Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The glorious revolution mini essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
I. Introduction
A. Attention getter: The Glorious Revolution was a bloodless overthrow of the reigning king at the time, James II.
B. Background information: James II was King of England from February 6, 1685 until he was removed from the throne in 1688. He was the last Catholic ruler to reign over the English kingdom. The majority of people disliked him and wanted him to give up his title of being king.
C. Thesis statement: There were several causes and effects of the Glorious Revolution that led to how the British Parliament is governed today.
II. Subtopic #1: Subtopic: Causes
A. Topic: This revolution was caused by disagreements and fearfulness regarding the ruler at the time, which was King James II.
B. Research-answer first question: James was on the throne, which caused uproar throughout Parliament. He was later replaced by a joint monarchy: King William and
Queen Mary.
1. (Cite Quotation): “Between 1688 and 1689, Parliament imported a new Protestant king and queen: William III and Mary II. Mary II was the Protestant daughter of James II from his first wife. William was her husband” (Damerow).
2. (Elaborate and Analyze-connect to thesis): The members of Parliament invited William and Mary to overthrow James for the sake of Protestantism. So, William III and Mary II replaced King James on the throne.
C. Research-answer second question: Because King James II was disliked by so many people, the fearful members of Parliament forced him to hand over his title of being king to allow a different person to take the throne.
1. (Cite quotation): “James was widely disliked because of his pro-Catholic pol...
... middle of paper ...
...erthrow of King James changed the way Parliament was overseen and has affected the world from multiple points of view. All around the settlements, William and Mary were proclaimed new rulers, and the people of country looked approvingly upon their accession to the throne.
Works Cited
Damerow, Harold. "Glorious Revolution." Glorious Revolution. N.p., 6 Jan. 2014. Web. 3 Mar. 2014.
"Glorious Revolution." World Geography: Understanding a Changing World. ABC-CLIO, 2014. Web. 4 Mar. 2014.
"North American Colonial Wars." World at War: Understanding Conflict and Society. ABC-CLIO, 2014. Web. 3 Mar. 2014.
"The Glorious Revolution." Christian Assemblies International Church. Christian Assemblies International, Aug. 2011. Web. 5 Mar. 2014.
Wilkes, Donald E. "England's Glorious Revolution." Glorious Revolution. N.p., 22 Oct. 2009. Web. 4 Mar. 2014.
The Elizabethan Deliverance - Arthur Bryant Reformation and Revolution 1558-1660 - Robert Ashton Elizabeth and her Parliaments - J.E. Neales Elizabeth and her Reign - Richard Salter Elizabeth I and religion 1558-1603 - Susan Doran Tudor England - John Guy Elizabeth I - David Starkey
gave to the people of the country, he took power from the government and let the
Fraser, Rebecca. The. George III (1727-1760) " The Story of Britain. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2003.
Cumming, William P., and Hugh Rankin. The Fate of a Nation: The American Revolution Through Contemporary Eyes. London: Phaidon Press Limited, 1995.
the monarchy of his efforts and achievements and it was he who took all of the
Stokesbury, James L. A Short History of the American Revolution. William Morrow and Company, Inc. New York, 1991.
According to Webster’s Online Dictionary, revolution is “a sudden, radical or complete change.” During the early settlement of the British colonies, settlers became so culturally different from those in Great Britain that they already seemed to be their own country. This is what John Adams meant in saying, “What do we mean by the Revolution? The war? That was no part of the Revolution; it was only an effect and consequence of it. The Revolution was in the minds of the people… years before a drop of blood was shed at Lexington.” In fact, the revolution began years before the colonists began to feel mistreated by the British. As they arrived in the new colonies, they noticed many major differences in the society and culture of this new place. As time went on, they learned about the colonies and the society there, and eventually, they evolved their cultures and lifestyles to comply with this new society. The primary changes the colonists the colonists made were in their economic system, their lifestyle, and their freedoms. In England, the economic system was primarily industrious, while in it was agriculture. In addition, the colonists, especially those in the south, relied very heavily on slave labor for agricultural purposes. In Great Britain, however, slavery did exist, but it was not relied upon for a functional society. The final change the settlers made in the New World was religion. In Great Britain, the king forced everyone to join the Church of England and leave the Roman Catholic Church. When in the colonies, settlers could go back to whatever religion they desired, so colonial religion was extremely diverse. Therefore, three main changes or “Revolutions”
Anderson, F., and R.S Stephenson. The War That Made America. Penguin Group USA, 2005. (accessed December 5th , 2013).
The Glorious revolution was a changing point in the course of history. It was the first revolution of its kind which led to many more like the American revolution. There were many similarities between the Glorious and American revolution, John Locke played a key role in both revolutions, and Locke’s ideas were mirrored in the Declaration of Independence.
...s assumption to the lands he sought to attain, and the throne he ironically set out to avenge.
Mintz, S., and S. McNeil. "The Revolutionary War." Digital History. Digital History, 2013. Web. 24 Nov. 2013.
King Philip’s War (1675-76) is an event that has been largely ignored by the American public and popular historians. However, the almost two-year conflict between the colonists and the Native Americans in New England stands as perhaps the most devastating war in this country’s history. One in ten soldiers on both sides were wounded or killed. At its height, hostilities threatened to push the recently arrived English colonists back to the coast. And, it took years for towns and urban centers to recover from the carnage and property damage.
The French Revolution evokes many different emotions and controversial issues in that some believe it was worth the cost and some don't. There is no doubt that the French Revolution did have major significance in history. Not only did the French gain their independence, but an industrial revolution also took place. One of the main issues of the Revolution was it's human costs. Two writers, the first, Peter Kropotkin who was a Russian prince, and the other Simon Schama, a history professor, both had very opposing views on whether the wars fought by France during the Revolution were worth it's human costs. Krapotkin believed that the French Revolution was the main turning point for not only France but for most other countries as well. On the other hand, Schama viewed the French Revolution as unproductive and excessively violent.
Gascoigne, Bamber. "HISTORY OF GREAT BRITAIN (from 1707)." History World. (2001): n. page. Print. .
Pettegree, Andrew. "The English Reformation." BBC History. BBC, 17 Feb 2011. Web. 1 Oct 2013.