The Dumbest Generation, How the Digital Age Stupefies Young Americans and Jeopardizes Our Future is a critical analysis on the effects of the prolific spread of information and communication technology on the youth of today. A statement such as : those under the age of thirty are “the dumbest generation” is quite a bold assertion.although I am definitely under thirty and easily fall into “the dumbest generation” category I do agree with such statement to an extent. The four documents geared towards the negative effects of technology are: The Dumbest Generation, Is Google Making Us Stupid? , Are We Getting Our Share of the Best? and Shelved. The four documents with a positive view on today's technology are: The Dumbest Generation? Don’t Be …show more content…
Dumb , Living and Learning with New Media: Summary of Findings from the Digital Youth Project, Your Brain on Video Games and The New Literacy. After analyzing all eight documents addressing both sides I can neither support nor refute the statement that those under the age of thirty are the dumbest generation.
Technology has vastly improved throughout the years, information that once took weeks to find is now easily accessible at our fingertips at any given moment. Due to such changes some think such technological advancements are deterring this generation's overall knowledge. In The Dumbest Generation by Mark Bauerlein, he discusses the disastrous result from the arrival of instant gratification go-go-go digital age on america's youth. The result being, a collective loss context and history. In Is Google Making Us Stupid? Nicholas Cara goes into detail about here growing thoughts on technology and its advancements having changed the way she thinks. She states, “Immersing myself in a book or a lengthy article used to be easy...my concentration often starts to drift after two or three pages..The deep reading that used to come naturally has become a struggle.” Cara compared the difference between how easily she read books back then and how hard it is for her to read a book now. Cara connects such issue with the advancement of technology, “Research that once required days in the stacks or periodical rooms of libraries can now be done in minutes.” With today's technology we are so accustomed to instant gratitude so when we attempt to do an activity which …show more content…
requires time and effort it seems like a difficult task that some don't want to endure. In the article Are We Getting Our Share of the Best? By R. Smith Simpson, he discusses his observation on today's generations knowledge on topics such as U.S history or the geography of the U.S. He goes into detail about the sort of questions he asked and the answers he received for example, “Asked if he knew anything about the Progressive movement, one candidate replied, “Oh, yes, that was LaFollette’s movement.” To the question, “Where did LaFollette come from?” he could only reply vaguely, “Somewhere out West.” Simpson makes a valid point that today's generation isn't too knowledgeable on our history nor the geography and this statement is agreeable because I myself have noticed that many students don't have that type of knowledge these days. The cartoon, Shelved by Roz Chast features a young man, sitting in a chair, a laptop opened on his knees, headphone buds in his ears. Roz Chast’s comment seems obvious: the books have been shelved, forgotten, abandoned. Their grand era is no more. Chast’s cartoon is implying that the thrill (of touching a book) is in the past, and it’s this loss the books are lamenting: oh, the tactility of textured paper given up for the plastic screen of an iPad. Technology seems to be taking over the youths lives and things such as books seem to be overlooked. Despite the negative views on technology of some others see the advancements in technology as a stepping stone for the future.
Views of such technological advances also brought to light that technology has improved thinking capacity and mental dexterity. In The Dumbest Generation? Don’t Be Dumb by Sharon Begley touches on IQ tests explaining what they measure which is thinking capacity not knowledge. Begley expresses that IQ tests have risen and questions whether technology is positive or negative for cognition. Begley's observances on IQ tests and the growing test results do correlate with growing fluid intelligence among today's generation that could be linked to technology. Mizuko Ito et al in Living and Learning with New Media: Summary of Findings from the Digital Youth Project goes into youth creating and navigating new forms of expression and rules for social behavior. In the process, young people acquire various forms of technical and media literacy by exploring new interests with new forms of media. Mizuko goes into detail about new media allowing a degree of freedom and autonomy for youth that is less apparent in a classroom setting. Also mentions that the youths efforts are self directed and the outcome comes through exploration, in contrast to classroom learning that is oriented toward set goals. As an avid internet user I absolutely agree with Mizukos views on new media and the creativity it allows for today's generation. Many people choose to be apart of social
media in their own way for example, bloggers, youtubers and beauty influencers, There is endless ways to express oneself through social media and many are drawn to such hobbies because they get to make what they want of it. In the article Your Brain On Video Games by Steven Johnson in which he sheds light on the positive side of video games. He addresses the popular misconception that video games are solely about improving hand-eye coordination and firing virtual weapons. Johnson introduces his view on video games and states “The most popular games are not simply difficult in the sense of challenging manual dexterity; they challenge mental dexterity as well.” Johnsons claim on the pros of video games is solid and is supportable because unlike popular belief video games are much more the violence and gore and can require many different skills. In the magazine, The New Literacy by Clive Thompson, Thompson tells the readers to be ready to hear experts, especially the teachers, complain about how the modern society kids cannot write as the school year begins. Thompson blames technology for this. Thompson also refers to Andrea Lunsford’s, professor of writing and rhetoric at Stanford University, findings. Lunsford conducted research study to evaluate the effectiveness of college students’ prose. She utilized data collected from essays, class assignments, emails, blog posts, journal entries, and chat sessions of 14,672 students between 2001 and 2006. Lunsford concluded that the world is currently in the middle of a literacy revolution. Technology in my opinion definitely has not caused students to not be able to write, if a student cannot write why would the blame go straight to technology? So many use technology now and can confidently say they are skilled writers. I agree with Lunsfords conclusions because I myself use google at times to expand my vocabulary when writing and it only helps me improve my writing skills. In ending, technology has without a doubt advanced emmsley and the newest generation is experiencing it first hand. Some see it in a negative light s and say today's technology has only slowed this generation down and compare past generations and lifestyles to nows. Others on the other hand view today's technological advancements positively and back it up with things such as rising test grades and research. Although both sides present valid points its difficult to stand with one side only. Technology has its advantages and disadvantages but in the end it depends on the individual and how they choose to use it whether if it's in a beneficial way or detrimental way.
