The Drive-Reduction Theory

550 Words2 Pages

Unit 8A:

The drive-reduction theory may not be useful as an explanation for his impulsive behavior. Jumping up and down after the good news is not a biological drive inside of Marcus. Instead Marcus is merely excited. Therefore the drive-reduction theory is not totally relevant in this case as an explanation.

The incentive theory, may be applicable as an explanation for his behavior. If Marcus had received an incentive, a positive or negative stimulus that motivates our behavior, in the past for his grades or being outgoing, then he will be more likely to continue being an extravert. He would also jump up and down and get excited at getting a good grade on his test because of an incentive in the past.

Maslow’s hierarchy of needs is a great explanation for Marcus’ behavior in class. His idea to jump on …show more content…

This response could lead to him doing the behavior over and over to receive their laughter. Through operant conditioning Marcus learned that if he acts in an extraverted manner he will be accepted by his peers.

There is a slight chance that Marcus could be predisposed to extraversion, therefore genetic predisposition may be an explanation for his behavior.

Unit 8B:

Sue automatically encoded the memory because the experience was unique and engaging. Her mind automatically encoded the funny memory into her brain.

Sue’s memory of this experience is a conscious memory made up of factual information. Therefore, it is an explicit memory.

Sue may have had trouble remembering this memory due to the fact that she was depressed. This memory was encoded when she was happy, so through mood-congruent memories, Sue will have difficulty recalling this happy memory if she is not happy at the moment.

Due to the two-factor theory, Sue’s happier mood came from her physiological experience, smiling, and the cognitive label she applied to the physiological changes, like

Open Document