In this way, only those products or brands symbolized as similar to the self concept will maintain or enhance the self in matching product or brand images to self images (Dolich, 1969) thus implying that the consumer will tend to purchase the product whose image is closest to his own. Landon and Laird (1974) propose that dissonance on the other hand might pressure the consumer into believing that the product does in fact expresses his true self and a more subtle possibility being that consumers may come to change their self-images after certain purchases. Accordingly, the self image congruency model assumes a process of cognitive matching between a products’ image and the consumer’s self image. Indeed, modified consumption changes both the “I” as well as the “me” in hope of becoming closer to the “I” in choosing products more reflective of the true “I” (Mittal, 2006). A clear interpretation of this can be understood that individuals have a desire to fill the gap between their current state of perceived self image towards an idealised and enhanced self image. Such a disparity between the two can be filled through the act of consumption in an attempt to move from the former to the latter. Different incidences Mittal (2006) explains can allow the consumer to choose products that index the desired “me”, which they chisel to shape the “I”- most notably the consumption embedded view of the “I”. As with most individuals who are not fully satisfied with their self will always seek to enhance or alter their self as it is something that continuously changes between people and over time (Belk, 1998). Similarly, it conforms to the notion of postmodernism which deems that the self is, in some way, a coherent construction and suggests that th...
... middle of paper ...
...ical values for products develop enhanced product acceptance or rejection by the similarity of these values to the self (Dolich, 1969). Consumers will be less inclined to purchase from brands referenced to the ideal self image if their ideal-self images are inconsistent with the product image. Therefore, careful consideration should be given to consumers’ psychology when psychological involvement is used as a promotional tool for brand differentiation (Dolich, 1969). Mittal (2006) criticises such an image based measurement in pertaining its restraintness whose content is in need of fuller accounting. As many consumption activities are related to self-definition, it is not surprising to learn that consumers demonstrate consistency between their image and the products they buy, yet not exclusively, on the basis that they are self relevant when constructing the self.
People are often deceived by some famous brands, which they will buy as useless commodities to feel they are distinctive. People require brands to experience the feeling of being special. People spend their money to have something from famous brands, like a bag from Coach or Louis Vuitton which they think they need, yet all that is just people’s wants. Steve McKevitt claims that people give more thought on features or brands when they need to buy a product, “It might even be the case that you do need a phone to carry out your work and a car to get around in, but what brand it is and, to a large extent, what features it has are really just want” (McKevitt, 145), which that means people care about brands more than their needs. Having shoes from Louis Vuitton or shoes that cost $30 it is designed for the same use.
Capitalist objectification of the self, the subjectification of Althusser, begins with the Old Navy ad. Here, kindly old mother-figures or warm and attractive young women assure us in their slightly lobotomized ways that shopping at the Old Navy is "fun," that their cargo pants are all the rage, that their carpenter jeans are the perfect thing. The representation of the self as Platonic form in the person of the model on the television screen recreates the self as consumer object:
In the New York Times article, The Oppressive Gospel of ‘Minimalism’, millennial Kyle Chayka expresses his disdain towards minimalism’s trend and increasing incorporation in everyday life, deeming it to be, “expensive and exclusively branded by and for the elite.” In other words, Chayka discerns minimalism to only appeal towards millennials who have the financial freedom to rely on instant purchases rather than stocking for emergencies. Nonetheless, his stance does not recognize that minimalism does not aim to throw away everything in possession, but rather concentrate value upon few items to gain clarity in its worth. Hence, minimalism techniques in marketing and product values do not aim to exclude those who can’t afford it, but instead aim for consumers to consider its value in a single product. Value does not stem from price alone, but rarity, material, artistic context, design, and underlying connotations factor into its worth. Therefore, these non-explicit components in minimalist items are not considered by critics such as Kyle Chayka, and are deemed unnecessarily high without any contemplation. Another criticism against minimalism’s use in marketing is that it doesn’t give enough information for audience’s to be on the same page with reality. The point of minimalism is that the lack of information gives audiences full control over their own interpretations, and administering it in advertisements strengthens consumers’ power. Rather than giving deliberate features of an item, a minimalist ad would highlight its strengths, but allow audiences to extract its importance, whether it be personal or objective. Additionally, minimalism is employed to extract a degree of materialism in product advertising, since readers have to extrapolate potential experiences from items rather than worry about the costs. According to sociologist Joel
Foster creates a logos appeal by providing strong reasoning and evidence to support her argument. Through her example about how Facebook advertisers are aware of their user’s insecurities about their body, thereby, increasing publication of advertisements in hope that users will undergo negative self-reflection and realize they do not conform to the mainstream ideal of thinness. Her examples also include research that she references from other scholarly authors. “For example it is no secret that exposing women to images of thin celebrities causes them to feel dissatisfied with their own appearances (Grade, Ward, & Hyde, 2008).” Foster’s second strong claim to her logos appeal by writing, that in spite of user’s insecurities, Facebook advertisers hope user’s will feel more dissatisfied with their body image and turn to the ads for a solut...
Ever since popular brands came out, many people changed their lifestyle. In “The Cult You’re In”, Kalle Lasn discussed how brands have changed people's identity and it’s not good for them. People are what they buy, and brands logo has become their identity. In “The Man behind Abercrombie and Fitch” Benoit Denizet-Lewis is kind of exposing Mike Jeffries, the CEO of Abercrombie and Fitch, discussing how his company is affecting consumers. Denizet-Lewis’s review of the business practice of A&F support Lasn’s assertions about the “cult”-like nature of consumer culture in the U.S. because they both talk about how advertisers influence consumers, people change themselves to fit in by losing their identity and consumers don’t think for themselves.