Nicholas Carr, a periodic writer on issues such as technology and culture, wrote the article called “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” (743) In this, he discusses the way that not only Google, but also the advancement in technology, especially computers and computer engines is slowly altering our brain, along with the way we take in information. The process started back in the 1970’s and 1980’s when technology got a jump in society. For example “television was our medium of choice” says Carr (747). From then on it has been a slow decline for the way we process information. Throughout this essay Carr backs up the reasons why he feels the way by using different types of figurative language, deductive reasoning, plus the use of logical fallacies that can strengthen or may even weaken his argument.
“The Dumbest Generation” is a title no group of people want to behold. Nonetheless, people under age thirty have been given this belittling title. To those who go off questions about obsolete general knowledge rather than the ability to take in and evaluate knowledge, this title may seem quite fitting. However, Millennials aren’t quite as dull as they’ve been perceived to be. The ability of Millennials to absorb information, rather than know general facts, and their use of contemporary technology as reading and writing resources has proven that they are quite an innovative and bright generation.
In “Cultural Illiteracy,” a preface to the novel The Dumbest Generation, Mark Bauerlein critically evaluates how technological distractions affect the younger generation. Bauerlein states that “digital diversions” are cutting the younger generation off from culturally enhancing mediums and is in turn making the younger generation less intelligent. Though Bauerlein is correct about the increase of peer pressure due to technology, he is mistaken about how technology is making the younger generation unintelligent.
Nicholas Carr’s “Is Google Making Us Stupid” and Sherry Turkle’s “How Computers Change the Way We Think” both discuss the influence of technology to their own understanding and perspective. The first work by Nicholas Carr is about the impact technology has on his mind. He is skeptical about the effect it could cause in the long term of it. He gives credible facts and studies done to prove his point. While Sherry Turkle’s work gives a broad idea of the impact of technology has caused through the years. She talks about the advances in technology and how it is changing how people communicate, learn and think. In both works “Is Google Making Us Stupid” and “How Computers Change the Way We Think” the authors present
If you find yourself skimming through pages, looking for bullet points and your mind wandering off, you might be suffering the effects of Google making you stupid. These are the things that Nicholas Carr talks about in his essay “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” was originally published in July 2008 in Atlantic magazine. Carr argues that the use of technology on the daily basis has made us unable to go into deeper thought about things. Along with the opinion of Scientists and other “literary types” he asserts that the web has indeed made us change the way we think. Power Browsing is the new way people are reading, this is where you look from title to title, surfing the web from link to link. Overall, he advocates that eventually our brains will
Advancements in technology have strived to make life easier for so many people. In most cases, the advancements have achieved its goal, but in the article “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” Nicholas Carr questions if the improvements in society have unintentionally hindered our thought process overall. Carr begins the article by providing personal instances when his concentration seemed to diminish due to the internet. He explains how he now loses interest when reading lengthy portions, his mind just can’t seem to remain connected to his readings. He then proceeds to talk about how today’s life is surrounded by the internet, and explains the pros and cons of it. The negative side of it is that his mind now wonders off when seeking information from
Humans have been creating tools that allow us to be do things that would be otherwise impossible since the beginning of our existence. The ability to use and develop new tools is what sets us apart from all other animals. Yet it seems that ever since these tools started being created there were also people that feared these new tools and claimed that they are bad for the human race. The present fear of new technology is illustrated in the essay “Is Google Making us Stupid?” by Nicholas Carr. In this essay Carr argues that the internet and other new technologies are changing the way we think in a negative way. Carr claims that new technology is making our generation stupid. In opposition the article “Smarter Than You Think” by Clive Thompson
With the rise of technology and the staggering availability of information, the digital age has come about in full force, and will only grow from here. Any individual with an internet connection has a vast amount of knowledge at his fingertips. As long as one is online, he is mere clicks away from Wikipedia or Google, which allows him to find what he needs to know. Despite this, Nicholas Carr questions whether Google has a positive impact on the way people take in information. In his article “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” Carr explores the internet’s impact on the way people read. He argues that the availability of so much information has diminished the ability to concentrate on reading, referencing stories of literary types who no longer have the capacity to sit down and read a book, as well as his own personal experiences with this issue. The internet presents tons of data at once, and it is Carr’s assumption that our brains will slowly become wired to better receive this information.
