Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on anglican continuum
How has religion affected history
How has religion affected history
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on anglican continuum
I. Introduction
The History of Anglicanism is a very fascinating part of English history, and often a misunderstood part as well. Many believe erroneously that Anglicanism came about purely as a result of King Henry VIII desiring a new wife, and creating a new religion was the only way to do so. The truth is a good deal more complicated. There is also the fascinating shift from Anglicanism being essentially Catholic, just with a different head of church, to be being one of Catholicism’s greatest opponents in European politics.
II. The Pride of King Henry
a.
King Henry VIII was a prideful man, full of fire and vigor, and despite being a devoted catholic in his early life, soon began to chafe at the notion of anyone other than God having power over him, which began his troubles with the Pope. Many people took Henry VIII’s break with Rome as complete proof of his status as a heretic, and in their defense, Henry VIII most certainly was a heretic from the point of view of a Roman Catholic or a Romanist. Many laymen were of course unaware of Henry VIII’s pathological need for control and the fact that the King hated having any authority above his own in any and all matters, both spiritual and secular, and so of course they just assumed his break with Rome and the Pope to be a purely spiritual matter. There are numerous examples of people accusing Henry VIII of heresy such as a layman named Henry Kylbrae in a discussion with the proprietor of the White Horse Inn in Cambridge, which was a hotbed of religious discussion. Kylbrae is known to have remarked that the King and all who held the King as the head of the Church were strong heretics indeed. The common people were not alone in this assertion. Several noblemen and noblewomen s...
... middle of paper ...
... evolution and change in a relatively short period of time, perhaps owing this fact to the relatively rapid changes in leadership in its formative years. Regardless, Anglicanism remains a fascinating field of study.
Works Cited
"Trouble brews over gay issue: province of Central Africa 'could' split." Anglican Journal Oct. 2007: 8. Academic OneFile. Web. 7 Apr. 2014.
"Sexual orientation no barrier to church leadership." Anglican Journal Oct. 2009: 10. Academic OneFile. Web. 7 Apr. 2014.
Braddick, Michael. God’s Fury, England’s Fire: A History of the English Civil Wars. New York: Penguin Press, 2009
Lake,Peter Conflict in Early Stuart England. London: Longman Group,1989.
Shagan, Ethan. Popular Politics and the English Reformation Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003
Walsham, Alexandra, The Fatall Vesper London: Oxford University Press, 1995.
Barron stresses, that many people today feel it is a church’s issue for reasoning for limiting a woman’s role in church leadership, not the other way around. Barron also describes the “Danvers Statement”, a statement put out by the Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood (451-452). The statement speaks on many areas
In this essay I will be discusses what Archbishop William Laud did wrong when trying to impose order and unity on English religion and how his efforts contributed to the civil war and the collapse of the Church of England. Harbottle Grimston referred to Laud as “the sty of all pestilential filth.” (Hirst, 167) Other historians had similar opinions of Archbishop William Laud. Robert Ashton writes “if there is the person to whose actions and policies the fall of the Stuart monarchy may be attributed, that person is William Laud.” He takes his opinion further by saying “the style of all the pestilential filth that hath infected the state and government of this church and commonwealth.”(White, 34) Archbishop William Laud went wrong in his aggressiveness and need to impose his ideas and views over the people of Britain. Laud was also known for his persecutions as well as humiliation of Puritans. His actions and influence over King Charles I would play a part in the start of the English Civil War. Archbishop Laud was adamant in getting Scotland to comply with using the English Prayer Book.
Web. The Web. The Web. 19 Apr. 2014. The 'Standard' of the 'Standard'.
Although written for church leadership, everyday church members would also benefit from understanding the concepts that Dawn is directing at God-empowered leaders. Ms. Dawn's work is predominantly scholarly, and she cites several other works at great length.... ... middle of paper ... ...
A king of England could not remove a pope from his position but popes claimed that they could remove a king by excommunicating him - this meant that the king’s soul was condemned to Hell and people then had the right to disobey the king.
King Henry VIII was an important figure in helping to kick start the Reformation in England, even though it was not his intent. His break with the Papacy and his constantly changing ideas on how the new Church of England should be run gave the Protestants the foothold they needed to gain popularity in Europe. Although his intentions were purely politically motivated, he started a change in the way the layman viewed the church and how it should be run.
