Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on effects of modern agriculture
Effects of deforestation on earth
Effects of deforestation on earth
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on effects of modern agriculture
Alan Weisman, an award-winning journalist, teaches an international journalism course at the University of Arizona and is a senior radio producer for Homelands Productions. Formerly, Weisman worked as a contributing editor for Los Angeles Times Magazine. He maintains an established background with pieces appearing in The New York Times Magazine, Harper’s, The Atlantic Monthly, and Discover. His paper “Earth Without People” written for Discover magazine inspired the book “The World Without Us.” The essay was selected for Best American Science Writing in 2006. Weisman has worked in more than 50 countries, and on all seven continents, to research for his six books. In this book, the author writes about the everlasting impacts of humanity and …show more content…
The advances negatively impacted the natural ecosystem in a few ways. Forests are depleting drastically, plastics have reached an all-time high, and our nature is forced to evolve to survive. For years forests have been cut down and ultimately replaced by cities and villages. Two great examples Weisman provides to support this is the Bialowieza Puszcza and the forest of Old England. The detail that he shared with the readers about the forests helps them imagine what it used to be. He mentions in the text that Puszcza, the only primeval forest left, was down to two-fifths of what it used to be but since then it has begun to grow back since people are moving away from the nearby cities. The Old England forest is another example Weisman gave for what humans have done to the ecosystem. Before the settlers arrived, squirrels could travel by treetop from Cape Cod to Mississippi and not set foot on the ground. After the humans arrived, they burned the underbrush and tree to make trapping and hunting easier. Another example that supports Weisman’s conversation about the forests is in the Central Valley in California. The Riparian forest Tulare Lake and other landscapes in the Valley have diminished as the population grew (class lecture, Richaud, 2018). If the population growth is to continue as expected, the Central Valley will lose the good soil that is necessary for …show more content…
Could the influence of civilization be reversed and changed in a positive way while we are around to fix our mistakes? This is one question I asked myself time after time while reading the book. The book enlightened me on my own behavior and I noticed I have sense than become more economically aware of my actions. Previously, I had heard about the exfoliants being tiny plastic particles, but I did not understand the full impact of plastics. I have starting using natural exfoliants and limiting my plastic waste to avoid exacerbating an already bad problem. I felt a sense of comfort, overwhelm, and guilt while learning what we have done and knowing the potential consequences. The book inspired me to change my behaviors to alleviate some of the damage. Which is what I really think was Weisman’s true intent. I do not think he wanted to erase our species, but rather show that with change, there is hope. Even if humans could not save themselves, life would continue, the fittest will survive and that surprisingly gave me comfort. Realistically, humans are not going to suddenly vanish, but the disturbing part about the book is that humanity today, is slowly destroying what makes Earth habitable for us. Weisman provides great support for his thesis and with the use of examples and expertise, he allows me and other readers to accept his ideas. Outside of Weisman’s book, there are many
There is no such thing as just changing something from one part and not having its effects distribute throughout the entire ecosystem. As an ecosystem continues changing and evolving, so will the organisms living around or in it. We must adapt to the environment or we will become extinct, unable to adapt into the rapidly changing environment we live in. Althout human impact on an environment may benefit us, it can also be harmful to nature. By taking care of what we do to the environment, we can prevent future negative changes in the environment and preserve earth’s natural state.
Society portrays the Earth as a resource, a place that provides an abundance of tools that are beneficial to one’s way of living. As time continues on, humanity’s definition of sustainability with the ecosystem becomes minor, meaning that it is not essential to their own lives. Thus, leading to the environment becoming polluted and affecting the human population. These ideas are demonstrated through these four sources: “Despair Not” by Sandra Steingraber, which provides the author’s perspective on the environmental crisis in terms of climate change.
A Vanished World: Muslims, Christians, and Jews in Medieval Spain is survey medieval Spain, where Christians, Jews, and Muslims once lived side by side and the Muslims were in charge. The book tries to lead the reader to the conclusion that there is indeed a historical precedent for the three major religions establishing a beneficially symbiotic relationship which may be an enduring lesson for coexistence. The author, Chris Lowney, is an ex-Jesuit and holds degrees in medieval history and philosophy.
In, The Fate of the Earth by, Jonathan Schell, he starts with the extinction of dinosaurs then moves onto how it’s not possible to judge on human extinction. He also talks about how the extinction of animals and how we have learned from our mistakes. He states how we live, then we die. And how different catastrophes could kill everyone or how they could slowly become extinct from those catastrophes. He mainly talks about population and how the extinction of human beings and once we are extinct we are done.
M.T Anderson’s novel Feed gives readers a representation of a future dystopian world, one in which technology is not simply around us yet embedded inside our heads. Anderson gives a warning for our own society by drawing parallels between our society and the feed. As Anderson describes, "Everything's dead. Everything's dying." (Anderson 180). In this dystopian world, the environment turns into a disaster due to how rapidly technology is advancing, and this concept can relate to our society today. Indeed, society’s life has improved over the decades due to technological advances, however, it brings more damage to the earth.
