Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effect of the Falklands war
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The effect of the Falklands war
Body of essay The effect the 1982 Falklands War had on Margaret Thatcher’s political career, in particular the election in 1983 During the 1970s and 1980s, Britain was going through a difficult time and the Government was facing many problems; a lack of free markets, the public’s lack of support and a failing economy. People were unhappy and unsatisfied and for many people living in Britain, Margaret Thatcher was the reason why. Margaret Thatcher became the first female Prime Minister in 1979 when the Conservatives won the general election. However; Thatcher was not the most popular politician of her time. Before 1982 according to sources, “No British leader in recent times had been so unpopular” (Garfinkel, 1985) Before 1982 she had very little support, even from her own Party, the idea Of Thatcher ever leading her party to an election win seemed nearly impossible. (Garfinkel, 1985) According to the literature, by 1979 she was being criticized for the failure of her programme and her strongest critics were saying that she essentially did not have the ability to handle the Prime Minister’s job. These criticisms continued in 1981 and most people living in Britain were reluctant to give Thatcher even her first five years. She had managed to win the General Election in 1979 but the general opinion was that unless the economy improved dramatically, Thatcher would surely lose the election in 1983. However, no one had anticipated the Falklands War or Thatcher’s fighting spirit as suggested when she famously said, “I have only one thing to say: you turn if you want to; the Lady’s not for turning.” (Gold, 2008). The Falklands War originated from the situation when Argentina insisted that the Falklands Islands belonged to it, and that Br... ... middle of paper ... ...ence, according to (Marshall, 2007) The Falklands War in itself cannot be considered the only reason for Margaret Thatcher's electoral victory in 1983. (Marshall, 2007) Despite other factors discussed it is clear to see, looking at the evidence, that the Falklands War certainly did have an impact on the general election in 1983 and on Margaret Thatcher’s popularity. Influencing and changing people minds and perceptions of how Britain should be run and by what kind of person. However it may not have been the sole reason for the win as other factors mentioned certainly contributed to the General election win in 1983.The Conservatives had a clear majority win in 1983 and it was one of the biggest land slide victories in British history, but it cannot be said that the Falkland’s factor was the sole or main reason why those results occurred, other factors contributed.
It could be argued that Gladstone’s failure to unite his party, during a time when their ultimate support and confidence in his leadership was crucial, was a significant tactical error that contributed heavily towards the failure of the 1886 Home Rule Bill. The results of the 1885 general election were to have a significant impact on the political landscape of Britain; despite winning the most seats, the Liberals did not have an overall majority.As Parnell and the Irish Parliamentry Party (IPP) held the balance...
Heath’s premiership during the years of 1970 to 1974 presents a period of affluence and appeasement alongside a lack of control indicates that Heath’s reign largely was a failure in maintaining stability. Despite the achievements that Heath implemented like Brittain finally getting into the EEC, the Oil Crisis, U-turn policies and the rest of the economic failures overshadow the policies that provided stability and modernisation establishing that Heath, according to Row ‘was good at policies not politics.’
This essay will address whether New Labour contained policies with which it wished to pursue, or was solely developed in order to win elections. It is important to realise whether a political party that held office for approximately 13 years only possessed the goal of winning elections, or promoted policies which it wished to pursue. If a party that held no substance was governing for 13 years, it would be unfair to the people. New Labour was designed to win elections, but still contained policies which it wished to pursue. To adequately defend this thesis, one must look at the re-branding steps taken by New Labour and the new policies the party was going to pursue. Through analysis, it will be shown that New Labour promoted policies in regards
To apply this rhetorical strategy, she incorporates several crucial phrases and words to which one can appertain. One example of Thatcher’s use of diction occurs in line twenty-three of her eulogy when she refers to Reagan as “Ronnie.” While to the reader, this name is but a sobriquet Thatcher uses for Reagan, one must identify her use of diction to understand her intention for using this name. After analyzing the word’s connotation instead of its denotation, the reader can discover that she incorporates this word into her eulogy to give the reader a thorough comprehension of the friendship they shared. For the reader, this diction permits him or her to identify Thatcher’s credibility, and for Thatcher, she strengthens her claim by validating her relation with Reagan. Thatcher, however, goes beyond reinforcing her claim through credibility; upon analysis of her eulogy, one can recognize her use of diction to depict historical occurrences surrounding Reagan’s presidency. The reader can identify an example of this tactic when Thatcher states in lines five and six, “[Reagan] sought to mend America’s wounded spirit” (Thatcher). On a superficial level, this
‘Confidence in the government declined between 1968 and 1980 largely due to political scandal’. To what extent do you agree?
