the United States. Originally established under President Wilson’s administration, the FTC was created to protect the public and businesses from unfair business trade and to formulate a strong and reliable relationship between consumers and businesses. Members of the Federal Trade Commission are appointed by the President and authorized by the Senate. Generally, the FTC is consisted of five appointed members that are sworn in for seven-year terms. However; the current structure of the FTC has only four appointed members: one chairman and three commissioners. Currently, FTC has one vacant commissioner position (FTC.gov, 2014). The current organizational chart of the FTC is constructed as follows: Edith Ramirez (Chairwoman), Julie Brill (Commissioner), Maureen Ohlhausen (Commissioner), and Joshua D. Wright (Commissioner) The Federal Trade Commission also consists of various offices, each constructed to focus on different areas of regulation and rulemaking.
When I think of the 1st Amendment and advertising, I immediately think of the ban of tobacco advertising. In 1964, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) agreed that advertisers had a responsibility to warn the public of the health hazards of cigarette smoking. In 1969, after the surgeon general of the United States released an official report linking cigarette smoking to low birth weight, Congress signed the Cigarette Smoking Act. This act required cigarette manufacturers to place warning labels on their products that stated, "Cigarette Smoking May be Hazardous to Your Health." On April 1, 1970, President Richard Nixon signs legislation officially banning cigarette ads on television and radio. The last televised cigarette ad ran at 11:50 p.m. during The Johnny Carson Show on January 1, 1971 (History.com).
The FTC deceives consumers by using advertisement weight-loss and as a result it has collected almost $107 million since 2010 (Giorgianni, 2014). In addition, people need to increase their awareness of fad diets by knowing the negative impacts of it.
... about the practical and useful ways to lose weight rather than believing all the words mentioned in advertisements.
Countless articles have been written on false advertising on television. Most of these articles target specific instances of fraudulent behavior, but some do address the television industry as a whole. These articles for the most part seem to be complaining about politicians (more so than the advertisers themselves) and the fact that "it is not politically palatable"(Miller) to make more stringent laws against fraudulent advertising. This means that politicians are not willing to make stricter laws for fear that they might come back to haunt them later. It is that topic that seemed to come up most in articles on false advertising.
Use advertisements to manipulate people is sinister because “normal” people’s freedom to choose freely is taken away. The important thing to remember is that it is not what was said and or done by the advertiser, but how a person (people) respond to what is trying to influence them. It is somewhat like lying, but it is the truth stretched out so far that it never seems to reach a lie. Some advertisers do lie and are held accountable in the sense that their business suffers because of it, but for the most part manipulative advertising is very common and well practiced especially in the United States.
In America, Truth in Advertising (TINA.org) exists to support honest advertising as well as eliminating deceptive marketing practices. Consumers in America lost billions of dollars due to false advertising and marketing every year. (https://www.truthinadvertising.org/about/)
...maintain that advertising exists primarily to create demand among consumers. People have certain types of wants and needs, and they are perfectly capable to discover it for themselves. People today just need food, clothing and shelter everything else is superfluous and additional stuff. Advertising are able to create demand that would not exist just by manipulating people’s min and emotions. Advertising is master in manipulate reality and fantasy, by creating “magic show.” It is true that advertising has been a powerful mechanism that distorts our whole society’s values and priorities. On the other hand, advertising educate people about several issues. In political terms, it moves mass of people and persuade them to vote for a candidate. And, of course, in terms of economy, contributes in the development through the consumption of the costumer.