Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Reducing human impact on climate change
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Reducing human impact on climate change
As cultural anthropologist Margaret Mead once said “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; Indeed it’s the only thing that ever has.” In an excerpt from an essay published in the New York Times Magazine, American public intellectual Michael Pollan reveals his goal to convince the ordinary of citizens America that they are capable of saving the world from climate change and to answer the unappeasable question of “Why bother?”. This inquiry stems from the belief that one person is not capable of making a difference in relation to the larger spectrum of Americans who continue to emit a large amount of C02, increasing the effects of climate change, and destroying the environment. Through the exploration of behavior change, and other personal alternatives aimed to reduce America 's carbon footprint, Pollan aspires to have …show more content…
Pollan recalls that the “really dark moment [of the lecture] came during the closing credits , we [they] were asked to...change [their] light bulbs.” He remarks that this minute gesture seemed punitive in comparison to the “magnitude of the problem Gore had described” stating that it is “drop-in-the-bucket” issues like this that cause people to ask the question “why bother?” Kentucky farmer and writer Wendell Berry also influenced Pollan’s thoughts on climate change when he wrote an analysis describing global warming as a “crisis of character” meaning that the everyday acts of humans- such as using computers and other forms of technology- have “real-world consequences” that aid in the destruction of the environment. The analyses of these two environmental specialists are what taught Pollan the importance of beginning the fight against climate change at
The two essays by Michael Pollan and Curtis white talk about climate change in regards to the relationship between the environment and human beings. Although the two essays share the same topic, they take the subject and engage the readers in totally different points of views. Pollan’s essay talks about global and ecological responsibility being a personal virtue while Curtis discusses the socio-economic or political issues underlying sustainability (Pollan; White). These two essays are very different in terms of voice; however these pieces of writing are both important for people all over the world to read. Climate change and environmental disasters are a real issue. Just this year, there have been more storms, cyclones, earthquakes and typhoons all over the world. One cannot look at the state of many developing counties where the majority of the population is exposed and vulnerable to the effects of climate change. This issue on developing a viable solution for the problem of anthropogenic gases and global warming is long from being found. Not only this, many people do not want to hear about this issue since they do not think it is real. Unless people have tangible proof that their cars, thermostats and aerosol cans are contributing to climate change, they are not going to give up their lifestyles. By synthesizing the two essays, one can see that there is a need for change and that it is not an issue which should be dealt with in terms of ecological factors or even personal virtue. The social, economic and political factors affecting this problem and the move towards real sustainability should also be a topic that will raise awareness.
Our world faces many issues consisting of political issues, economic crisis, poverty, world wars, and environmental issues for example. Global warming is one of the many environment issues that many pay little attention to. Mr. Al Gore in his documentary directed by David Guggenheim brings to light this climate crisis and how affective it can be to the earth and how we must address it as soon as possible as it may lead to the destruction of our world’s environment. Al Gore does a great job in identifying global warming, what are the cause and effects, and how we should address the issue that can potentially save our planet earth. Overall, Al Gore offers a credible argument and one of the many reasons Al Gore’s argument is credible is because
In the article “Global Warming’s Terrifying New Math”, written by Bill Mckibben, he firstly opens up by saying that back in 2012, according to the statistics, we surpassed the global record high for climate temperature in our nation, destroying other previous records. Despite the research and the displaying of data, nobody is doing anything to adress the following issue. Mckibben outlines three distinctive numbers that outline the following issue., 2 degrees celsius, 565 gigations, and 2795 gigtons, which he uses to validitate and support his argument. Firstly, the ongoing problem of climate change in society is fundamentally a matter of individual moral responsibility that is inspired by the insight individuals are intentionally harming the environment. Secondly there is yet to be an effective collective state response to the issue of global warming, despite approaching two full decades of ongoing and reoccuring negotiations and the very near universal participation by states in the UNFCCC. Thirdly, because this issue has been put on hold for longer than it was innitially expected, greenhouse gases are being emitted into our atmosphere, polluting our environment. The South-North issue and an ongoing debate comes into effect as all the greenhouse gases that are created and used in the Northern hemisphere are being emmited into the southern hemisphere. Hence, my thesis is; despite the fact that global warming and climate change has been an ongoing problem globally for years, humanity has failed to resolve thiis issue as it quickly begins to escalate.
Michael Pollan, on his essay “Why Bother” published in the New York Times in 2008 recounts his concern on the lately increased of global warming. He begins contrasting Gore’s writing about changing a light bulb as a perfect way to make a change in the environment. This upset him, because he thinks that such things are not enough that
It is the responsibility of the developed world to change. They have the resources and technology to significantly curb emissions and dampen the effects of climate change. As the world’s second largest emitter of Co2, and as the world’s largest economy, the US must become a leader in the battle against climate change. However, historical incidents of environmental degradation indicate that will power is simply not enough. Unless environmental problems are seen and felt, the US population has been slow and reluctant to act. Unfortunately this lack of will power is still present. As a citizen of the United States, I see no hope for change without the help and intervention of government. Without economic incentive, individuals and firms will not change. I believe that the US government must intervene and implement emission reduction policies, and work toward limiting emissions to the earth’s natural sink function.
