Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The influence of social movement
The influence of social movement
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
At the time of conflict, war and peace the minorities have been more effective than others in any society. They usually faced and face the challenges by majority and those who are in power. Hannah Arendt, the author of The Decline of the Nation- State and the End of the Rights of Man, explains that the notion of minorities has been created after peace treaties and constantly growing of refugee’s movement as the consequences of revolutions. After that, the minorities has no state and has no government to represent and protect them. And they forced to live under the law which imposed by majorities or live in state of and lawlessness (Arendt). However, the article is focused on western countries that the situation can be different in eastern countries
A Nation Under Our Feet is about the black political struggles in the rural south from the final decades of slavery to the Great Migration. The purpose of this book is to show how African Americans from their earliest days in the South attempted to assert control over their own lives, shape and protect their communities, and gain political power.
The formation of various rights and freedoms movements by the minorities was a form of nationalism and it was aimed at the fight for independence by the minorities. Through the nationalism movements, the minorities got an opportunity to fight for their self-determination and equality with their white majority population. The political movements took the form of racial, ethnic and religious shapes. There were nationalism movements for the African-Americans, Latinos and
For many people, the 1917 revolution heralded a new age, much as the French revolution had. But instead of bringing on an age of secular republics, and liberalism, it brought on an age of oppressive states based on the Soviet Union’s model of government. To the untrained 20th century eye, the 1917 revolution’s model of state organization was something truly new, bizarre and intriguing. Yet, a brief synopsis of Russian history would quickly reveal that there were more similarities between the Soviet and Tsarist governments than Stalin or any other Soviet official would have cared to admit; the revolution was not as revolutionary as it seemed. This paper will use Hannah Arendt’s definition of revolution to demonstrate that the 1917 Bolshevik
Unlike individual refusals, political refusals like civil disobedience always involve claims of legitimacy. In her essay "Civil Disobedience," Hannah Arendt examines the legitimacy of civil disobedience, particularly that which occurs in the United States. Arendt says that "Voluntary associations are not parties; they are ad-hoc organizations that pursue short-term goals and disappear when the goal has been reached" (95). The voluntary organizations that she mentions are groups involved in civil disobedience. The short-term goals that the organizations have add legitimacy to their refusal, as they form only for a specific purpose and dissolve after the purpose has been reached. In his "Letter from Birmingham
History, overall, is a sweeping synthesis of both the darker the more triumphant moments of the human race. Despite this, there will always be some nations that will stand for the better principles of humanity, even if its constituents and administrators sometimes fall short. In his piece, “The America I Love”, Holocaust survivor Elie Wiesel touches on various points of history to illustrate why in both moments of triumph and shame, America will remain a beacon of liberty for him.
Mohammad Akhbari, H. Z., winter 2009. a geopolitical analysis of ethnicity in Iran, with an empasis on challanges and opportunities. Tehran : Archive of SID.
The decisions are based on a combination of settings and situations in the development of action alternatives in life experiences, and consideration of those action alternatives in the final moral action. I will compare and contrast, Wikström and Treiber (2009) SAT by in examining the behavioristic and deterministic aspects of the in the clash between two cultures of Europe with the western cultural views based on Judeo-Christian norms and laws, as compared to the cultural norms of the rising Fundamentalism of the indigenous and migrant Muslim population of Europe. The various aspects of rising extremism are the results of poor integration of the migrants into European culture, as well as combining it with the poor collective efficacy in the existing and growing activity fields (i.e., enclaves, no-go zones, Sharia complaint areas) which have been created by the host nation through their efforts to accommodate and appease the integration-resistant migrant population. The ongoing efforts by host nations to hide rising crime rates and threats of terrorism from the citizenry, thereby minimizing the anti-immigration and nationalist movements, only seems to provoke more violence and radicalization of the Islamists.
Campbell’s work National Deconstruction: Violence, Identity and Justice in Bosnia is effective in bringing to the readers’ attention a different way of thinking about violence and identity in Bosnia. However, a few flaws in his methodology have been noted. Furthermore, while the possibility of a multi-ethnic solution is an interesting one, and deserves further academic discourse, the reality may not match up to his thinking, for example other issues in the former Yugoslavia, including the Kosovan separatist movement, could be seen to cast doubt on the effectiveness of large multi-ethnic states with pockets of different ethnic majorities.
