Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Abortion legal and ethical issues
Legal issues of abortion essay
Pro choice reproductive rights
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Abortion legal and ethical issues
Background and Context Abortion is defined as a procedure that is done to remove an embryo or fetus from the uterus of its mother in order to prevent its birth (Roth, 2005). Abortion is categorized as a bioethical issue because it relates to the morals of biomedical advances, policies and research. Abortion is a difficult subject that can involve personal morals and beliefs, legality and religious values. The issue is often viewed from either the side of pro-life, which places emphasis on the fetus and its right to life or pro-choice, which emphasizes the rights of the mother to decide the appropriate action (Roth, 2005). This brings the ethical question of should the government have the right to outlaw abortion into debate. The two viewpoints of pro-life and pro-choice explore the two main moral issues concerning abortion (Roth, 2005). The first moral issue is the moral status of the fetus (Roth, 2005). This deals with the question of whether or not the fetus should be considered as a person and at what stage does the fetus become a person. The second moral issue is the rights of the mother (Roth, 2005). This deals with the question of whether the mother has the right to decide to carry the fetus full term or not. It is important to note that there are two separate questions regarding abortion, one being its morality and the other being its legality (Roth, 2005). There are things that are considered immoral but they are not necessarily illegal. For example, marital infidelity is considered to be wrong but it is not illegal. One moral argument is that the fetus is an innocent person and it is wrong to kill an innocent person therefore it is wrong to kill a fetus (Roth, 2005). The opposite argument can also be made. The fetus ... ... middle of paper ... ...argument for a future like ours makes the assumption that every life will be good and that everyone will want to have a future like ours. The potential life of the fetus could be great or terrible. Just because the life of the fetus could be great does not mean that it has the right to use the mother’s body. The mother still retains the right to an abortion because the fetus depends on her for survival, regardless of its potential. The argument can be made that the fetus deserves the same level of personhood that children and adults do. This can be countered with the fact that children and adults are able to live without occupying the body of another person. The point at which personhood occurs may never be established because of the contrasting views for and against personhood and it would be very difficult to establish any kind of middle ground on personhood.
In the US, 89% of abortions are performed during the first trimester of a woman 's pregnancy. Approximately 115,000 abortions are done per day in the US and at least 25 and younger women have a 50% of having an abortion. This paper will reflect on the moral status of abortion, a fetus having value to life, alternative options instead of abortion and rape being an exception. The conservative point feels a fetus should be given full moral status. They should be given full moral status because in the early weeks of development they are developing major organs. A fetus should be given the right to continue to fully develop so that they have the opportunity to contribute to society. If an abortion occurs, it does not give a fetus the opportunity
In A Defense of Abortion (Cahn and Markie), Judith Thomson presents an argument that abortion can be morally permissible even if the fetus is considered to be a person. Her primary reason for presenting an argument of this nature is that the abortion argument at the time had effectively come to a standstill. The typical anti-abortion argument was based on the idea that a fetus is a person and since killing a person is wrong, abortion is wrong. The pro-abortion adopts the opposite view: namely, that a fetus is not a person and is thus not entitled to the rights of people and so killing it couldn’t possibly be wrong.
But, arguing against this point, since a fetus does not have a desire to live, or any desires at all for that matter, then it is not wrong to kill the fetus. To backup this argument, David Boonin states in his book, A Defense of Abortion, “Since the pre conscious fetus is not conscious, it does not have ideal desires in this sense. And so, on this account, the best account of why you and I and temporarily comatose adults and suicidal teenagers have a right to life does not imply that the pre conscious fetus
Abortion, defined as the intentional termination of a pregnancy, is one of the most highly debated liberties of all time. Approximately one to three million abortions are performed each year. Women receive abortions for reasons such as rape, teen pregnancy, and health concerns. Unfortunately, it is a liberty that some still wish to eradicate due to religious beliefs and misconceptions. Abortion should remain a legal option for women because illegal abortions result in far more fatalities, religion does not serve as grounds for a law, and most importantly, there is no conclusive evidence that a fetus is equal to a human being.
During the past quarter century, abortion has joined race and war as one of the most debatable subject of controversy in the United States. It discusses human interaction where ethics, emotions and law come together. There are many points of view toward abortion but the only two fine distinctions are "pro-choice" and "pro-life". A pro-choicer would feel that the decision to abort a pregnancy is that of the mothers and the state has no right to interfere. A pro-lifer would hold that from the moment of conception, the embryo or fetus is alive, but others approve of abortion because they believe that a fetus is not human until birth.
