Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ayn rand objectivism essay
Anthem ayn rand essay on individualism
Ayn rand objectivism essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ayn rand objectivism essay
Howard Roark’s speech in Ayn Rand’s The Fountainhead displays the author's personal philosophy of objectivism. Objectivism is an idea that Ayn Rand had developed and promoted in her works of literature. Objectivism advocated for the rights of individual freedoms such as someone being able to do whatever that person desires with their own creations. In this case, Ayn Rand’s character Howard Roark; who had dynamited his own building . Through Rand’s persuading diction, immense detail, and powerful organization, Ayn Rand takes a stand through a fictional character to promote the idea that an individual should be able to live freely without society or the government scrutinizing him.
Howard Roark’s diction strengthens his testament of being his
…show more content…
own man, how people did not deserve to live off him by taking away his creation, how he was an individual with his own mind to make up. Roark compares himself to creators who he envisioned as independent thinkers, “[h]is creation - not the benefits others derived from it - the creation which gave form to his truth.”Cortlandt was Roark’s creation, but others had cheated his original vision through breach of contract; henceforth, Roark decided to blow up his soiled Cortlandt. Roark starts to conclude his testament with “[t]he world is perishing from an orgy of self-sacrificing.” Roark’s choice of diction using “orgy” can be alluded to the sin of being heavily indulged and making the world become rampant with the sin of self-sacrifice. This choice of diction is used because of Roark’s perception of individuality being taken away from independent thinkers such as himself. Roark chooses to not accept being cheated by the breach of contract and the unwanted change of Cortlandt, he chooses to not be apart of the orgy of self-sacrifice, which is killing the world. Throughout Roark’s speech, Ayn Rand’s use of detail strengthens Roark’s testament. Roark uses the great creators in his defense, their “every new invention was denounced. But the men of unborrowed vision went ahead. The fought, they suffered, and the paid. But they won.” This line shows the struggle of the people who had to keep progressing when society and their brothers had denounced them. It shows this through the mention of fighting for independent ideas without others destroying it, as the men did at Roark’s Cortlandt. Roark talks about the people who change a man's creation, ones who destroy independent ideas as parasites. “The creator stands on his own judgement; the parasite follow the opinion of others” “the creator requires independence” “the parasite seeks power.” Roark compares the men who cheated him as the parasites who were hungry for power and had changed Roark’s ideas, a creator’s ideas. Roark’s syntax moves to historical, to the present day, to the future of humanity and its endeavors.
In the beginning, Roark talks about the humble beginnings of man and the great creators that lived before him. These people gave humanity their creation without the interruption of others, before the orgy of self-sacrifice in the present. This is talked about because these men were allowed to act alone and create what they wanted to create, no input from others needed, unlike Roark’s present that contains cheaters and other parasites. In the middle, Roark talks about how parasites are collectivists who essentially want to bound all men in shackles. The philosophy of Rand’s objectivism and the idea of collectivism contrasts at this point of Roark’s speech; it voices the flaws of Rand’s opposing viewpoints. In the end, Roark’s speech moves to a call to action for “every man of independence left in the world.” Roark’s speech moves away from his own defense but to the defense of every individual who refuses to rely on society. It’s Roark’s and Rand’s main idea of the whole speech, the individual should be unhindered unlike the plot behind Roark’s back. The individual has the rights to their creation and can do whatever they want to do with it, without society’s say in
it. This speech in Ayn Rand’s The Fountainhead has remained relevant in modern-day politics to right-wing Libertarians. Roark’s testament has been used in many arguments to try and justify the rights of the individual versus collectivist ideas. The author’s purpose is to promote that a man should be able to roam free with their body and with their mind. According to Rand, individuals are free while collectivists and parasites are slaves.
In 102 Minutes, Chapter 7, authors Dwyer and Flynn use ethos, logos, and pathos to appeal to the readers’ consciences, minds and hearts regarding what happened to the people inside the Twin Towers on 9/11. Of particular interest are the following uses of the three appeals.
Many characters have hopes and dreams which they wish to accomplish. Of Mice and Men has two main characters that go through obstacles to get what they want. In the beginning it is George and Lennie running away trying to get a job. Once both George and Lennie have a job they try to accomplish their dreams. Unfortunately they both can't get their dreams to come true since lennie does the worst and George has to shoot Lennie. Steinbeck uses characterization, foreshadowing, and symbol as rhetorical strategies to make George's actions justified.
Creative Section Prompt: Write a scene where an “unlovable” character is involved in a surprising or unexpected hobby or appreciation for something.
Jared Diamond makes a great and compelling argument about how inequality across the entire globe originated. The main components that were agreeing with this argument were guns germs and steel. Guns meaning the advancement in weaponry, military warfare and military sophistication. Germs meaning the harmful disease and other foul illness that wiped out humans throughout History. Then the third and final point steel, which was about the advancement in societies and the complex sophistication with their technology, which lead to building great architecture and devices that were completely impactful.
“People who had incurred the displeasure of the party simply disappeared and were never heard of again.
The chapter, Church, has the troop hold up in a church for a few days. In the church, the monks take an immediately likely to the troop help with food and weapon cleaning. A few of the soldiers discuss what they wanted to do before the war. The troops learn more about each other and insight into what faith can be to them.