Scranton believes that human beings are killing present life by ignoring the effects of global warming on the world. He continues to warn the reader that change is coming regardless of what people do now and that they human race must prepare for what is inevitably coming, as it will be the collapse of global civilization as it is known. Scranton states that this time we are living in, the anthropocene, presents humans with multiple challenges but mostly, “what it means to be human” (page 234). How to control the inevitable
The progressive nature of our humanity is demonstrated through the independent development of new morals and perspectives within each individual throughout their day to day life. This natural inclination to evolve and expand, physically and psychologically, is the process of discovery. The importance of discovery is evident in Ivan Mahoney’s 2011 trilogical documentary ‘Go Back To Where You Came From’ and is further supported by Matt Ottley’s 2008 graphic novel ‘Requiem for a Beast’. Both texts explore fresh experiences that allow individuals to reassess their former perspectives of self and society. These transformations can be a result of challenging undertakings, conflict between differing views, and physical isolation. (don’t list) It
When people see new construction or a recently paved road, they often do not realize the sacrifice that was made to create these luxuries. Most people pass some form of construction on the way to their jobs or school every day. This simple fact sparks questions regarding what this area looked like before it was inhabited by humans. Illinois forests have undergone drastic changes in the decades since European settlement. Only 31 % of the forest area present in 1820 exists today. (Iverson Pdf) Tearing down trees to build new structures isn’t bad if done in moderation, in some ways with time and good planning its wonderful. However, anyone that hunts or claims to be an outdoorsman will relate to the incomparable feeling experienced when alone in the woods and far from the hustle of the urbanized world.
Will this century mark the decline of society? Is the future safe from the mistakes of mankind? In “Learning How to Die in the Anthropocene”, Roy Scranton suggests that the question we should be asking ourselves about global warming is not whether it exists or how it can be stopped, but rather how are we going to deal with it. The purpose of the article is to convince everyone that current life is unsustainable, and that nothing can be done to reverse the process; we must acknowledge that the future will be drastically different and plan in advance if civilization is to keep moving forward. Dr. Scranton develops a realistic tone that relies on logos, pathos, and ethos appeals to persuade readers of his claim. Scranton sufficiently backs up
Tignor, R., Adelman, J., Brown, P., Elman, B. A., Liu, X., Pittman, H., & Shaw, B. D. (2011). Worlds together, worlds apart A history of the world: V. 1 (3rd ed., Vol. 1). New York: WW Norton &.
Throughout the presence of space and time, various incidents occur in which society gains experience from. Through those experiences, the community makes novels, articles, timelines,and more about those events. One particular author, Elie Wiesel, has written a speech after receiving a nobel peace prize about the dreadful account of the Holocaust. Mr. Wiesel lectures about the numerous deaths of the victims during the Holocaust that affected approximately 12 million people . He speaks of the ghetto that he lived in, the suffering he endured, and the pain of it all. On the other hand, He also speaks of how the world should change, so that an event like the Holocaust never happens again. In his speech, Elie Wiesel illustrates the idea of how the world’s actions are bewildering, but it is also up to the same world to stop it. He develops this meaning of his speech by points of point of view, rhetorical questioning, and parallel structure.
The Western forests are drastically different from what they were like before the European settlement. In pre-European time, the forests were open and park-like with only 25-35 trees per acre surrounded by areas of open grasslands. One could easily ride a horse through the spacious forest. This, however, is not possible in today's forests. Today, for example the Ponderosa pine forests, have over 500 trees per acre, creating thick dense areas of trees, brush, and bushes (President Bush, 4). The pre-European forests were subject to frequent low inte...
...tion, but a pessimistic one because change is hindered by the system of capitalism that prioritizes the needs of the market and economy before the environment, which is a paradox in itself because markets need the environment to produce the materials that allow it to survive to begin with first place. To reiterate Wright, the progress trap is hitting modern society and people should recall fallen civilizations in order to escape what is inevitable: collapse. Delaying the collapse is not good enough, and changing the track no matter how difficult a move this is, is needed in order to prevent to sustain life on Earth.
John McNeill, in his informative book, Something New Under the Sun, he discusses how the twentieth century brought the world into a steady decline. Although the world has improved technology-wise, it has also had a decline that overshadows the improvement we have seen. McNeil goes on to prove that it is humans, with our new technology are the reason behind this fateful decline. The world’s population has positively and negatively affected the twentieth century world by bringing “ecological changes” that will forever change the world(4).
The term serves as an alternate for other phrases referring to the era of modern man, such as “anthropocene” or “capitolocene,” which Haraway disagrees with. Rather than the ominous implications of the anthropocene and capitalocene, the Chthulucene is precarious, but not yet doomed because it consists of “ongoing multispecies stories and practices.” The concept of the Chthulucene implies a one-ness shared by all beings, human and non-human. By rejecting the anthropocene and capitolocene, Haraway also rejects the notion that dictates define the age we are currently living. “Anthro-“ and “capital-“ place a certain amount of blame on single entities, namely humans and capitalism, but in the rest of her work, Haraway suggests that recognizing unity and networks is ultimately more important than assigning fault. While the other terms seem to identify a cause for the modern age, Haraway’s Chtulucene emphasizes a method of thinking about and living with the present. In Haraway’s view, the Chtulucene is a vital part of reimagining our existence in the world. She goes on to discuss “tentacular thinking” and “making kin” as other aspects that are key to creating a sustainable world. In order to continue existing,