Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The causes and consequences of the war of crusades
The causes and consequences of the war of crusades
The crusades helpme 123
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The causes and consequences of the war of crusades
When discussing religion, conflict, and the nature of man, President Richard Nixon has been quoted as saying, “In the long term, we can hope that religion will change the nature of man and reduce conflict. But history is not encouraging in this respect. The bloodiest wars in history have been religious war.” When examining the countless massacres and other acts of man’s inhumanity to man that occurred during the Crusades, Nixon’s statement undoubtedly rings true. Occurring from 1095 to 1272, the Crusades triggered a progression of conflicts in which European Christians sought to regain control of the Levant from Muslim control, in addition to Europe’s response to the threatening expansion of Islam. It was during the Crusades that both groups …show more content…
The first half of the book examines the practical features of the Crusades. In the first chapter, Finucane offers a concise overview of the numerous crusades and goes into details with the more notable crusades. This summary certainly presents the background information needed to better understand the remaining chapters, which focus on individual themes. In Chapter 2, Finucane provides excellent depictions of the ways preachers recruited the men for crusade and their motivations for doing so, as well as accounts of the methods that both royalty and the clergy used to finance the expeditions. With Chapter 3, Finucane offers enlightening accounts of the difficulties and dangers that crusaders experienced journeying to the Holy Land. He discusses the crusaders’ travels, both on sea and land, with all the problems that crusaders encountered. Chapter 4, entitled “God’s Armies” discusses the composition of both armies, yet it is very limited in its scope. In his analysis, he provides significant detail to crusaders, yet Finucane does not provide adequate information on the Muslim soldier in comparison to the Christian soldier. In the last chapter of the first section, Finucane provides elements of three types of warfare engaged during the Crusades and detailed information on various massacres and atrocities committed by both Christians and Muslims. For …show more content…
When utilizing his secondary sources, Finucane employs information from other leading Crusader historians, such as Hans Eberhard Mayer and Steven Runciman, to lay the foundation of historical facts with which to add his well-chosen narratives and quotation from the collection of primary sources. His use of primary sources is seen throughout the text to either provide detailed explanations or meaningful narratives to the material from the secondary sources. Finucane’s uses of passages from Anna Comnena’s The Alexiad provides some of the most detailed accounts in various chapters that many may not expect from the daughter of the Byzantine Emperor, Alexius I Comnenus, yet general readers may not know that she was also a scholar and a historian. In the Chapter 4, entitled “God’s Armies,” Finucane cites Anna Comnena when discussing the use of horses as a weapon used during the Crusaders’ massed charges, which she saw as both an advantage and disadvantage against Muslim forces. Finucane states, “Even Anna Comnena, who hardly qualifies as an admirer of the Latins, had to admire at least twice that the Franks were unbeatable when charging down upon the enemy.” Anna also recognized the disadvantage in that when the charge was completed, the knights were seldom able to
The Crusades were a number of military expeditions by Europeans of the Christian faith attempting to recover the Holy Land, Jerusalem, which was then controlled by the powerful Muslim Empire. In his book People of The First Crusade, Michael Foss an independent historian tells the story of the first Crusade in vivid detail illustrating the motives behind this historic event, and what had really occurred towards the end of the eleventh century. The Christian lands of Western Europe were slowly deteriorating from invasions of the North, and the passing of corrupt laws from within the clergy and the high lords. However, these were not the only challenges those of European Christian faith had to face. Islam strengthened after the conversion of the
Contrary to many commonly held notions about the first crusade, in his book, The First Crusade and the Idea of Crusading, Jonathan Riley-Smith sets out to explain how the idea of crusading thought evolved in the first crusade. In his book, Riley-Smith sets out five main arguments to show how these ideas of crusading evolved. Firstly, he argues that Pope Urban’s original message was conventional, secondly that a more positive reaction was drawn from the laity (due to the ideas surrounding Jerusalem), thirdly, that the original message of crusading had changed because of the horrible experiences of the first crusaders, fourth, that due to these experiences the crusaders developed their own concept of what a crusade was, and lastly, that these ideas were refined by (religious) writers and turned into an acceptable form of theology. Riley-Smith makes excellent points about the crusade; however, before one can delve directly into his argument, one must first understand the background surrounding the rise of the first crusade.
In his essay, Rodriguez believes that the diplomatic affairs we see on the evening news are merely being disguised as a religious war. The fight over oil or land when in reality it is the fight between whose side God is on, the attacks under the control of Al Qaeda when perhaps it’s the greed for power or world domination. According to Richard, these religious wars are allowing terrorism to become prevalent; often times within the same culture (147).
The First Crusade was a widely appealing armed pilgrimage, and mobilized a vast conquering force at a time when the Christian Church was moving towards centralization and greater political influence in Europe. The Church gained a wider audience more accepting of its leadership, benefitted economically, and developed its own militarily force. These outcomes, along with the Church’s documented ambition to expand and its reversal of prior teachings, support the idea that the First Crusade was a deliberate political maneuver, intended to to expand and consolidate the authority of the
The selection from Usama Ibn Munqidh’s Kitab al-l’tibar otherwise know in English as the Book of Contemplation is a book in which Usama provides a series of short vignettes as a testimony to his experiences in the medieval Middle East and the Crusades. Through his writings the reader is able to get a Muslim account of the Crusades. It is largely a personal account so many details are left out and much background knowledge is assumed. It also is not the most unbiased source as supported by Usama’s frequent utterence that “Allah render them [The crusading Christians] helpless” (Ibn Munqidh 197) Usama also makes no attempt at analysis or understanding and just writes exactly what he observed without asking questions or delving deeper into the myriad differences he discribes. On a whole though it provides a great overview of the experience of many Muslims (especially the upper class, of which Usama was a part of) during this unstable period of invasion and political fragmentation in the Islamic world.
