The Effects of Industrialisation on the Structure of the Family

948 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Industrialization and nuclear family

The Effects of Industrialisation on the Structure of the Family

The pre- industrial family was said to be an extended family

consisting of three generations, the children, parents and the

grandparents. The family would all work together in the farms to help

provide for the entire families needs, children as young a 5 or 6

would have been found work to do. However this was until the

Industrial revolution when factories become the main source of work

and development. The pre-industrial societies were largely based on

extended kinship networks; land and other resources were commonly

owned by a range of relatives that extended well beyond the unit of

the nuclear family. It was very common for families to work alongside

their cousins and even live with them. This extended family was

responsible for the production of the shelter, food and clothing for

the family. Roles in the family were usually ascribed to the offspring

rather than being achieved. These roles would hardly ever be rejected

and in return for this commitment, the extended network would perform

other functions for the members. The family gave its members the

skills and the education in which to take their place in the family

division of labour. The family functioned to maintain health for its

members, as there was no universal health care, they also provided

welfare; those in the family who would make it to old age would have

been cared for in exchange for childcare services.

Then came the industrial revolution. Parsons believed that the

industrial revolution brought about the dramatic change from the

extended family to the nuclear and three fundamental changes to

soci...

... middle of paper ...

... there

own crops and provide for themselves really seems to have had little

effect on the family until 1960 when the nuclear family appeared in

great numbers according to Young and Wilmot. However is this actually

true? Laslett seems to suggest that the nuclear family has always

existed but worked as an extended family and that industrialisation

only occurred because of the nuclear family and not the other way

around. So if Laslett is correct then there was no extended family but

two nuclear families working as an extended unit, living under

separate roofs. This greatly flaws Parsons and Young and Wilmot's

theories of the extended family consisting of three generations. So

has the nuclear family always been the norm of British society and has

everything that has been developed has only been developed because of

it?

Show More
Related

  • The Role and Rights of Women in Western Europe and Eastern Asia from 1750 to 1914

    1519 Words  | 4 Pages

    Before the introduction of industrialization, the family and the household was the basic unit of manufacturing in Western Europe. The family members would work together in commerce, and agricultural...

    Read More

  • Changing Family Structure in America from a Functionalist Perspective

    901 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...Many Kinds of Family Structures in Our Communities." . N.p., n.d. Web. 10 May 2014. .

    Read More

  • Annotated Bibliography on the Effects of Family Structure

    1789 Words  | 4 Pages

    productivity: An examination of gender, occupational status and work environments effects. Report available from The Merrill-Palmer Institute, 71-A East Ferry, Detroit, Michigan, 48202.

    Read More

  • Interracial Dating Research Paper

    1294 Words  | 3 Pages

    2. Coontz talks a lot about how people use to define family, not too long ago did family just start to mean a married couple and their kids. Family use to mean many different things back in the day: a large kinship group in which they derived their claims and property, as the European nobility described it, or middle class Europeans and North Americans described

    Read More

  • The Way We Wish We Were

    307 Words  | 1 Pages

    Over the centuries, these methods have changed. These methods are changed because of events in history. Such events like the Industrial Revolution, the Great Depression, WWII, and mass numbers of Immigrants are said to be the cause for the loss of the "traditional family. Coontz states, "The Industrial Revolution destroyed the traditional family." The Industrial Era provided work for younger ages. With the age of the work force lowered, children had less time to play; the roles for women were redefined, causing more individuality with in a family. This was not the style of the traditional family, when the wife cooks the meals, takes care of kids; the husband goes to work, and supports the family, traditionally.

    Read More

  • Life in the 1700's

    1019 Words  | 3 Pages

    Family life in the 1700's was highly valued and prioritized. Back in those times families were extremely large in size. There was much inter-marriages from generation to generation, Therefore, everyone in a community was most likely related to each other. Because of these extreme connections between communities, visiting fellow family members was very popular. Many of these visits were informal and prolonged. Out of everyone in a family, the women usually corresponded the most with other relatives. The lack of decently designed roads and great distances made the matter of traveling very important in social activities. In addition, the family was looked upon as a unit of production and enterprise. Most families in the 1700's contained usually twenty to thirty people. These large numbers were due to the fact that the families were extended. Every relative lived together, even if they were distant relatives. Families with ten or twelve children were common and those with twenty or twenty-five children were not regarded as abnormal. But, usually not all the children survived. Typically, four in ten children dies before they reached the age of sixteen.

    Read More

  • Changes in American Family Life from Colonization to the Civil War

    1291 Words  | 3 Pages

    The most dramatic changes in family life took place among those with wealth and status, where a change in economic circumstances was reflected by a drastic change in family structure. Other groups' family lives reflected their circumstances during this time period just as much, meaning that they did not fundamentally change in the same ways. All families were affected by the economic transformation in one way or another, but overall every family group continued to reflect their particular economic and social circumstances.

    Read More

  • The Nuclear Family is No Longer the Norm in Modern Britain

    725 Words  | 2 Pages

    If your family wasn’t nuclear, you were considered as different to the society. You would even be treated differently. Not having a nuclear family would be a single mother with children, or a single father with children (though in some cases the adult could be a widow/widower). Another way of not being a nuclear family would even be being single/not married! In those days they used the word spinster for single women.

