Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Any opinion on capital punishment
Capital punishment solutions
Any opinion on capital punishment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Death Penalty is a Just and Proper Punishment
The idea of putting another human to death is hard to completely fathom. The physical
mechanics involved in the act of execution are easy to grasp, but the emotions involved
in carrying out a death sentence on another person, regardless of how much they deserve
it, is beyond my own understanding. I know it must be painful, dehumanizing, and
sickening. However, this act is sometimes necessary and it is our responsibility as
a society to see that it is done.
Opponents of capital punishment have basically four arguments.
The first is that there is a possibility of error. However, the chance
that there might be an error is separate from the issue of whether the
death penalty can be justified or not. If an error does occur, and an
innocent person is executed, then the problem lies in the court system,
not in the death penalty. Furthermore, most activities in our world, in
which humans are involved, possess a possibility of injury or death.
Construction, sports, driving, and air travel all offer the possibility of
accidental death even though the highest levels of precautions are taken.
These activities continue to take place, and continue to occasionally take
human lives, because we have all decided, as a society, that the
advantages outweigh the unintended loss. We have also decided that the
advantages of having dangerous murderers removed from our society outweigh
the losses of the offender.
The second argument against capital punishment is that it is
unfair in its administration. Statistics show that the poor and
minorities are more likely to receive the death penalty. Once again, this
is a separate issue.
It can't be disputed sadly, the rich are more likely to get off with a
lesser sentence, and this bias is wrong. However, this is yet another
problem of our current court system. The racial and economic bias is not
a valid argument against the death penalty. It is an argument against the
courts and their unfair system of sentencing.
The third argument is actually a rebuttal to a claim made by some
supporters of the death penalty. The claim is that the threat of capital
punishment reduces violent crimes. Opponents of the death penalty do not
agree and have a valid argument when they say, "The claims that capital
punishment reduces violent crime is inconclusive and certainly not
proven."
I am not refuting this accusation. In fact, statistics show that the
death penalty neither lowers or raises the incidence of violent crimes.
what they feel morally justified to do. The moral aspects of killing a person would be the
Murder should include the elements of purposely, knowingly, or recklessly under circumstances showing extreme indifference to the value of human life (Brody & Acker, 2010).
whether or not it makes a difference if a person’s life is ended by an act of active killing,
We kill people to show them killing is wrong. The death penalty does not punish people for killing but for murdering someone. Murder is "the unlawful, malicious, or permitted killing of one human being by another" (Carmical 1). The slogan should be ?We execute people to show people that murder is wrong.? The death penalty is racist, it punishes the poor, it causes the innocent to die, it is not a deterrent against violent crime, and it is cruel and unusual punishment. The death penalty is wrong and it should be abolished.
Was he/she abused or tormented in a severe way? Or was the victim raped? I would
Do you know the different types of punishments that comes with the death penalty? Do you know what effects these punishments can have upon the humans body? From seeing the outcome of what it takes to be put on death row, it may be looked down upon as human cruelty. Society proclaims itself to be loving and caring for each other, but seeing from the outcome of capital punishment, nothing seems to be loving or caring about killing another human. When it comes to death penalty there three common deaths which are Lethal Injection, Gas, and Fire Squad. One thing that always came to mind when thinking about these deaths is what take place when these method are being done.
