Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Literature on employee engagement
Employee engagement theory literature review
Employee engagement theory literature review
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Literature on employee engagement
I selected to discuss the employee engagement process intervention method. According to Kahn (1990), employee engagement is when organizational members utilize their emotional, cognitive, and physical means in order to perform their duties (as cited in Xu & Thomas, 2011). The purpose of using the employee engagement process intervention method is to convert the culture in management from one that is traditional to one that has shared responsibilities, collaborative, and team focused (Holman, Devane, & Cady, 2007). Furthermore, the purpose of this intervention method is to achieve an environment with open communication, and individual accountability of the culture (Holman et al., 2007). Holman et al. (2007) states that the process starts with prepping organizational leaders for the planning sessions and work groups to be experienced later in the process. They report that the reason for doing this is to eliminate any resistance from the leaders in response to the open communication and feedback of employees. The next stage in the process is for the leaders and organizational members to complete the McCormick Employee Engagement Inventory (MEEI).
The MEEI is an instrument which consists of 35 questions covering seven scales that measure overall employee engagement. It does this by evaluating the organization’s
…show more content…
The second approach by Khan (1990, 1992) states that for effective engagement members need to feel like the work that they do is effective (as cited in Xu & Thomas, 2011). Additionally, members must know what their role is within the organization (Holman et al., 2007). Having the resources available, role clarity, and confidence encourages the increase of productivity and collaboration that the employee engagement process is based
The chapter “Revising” taken from the book, originally published in 2006, Rewriting: How to Do Things with Texts, was written by Joseph Harris, an English professor who teaches at the University of Delaware. The chapter in his book that is titled “Revising,” suggests techniques and approaches to apply when revising one’s work and tackles common misconceptions on revision. Harris defines revising as, “ rethinking, refining, and developing” a piece of work ( 441). He uses these three words to encompass the importance and complexity of one word: revision.
Workers feeling, which includes competitive compensation and reward strategies, professional growth and development, career paths and succession plans and the organizations leadership and culture are contributing factors of employee engagement
Boston, MA: Pearson Sivarethinamohan, R. R., & Aranganathan, P. P. (2011). Determinants of employee engagement
Leaders benefit from building a team to create and implement change, this is a key theme in the Kotter model of change. This teambuilding engages employees throughout the process. Allowing employees to be a part of the change process gives them the opportunity and trust to be creative moving toward the future (Cochrane, 2002). Leaders can create opportunity for employees and leaders to dialogue about the change, which can help troubleshoot the process. Leaders who engage employees throughout the organization from various levels of the organization will receive perspectives from the entire organization helping them make better-informed decisions. Employees want to be allowed the opportunity to help an organization they believe in, in a way that enhances the
An organization almost always has the intention of being successful. The many factors that contribute to an organizations success is organizational factors such as motivation, leadership, communication, structure, change, culture and more, which can affect an employee’s behavior. Organizational behavior is defined as the study of what people do in an organization and how their behavior affects the organization’s performance (Judge & Robbins, 2016). Integrating these organizational ideologies into a corporation can create tremendous outcomes. These ideologies are enforced on a management level to ensure optimal employee engagement. Understanding organizational behavior is important for managers because they must always be kept on their toes
Effective engagement is effective when active listening takes place as well because sometimes people (myself included) can listen to a person talk for hours but not really hear them. That’s why it’s important to build up a positive rapport when dealing with clients. The clients in my agency are going through a range of emotions
In recent years, employee voice has become a topic of interest in the field of management. Employee voice behavior is defined as "the discretionary communication of ideas, suggestions, or opinions by a member of an organization intended to influence others to make improvements or changes" (Morrison, 2011, pp. 373-412). Employee voice behavior is essential for organizations to improve their operations and achieve their strategic goals. It is also a crucial factor in employee engagement, which is the emotional commitment an employee has to their organization and its goals (Primicias, 2013).
MacLeod, D. and Clarke, N. (2009), Engaging for success: enhancing performance through employee engagement, London: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills
It is doing what we can to put a smile on someone’s face, especially after a rough day or call. Engagement is caring about our job, providing feedback to better the process, and enjoying the work we do. This includes capturing the attention of agents in creative ways, which allows them to feel that they are important to us. Engagement means having a singular focus, sharing goals, and celebrating accomplishments. Celebrating accomplishments promotes a bond that is forged through the challenges
Each employee involved in the process gets a report of readiness and competency assessment. They also get guidance and direction on development, training opportunities and together with managers create a career learning plan
Definition. Schaufeli’s (as cited in Truss, Delbridge, Alfes, Shantz, & Soane, 2014, p. 26) ideas on employee engagement can be explained by using the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model. Job demands and availability or lack of resources, both job and personal, either contribute to or deter employee engagement, this is illustrated by the JD-R (Truss et al., 2014). On the positive side, according to Truss et al. (2014) job and personal resources “foster engagement in terms of vigor (energy), dedication (persistence) and absorption (focus)” (p. 26). An employee who has the resources needed to do their job is better equipped to do the job and thereby better able to perform their job (Truss et al., 2014). Employees who are better able to meet job
Employee engagement, a term devised by Gallup research group, is viewed as an important management tool for any company who wants to be an effective and productive organization. Researches have shown that employee can contribute positively to the organization vision and goal when a company engage them effectively. The employee will also feel more passionate about their work and have a sense of belonging.
The article I found for this assignment is Workplace Engagement and Generational Differences in Values by Nancy M. Schullery it was published in Business Communication Quarterly. The Article focuses on the difference in work place engagement and communication at the generational level and how similar it is to interaction inside the classroom. The article provided a survey of the literature on workplace engagement, and detailed how the values of the newest generation in the workforce, the Millennials, are different from previous generations. "These value differences may diminish the effectiveness of employers’ efforts to increase engagement, similar to the way differing values also may reduce our own effectiveness in the classroom"(Schullery,
Here are some figures that display how Employee engagement practices have bolstered up the efficiency and productivity of the employees and in return have augmented the profits of the companies. According to a new meta-analysis that was conducted by the Gallup organisation amongst 1.4 million employees, the organisations that focus on employee engagement practices to a large extent have reported 22% increase in productivity. These practices even impr...
within the groups process. In the Final stage the members as well as the organization recognize