Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Comparison of Netflix and Blockbuster
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Comparison of Netflix and Blockbuster
The Decline of Blockbuster Entertainment
How could a company that was built into a multibillion dollar empire fail less than two decades later? Blockbuster Entertainment started with one store in Dallas in 1985 and rose up to become the dominant force in the movie rental industry. They were acquired by Viacom, at the pinnacle of their success, for $8.4 billion in 1994 and were in bankruptcy by 2010. A series of blunders by upper management, highlighted by a lack of strategic vision, led to Blockbuster’s rapid decline and ultimate failure.
In 2000 Blockbuster had the opportunity to purchase rival, Netflix but failed to envision Netflix’s potential. The founder of Netflix, Reed Hastings, met with then CEO of Blockbuster, John Antioco, to discuss selling a forty-nine percent stake in Netflix to Blockbuster. The deal would have cost Blockbuster a mere $50 million in comparison to their $6 billion yearly in revenue. At the time technological and dot com stocks had taken a serious tumble and Blockbuster was skeptical of Netflix’s future. Instead of acquiring Netflix, Blockbuster signed a twenty year deal with Enron to deliver pay per view movies. Enron filed for bankruptcy one year later. In 2004 Blockbuster launched their own DVD by mail service but it was too late to catch Netflix. Netflix has continued to grow and in 2010 surpassed Blockbuster in market share.
In 2004 Viacom decided to sell their controlling interest in Blockbuster. Unable to locate any interest they decided to spin off Blockbuster through a stock swap. Blockbuster would have to pay Viacom shareholders $5 per share resulting in nearly $1 billion in debt. At the time Blockbuster management thought they could quickly pay down the debt with their $500 million a year...
... middle of paper ...
...ut it took on average three months. During the initial three month period stores were very unprofitable. Blockbuster simply could not afford to roll it out nationwide. Red Box has grown to control a forty percent share of the rental industry.
When Blockbuster finally realized they needed to modernize operations and change with an ever developing industry they were unable to because of their enormous debt and negative cash flow. Senior management failed to see how advances in technology would lead to changes in how consumers rent and purchase movies. During Blockbuster’s prime they squandered their earnings on bonuses and lavish meetings. Their arrogance led them to feel invincible and that no one could ever catch them. Blockbuster management, in the end, failed to see the need to evolve to meet their customer’s needs while other companies rushed to fill this void.
With the rise in digital downloads such as on iTunes, HMV lost 36million in August 2012 due to streaming online and downloading music online, music and DVD sales were down by 20% in the run up to Christmas 2012. (Wood, Z. Milmo, D. 2011) HMV’s market share in January 2013 had fallen to 17% a low figure compared to Amazons which was 23% at this time. (Lawson, A 2013). With a falling market share a company begins to lose sight of the market and drastic changed need to be made to meet customer demands and to keep ahead of rivals.
The entertainment industry holds the immense potential for growth and development. The industry is constantly evolving and Walt Disney emerge as a global leader and recognized as the world’s second largest media conglomerate in the terms of revenue after Comcast. The Walt Disney Company is a multinational entertainment conglomerate headquartered at California, United States. The company integrated its products into five target segments are as follows: (1) Media Networks (2) Parks and Resorts (3) Walt Disney Studios (4) Disney Consumer Products (5) Disney Interactive. The company has strong diversified product portfolios and generate high returns and revenues from all the target segments but the media networks contributes
In the early 1970s, Steinway encountered competition from low-cost producers based on in Japan. While Steinway¡¯s fine image and reputation was unquestioned, the business wasn¡¯t particularly profitable. In addition to it, due to some stockholders who were unwilling to invest but mainly interested in income, Steinway¡¯s financial conditions became worse, so the family company came to an end, was sold to CBS. CBS recognized that the business didn¡¯t fit its corporate strategy. In 1985, CBS sold the company to John and Robert Birmingham, Boston-based investors. Under Birmingham, Steinway returned to its former stature, stressing quality and focusing on the high-end market. But ten years later, Steinway is also sold two investors, Kyle Kirkland and Dana Messina because of financial problems.
For this paper, I had to do a lot of research to find information on how the internet sites for pay-per-view movies worked, and how they were going to be marketed. Since the prevalence of this kind of internet site is very recent, I received the majority of my information from periodicals. For this, I did a lot of research on my University Library Site looking for newspaper and magazine articles from all around the world. I came up with a few very good articles that gave me a plethora of knowledge that I attempted to incorporate into my story. Since I choose to focus on the site Movielink.com, which is backed by the previously mentioned entertainment companies, I choose to make each of the CEO’s of the companies a character in my paper. It is important to note that none of these CEO’s ever met, nor do they necessarily reflect the personality traits that I created.
According to the history of movie rental, home video, and gaming, Netflix was the first company to introduce the movie rental service back in April of 1998 and offered more than 900 titles (Lardener, 2010). Ever since, the industry has become larger with new technology such as online streaming and next day delivery. Also, more competitors are now available and provide the same services, such as Amazon, Wal-Mart, blockbuster, and Redbox kiosks.
Movie theaters have been around for a long time. As time has evolved movie demand was increasing and wanted a more convenient route. “Blockbuster was founded by David Cook, who had previously owned a business that provided computer software services to the oil and gas industry in Texas. Cook saw the potential in the video-rental business and after opening the first Blockbuster in 1985 (A&E).” and was the only company to provide a walk in store for movie rentals. This business was booming and most of the rental sales came from the first three weeks after a movie was released to VHS or DVD. This niche in the market is rapidly failing today.