In the book Into the Wild, Jon Krakauer wrote about Christopher McCandless, a nature lover in search for independence, in a mysterious and hopeful experience. Even though Krakauer tells us McCandless was going to die from the beginning, he still gave him a chance for survival. As a reader I wanted McCandless to survive. In Into the Wild, Krakauer gave McCandless a unique perspective. He was a smart and unique person that wanted to be completely free from society. Krakauer included comments from people that said McCandless was crazy, and his death was his own mistake. However, Krakauer is able to make him seem like a brave person. The connections between other hikers and himself helped in the explanation of McCandless’s rational actions. Krakauer is able to make McCandless look like a normal person, but unique from this generation. In order for Krakauer to make Christopher McCandless not look like a crazy person, but a special person, I will analyze the persuading style that Krakauer used in Into the Wild that made us believe McCandless was a regular young adult.
In Arthur Miller’s play, The Crucible, he utilizes various literary devices to emphasize his many thematic topics. He demonstrates sin through the unholy nature of Abigail’s history with John Proctor with Abigail’s words, "I know how you clutched my back behind your house and sweated like a stallion whenever I came near!" (Miller 21). He reveals the wrongness of the situation, and shows the desperation Abigail has for John to return her feelings. due to his marital status and her age through his simile describing John’s actions and reactions near Abigail as animalistic and dirty. Miller’s similes also demonstrates the idea of good vs. evil through his description of the Devil’s effect on several girls. “...
In Ayn Rand’s famous, or in some circles, infamous, story Anthem, the differing ideologies of objectivism and collectivism are pit against each other. With objectivism being so tight knit and different from the society in the book, it seems that it would be almost impossible to truly follow in its entirety. However, Anthem, as a whole, doesn’t violate the ideals of Rand’s philosophy of objectivism.
Prevailing Purposes in “The Crucible” Playwright and essayist, Arthur Miller, in his play, “The Crucible”, utilizes pathos, symbolism, and irony to convey his purpose of how the events of the Salem Witch Trials had detrimental effects on the society and how far the elites went to protect their reputation . Miller’s reasoning is to expand Parris’ and Danforth purpose for their side of the argument during the witch trials. He adapts a contrasting tone in order to appeal to similar feelings with reasoning in his american readers.
Imagine the world we are living in today, now imagine a world where we are told who to marry, where to work, who to hate and not to love. It is hard to imagine right, some people even today are living in the world actually have governments that are controlling their everyday life. In literature many writers have given us a view of how life may be like if our rights as citizen and our rights simply as human beings. One day the government may actually find a way to control and brainwash people into beings with no emotions like they have in the book 1984 where they express only hate, because that’s what they have been taught by the party.
Elie Weisel once said this: “I know and I speak from experience, that even in the midst of darkness, it is possible to create light and share warmth with one another; that even on the edge of the abyss, it is possible to dream exalted dreams of compassion; that it is possible to be free and strengthen the ideals of freedom, even within prison walls; that even in exile, friendship becomes an anchor.” Compassion is not something that is easy to understand, or even easy to show sometimes. The Holocaust was a difficult time to comprehend: how could one man have so much power and hate towards a society of people that he started a genocide? There may never be the right emotional explanation to describe the disturbing events that happened during the Holocaust, but Elie Weisel was able to share his. His message was that compassion and friendship can refrain someone from sinking so deep into a dark sea like the Holocaust.
...ay, as a mere foil to the characters she likes. She did not turn him into an idiot, which would be her way with many of the villains in her next novel, Atlas Shrugged. In The Fountainhead, Rand knows that the intensity of a long-protracted conflict needs a strong antagonistic force, a force whose influence can be felt on many levels. Roark is the active and effective embodiment of an individualist system of values; Toohey is the active and, in almost every case, the effective embodiment of a collectivist system of values that engages Roark's values at every point.
Ayn Rand based her novel of the idea of objectivism the idea that reality exists independent of consciousness, and that the proper moral purpose of one's life is the pursuit of one's own happiness or rational self. We see this throughout the entire novel and within all of her characters. Ayn Rand had an interesting perception of selfishness and selflessness, along with her view of objectivism. As a reader we are thinking the opposite of what the characters are thinking, and never know what is going to happen next. Roark and Keating gave new meanings to selfishness and selflessness within the world of architecture.
The theme of The Fountainhead as stated by its author, Ayn Rand, is "individualism versus collectivism, not in politics, but in man's soul." Three major characters serve as types for the noble, contemptible, and parasitic in this comparison. Howard Roark is an architect who serves as Rand's model for individualism to the extent that he is willing to sacrifice everything he has in order to retain his status as an individual. Ellsworth Monkton Toohey is a charismatic genius who uses his knowledge of human nature and collectivism to manipulate and control the masses, who hang on his every word. Peter Keating is an ambitious young man who is in all actuality exactly what the public says he is; he reaps the benefits--and the curses--of collectivism in his rise to and fall from the top. The actions and motives of these three men serve as a means of bringing the two concepts in question to life for the readers of The Fountainhead.