Village, Andrew “Biblical literalism among Anglican clergy: what is the role of psychological type? Mental Health, Religion & Culture. 2012. Web.
The Victorian period from the mid to late 1800's was a time of internal religious turmoil for England. In the Anglican Church there were many different groups competing to define the doctrine and practice of the national religion. The church was politically divided in three general categories following: the High Church, which was the most conservative; the Middle, or Broad Church, which was more liberal; and the Low Church, which was the Evangelical wing of the Anglican Church. Within the High Church there were also differences of opinion on the true nature of the Church as a whole. It is from this conservative branch of the Anglican Church where the men of the Oxford Movement came.
For many homosexuals, today’s world is not a very friendly and loving place. They face all sorts of prejudice, misunderstanding, and hatred by the straight world, and the church is the last place they should find this opposition – to an extent. However we as Christians have to draw the line somewh...
Wilkes, Donald E. "England's Glorious Revolution." Glorious Revolution. N.p., 22 Oct. 2009. Web. 4 Mar. 2014.
Henry VIII and Queen Elizabeth I may have been the English Reformation’s greatest benefactors, all because of self interest. Henry VIII was not originally Protestant, but after the pope denied him of his divorce, Henry VIII took things into his own hands. Due to the power kings had in the Middle Ages, Henry VIII was able to control Parliament and force it to do whatever he wanted. So in 1534, Henry VIII forced Parliament to pass a law he made known as the Act of Supremacy. The Act of Supremacy stated that the king ought to be the head of the Church of England. This law gave the king complete power over the Church of England, instead of the pope. However, the type of church and state relationship did not change. Rather all the Act of Supremacy did was take power from the pope and give it to the king. Surprisingly, the Catholics did not retaliate against this strong change. The pope had always been the head of the church, but now the king had taken his position. This serves as an example of nationalism. The Catholics did not think about how removing the pope could harm their religion in any way. However, instead the people blindly followed Henry VIII because he was the leader of the nation and they assumed he was right. Also, by imposing other laws that punished Protestants, Henry VIII did not give the people much of a choice. Fortunately, for Henry VII, nationalis...
In the sixteenth century, Richard Hooker, an English priest, was one of the most influential theologians during his time (Wikipedia). Hookers’ value on Scripture, reason and tradition helped shape the creation of Anglicanism just as it did for John Locke, a political philosopher (Wikipedia). Anglicanism is known as the median between Protestantism and Catholicism (Wikipedia). Book One of the Politie, Hooker entails how government began and his account of law, something that he is better known for according to political philosophy (Wikipedia). On the other hand, some scholars wished to differ and felt he should be known for mainstream Reformed theology during that era (Wikipedia). In addition, there were scholars who were oppossed to his
Pettegree, Andrew. "The English Reformation." BBC History. BBC, 17 Feb 2011. Web. 1 Oct 2013.
Henry did not want Lutheranism to spread, so he chose to write "Defense of the Seven Sacraments," which was a retaliation towards Luther. The Pope of the time was very grateful for Henry's defense of the religion, therefore deeming him "Defender of the Faith." Many years later, after years of marriage to Catherine of Aragon, Henry wished for an annulment because of Catherine's inability to provide him with a male heir to the throne. However, Catherine wasn't willing to agree to the divorce, so therefore the Pope denies the annulment. In spite of the Pope's disagreement, Henry chose to remarry in secret, forcing the clergy to follow his demands. Thus, he had his new archbishop declare his marriage to Catherine invalid. With this, the Pope threatened Henry with excommunication, which caused Henry to pass an act in which made him head of the church in England. This left him with ultimate power over the church, therefore Henry is known as an individualistic reformer for this reason. Though first being recognized as a supporter of the Pope and the Catholic church, Henry's supreme ideals and wants against the church caused him to behave in an individualistic manner.
King Henry VIII was seeking approval from Thomas in obtaining a divorce from his wife Catherine because she was not able to produce any heirs to the throne. The King was looking for his approval because Thomas was respected by society. The King already had other peoples’ approval . The two men were in conflict because they had a fundamental difference in outlook on what constituted the right balance between the spiritual and the practical. The two were Catholics. Thomas was a representative of the older spirituality, wherein the Church was as a sacred institution and an instrument of God’s will, and which ought to be outside politics. The King saw the church as a political institution, one that was to bend for him in certain political matters. That is basically the story.