[1] Information was mainly taken from the Harvard Business Case Study “The Walt Disney Company: The Entertainment King”
billion dollars dept and had to decide to sell some of its business to carry
The idea inspired Reed Hastings and Marc Randolph, and then they founded Netflix in Scotts Valley, California in 1997 (Netflix, 2014). The company comes into play by developing a subscription-based streaming platform for movies and television shows. Unlike the traditional movie rental businesses such as Blockbuster and Redbox, Netflix’s innovation offers service via Internet, and it does not have any physical stores but instead delivers DVDs through postal mail in the U.S. Since then, Netflix has become the world’s leading internet television network with constant growth of customers to over 48 millions members in more than 40 countries in the North America, Europe, and the Latin America (Netflix, 2014). In this analysis, the main focus is examining the current market environment for Netflix. It identifies the type of market structure that Netflix is currently competing. The analysis also expands on the competitions, product differentiation, pricing strategy, and measuring the level of easy entry-and-exit.
Best Buy opened it’s doors in 1966 by the name of “Sound of Music”, it wasn’t until 1986 that it proceeded to change it’s name to what it is recognized today. Best Buy is the top retailer in the nation’s (USA) consumer electronic retail industry. What makes Best Buy unique is that they sell electronics and appliances used for home and office, they provide customer service and business support through their Geek Squad Technical Support System, and they offer major tech brands and their products such as Apple and Windows in house. According to The New York Times, the computer and electronics industry consists of companies engaged in the retailing of computers and peripherals, consumer electronics and other technology products. The industry includes household appliances, audio and video equipment, consumer software, digital cameras, cell phones and components and other electronic goods.” Like many top leaders, Best Buy has not been immune to issues in regards to maintaining its status in the market. Some of the issues the company faces include, loss in stock value, loosing the retention of it’s customers, and being out-competed by e-commerce companies in the same industry such as, Amazon. All of this can be classified as a marketing problem Best Buy faces.
Reed Hastings, co-founder of Netflix headquartered in Los Gatos, CA, began the company’s operations in 1997 after receiving an enormous late charge from a movie rental he returned long overdue. However, Hastings had the desire to be different than traditional movie outlets; whereas, customers had to drive to the location, pay a certain amount for each movie they rented, and were given a deadline in which to return the movie. Instead of using a method established by other video markets “to attract customers to a retail location, Netflix offered home delivery of DVDs through the mail” which eventually led to a booming business towards streaming forms of entertainment (Shih, Kaufman, & Spinola, 2009, p. 3). Today, Netflix exists along with several competitors; however, offers the most streaming content available for viewing, and continues to grow its subscriber base both domestically and globally. Although, direct and indirect competitors, acquisition costs, and several barriers present a financial threat for Netflix, the company has managed to grow with the acclamation of partnerships, expand to international territories, and vastly increase its price in shares of stock.
A blockbuster is defined as a movie with a high production value that is large in scope and scale, and is very entertaining. The roots of Avatar stemmed from James Cameron writing an 80 page book for Avatar, in which he drew inspiration for the movie from all the science fiction books that he had ever written. After his first blockbuster “Titanic” he decided to film Avatar which he would make by using computer generated actors. One big quality that would make this film be considered as a blockbuster would be the expense that this project would cost to make. Cameron was under the impression that the technology at the time had not caught up with the story in the vision that he wanted to tell during the late 1990s. In 2006 he revealed that it was finally time to create Avatar because the technological advances were ready to create the characters that he wanted to start. He noticed that from other films such as Gollum from Lord of the Rings and ...
Another case that exemplifies a lack of Leavitt’s Diamond’s fundamental principles is Kmart’s acquisition of Borders. In this case, Kmart wished to integrate Borders with their existing bookstore chain Waldenbrooks. Although the goal of both companies was similar, Kmart made the assumption that the people would be akin as well. This proved to be a false assumption, which led to the their end several years later—another example of a failed system, due to a lack of attention to Leavitt’s Diamond. In direct contrast to these cases, the few successful mergers happen only after properly viewing the impact on all areas of the organization. Some of the strongest examples of this are Disney’s various acquisitions of Marvel, Fox, and Lucasfilm. Throughout these sequential acquisitions, Disney’s stock has grown from $16.340, to $111.620. In addition, their net worth has increased by 32.67 billion dollars. In the case of all of these acquisitions, the various entertainment companies’ shared similar goals, yet had various differences in other areas of tasks, as well as differences in people and structure. With proper changes made to each area; however, Disney ensured successful mergers in every instance. One important aspect to note is that Disney’s initial plan for the acquisitions included the change to structure. Because decisions had been made prior to the transition, the company lost no recourses trying to
In 1983 Atari had a chance to revive itself and a little of its fortune but it messed up its opportunity. Nintendo the creator of the video game Donkey Kong decided it was going to bring its Famicon to the United States and join the gaming market but it didn’t want to do it alone so they started to negotiate and talk for about three days and Nintendo decided to go in the market alone and in the end it was a good choice for Nintendo becoming one of the biggest gaming companies in the industry asfor Atari they don’t really do much anymore and that was the last big chance they had.
Tickets for movies were rising and the economy was going right a long with it. American’s no longer had the luxury of spending. John Campea, author of “Economics Of the Movie Theater-Where The Money Goes And Why it Cost Us So Much”, states that “With the cost of today’s movies getting higher and higher, the studios leverage their position with the theaters to squeeze more and more…”. As the cost of movies we’re asking for more, they started asking the customers for more. However after Hulu and Netflix came out in 2007 the entire game was changed. Everyone was now accessible to TV shows and movies at a cheaper and more convenient