“Climate change is real. It is human-caused. We’re seeing the effects now.” (Romm, 2014). Climate change is an important issue the public is aware of, but do not see how their individual responses can have an impact on such a large global issue. Changing people’s temporal habits and attitudes about climate change will be a challenge. As the impacts of anthropogenic climate change are felt more often in our daily lives, people around the world will begin to adjust their temporal habits for greater sustainability of the natural environment we solely depend on for our survival.
Michael Pollan expresses in his essay that he believes that our actions are the leading factor in climate change. While the actions of mankind is a contributing factor to the rate of which it is occurring, I don’t believe that the fault falls totally on us. The earth too is responsible to a degree for climate change due to its natural processes to warm the planet and change its climate along with the ability of adapting to what’s going on around it. With that said, however, I do still believe that we should take some responsibility for our actions and reduce the amount of carbon dioxide that we emit. There are so many ways to do so, but not every option is for every person. Find the solution that works best for you. Pollan’s essay presents a good question in his title of “Why Bother?” Why should we? Because if we don’t, then who will? We should be the change that we want to see in the
Dr. Osherson, the National Audubon Society, the town of Ashton Hayes and National Geographic all agree there are these simple solutions that everyone can take to stop climate change, even busy college students. We don’t have to sit around feeling helpless while waiting for Congress to act. Now is the time to act and if we all do our part, even if it’s small, there will be an impact. Together we have the power to stop climate change but it all starts with
To stop the rather scary problem of global climate change dramatic orders would need to be put in place. “We’re talking about the wholesale decarbonization of our country, about removing the fossil fuel base on which our prosperity has so far rested,” and that all seems a bit too complicated (McKibben 501). So instead, it seems a change in attitude is needed. In many cultures, including America’s, it is money over everything and it has always been like that. “If something made the economy…larger, we generally assented,” and that is the problem. Obviously, the reckless attitudes of humans are becoming more and more apparent as our planet plummets deeper into peril. However, maybe just by changing the overall attitude of the population, the results will change too. And in the long run, putting the environment first now will allow the economy to push to the front again.
61). Moreover, it can also be seen “as presenting us with the largest collective action problem that humanity has ever faced, one that has both intra- and inter-generational dimensions” (Jamieson pg. 61). Thus, climate change will not only affect us but our children, and their children’s children, for generations to come. So is this it? Have we as humans sold our souls to the climate change devil? Is this something that we will always have to deal with and if so then why should we even bother trying to prevent it? Dale Jamieson philosopher and author of the book, Reason in a Dark Time, argues that we have sold our souls to the climate change devil and will be stuck with this problem for eternity. However, just because we are stuck with climate change, Jamieson argues, we should not give up on trying to slow down its effects. In addition to Jamieson the Federal Republic of Germany also believes that we are stuck with climate change and have developed their own solutions to help mitigate the effects. Throughout this paper I will present a descriptive and normative analysis to help address the environmental justice claims that both entities are making. I will then go on to show the instability of Dale Jamieson’s argument in both his descriptive and normative analysis through the development of my own
Director David Guggenheim's, 'An Inconvenient Truth' is a documentary about former American politician Al Gore informing citizens on the causes and effects of Global Warming. He explains that the natural cycle of the Earths climate has been disturbed by noxious gas building up around the atmosphere and will continue to raise if we don't act soon. Gore's way of explaining Global Warming is both enlightening and surreal, as he refers to statistics, sentiment of nature, and the question of our perception and freedom to get his point across to his audience. By using such techniques to show his extensive knowledge on the subject, he can really appeal to the community. Gore states his first point by presenting visuals such as videos and graphs to show the progressive rate of temperature and Carbon Dioxide levels of the Earth's atmosphere.
Williams, Mary E. Writing the Critical Essay Global Warming. Farmington Hills, MI 48331-3535: Greenhaven, 2006. Print.
It was difficult for me, at first, to understand the momentum of Climate Justice. When I started high school, it became clear to me how significant the issue was. I’m from a small island in Indonesia, called Bali, where garbage is carelessly tossed over the shoulders of locals. I never noticed it because it was the environment I lived in, it never seemed odd or out of place. When I moved to America for the first time, I noticed a drastic difference. I moved to a small town in Northern California, where priuses and reusable cloth bags were counted on fingers and toes. Shortly after, I moved back to Bali, and it was a monumental shock. I had never took notice of the impact it had on the earth. In Bali I constantly observed my setting, from wading
Subpoint A: Not long ago, a documentary film called “An Inconvenient truth” came out in 2006. This film raised international public awareness of climate change and reenergizing the environmental movement. A former U.S Vice president Al Gore campaigned to educate citizens about global warming through a simp...
Gore, Al. The Inconvenient Truth: The Planetary Emergency of Global Warming and What We Can Do about It. New York: Rodale, 2006. Print.