    Read More

  • Talcott Parsons And Bales: Leader Of The 1950s-Nuclear Family

    1505 Words  | 4 Pages

    Family structure and stability have constantly evolved and been researched in aspects of sociology. Following World War II, the family ideology in the 1950’s was brought to the attention of Talcott Parsons and Robert Bales (1955) whom demonstrated how transitioning from an agricultural society to that of an industrialization one played an important role in altering family life and structure. Parsons and Bales further expressed how gender role specialization was vital in the continuous of family solidarity. The “instrumental” male father role as the leader of the family responsible for providing the income and support as the “expressive” role which is that of the female mother delivers her contribution to the family through house work and nurture

    Read More

  • Frankenstein and Industrialization

    821 Words  | 2 Pages

    A new pattern in family life emerges. Families now worked in factories and mills for people they did not know. Production was the key in the industrial society and family was a minor issue. Families were less closely bound together than in the past - the economic link was broken.... ...

    Read More

  • Women and their Roles in Pre-Industrial Europe

    1237 Words  | 3 Pages

    Many of people today feel trapped inside their homes, just how the women of Pre-Industrial Europe felt. Working day in and day out inside the homes, just to keep the family together, and make a little money on the side, these women were an integral part of Pre-Industrial families. Not only were the women important to Pre-Industrial European families, but so were the households. Much of the money was made in the households, and this is where families either succeeded or failed. The household and women of Pre-Industrial Europe played an integral role in the economy of the families, and more importantly, the women of these households kept them running smoothly. Without either of these important aspects of life in Pre-Industrial Europe, it is safe to say that the families would have collapsed, due to a lack of organization and structures. Pre-Industrial Europe, in which the women and the household were “the factories” per se, due to the income they generated, was much different from the Europe we know today. Leading into the Industrialization of Europe beginning in the late 1700's and lasting through the early 1800's, the household played an integral role in the family’s income. Without the household, the families would literally collapse, due to a lack of organization and stability. Within these important family sub-units, there was one married couple, their children, the family’s servants, and in some cases, depending upon the region of Europe, there were grandparents, aunts and uncles. Not only did the father and servants of the house work, but also the women and children. Also, in the case of there being more than one generation of family in a single household, depending upon the region of Europe, the grandparents, aunts, and uncles would also work within the house. Once the children of these households reached a certain age, usually the early teens, they were sent off to work in a house as a servant. These servants were different then the servants of today, as they worked for room, board, and food, not waiting on the family. Once they started to generate income, the teens would save up the money necessary to begin their own family. However, there were the few exceptions; teens that did not work as servants, and ended up marrying into an existing household. This however,...

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Modern Family

    1863 Words  | 4 Pages

    The television sitcom Modern Family produced by Steven Levitan and Christopher Lloyd shows the many different types of a modern American family. According to Andrew Hampp, “The show is among the most-viewed scripted programs in prime time in its second season, averaging 11 million viewers during original airings and often ranked as the most DVRed program most weeks” (2). The television show is a frequently watched show and is liked by many viewers. Modern Family's storyline helps the families of viewers by being an influential and relatable show to different types of families. The show is about the lives of three different families that are all related. In the show there are Jay and Gloria, an intergenerational couple with two sons-- Manny (from Gloria’s previous relationship) and Joe, their new baby. Jay’s adult son Cameron is married to his gay partner Mitchell, and they adopted Lily from Vietnam. Finally, Jay’s daughter Claire is married to her heterosexual partner named Phil and they have three children. The show is influential to our culture today because it shows these different types of families and addresses controversial themes such as gay adoption, the different family connections and communications, intergenerational coupling, and acceptance of diversity within an extended family. The family is easy to relate to while watching because it is based off of real family situations.

    Read More

  • The Function of the Nuclear Family

    1571 Words  | 4 Pages

    The extended family predominated pre-industrially because of the need for a large family to help tend the land or look after those who were unable to do so. Infant mortality was high so you had to produce more children to be sure of having enough help. The family were a unit of production producing only the goods needed to survive and trading the remainder. Following the Industrial Revolution in the late 19th century, it was replaced by the nuclear family which was a unit of consumption as family members became wage earners and families needed to become more geographically mobile and move to where they could find work.

    Read More

  • The Effects of Industrialization on Society

    1428 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Effects of Industrialization on Society The Industrial Revolution changed society from an agriculture-based community into a thriving urban city through many interrelated changes. One of the most important changes was the quantity and rate of products produced to meet the rising demand. Large industrial factories increased efficiency and productivity, which caused a shift in the economy. Karl Marx’s believed that the new changes overturned established economies as well as society.

    Read More

  • My Family Structure Essay

    1041 Words  | 3 Pages

    Family structure can greatly impact the day-to-day activities of a family. A family with one parent may have a very different dynamic than one with two parents, or possibly even more parents. It is no surprise that these differences exist and families and that one’s family impacts their way of life. However, does it make a significant difference? Or is it simply a difference in how people react to their situations. That is what I wanted to learn from this assignment.

    Read More

More about The Effects of Industrialisation on the Structure of the Family

Open Document