Life is the most wonderful gift that God gives us. He also gives us the
The difference between a medical procedure and an execution is explained by J. Jeffrey Andrews, the secretary of the American Bar Association. Andrews said, "Patients should never confuse the death chamber with the operating room, lethal doses of execution drugs with anesthetic drugs, or the executioner with the anesthesiologist…” (Pappas, 2014, Web). There will never be a single handly perfect way to carry out executions. However, even with the lack of perfection a humane answer can be found and carried out. L. Kay Gillespie, author of “Inside the Death Chamber”, a book exploring the idea of executions, said, “Perhaps the future of capital punishment, is there is one, will develop methods of executions based on computers, space technology, or laser technologies.” A closer look at the topic by lawmakers and judges who hold the power to change the injustice would provide even the lowest, violent criminals with the last thing they have left, their inalienable rights. He goes on to say, “Perhaps even our perspectives and definitions of what is humane will change to accommodate our technologies. In a society where our realities are based on definitions, there are unlimited possibilities on the reality of capital punishment” (Gillespie, 2013, p.66-69). However, it is not just lawmakers responsibility to bring this topic to a solution. Our
It must be remembered that criminals are real people too, which have. life and with it, the feeling of pain, fear and the loss of their loved ones and all the other emotions that the rest of us feel. There is no such thing as a humane way of putting someone to death. Every type of execution causes the prisoner physical suffering, some. methods perhaps cause less than others, but be in no doubt that being.
Legal professor Ernest van den Haag believes that the death penalty is the good as in a punishment for terrible crimes that are committed. On the other hand professor of philosophy Hugo Adam Bedau thinks that the death penalty is not appropriate, do to it takes the lives of people that can not afford a good defense. I would have to agree with Ernest van den Haag. When a person commits a serious crime like murder, the only fitting penalty is death. "Maldistribution inheres no more in capital punishment than in any other punishment." (Haag 274) Fear of the death penalty can be a good deterrent. Many people also try to abolish the death penalty by talking about the suffering a convicted murderer has to go through, but what about what the victim had to go through. Further, if we get rid of the death penalty it will show that we are not willing to impose our punishments on people who brake our laws.
I believe that under certain circumstances that capital punishment should be allowed because if someone is going to commit mass murder they should pay with the ultimate human right which is of their life. This topic has been widely thought of in the world with a few philosophers really encompassing my views. Those are the views of Ernest Van Den Haag and Bruce Fein. Philosophers who oppose our views are such like Justice William Brennan and Hugo Adam Bedau. I will prove my point using the ideas of deterrence and morality of the issue of capital punishment. If the government would show that if you kill someone there will be a consequence for their actions and that the consequence would be equal to what they have done. The population will see that it isn’t worth taking another humans life. If we were to kill people that are committing these mass killings of innocent people there would not be as many criminals around. Therefore the streets would be a place people wouldn’t be afraid of anymore.
First-degree murder, treason, capital drug trafficking and, kidnapping resulting in death. These are some of the crimes punshiable by the death penalty. Instead of putting the criminal in jail for a lifetime, you kill him. For what? Statisitcs show that Homicide rates are actually higher in states and regions that have the death penalty than in those that don’t. The death penalty should be illegal because you don’t gain anything from it. The death penalty costs a lot of money than keeping him/her in jail for a lifetime. The death penalty is morally wrong, nobody should have that much power to choose life or death on a human being.
Ethics and morality are the founding reasons for both supporting and opposing the death penalty, leading to the highly contentious nature of the debate. When heinous crimes are com...
The heaviest punishment towards convicts is death penalty in law. It means to atone for an offense is dead. Of course, it will not execute for every criminal. Death penalty is only for felons. For example, a people who murdered someone would not get the death penalty. The death penalty is for murders who related to the smuggling of aliens or committed during a drug-related drive-by shooting. Sometimes, however, the felons also can avoid the death because some countries (or actually states) don’t allow death penalty. Then, what decision would the convict get? It is a life sentence, which means the prisoner should be in a prison until he or she dies. However, it is not good idea to keep felons. Death penalty should be allowed and get more active because life sentence is costly, unsafe, and insincere for a victim and the family.
The Death Penalty Is Righteous Do you believe that people should get the death penalty? People should get the death penalty because Americans are just wasting our money on criminals who aren't learning their lesson. People should get the death penalty because they have far too many privileges in prison that people actually want to go to. People should get the death penalty because if there is a bigger consequence for their actions, there wouldn't be as many people in jail.