In Is Google Making Us Stupid, Nicholas Carr disputes that due to new digital tools, peoples’ ability to retain and acquire information has been negatively altered. Even though, we have information at our fingertips, we often don’t take the time to soak in all the information. Carr mentions Bruce Friedman, a blogger, who finds it extremely difficult to read a “longish article on the web” and to try to focus on the importance of the text holistically (Carr 316). This is an issue that many can relate even Carr knows that, “ the deep reading that used to come naturally has become a struggle (Carr 314). Additionally, media theorist Mcluhan describes the net as “chipping away [mental] capacity for concentration and contemplation” (Carr 315). In essences, Carr states that we are having less of an attention span and consequently, less patience for longer articles (Carr 314). Therefore, this affects media outlets such as magazines, newspapers, and other articles, because they must conform and shorten their texts to fit the status quo that people safely enjoy (Carr 321). In addition, the net forces people to be efficient, and so, causes people to “weaken [their] capacity for deep reading” (Carr 317). People are becoming more driven on how quick he or she has to do something rather than think why this text is important. As a consequence, Carr believes that we are starting to lose our ability to be critical readers and
“Is Google Making Us Stupid?” by Nicholas Carr and “How Computers Change the Way We Think” by Sherry Turkle are two articles that explore how technology influences our daily lives. “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” discusses the effects of the internet in our society, how it is robbing us of our deep thoughts, memories and our ability to read books. Carr also talks about how the internet has become our primary source of getting information. The writer also discusses about how he’s having difficulty focusing on reading. “How Computers Change the Way We Think” is talking about how people don’t use their brains full potential capacity to solve problems. Instead, we depend on technology to do that for us.
Have you ever wondered if our generation is the dumbest? Well, there’s some evidence to prove so. Generation ‘Y’ is considered to be the dumbest generation of all. This is based on numerous experiments, polls, surveys, etc. While everything else in this world is rising, intellect of each generation is falling. With the ignorance of facts, by choice, and lack of some education, Generation ‘Y’ is considered to be the dumbest generation.
If only my local library could hold the vast quantity of information that my hand held smart phone does. Carr insinuates that Google (and the internet) is making us stupid. I say they are making us lazy. In “Is Google Making Us Stupid” by Nicholas Carr informatively states that with the advancement of technology, Google search engine, and the internet we are become more distracted—with all the different forms of flash media, the amount of hyper-links after hyper-link after hyper-links, and clickable adds-- in turn we are doing less critical reading by way of the internet as opposed to a printed book. Being able to glance over several articles in hour’s verses days looking through books; being able to jump from link to link in order to get the information you need, never looking at the same page twice has decrease out deep thinking and reading skills. Now days, all forms of reading, e.g. newspaper, magazine, etc. are small amount of reading to get the main idea of what’s going on and if you would like more information you will have to go to another page to do so. In the end, C...
Even the society is becoming more and more in favor with advancements in technology and mass media. The rate that we get information is too much for us, but it is what keeps us intelligent. Personally, I am quick to open the Internet when I have a question about something or want to research a topic. The accessibility of the vast information available at the finger tips makes learning easier and more tangible. The issue that we are facing with technologies is due to our lack of self-control. Even the society is becoming more and more in favor with advancements in technology and mass
Generation Z is determined to change the future and is at an advantage over all previous generations to do so. This group is those born between the years 1995 and 2012, whom are currently ages 4 to 21. Statistics show Gen Z is extremely mature for their age with the lowest levels of drug use, alcohol consumption, smoking, and teenage pregnancy in decades, as stated by JWTIntelligence. This demonstrates that they are future orientated. Generation Z is unified, diverse, realistic, and technologically advanced, making them the generation with the power to impact the world.
The generation that I was born into can sometimes be easily misunderstood by those in earlier generations. The individuals in my generation get thrown many different labels such as those that Rosie Evans (n.d.) listed in her article, “Millennials, Generation Y, the Lost Generation, boomerang kids, the Peter Pan generation…” and more. This can impact us as a whole because some will begin to live by the labels, in some cases that can be negative but in others it may be beneficial. Many people in this generation believe that they can’t reach their full potential due to labels and prejudgment, while there are others believe nothing can hold them back. When we get labeled all together that is also what may drive some to try to stand out from the