[5] Nandan, S. (2005) An exploration of the brand identity-brand image linkage: A communications perspective, Brand Management. (pp 264 – 278)
The consumption of products and services is important for the way in which it functions to mark social differences and act as a communicator, but it also gives satisfaction. Style, status and group identification are aspects of identity value. People choose to display commodities or engage in different spheres of consumption in an attempt to express their identity in a certain sort of image. A clear example to demonstrate a way in which someone may communicate their identity is the football supporter. When referring to picture 1, by simply wearing a Manchester United shirt, a...
Retailers are constantly breathing behind consumer’s necks to persuade the individual that their brand is the best. In a result, these retailers are hoping the shopper will give in, buy the product(s), tell another friend about the brand, and push them to buy/show off the name. It is an ongoing and viscous cycle for individuals to keep their self-image updated with society. Moreover, the pressure to be accepted by others is influenced by buying a name brand item to avoid a negative response from peers. Jim Guest, author of Consumers and Consumerism in America Today, explains “In the current economic climate, consumers are constantly pressured to buy expensive, often unnecessary products and serves, and to live beyond their means” (148). A major reason for the overconsumption of brands are due to the popularity of brand ambassadors. As consumerism continues to grow, companies are becoming smarter and smarter; they will hire celebrities to endorse their brands and create an image of superiority for others to follow. To name a few examples, LeBron James, a professional basketball player, is endorsed by Nike; Carl’s Jr., a famous fast food chain, displays ads with beautiful models in bikinis eating their burgers; Kim Kardashian, a famous celebrity and fashion mogul, has endorsed Skechers sneakers. These are a few big named celebrities that
Shoppers shape mark observations and desires in view of outside correspondence with the association and others; in any case, in light of individual involvement with a marked item a buyer will develop a brand personality. It is advantageous to take note of, that attributes that might be appealing to a buyer in one market fragment may not be alluring to shoppers in other market portions. Shoppers utilize brands to appraise, survey, or assess distinctive items in a market – this is frequently alluded to as item separation. Along these lines, an appealing brand gives a heuristic to quality and esteem and decreases
Today, vast product selections require marketers to identify and understand their target market, and to ensure their message is specifically directed to, and clearly received by their target market. In Dove’s example, early marketing strategies targeted all woman who needed an alternative to harsh soaps. However, as soaps progressively became less harsh, the Dove brand required more strategic positioning in the minds of their consumer. When speaking to Dove’s re-positioning efforts, Flagg (2013), points out that while similar products associate brand image with slender, stereotypical models, Dove’s “2004 campaign for Real Beauty” (p.1) specifically targeted ordinary women, celebrating women’s diverse body shapes, and the importance of every woman feeling good about herself (p.1). With ever increasing product offerings entering the marketplace, marketers must clearly communicate to their target group why their product is right for them, as compared to other
Ethical egoism can be a well-debated topic about the true intention of an individual when he or she makes an ethical decision. Max Stirner brings up a very intriguing perspective in writing, The Ego and its Own, regarding ethical egoism. After reading his writing some questions are posed. For example, are human beings at the bottom? Following Wiggins and Putnam, can we rise above our egoism and truly be altruistic? And finally, if we are something, do we have the capacity to rise to a level that we can criticize and transcend our nature? These questions try to establish whether or not we are simple humans, bound to our intrinsic nature, or far more intellectually advanced than we allow ourselves to be.
In this paper we will explore how advertisements cultivate a woman’s need for consumerism as a part of their own self image. George Gerbner, the founder of cultivation theory, argued that television has the ability to impact the way that people percieve certain message and influence their everyday life. In this study, we will conduct a content analysis of quantitative and qualitative measures that will study fashion advertisements. Each advertisement will be critiqued by a set of questions to help find any pattern or correlation between attributes that may have an impact on female consumers. A sample population will be drawn at random on three different occasions containing women from the ages of 18-30. In the first group each individual that is selected will be given a survey of questions. This set of questions will focus on the shaping of body image with the use of makeup, accessories, and clothing, and help identify trends between fashion and life style. The second sample group will participate in a focus group discussion that will be directed towards how women see themselves with regards to their own body image. The third group of women will complete a written survey before and after being exposed to television advertisements. This will test to see if advertisements entice woman to purchase products or change their personal portrayal.
Brand attitudes: it’s the consumer evaluation of brand .Keller (1993)another important impact distinctive Between 11 dimensions: product attributes, intangibles, customer benefits, price, use/ application, user, product class, celebrity, country of origin, competitors, and life style. Aaker’s and Keller’s show many topologies like price, user imagery, usage imagery, and product attributes I will identify some weakness , but it should be considered that how it’s possible to trap the content of consumer knowledge. Aaker (1991). "Sum of the total brand impression is called brand image (Herzog 1973), anything that is associated with brand (Newman 1957), and "the perception of the product" (Runyon and Stewart
Commodity fetishism refers to the Marxian concept of the decontextualization and mystification of the social relations of production in the process of commodification. In consumer culture this concept often highlights the characteristics of advertising brand discourse which tend to overlook the production of commodities especially in large scale productions. They ignore the social and environmental cost and instead focus on creating additional meanings and symbolic agency around brands. In this paper, I would like to analyze commodity fetishism by taking into account the Marxists theory of commodity fetishism and the notion that commodity culture is intricately related with the idea that we construct our identities through our consumption
The Self-Concept is a complicated process of gaining self-awareness. It consists of mental images an individual has of oneself: physical appearance, health, accomplishments, skills, social talents, roles, intellectual traits, and emotional states and more –all make up our self-concept.