Why do nations fail? This is a topic of popular debate with many economists and a question many scholars have struggled to find an answer to. Global poverty is an issue that economists Daron Acemoglu and James A. Robinson investigate and provide an alternative insight for in their book: ‘Why Nations Fail’. Acemoglu and Robinson investigate inequalities that exist across countries and why nations are an epitome of success and others, failure. They come up with an alternative explanation for why standards of living differ across countries, and why a gap exists between the rich and poor. The book introduces an example of two cities that are separated by a border: Nogales, Arizona and Nogales, Sonora. On the American side of the border, the income of the average household is $30,000, the population is relatively healthy, and the citizens live prosperously (Acemoglu & Robinson, 2012). On the opposite side of the border in Mexico, majority of the population do not own a high school degree, poor health conditions exist, poor infrastructure and unfortunately, high infant mortality rates (Acemoglu & Robinson 2012). How can situations on opposite borders be so different? The basis for Acemoglu and Robison’ s thesis for this phenomenon is that of institutions. They propose that that there is a strong correlation between economic and political institutions. That is, inclusive political institutions support inclusive economic institutions, and extractive political institutions support extractive economic institutions (Acemoglu & Robinson, 2012). Democratic institutions generally allow opportunities for the majority, leading to positive economic growth. Political institutions that look after a narrow elite is reinforced with stag...
1. In a society that decides things on the basis of majority rule, is there a danger that the majority might ignore the legitimate concerns of minorities? What steps can be taken to protect minority rights?
While a democracy is based on majority rule, minority rights must not be disregarded. One of the principles of democracy includes a minority receiving equal opportunity to become a majority, and thereby providing competition for the majority of the time. Competition has potential to force a majority to become a minority, needing the protection of its rights to provide opportunity for it to become a majority again. Furthermore, the smallest minority is the individual. By protecting minority rights from majority oppression, the individual is protected and vice versa. For example, individual rights of expression and speech ...
The article " Do Ahmadis deserve to live in Pakistan?” was published in the Friday News on September 6, 2012. In this article, Hamdani highlights the problems Ahmadis face as a minority group in the Muslim majority country like Pakistan by giving plenty of examples. He also explains how with the passage of time the problems for Ahmadis have increased. He also tries to explain the importance of the Ahmadi sect in Pakistan by hinting that they had played a vital role in its creation. Hamdani also highlights that Ahmadis are still working for the prosperity of the country but the people and Government of Pakistan do not give them any significant importance and ignore their praiseworthy work b...
Multiculturalism has been a subject of concern in the United Kingdom in past few years since it has become a very cosmopolitan country. There are lots of different opinions about this from different people like politicians, journalists, professors specialized in the subject and even artists. And these opinions are expressed through different media like speeches, articles and movies. In this essay it will be analyzed how multiculturalism applies in the movie East is East, what are the problems that arise in this movie and how they can be solved, going through a deep analysis of causes of the conflicts raised applying opinions from critics like Pnina Werbner and Sara Ahmed. In addition, the view, problems and solution about multiculturalism from the Prime Minister David Cameron will be explained and the counter critics. Multiculturalism is an intricate subject, but I believe is should be about having one identity that everyone shares and about tackling racism.
As a result of this essay, we can say that multiculturalism is a serious problem for European nation-states in todays.Western states as Germany and Frannce failed to control the idea of multiculturalism.Multiculturalism was wealth or necessity for early years of Ottoman Empire and Roman Empire but it is clear that contemporary nation-states could not implement this idea completely as being in Turkey.Concessions given to minorities have increased and Turkey has faced a serious problem in todays.Unfortunately,meaning of multiculturalism has been misunderstood from both sides.Nation states should think deeply about the crisis of multiculturalism and should take radical decisions if they want to continue their existance.It should be noted that because of wrong management of multiculturalism, Ottoman Empire was blown up by its own bomb.
Indeed, by being in contact with people of different races every day since very young, a person finally learns how to work and live with his friends of different cultures, to respect their values and to be proud of his own faith at the same time. The community of practice is also one of the measures to maintain harmony among the various races in the world. Practice good society can secure a plural society in the world. Public security can be maintained with the involvement of all races and every activity in a community. For example, the practice of annual community sports tradition with the involvement of each of the different groups accompanied by the adoption of attitudes that do an admirable tradition. If the traditional practices of a society with the involvement of all races are not practiced, certainly harmonious society cannot be maintained. In short, the traditional practices of the involvement of a pluralistic society can maintain peace and prosperity of the community living in the community of all