Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Moby dick literary technique
Symbolism of the whale moby dick
Literature and the human condition
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Moby dick literary technique
The Duality of Man in Moby Dick
In Herman Melville’s novel, Moby Dick, every character is a symbol of the
good and evil sides of humanity. However, none of the characters represent
pure evil or pure goodness. Even Melville’s description of Ahab, whom he
repeatedly refers to monomaniacal, which suggests he is driven insane by one
goal, is given a chance to be seen as a frail, sympathetic character.
Ishmael represents the character with the most good out of the crew, though
his survival is unclear because he never had a direct adversary to overcome.
He has his moments when evil thoughts pervade his mind. The unclearness of
morals in the universe is prevalent throughout Herman Melville’s Moby Dick.
The outcome of choosing good or evil can not be seen as favorable or just.
Ahab, is the main human character of the novel. He is also the captain
of the vessel and is seen as the representative of evil. Then there is
Ishmael the young seaman making his first real voyage. He is pure in
comparison with Ahab because he lacks the need for revenge. Ultimately, it
is the dichotomy between the respective fortunes of Ishmael and Ahab that the
reader is left with. Herein lies a greater moral ambiguity than is
previously suggested. Although Ishmael is the sole survivor of the Pequod,
it is notable that in his own way, Ahab fulfills his desire for revenge by
ensuring the destruction of the White Whale alongside his own death.
Despite the seeming superiority of Ishmael’s destiny, Melville does not
explicitly indicate so. On the contrary, he subtly suggests that Ishmael’s
survival is lonely and empty upon being rescued: "It was the devious-cruising
Rachel, that in her retracing se...
... middle of paper ...
... reader a moral
hierarchy, and in doing so, remains ambiguous. The reader is then left with
the possibility of assigning symbolic relations between the characters. If
looked at from the grandest scale, it is possible to see the whale and the
sea as a morally ambivalent cosmos. If so, then the fault of Ahab and the
crew of the Pequod is their futile attempt to master a force of nature far
beyond their comprehension, and are destroyed for it. The image of Ishmael
floating helplessly upon the ocean, without even the wreckage of the Pequod
then becomes a strikingly lonely image of humanity adrift in a universe
neither good nor evil. The uncertainty of each characters final outcome
leads one to wonder whether good or evil has triumphed in this novel.
Works Cited:
Melville, Herman. Moby-Dick. Ed. Charles Child Walcutt. New York: Bantam, 1967.
Analysis: Melville's Great American Novel draws on both Biblical and Shakespearean myths. Captain Ahab is "a grand, ungodly, god-like man … above the common" whose pursuit of the great white whale is a fable about obsession and over-reaching. Just as Macbeth and Lear subvert the natural order of things, Ahab takes on Nature in his
"He tasks me; he heaps me; I see in him outrageous strength, with an inscrutable malice sinewing it. (280)" At first glance, a modern reader might mistake this quote for that of a social justice warrior complaining about the patriarchy and not a line proclaimed by Captain Ahab in Moby Dick. However, as one deconstructs Herman Melville's classic, he will observe that this gaffe is actually justified. Despite originating over a hundred years before the equality movements, Captain Ahab symbolizes one of their ambassadors because of his hatred for the system that wronged him; his driving will to enact revenge; and being disdained upon for his actions. To commence elaboration, the first characteristic exemplified by Ahab that establishes his symbolism is his loathing for the body that ruined him.
The lines that define good and evil are not written in black and white; these lines tend to blur allowing good and evil to intermingle with each another in a single human being.
Ahab’s quest for the whale is not an honorable pursuit of God, but man’s vain endeavor in his hatred of God to destroy the all-powerful deity. The symbol of the whale as God makes sense as it is white a color that is associated not only with purity and honor but the deity of God himself. Because this whale caused him personal damage in an earlier encounter, Ahab views the whale as an “inscrutable thing”, making it his life’s quest to get revenge (335). Not only does he associate the whale with this damaging experience, he connects the deity of God with “the white whale that razeed me; made a poor pegging lubber for me forever and a day!” (334). His quest for vengeance distorts his ability to have a relationship of God as who can endure the pursuit of such a being if the pursuit is driven by enmity? Ahab’s pursuit of Moby Dick, “Be [he] agent, or be [he] principal” is driven strictly by hostility and a lack of righteousness (335). Only those who have experienced the sweetness of reconciling grace can look at the tremendous
Steinbeck also presents another view of Curley’s wife. In his omniscient description [form: overall writing technique] of her, he writes that she ‘bridles a little’ at Lennie’s attention; she is metaphorically shying away from the fixated attention. Steinbeck also unobtrusively mentions that she is a ‘girl’; both these observations suggest her innocence and vulnerability.
