The Effects of Erosion and Loss of Marsh Land in the Southern United States

2576 Words6 Pages

Motivation for Research and Objectives

Louisiana contains approximately 40% of the coastal wetlands of the lower forty-eight states. Louisiana has lost up to forty square miles of marsh per year for several decades (accounting for 80% of the nation’s annual coastal wetland loss) (lacoast.gov). From a hydrologic standpoint, the wetlands replenish aquifers, hold excess floodwaters from intense rainfalls, and provide storm surge protection.

The Nation also benefits from Louisiana’s coastal lands. Louisiana is responsible for a major part of our nation’s oil and gas production, shipping commerce, fisheries industry, fur harvesting, and oyster production, accounting for over 55,000 jobs and billions of dollars in revenues. Additionally, wetlands are wonderful recreational resources and are part of Louisiana’s growing ecotourism business (http://www.lacoast.gov/new/About/Default.aspx?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter).

The effects of erosion and loss of marsh land in the Southern United States has devastating consequences to all of these benefits, both local and national. The loss of land can mostly be attributed to subsidence, erosion, and severe weather events. The USGS reports that a total of 118 square miles of land has been transformed to new water areas in a 9,742 square mile area from the Chandeleur Islands to the Atchafalaya River. This land loss is from fall of 2004 to the fall of 2005, after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita (USGS, February 2006).

Today, with our understanding of how fragile the coastal areas are, there are many study and restoration projects underway. Since the implementation of the Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection, and Restoration Act (CWPPRA) in 1990, there have been 151 coastal restorat...

... middle of paper ...

...aused resuspension in some tests. This is not detrimental to the understanding the resuspension characteristics of the sample, or being able to use that data for stress plots. However, it would be preferable to have stresses below observable resuspension levels.

Differences from Lick’s experiments with the shaker and these experiments:

A sampling port for measurement of the sediment concentration was located at 12.7 cm (5 in) from the bottom of the cylinder.

For purposes of reducing biological activity, Lick covered the sample cores, as well as, kept the cores in a dark chamber.

Before running the test, the depth of the overlaying water inside each core was adjusted to 12.7 cm (5 in). The grid was also adjusted such that the lower surface was 5.08 cm (2 in) above the sediment surface (the grid oscillated between 5.08 and 7.62 cm above the interface).

More about The Effects of Erosion and Loss of Marsh Land in the Southern United States

Open Document