Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Justify the death penalty
ARGUMENT against death penalty
Arguments for and against the death penalty
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Justify the death penalty
First-degree murder, treason, capital drug trafficking and, kidnapping resulting in death. These are some of the crimes punshiable by the death penalty. Instead of putting the criminal in jail for a lifetime, you kill him. For what? Statisitcs show that Homicide rates are actually higher in states and regions that have the death penalty than in those that don’t. The death penalty should be illegal because you don’t gain anything from it. The death penalty costs a lot of money than keeping him/her in jail for a lifetime. The death penalty is morally wrong, nobody should have that much power to choose life or death on a human being.
In some cases the legal system gets it wrong. In the USA 130 people have been released from death row, in the past 30 years. You know why, they were proven innocent by DNA evidence. Even though these people were found guilty “beyond a reasonable doubt.”Sadly, in some cases where the “criminal” is innocent, there is no DNA evidence available. So, as long as the death penalty is already in place, they are pretty much GUARANTEED to execute an innocent person.
Violent/Homicide crime rates are actually HIGHER in states that allow the death penalty. I honesty think that criminals take it as a challenge. 10 of the 12 states without the death penalty have homicide rates below the national average. FBI data show that while half the states with the death penalty have homicide rates above the national average. A state-by-state comparison found that in the last 20 years, the murder rate in states with the death penalty were 48 percent to 101 percent higher than the states without the death penalty.
Death is too good for the worst criminals. Let them wake up every day of their lives in prison and think about t...
... middle of paper ...
...The alternative doesn’t put anyone to death and gives someone a new chance at changing themselves and bettering themselves for a life behind bars.
In conclusion, the death penalty is wrong and should be abolished. There are alternatives to the death penalty, they cost less money and they save lives. Capital punishment (Death Penalty) does not teach any lesson and is pointless. Murder rates are higher in states that allow the death penalty than states that don’t. It’s a coward move and is 2 wrongs hat don’t make a right. Most of the time innocent people are dying for the price of 2.3 million dollars, what kind of country is this? Killing innocent citizens for making a mistake, when life in jail without parole is cheaper. The “criminals” should think about what they have done behind bars, make them pay the price for their actions instead of American tax payers.
Even the worst crimes should not be paid with the simple escape of death. The death penalty costs far more than a life sentence, though it seems like the opposite would be true. With the multiple appeals and trials and relocations, it’s millions down the drain. According to deathpenalty.org it costs taxpayers $90,000 more a year to maintain a death row prisoner versus maintaining a prisoner in general population. Add in the cost of execution depending on the method, $24 million for each electrocution in Florida, at least $86 per lethal injection, around $25,000 for a fire squad execution,(deathpenaltyinfo.org) and it’s even more for a quick end.
Are there really innocent people on death row? At least twenty-three people have been executed who did not commit the crime they were accused of (JAICLC). And that 's only those that we know. And here lies a natural danger of capital punishment...when we execute an innocent person; the real killer is still on the streets, ready to victimize someone else. But when an innocent person is arrested, he is often the motivating reason behind further investigation, and if he is executed, than the case remains closed forever or until someone else gets killed by the real perpetrator. Often the only people who know what really happened are the accused and the dead. It then comes down to the skill of the examination and the defense lawyers as to whether there will be a conviction for accidental murder or for manslaughter. At times, a detective could naturally make an error and possibly lead to the conclusion that the innocent committed the crime. Whether it be multiple years in prison or even capital punishment there is no possible way of revenging or forgiving the judge and jury for this miscarriage of justice. There must always be the concern that the state can order the death penalty justly. In America, a prisoner can be on death row for many years awaiting the outcome of numerous appeals (Short). In simpler terms killing another being with or without evidence is not fair, decent, or ethically
There are over sixty offenses in the United States of America that can be punishable by receiving the death penalty (What is..., 1). However, many individuals believe that the death penalty is an inadequate source of punishment for any crime no matter how severe it is. The fact remains, however, that the death penalty is one of the most ideal forms of punishment. There are other individuals who agree with the idea that capital punishment is the best form of punishment. In fact, some of these individuals believe that this should be the only form of punishment.
