Are they telling us the whole truth? In this passage from the Empire of Illusion by Chris Hedges, he states “the most essential skill...is artifice.”Artifice is the action of tricking others for your benefit. This action is commonly used in the political world. They use the work of propaganda. It is information that is biased and used for political reasons from a person's own perspective. I agree with Hedges’ statement because most political leaders show what the public wants to see or hear, but I believe it is not ethical in the world we live in. Political leaders almost always tend to have money so that gives them an advantage and an easy way to hide what they don’t want the public to know about themselves. It as an effortless way of hiding their true identity. Artifice is potentially something that is going to keep happening now and in the …show more content…
future. This act may be very harmful to our future, considering it will be the political leaders in charge of our well-being. In his argument, Hedges declares, “Most of all they need a story,” which means a personal story that a political leader needs to talk about, something to tell the crowd, to get them focused on what they're saying.
Leaders internally talk about their past to get the crowd to know them a bit more, even if it means making up a story with false information. When it’s related to an issue they can also announce things that can make citizens sad or happy and may even get them angry, but by any means it still gets the crowd feeding into whatever nonsense the speaker is saying. For example, when Trump would speak about how he would build a wall to stop immigrants it got everyone's attention no matter what their reaction was towards it. Furthermore that is where a politician would probably even say incorrect facts on purpose to get specific people engaged. Some might argue that if a person becomes angry at what a politician says, they aren’t paying much attention to the speaker but that is completely wrong. A person would actually pay more attention to what the speaker has to say so that they can criticize what they are doing
wrong. Additionally, Hedges says that if a political leader doesn’t grasp the concept of artifice, then they would struggle. A political leader’ should have attributes that usually include being “competent, sincere, or honest,” since this is the kind of person most people would like to vote for. Supposing that they don’t have these characteristics, they will struggle with trying to get the audience to listen to them. The only way they would actually succeed is if they actually have the right qualities for that job which includes having the ability to deceive the public in order to look good. They need to be able to grab the public’s attention and if they fail to do this then they would just become irrelevant. The public won’t even turn to them, they would just slowly disappear. The passage accurately reflects situations that happen in the society we live in. Some of the most important people in our world, the political leaders, usually aren’t who they say they are. They are just people trying to get people to notice them by any means necessary. Do political leaders want to fall through? No, they want to succeed no matter what it takes. So they will go above and beyond to reach their goal. On these terms our world is becoming a world of lies and manipulation. Artifice in politics is really changing our world. It has come to the fact that people don’t even care about the real truth. They don’t look for the evidence of what a person is saying or they are not looking at the actions the person does.
The art of artifice compels the idea of false intimacy between a leader and his or her people. This essential skill acts like a play to distract its audience from the reality behind government authority. All a country wants is a leader that can talk the talk and walk the walk, even if they are faking it. In Empire of Illusion by Chris Hedges, the author exemplifies the importance of artifice in political theater and consumer culture since “Those who are best at deception succeed.” Artifice masks the true intentions of political leaders, whether it’s Napoleon’s domination over Europe, Hitler’s rise to power, or Donald Trump’s proposal against illegal immigration.
Politicians use many different ways to persuade the intended audience. The speech to the Berlin Wall, and the speech to the Virginia Convention were both similar in ways of impacting people and using the same form of persuasion, but different when it came to a sense of hope, time periods, and the reasoning. Reagan and Henry use different different modes of persuasion.