The first crusade was held only in order to fulfill desire of the Christians of the recapturing the center of the Christian faith-Jerusalem, which has been controlled by the Muslim nation for more than 400 years. This military campaign was followed with severe cruelty and harsh actions against Muslims which cannot be justified with anything but religious and material interest.
Religion is a part of society that is so closely bound to the rest of one’s life it becomes hard to distinguish what part of religion is actually being portrayed through themselves, or what is being portrayed through their culture and the rest of their society. In Holy Terrors, Bruce Lincoln states that religion is used as a justifiable mean of supporting violence and war throughout time (Lincoln 2). This becomes truly visible in times such as the practice of Jihad, the Reformation, and 9/11. The purpose of this essay is to show that as long as religion is bound to a political and cultural aspect of a community, religious war and destruction will always occur throughout the world. A historical methodology will be deployed in order to gain
The Crusades were one of the most prominent events in Western European history; they were not discrete and unimportant pilgrimages, but a continuous stream of marching Western armies (Crusaders) into the Muslim world, terminating in the creation and eventually the fall of the Islamic Kingdoms. The Crusades were a Holy War of Roman Christianity against Islam, but was it really a “holy war” or was it Western Europe fighting for more land and power? Through Pope Urban II and the Roman Catholic Church’s actions, their proposed motivations seem unclear, and even unchristian. Prior to the Crusades, Urban encouraged that Western Europe fight for their religion but throughout the crusades the real motivations shone though; the Crusaders were power hungry, land coveting people who fought with non Christian ideals and Morales.
Maalouf’s main thesis in The Crusades Through Arab Eyes is that the crusades are a major part of history and have truly influenced every one of our lives. The second pa...
Among some of the largest conflicts in the world stand the Crusades; a brutal conflict that lasted over 200 years and was debatably one of the largest armed religious conflicts in the history of humankind. Since this is so clearly an event of importance, historians have searched vigorously for the true answer as to why the crusades began. Ultimately, because of accusatory views on both the sides of the Christians and of the Muslims, the two groups grew in such hatred of each other that they began to act in deep discrimination of each other. Moreover, Christian motives seemed to be driven mostly by the capture of Jerusalem, the dark ages of Europe and the common-folks desperation for land, wealth, and a spot in heaven. What seems to be continually
The First Crusade from 1095 to 1099 has been seen as a successful crusade. The First Crusaders carefully planned out their attacks to help promote religion throughout the lands. As the First Crusade set the example of what a successful crusade should do, the following crusades failed to maintain control of the Holy Land. Crusades following after the First Crusade weren’t as fortunate with maintaining the Holy Land due united forces of Muslims, lack of organization, and lack of religious focus.
God’s Battalions: The Case for the Crusades by Rodney Stark, will cause readers to question much of what they know about the Crusades, the Crusaders themselves, and the formidable Muslim forces they encountered along the way in liberation of the Holy Land. Stark gives compelling reasons for the Crusades, and argues that readers should not be too quick in following the lead of historians who cast the Crusaders in less than positive light. Stark makes his case supported by evidence that vindicates the valiant struggles of the Crusaders who accomplished the task of keeping Christianity alive through troubled times.
In 1095, Pope Urban II called the first crusade. Happening between 1096 and 1099, the first crusade was both a military expedition and a mass movement of people with the simple goal of reclaiming the Holy Lands taken by the Muslims in their conquests of the Levant. The crusade ended with the capture of Jerusalem in July 1099. However, there has been much debate about whether the First Crusade can be considered an ‘armed pilgrimage’ or whether it has to be considered as a holy war. This view is complicated due to the ways in which the Crusade was presented and how the penitential nature of it changed throughout the course of the Crusade.
In chapter two, Lockman writes that the era of the Crusades was finally over by the end of the nineteenth century and there was little interested energy in the midst of the Western European Christians for any more campaigns to regain the Holy Land. The various developments made the Latin Christians to hope that the Mongols were sent by God in order to destroy Islam, and thus efforts were made to secure an alliance with them. As a result of the failure of the last Crusades and the loss of hope placed in the Mongols enabled a good portion of the educated Christians in the West to come to terms that it was unlikely that Islam be destroyed with military
In order for the crusades to begin, the Christians needed to gather an army to travel and fight the forces of Muslims. With all the power being held by monarchies at this time, the church needed to be cleaver in order to gain troops to put their lives on the line. To gain the support of these warriors and dedication of men, Pope Urban II (1088-1099) challenged those morals of men by telling them to grab their weapons and join the holy war to recover the land of Jerusalem. It was not the challenge that convinced men to take part in this war. The promise of “immediate remission of sins” attracted the men to stand up for their religion and beliefs while at the same time, promising them a trip to heaven when life comes to an end. With this statement, men instantly prepared for battle which in a very short period of time gave the church power which has been held by the monarchies. Men of rich and poor prepared for battle, some wearing ...