If a person is so uncompassionate about human life and does not care what happens, is sick enough to harm someone else, they should also pay the price of their lives. Violent criminals will always exist in society and the death penalty will only decrease these numbers gradually, however every violent criminal that does not exist in society makes society a safer place. Placing these criminals in prison with a life sentence does not deter them from committing another crime. This just enables them to plan, plot and proceed with the next murder, escape or worse. The majority of people that commit heinous crimes that call for the death penalty cannot be reformed....
Many prisoners in the past have been known to be killed before they were proven innocent. Many documented cases where DNA testing showed that innocent people were put to death by the government. This sometimes happens because there are defendants who are given minimal legal attention by often minor qualified individuals. The government has made many mistakes which are being wrong about convicting someone for something they didn’t do, and killing this person for the wrong reason. Putting the wrong person to death is the biggest mistake that can be made and the government cannot afford to make this mistake.
While it may seem that keeping someone in prison for life would cost more than putting someone on the death penalty, howev...
The death penalty is racist, it punishes the poor, it causes the innocent to die, it is not a deterrent against violent crime, and it is cruel and unusual punishment. More than half of the countries in the world have already abolished the death penalty and the U.S should abolish it too. It is wrong and cruel. Some states in the U.S still hold the death penalty because they think it will keep U.S citizens safe, but we can just keep the murders in a separate patrolled jail. Abolish it and we may save the lives of the people that may have been executed innocent.
Life imprisonment can be worse of a punishment than death for many convicted murderers. Instead of an easy out, these people will have to live out their lives without many of the freedoms and rights you and I ta...
Not only that, but some states that don’t have the death penalty have lower crime rates than those that do. In my opinion, the death penalty should be abolished due to many purposeful reasons including: financial costs, the process slowing down the court system, life in prison being far more effective, the possibility of convicting and killing an innocent person, and violating the “cruel and unusual” punishment clause. According to balancepolitics.org, it costs two to five times more than keeping that same criminal in prison for life. The reasons for such high financial costs are the endless appeals, additional procedures, legal processes, paying people, lawyer costs, and even the execution itself based on which type. Not only do the financial costs affect the state, but it affects the taxpayers.
By placing convicts on death row, America has found a just way of preventing repeat offenders while decreasing the rate of homicide as justice deteriorates crime rates. For instance, “There is overwhelming proof that living murderers harm and murder again, in prison and after improper release. No one disputed that living murderers are infinitely more likely to harm and murder again than are those that are executed murderers” (Williams). Accordingly, with the chance of facing the death penalty and going on death row, criminals are discouraged from committing the crime they are proceeding in, apprehensive of being placed on death row. Revealing likewise, this also shows that punishing criminals by benefiting them with shelter, food, and basic accommodations does not discourage them from committing more crimes after an improper release occurs. Continuing on, “For every inmate in America who was executed on Death Row, seven innocent lives were spared because other criminals were deterred from committing murder”(Williams)....
“Since the reinstatement of the death penalty in the United States in 1976, 138 innocent men and women have been released from the death row, including some who came within minutes of execution. In Missouri, Texas and Virginia investigations have been opened to determine if those states executed innocent men. To execute an innocent person is morally reprehensible; this risk we cannot
Statistics show that in areas where the death penalty is enforced there are fewer serious crimes being committed. According to Fein (2008), “As of two thousand and ten there are over seventeen thousand under sentence to be put to death...
Some even claim that it is cruel and unusual punishment. I would like to shed light on the issue and inform everyone as to why we should keep the death penalty and possibly even use it more than we do now. First of all, it is hard for anyone to argue that we already use the death penalty too much because facts say that we hardly use it at all. Since 1967, there has been one execution for every 1,600 murders. There have been approximately 560,000 murders and 358 executions between 1967 and 1996(UCR and BJS).
middle of paper ... ... An alternative, such as a jail sentence, would mean that the family and friends of the offender would still have contact with their loved ones. and there would be no trauma caused by death. This is yet another side effects of capital punishment.
"Common sense, lately bolstered by statistics, tells us that the death penalty will deter murder... People fear nothing more than death. Therefore, nothing will deter a criminal more than the fear of death... life in prison is less feared. Murderers clearly prefer it to execution -- otherwise, they would not try to be sentenced to life in prison instead of death... Therefore, a life sent...