Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The role of religions in a political society
The role of religion in state formation
The role of religion in state formation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The role of religions in a political society
Saddam Hussein was a suppressive leader who struck fear into the world’s people. His destructive ways radiated as he attempted to eliminate the Kurdish population, nationalize Iraqi oil, and keep his regime in power. Yet, his strict rule helped start and maintain peace between the people of his country despite the many different religions living in the area. He protected his country against a theocratic form of government and for a period of time, Hussein was an ally of the United States. He led a westernized nation in a fundamentalist region of the world. His regime was able to halt al-Qaeda expansion into Iraq, provide civil rights for women, and prevent religious killings over mixed marriages. Although Hussein was a brutal dictator, he was able to unite his country and create a westernized nation during his regime despite the country's Islamic location.
Saddam Hussein Abd al-Majid al-Tikriti was born on April 28, 1937 in Ouja, Iraq, a small village outside of Tikrit. In Arabic, Saddam translates to “The one who confronts”. He was born into a landless, peasant family and his birth father, Hussein ‘Abid al-Majid, passed away around the time of Saddam’s birth. He lived with his mother, Subha Tulfah al-Mussallat, and two siblings, Barzan Ibrahim and Awad Hamed al- Bandar. When his older brother died of cancer, his mother became depressed and wasn’t fit to take care of him. She sent him to Baghdad to live with his uncle, Khairallah Talfah, a Sunni Muslim with a large influence over Saddam. He later moved back to live with his mother and her third husband Hassan Ibriham, or Lying Hassan as many people in the tribe called him. He often would use an asphalt covered stick to beat Saddam, which people think was the reaso...
... middle of paper ...
...in executed hundreds of Shi’ites, thousands were put in prison, and tens of thousands were forced to flee the country and take refuge in Iran.
Hussein could see that there was a large possibility for a war with Iran, and after weighing the possibilities he deliberately started one. He believed that he could win a war over Iran for a number of reasons. The Iranian military was low on numbers because of Ayatollah Khomeini’s purge of the shah’s officers, and Iran was isolated from the world with no strong allies to support it. Iraq, however, had a stable economy and an organized, strong military. Also, a Shi’ite had attempted to assassinate Tariq Aziz, the Foreign Minister of Iraq and a close friend of Hussein's. The rapid growing power of the Ayatollah and along with the fear of being overthrown by Shi’ites pushed Hussein towards starting the Iran-Iraq War.
Iraq and Saddam Hussein were trying to take over Kuwait, which was a major oil supplier to the world. If Iraq got Kuwait than Saudi Arabia would be right next to them. So then Iraq would pose an Immediate threat to take over Saudi Arabia, which was also a major oil supplier.
Saddam Hussein’s main purpose of sending troops to take over Kuwait was to take control of their oil fields, which Hussein believed would be an easy task; however, he failed to understand that the United States and United Nations were keeping a very close watch on the Iraqi’s actions. Hussein also had other motives, such as freeing himself from the debt he was drowning in from the Iran-Iraq War just two years earlier. He set the pretense for war with Kuwait by defining their refusal to give land to Iraq as an act of military belligerence. President Bush ordered the United States to respond just five days after Iraq had invaded Kuwait. If the United States had not taken action, Hussein would have possibly continued to invade other oil producing countries and take control of the United States main sources of oil as well as threaten a number of innocent people’s lives.
As stated previously, the mission of Operation Ajax was to overthrow Mohammad Mosaddegh. Mosaddegh plans were to nationalize the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company that was partially owned by the British. By nationalizing Iran’s oil, Mosaddegh was insuring that his country would receive more income off their own oil while the British paid more. Britain was angry while America was worried and fearful of Iran turning communist. The past 50 years of Iran’s oil history is the key to understanding exactly why Mosaddegh wanted to nationalize Iran’s oil. Fifty-two years prior to the coup, the Shah of Persia, Mozaffar al-Din Shah Qajar, negotiated a deal with William Knox D'Arcy. D’Arcy acquired the right to prospect for oil for 60 years in a significant amount of Iranian territory. The amount of l...
Saddam was trying to make the people fear him using terror, “His rule is based on fear”. He wanted the people to obey him without thinking and without saying no on anything he does believing that he has a divine power. But because he used terror to be respected by everyone he was decieved a lot, sometimes his subordinates lied and did not tell him the truth because they were afraid of getting mad and turing against them, so they would just tell him what he wants to hear. Even his guards were not loyal to him not because they wanted to but becasue they feared him “Their loyalty is governed by fear and self-interest, and will tilt decisively if and when an alternative appears.” Saddam was very suspicious he did not trust anyone and he was also weak but he never wanted to show it, for that he was trying to appear strong and powerful to hide his weakness and insecurity. From the things he used to hide his weaknesses was brutality and violence. An example that shows his savagery was when he wanted to capture U.S. soldiers and tie them up around Iraqi tanks to use them as human shields during the war over Kuwait. This actually shows that he knew he made the wrong decision in invading Kuwait but he did not want to admit it infront of anyone, so he was trying to find any solution that could make them win instead of taking the blame for their defeat. And here one can notices that fear and brutality kind of overlap or connect to each other, because Saddam used violence to make everyone fear him, a good example on that would be when Saddam’s regime accused some people of taking bribe and sentenced them to die, the colleagues, families and friends of those people were ordered to attend their hanging and everyone was compelled to attend because they knew that refusal could turn suspicion on them and end up hanged like
In September 1980, a very destructive war with Iran was started by Saddam Hussein. This was a result of an invasion in Iran. This invasion spurred an eight year war. Saddam used c...