Buying media slots for candidates, which used to be a small business just over half a century ago, has grown so that these companies manage “more than $170 billion of their clients’ campaign funds” (Turow 230). This fact about the growth of such an industry should at a minimum raise an eyebrow, as it characterizes the shift and importance this data analysis has become. It also serves as an important point because it fuels the common fear of corruption in politics, as this data essentially offers a window to the responses and how people think to what politicians say. This could lead to the next phase of the “polished politician” where candidates will say statements that statistically receive favorable responses from the population. This strong pathos is a central pillar of the argument Turow is trying to make, effectively playing the emotion of pity from the hypothetical family situation, and building it into a fear of the system and establishment. Such emotions are strong motivators, and this combination encourages the reader to take action, or at the very least inform someone they know about such issues they weren’t even aware were
America was built on a notion of freedom, justice, and equality, thus inviting people from all different parts of the world to pursue success while still retaining their background. However, despite what this nation was truly supposed to stand for, there were grim periods in which it did not truly uphold its core values. During World War II, in which the relationship between the U.S. and Japan was at its worst, many Japanese- Americans faced discrimination and injustice. Americans claimed that this needed to be done as a national emergency and for the peace of the nation. From the sources “War Message” by Franklin D. Roosevelt and “Desert Exile” by Yoshiko Uchida we can piece together the events that lead to the discrimination of Japanese
“Untouchables” by Jonathan Kozol goes on a journey to discover the mistreatment of homeless Americans. The story is very well detailed in explaining how society does not accept these individuals and how they are literally “untouchable.” Kozol shows characters and tells stories of how they life got affected by homelessness and the treatment that came along with it. The author also explains how easy it is to be prune to homelessness by making one little mistake. Not only does Kozol show society thoughts about the homeless are bad, but he also shows the homeless people thoughts of how society responds to them being “low class.” In Jonathan Kozol’s short story “Untouchables,” he exhibits this by explaining how they are misunderstood, stereotyped,
Many people will argue that honesty will make a person go far in life; however, people who practice artifice succeed substantially. Artifice is a clever or artful skill especially used to trick or deceive others. In the excerpt Empire of Illusion, Chris Hedges states that,” The most essential skill in political theater and a consumer culture is artifice.” I profoundly agree with Hedges’ position on artifice.
The PBS Frontline Documentary The Untouchables shined light on the claim that wealthier people in today’s society get off easier when they break the law. During the financial crisis of 2008, it was said that fraud was committed when many mortgage bankers and high-end executives on Wall Street knowingly bought loan portfolios that didn’t meet their policy credit standards. Even with the evidence in place, no one was arrested and held responsible for a stock crash that nearly destroyed the entire financial system of the United States. With a powerful justice system and justifiable evidence in place, no was prosecuted. Did the justice system not take the necessary steps to ensure that justice was served
Falsehood could be a useful evil in politic, because, apparently, by means of falsehood, the risk of social turmoil could be efficiently minimized or even eliminated. Thus, the ultimate good of the whole,
To begin with, artifice can work so easily as long as the people can be manipulated. If they’re told what they want to hear, the population eventually fights for that person with all of their being. No one’s ever absolutely sure whether the politician’s words are truthful or not, but they take the chance anyway. At the beginning of Hedges’ excerpt, he explains that political leaders are some of the countless individuals who use
Means of posed pictures and the false idea of a morally right person often succeed in allowing the politician or person in a consumer world to exploit the feelings and trust of a person. Posed pictures often give something for people to base their feelings and trust off of but theses medias are foten out of context or missing the entire backstory or meanings for the picture. The ability to act differently and weave a personification of a morally right person to gain people's trust, often leads the audience to trust in a veil that is not the real person that they voted for. NOw when these ways are both wrong, they often lead the the entire trust being placed in the politician and the success of the politician. That is why i believe that the success of successful politicians are often because of the use of artificial medias and even though they are wrong, they are the most effective skill if a politician wants to become
It is true, as Hedges writes, that “Political leaders, who use the tools of mass propaganda to create a sense of faux intimacy with citizens, no longer need to be competent, sincere, or honest.” We are already live in this reality. Donald Trump, our very own President, has been widely accused of making mistake after mistake. Sharing classified information with Russia, talking smack and threatening North Korea, the list goes on. The other day, I even heard that he tweeted about the United Forces being ‘locked and loaded’, implying that we’re ready for nuclear war with North Korea because of this. Despite all of the suspicious actions of the POTUS, people still take his side, claiming he’s America’s saviour. It goes to show how no matter how crazy someone is,
Everyday citizens often live unaware of their government’s inner workings. The knowing of political espionage is often too heavy of a subject to be inducted in conversation. True, prima facie, modest twists and turns of information may not be considered substantial, but this inconsideration leaves much to be uncontrolled. It is easy for political leaders to become power crazed, to not realize the massive implications that come of their actions. Only after all is said and done do the people actually realize their government is an opaque mask of deception. The Watergate Scandal substantially impacted Americans’ trust in their government.
Kouzes, James M., and Barry Z. Posner. Credibility: How Leaders Gain and Lose It, Why People
Louw, P. E. (2010). Spin Doctoring: The Art of Public Relations. The media and political process (2ed., p. 81). London: SAGE.
... leaders must, to use a time-worn phrase, “walk the talk” are essential to catalyzing that motivation.