The Deception Of Individuality

632 Words2 Pages

According to Arthur Schlesinger, Jr’s quote, it is asserted that we as human beings have ideas, vision, and audacity. These concepts that are created by an individual are infrequently composed due to society. Yet, for an individual to have an intellectual and moral life, it begins with an individual confronting his own mind and conscience in a room by himself. In order for an individual to do so, it is established through self-reliance and having one’s own individuality. Withal, society’s aspirations are for an individual to conform to the standards that are created. This leads to an individual to have self-reliance which is the dependence and reliance on their own effort and abilities. It is declared that an individual should “believe that …show more content…

It is asserted that “imitation is suicide” and “envy is ignorance” which depicts and demonstrates that emulating another person’s soul is killing one’s own individuality (Emerson 20). Yet, that an individual appreciates and cherishes another human being’s aspect rather than their own originality. With admiring another individual, it influences one to anticipate from growing and flourishing into their true self. The reason being is that an individual is mesmerized and blinded by another person’s distinctiveness. However, every human being is disparate and diverse which is “endowed by their Creator” (Cohen 167). This portrays that God has created every individual in the society to be unique and distinctive in their own way. It is affirmed that “God will not have his work” be “manifest by cowards” which exhibits that the “cowards” are the ones who follow the decisions and actions of others (Emerson 20). Withal, an individual should not be “ashamed” of their ideas that one has created for themselves because every human being has a “divine idea” that represents” or “express” themselves (Emerson 20). Nevertheless, it is proclaimed that “any law that degrades human personality” illustrates “unjust” (King 265). The meaning of this is that disgracing and demeaning an individual for their identity is inequitable. Therefore one’s identity should not be overburdened and altered by society’s standards or vision of people and one should stay true to their

Open Document