Election results also suggest that the Liberal Government were not heading for failure but proceeding to continue strongly. I therefore contradict Dangerfield's theory that the Liberal government were doomed to failure prior to World War 1, suggesting that they were still a strong government. It would be easy to make assumptions looking back in hindsight as Dangerfield did, however I would argue that upon entering World War 1 the Liberal Party still appeared to be strong. Unfortunately the nature of the pre war years seem to accentuate the problems and cast a shadow over the achievements, Dangerfield is a clear critique of Liberal England and what it has to offer.
The Death of Lord Liverpool as the Most Important Reason for the Collapse of the Tory Ministries
The Thatcherism ideology was part of the establishment of privatisation, cutting off the taxes and reducing public expenditure in health and care services in order to improve Britain’s economy, as a consequence more than 50 identities were privatised by
War Is Peace. Freedom Is Slavery. Ignorance Is Strength. The party slogan of Ingsoc illustrates the sense of contradiction which characterizes the novel 1984. That the book was taken by many as a condemnation of socialism would have troubled Orwell greatly, had he lived to see the aftermath of his work. 1984 was a warning against totalitarianism and state sponsored brutality driven by excess technology. Socialist idealism in 1984 had turned to a total loss of individual freedom in exchange for false security and obedience to a totalitarian government, a dysutopia. 1984 was more than a simple warning to the socialists of Orwell's time. There are many complex philosophical issues buried deep within Orwell's satire and fiction. It was an essay on personal freedom, identity, language and thought, technology, religion, and the social class system. 1984 is more than a work of fiction. It is a prediction and a warning, clothed in the guise of science fiction, not so much about what could happen as it is about the implications of what has already happened. Rather than simply discoursing his views on the social and political issues of his day, Orwell chose to narrate them into a work of fiction which is timeless in interpretation. This is the reason that 1984 remains a relevant work of social and philosophical commentary more than fifty years after its completion.
the British had won the War in the Falklands. This war was won both in military
7th edition. London: Pearson Longman, ed. Garner, R., Ferdinand, P. and Lawson, S. (2009) Introduction to Politics. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
British women were often used as foils in large political struggles and were often represented and treated as if in need of protection, in order to portray non- European males as barbarous. This had a profound effect on British women’s relation to imperialism, the form their interventions in political debates and the type the national subject position available to them. (Sharpe, 1993, pp. )
War is an inevitability of human nature and international peace does not relate to the gender of the leaders of the world. Women in power will still act within the states best interest and are not confined to the preconception that women have an “affinity for peace” . Realist theory suggests that the international system is anarchic and an attempt to obtain or even promote world peace would be an act in futility. In an international system with no global hegemon, states are free to act within the states best interest driven by the demand for power and state survival . From Cleopatra and her funding of the roman military campaigns to Helen Clark providing troops for the war in Afghanistan, globally, female leaders have played some part in the disharmony of the world. In April 1982, under the hand of Margaret Thatcher, Britain was lead to war with Argentina to defend British sovereignty. After 10 weeks and almost 100...
The idea of a more peaceful word if more women held powerful and influential positions depends fundamentally on the conventional view of females as the most peaceful and pacified gender. It is easily questionable as to whether this outlook is naturally inherent, or if society has assumed these values as the manner in which women are to behave (Cook & Wilcox, 1991). By analysing the characteristics and actions of women who have been in influential and powerful positions, it is clear that those who succeed when in these positions of power tend to show conventionally masculine qualities. For example, bellicose leaders such as Margaret Thatcher, Indira Gandhi and Golda Meir would prove the idea of a more peaceful world if more women were in power as untrue due to all three leaders’ history of war and in Gandhi’s case, a nuclear program. This is because in current politics, the rise to a powerful posi...
Historically the introductyion of a democratic political system was due to the failure of the post emancipation , scoio economic situation. Which resulted in the export of the Westminsiter model and fostered the emergence of Caribbean political leadership who favoured progressive upliftment in socioeconomic conditions where it became deeply engrained in the political system. This is where a concsiouness developed based upon sustaining stability and legitimacy of the system . such a system greatly depends on the existence of the enjoyment of political freedoms, as well as the ablity of the government to provide essential needs. In Winner Takes All Ryan speakes of the “exportation” of this Westminister sytem and challleges the theory that political sytesm Anglophone Caribbean has adopted is a model of the British Westminster. Ryan questions this and call such proclaims as myth of the Westminster model of governance.. To further understand ryans criticism one would have to fully comprehend the Westminster model. One may define the Westminster Model as the Westminster system is a democratic system of government that takes after that of the United Kingdom. It is in use in a number of commonwealth nations. They include: the Anglophone Caribbean;Canada; Singapore and India among others...