This view may be problematic if we consider that life does not necessarily imply personhood. We may claim that the foetus is a human being but this merely implies that it is a member of our species, and not that of another. Yet it is at least true to say that a foetus, even in the earliest stages of pregnancy has the potential to be a person. This is slightly differe...
In our society, there are many ethical dilemmas that we are faced with that are virtually impossible to solve. One of the most difficult and controversial issues that we are faced with is abortion. There are many strong arguments both for and against the right to have an abortion which are so complicated that it becomes impossible to resolve. The complexity of this issue lies in the different aspects of the argument. The essence of a person, rights, and who is entitled to these rights, are a few of the many aspects which are very difficult to define. There are also issues of what circumstances would justify abortion. Because the issue of abortion is virtually impossible to solve, all one can hope to do is understand the different aspects of the argument so that if he or she is faced with that issue in their own lives, they would be able to make educated and thoughtful decisions in dealing with it.
position that abortion is morally wrong. Therefore, if you kill a fetus, then (prima facie)
Morality of Abortion For the past couple of decades, the issue of abortion has been the most heated topic debated in the United States. When considering this topic, one must look at three things: ethics, emotions and the law; all of these are important to this issue. Like any debate, there are two sides to this issue: pro-choice and pro-life. People who are pro-abortion say that the mother is the ultimate person to decide to abort a pregnancy and that the government should not get involved. On the other hand, a person against abortion would state that from the time of conception, the embryo/fetus is considered a human being.
Abortion is an ethical issue because there are many differing views on if it morally right to terminate a pregnancy before normal childbirth. Some people believe that abortion is acceptable, others completely disagree with the practice and other believe it is acceptable under some circumstances. This is an ethical issue because there is the ‘Pro Life’ argument, where there is the belief that abortion is murder, and the unborn child has the right to live as anyone else does, there is also the ‘Pro Choice’ argument, where there is the belief that the woman has ‘reproductive rights’ and can choose what she does with her body, because it is her body. There are also views of abortion that come from religion. People base their views on their values,
Abortion is on the brink of becoming one of the most debatable subjects of controversy in the United States, alongside race and war. It is an argument where integrity, law, and emotions clasp. Abortion constitutes a social, moral, and medical dilemma that affects people and makes our country turn into an emotional and vicious atmosphere. People have many views on abortion but the two variations are “pro-life” and “pro-choice”. Someone that is pro-life believes that the fetus is alive; they believe that it is considered murder and that there is a moral responsibility. They truly believe the unborn child has constitutional rights. Someone that is pro-choice believes that the mother should be able to make the decision of abortion with no interference from the state. The unborn child has no rights as a human, since it is not technically living and breathing outside of the uterus.
Abortion is the termination of the fetus within 28 weeks of becoming pregnant. There are two main viewpoints discussed throughout America on this topic, which is pro-life or pro-choice. Pro-life is the encouragement of human life of the fetus, so anti-abortion. Pro-choice is a United States social, political faction supporting the right that women should get to choose between aborting the child or not. Abortion is a controversial issue that countless individuals in the pro-life and pro-choice community have a powerful and divergent opinion concerning the matter. Abortion is not morally ethical because it is the murder of an unborn fetus.
In contrast, many argue that abortion can never be rationalized, as it is truly immoral to kill an unborn child, as it is an innocent
It is said that a foetus is not really a person but is only an appendage to the mother. Therefore, she has the right to remove this foetus just as she would a tumor. According to this argument, the infant’s body does not receive a human life until sometime shortly before birth or just after birth; which in both cases is a murder.
When does the fetus because a person, Conception or birth? Do woman have the right to decide if they are going to carry a baby to term or not? These are the most commonly argumentative questions that come up in this specific topic. The moral status of the fetus is in much of the debate in regard to abortion. If the fetus is a person, then they have the right to be kept to term. Some philosophers like Judith Thomson and Jane English had made arguments that even if the fetus is a person, abortion may be morally justified. They dispute the truth of the premise, “It is wrong to end the life of an innocent person.” The question then becomes again when is a fetus a person? Some say it happens at the moment of conception, others say it happens when the heart beat starts, and others feel life doesn’t start until birth. According to Dr. Jack Willke, the president of the National Right to Life Committee, an embryo is a human being from the moment of conception. His definition of a human depends upon the forty- six chromosomes. The embryo exists beyond our understanding. The fertilized egg contains all the DNA necessary for the embryo to develop. Half the DNA is supplied by the egg and the other half by the sperm. It makes a unique combination that can’t be duplicated, which entitles a unique individual. Although, arguments have been made contradicting Dr. Willke’s