On the month of April in 2004, in the city of Habbaniyah, Iraq, a brutal and terrible act took place which ignited one of the bloodiest battles in the history of Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF). Four Black Water security members were killed and publicly maimed. The resulting battle left a high casualty rate as well as hundreds of American service members being wounded. This is the story of the events that took place after the events in the city of Habbaniyah.
He ruled Iraq with a virtual iron fist. His use of fear and intimidation is well known among the Iraqi people and it worked for over 20 years as he ruled without question.
Uday Hussein was the elder brother, seen as a rapist and murderer, he claimed that he wishes to continue carrying out his fathers cruel acts among the people, having the same hate against America as well as those who poses a threat towards him. He is also seen as a sadist in our point of view, but not really in the perspective of the people who support him. According to the information David Walsh gathered, a writer regarding this international media spectacle, it is said that his brother Qusay, was the chief of Iraq’s notorious security group. He to had the same mind set as his brother. They both walked around with blood in their hands.
In the 1970’s Iran, under Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi was a very centralized military state that maintained a close relationship with the USA. The Shah was notoriously out of touch with working class Iranians as he implemented many controversial economic policies against small business owners that he suspected involved profiteering. Also unrestricted economic expansions in Iran lead to huge government expenditure that became a serious problem when oil prices dropped in the mid 1970’s. This caused many huge government construction projects to halt and the economy to stall after many years of massive profit. Following this was high rates of inflation that affected Iranians buying power and living standards. (Afary, 2012) Under the Shah, political participation was not widely available for all Iranians and it was common for political opposition to be met with harassment, illegal detention, and even torture. These measures were implemented by the Iranian secret police knows as ‘SAVAK’. This totalitarian regime combined with the increasing modernisation of the country paved the way for revolution.
What does the United States have to gain from a war with Iraq? Supporters of a war with Iraq say it will help prevent the risk of an attack by a weapons of mass destruction developed by Iraq. Critics of a military action that say nothing will be gained, and the U.S. just wants to obtain the oil that Iraq controls. They claim that casualties will be too costly for America to afford. Nonetheless, America should act while others will not for fear of disturbing global peace. Iraq poses a “clear and present danger” to the security of the United States and the security of countries around the world.
Under the Shah's son, Iranian citizens were often whipped, killed execution style, or went to prison for speaking out. Brainwashing people into believing, that the way to heaven was by obeying the Shah's rules and if they did not honor the Shah they would go to hell. After the deposing of the shah by revolution, the people of Iran elected a democratic leader.... ... middle of paper ...
Pre-invasion Iraq reflected the views and policies of its leader, Saddam Hussein, who made his first political appearance as a supporter of the Ba’ath Party. He was jailed in 1967 for this, and after his escape quickly rose to power within the faction. (Saddam Hussein Biography, 2008) Saddam became known for his political talent and progressiveness, and soon became a popular politician. After working on extensive unification and expansion efforts for the Ba’athists, the man rose to vice chairman of the Revolutionary Command Council. Faced with a tremendous amount of religious, racial, social and economic divisions, Saddam launched a campaign of total control to bring about stability.
The Iraq War was a protracted armed conflict that began with the 2003 invasion of Iraq by a US-led coalition. The US wanted to destroy Saddam Hussein’s regime and bring democracy. To addition to that, US and its allies believed that Iraq had secret stocks of chemical and nuclear weapons, hence Iraq was a threat to the world (Axford 2010). In March 2003, US air bombed Baghdad and Saddam escaped Iraq. The invasion disarmed the government of Saddam Hussein. President Bush in March 2003 gave a premature speech, that tyrant of Iraq has fallen and US has freed its people. President Bush flew into Iraq to show the world that the war is over, even though nothing was accomplished (Kirk et al. 2014). Iraq was facing 13 years of scantions, therefore regime diverted its resources to flexible networks of patronage that kept it in power (Dodge 2007, 88). Iraq faced widespread of lawlessness and after the violent regime changed US could not control the situation. Iraqi civilians were looting, attacking ministries building and this resulted into a series of event (Kirk et al. 2014) . From a military perspective the regime was taken down, but they made no commitment to rebuild or secure the country.
The Revolution in Iran has had far reaching consequences in the Middle East and affects the political and cultural world as a whole. The war on terror has become a major component of the military efforts of the United States. The westernization of Iran and the large presence of American advisors during the reign of the Shah caused a religious backlash that changed the face of the government of Iran. It essentially became a religious dictatorship that opposed all things American. The Revolution that changed Iran was a direct response to the economic, political, cultural and religious values that occurred under the Shah that stood as an affront to the Shiite Islamic religion.
the protest was led by Khomeini. These once so peaceful protest turned into violence when police shot 20 protestors. When the king and his wife fled Iran in 1979 Khomeini became the “supreme leader”. He made a new constitution and laid power on small secret group called Mullahs. Mullahs and Khomeini took away some rights for women and made them wear head coverings. Whoever didn’t like the new constitution was tortured. President Carter in 1979 let the king of Iran into the U.S for a cancer treatment, a month after the king was let into the country, thousands of Iranian students stored the embassy in US and took and held 66 Americans hostage. Iranians ran through streets screaming and burning American flags. A standoff lasted 14 months and killed eight servicemen from America. Soon President Ronald Reagan came into control, the hostages were held for 444 days, and however they weren’t released until Reagan took an oath in 1981. Shortly after the hostages were released Khomeini died in 1989. Today America and Iran are on the same side about