In Herman Melville’s world-renowned tale, Moby Dick, the crew aboard the Pequod sail the seas in order to hunt, capture, and kill a mysteriously terrifying sperm whale named “Moby Dick”. For centuries, humans have used technological advances to protect their elite status in the animal kingdom, at the unfortunate expense of species ignorantly perceived as being too weak or unintelligent to fight back. Moby Dick illuminates one of the most historically cruel instances of selfishly-oriented, industrial engineering: whaling and hunting animals for sport. Humans and animals are the only living creatures with a similar state of consciousness and this cognitive interconnectedness binds the two species together in ways that can only be speculated and
Therefore, many people do similar activities as Chris tried to do. For example, in the bus where Chris died, “More than 100 of these pilgrims come annually, according to one local’s estimate” (Moss). With an umpteen amount of people following hiking the same Stampede Trail as McCandless, the only option left to follow him in is his spirit. Furthermore, every year countless people visit mountains all over the world and go hiking. Typically, some hikers die on these treks, yet participants remain open to this high-risk, high-reward adventure. People love the thrill of looking at a vista after a challenging climb. In a sense, what people like in Chris McCandless is the lure of the wild, to escape normalcy and go
“Ishmael’s discourse is often calculated to undercut the myth of white supremacy, asserting that society’s survival may ultimately depend on the acceptance of Ishmael’s democratic vision (seeing equality in diversity) and a rejection of Ahab’s tyrannical one (seeing only white).”
Curley’s wife is a difficult character to understand. Steinbeck hasn’t named her; this could be for a number of reasons. He may have wanted her to be seen as lonely therefore not naming her shows no one gets close enough to her to call her by her first name. He may have done it to show the other characters only see her as the wife of Curley rather than an individual. He may also have done it to show the male attitudes towards females. Curley’s wife also helps to provoke mixed emotions in the reader. We often feel sorry for her such as when she talks of her loneliness, but on other occasions the reader can find her cold hearted. This is seen when she is racist towards the other characters.
Although Ahab’s insanity appears to be what shuts him off from humanity, in reality it is what makes him human. Ahab desperately wants to be freed from his obsession – to not have to rely upon it to feel. It is because Ahab is no longer in control of his obsession that the reader eventually discovers that besides what the book originally seems to insinuate, Ahab is only human.
In addition Ahab in "Moby Dick" is considered not only as an evil and sinful person but is selfish and greedy. The reason why he is sinful, evil, selfish, greedy, mainly is because he didn’t care what the other people on the ship wanted or that what he was going to do would or could bring dangers, and what he was doing was a waste of time, because instead of getting vengeance on "Moby Dick". He could be hunting whales for food and selling what’s left of them and make money.
When looking at the cycle of life one sees that creatures usually hunt others that are opposited from themselves. The relationship between cat and mouse is the apotheosis ot this idea, a classic case of one preying on the other where the two are looked upon as complete opposites. In Herman Melville's "Moby Dick" the whalers are hunting down the white whale. So according to my statement above this should make the crew members of the "Pequod" the absolute negation of Moby Dick. At first glance, maybe it seems this way, but in actuality the two are very similar. From the moment the crew members choose to embark on their voyage they become more like creatures of the sea than land dwellers. As the story evolves, the reader begins to uncover more and more similarities between the creatures on board the vessel, and those of the ocean. On top of this, as the characters progress and become more similar to their fellow ocean dwellers, they begin to actually show character traits similar to that of Moby Dick himself.
The amount of involvement in one’s profession is another important theme in the two stories. Ahab takes his job as a whaler quite seriously. He is obsessed by the desire to destroy the whale that shattered his life. In contrast, the narrat...
At first glance, Herman Melville’s novel Moby Dick, appears to be the story of a man, his captain, and the whale that they quest to destroy. But a closer look reveals the author’s intense look at several metaphysical ideologies. He explores some of the most ponderous quandaries of his time, among these being the existence of evil, knowledge of the self and the existential, and the possibility of a determined fate. All of these were questions which philosophers had dealt with and written about, but Melville took it to a new level: not only writing about these things, but also doing so in a lovely poetic language backed by a tale packed with intrigue. He explores the general existence of evil in his antagonist, the white whale, and through the general malice that nature presents to humans throughout the novel. The narrator, Ishmael, gains a lot of knowledge about himself through his experiences on the whaling voyage, where he also is able to learn much about the phenomenon of existence itself. Also, through Captain Ahab, he sees more about the existence of man and the things that exist within man’s heart. Especially through Ahab and his ongoing quest for the white whale, and also in general conversation amongst the whalers, the issue of fate and whether one’s destiny is predetermined are addressed in great detail, with much thought and insight interpolated from the author’s own viewpoints on the subject.
Performing a pagan ritual before the groggy crew, Captain Ahab swears the men to join him in hunting down the white whale Moby Dick and killing him to satisfy Ahab's desire for revenge. Starbuck is horrified, while the crazy ranting of their captain wildly inspires members of the ship. This is an evil voyage. I fear the wrath of God. Service to mankind that pleases God is not revenge. "