Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effects of the first crusade
The effects of the first crusade
The effects of the first crusade
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The effects of the first crusade
The Medieval period was a rough time period because there was a lot of death and conflict from fighting and diseases. There were places that had a social class and because of that there was a lot of inequality between the people living there because the people who are on top of the social class had more power than the people at the lower classes and the people in the lower class did most of the work but get paid the least. There were conflicts in parts of Europe because of different religious beliefs this ultimately leads to many crusades with the objective to keep peace to the areas of Europe but what actually happened is that the crusaders ended up slaughtering the people inside the towns that they were living and they didn’t care which religion they were in or what age they were. Godfrey of Bouillon was a French who was born in 1060 and he was the leader of the First Crusade and he won at the Siege of Antioch he was later elected as king of Jerusalem on July 22 1099 but he …show more content…
refused the title of King because he believed that the true King of Jerusalem was Christ . He died at the Siege of Acre by an arrow. Peter the Hermit was born in 1050 and was a priest and a key figure of the First Crusade he lead the first of the five sections of the People's Crusade to the destination of their pilgrimage. He also preached the first Crusade.
People said stories that Jesus appeared to Peter the Hermit in the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, and bade him preach the crusade and they also said that he was the true author and originator of the First Crusade. Thesis Peter the Hermit and Godfrey of Bouillon were both people who participated in the First Crusade to save The Holy Land. The First Crusades main mission is to go and take over Jerusalem which was called a Holy Place because of all the religious activities that happened there and they decided to take it over is because the people who were controlling it at the time prohibited any Christians from visiting Jerusalem. They did capture Jerusalem in the end but even though they did that there were still conflicts between people of different religions and more Crusades will be made but these Crusades will accomplish nothing but a lot of deaths because the Crusaders that were in the Crusades were mostly filled with greedy and violent people that would kill every person whoever they come across and raid everything from a town that they destroyed. Peter the Hermit and Godfrey of Bouillon had some similarities and differences in regard of participating in the Crusade, what role they played in the crusade, what they did during the Crusade, and what their men did when they were raiding during the Crusade. 1st similarity The first thing that both Permit the Hermit and Godfrey of Bouillon had in common is that they both participated in the First Crusade.
When Pope Urban II called for a Crusade to liberate Jerusalem from Muslim forces and also to aid the Byzantine Empire which was under Muslim attack both Permit the Hermit and Godfrey of Bouillon volunteered to be in the crusade in order to help the crusaders take back the Holy Land and Liberate it and to assist the Byzantine Empire. They both led people in the Crusade and went into battle. This meant that they had to kill people if they ever wanted to control the areas they were trying to take over. Both of their men would capture towns and cities that they come across and eliminated everybody in it until they reach Jerusalem and capture
it. 2nd similarity The second thing that both Permit the Hermit and Godfrey of Bouillon had in common is that they were both Christians. This meant that everything they did in the First Crusade was because they believed that they were doing the right thing for all Christians. Unlike other Crusaders they were not driven by greed or did it for the fortune because they knew that Christ will not tolerate any of that. So when Godfrey of Bouillon was giving the opportunity to be titled king he denied it because he said that Christ was the only king in this world and whenever Peter the Hermit went somewhere he always believed in god for helping them win the battles and to capture Jerusalem for the Christians and he would later on be the founder of an Augustinian monastery in France named for the Church of the Holy Sepulchre. Difference The one thing that both Permit the Hermit and Godfrey of Bouillon had different is their role in the Crusade which is that Permit the Hermit was a priest and that Godfrey of Bouillon was a lord who fought so because of this Peter the Hermit did not kill anyone in the Crusades and he just preached to every location that the Crusaders captures and he also gave courage to all of the Crusaders that he led because they were promised that all the sins that they had will all be forgiven if they die during the crusade. Godfrey of Bouillon on the other hand actually killed people in many sieges and won those sieges like the Siege of Nicaea, the Battle of Dorilaeum, and he also helped in the capture of Jerusalem. He also took out loans on most of his lands, or sold them, to the bishop of Liège and the bishop of Verdun and with the money he gathered thousands of knights to fight in the Holy Land as the Army of Godfrey of Bouillon. Conclusion In conclusion, Permit the Hermit and Godfrey of Bouillon had similarities like being in the First Crusade and both being Christians but they also had a difference which was that Peter the Hermit was a priest and Godfrey of Bouillon was a lord who fought. That means that they took back the Holy Land so that Christians can be allowed to visit Jerusalem (which is a Holy Place) again since the people who had I first didn’t let Christians visit. Peter the Hermit also didn’t fight since he was a priest but he did command people to areas where they were taking over and Godfrey of Bouillon did fight since he was a warrior on the frontlines and helped his men take over the areas they were evading.
Foss explains, “What Urban needed was an enterprise, clearly virtuous in serving the ends of Christiandome… in these moments of reflection, the popes mind turned towards Jerusalem.” Urban II reflects back on the first taking of the Holy City after the defeat of the Byzantine Empire in 1071, and begins to question what his people know about the Turkish race and really the ideology of Islamic thought. Foss goes on to examine the ignorance of westerners and needed to be “reminded [by the pope] of the infamous heathens, their cruelty and hatred of Christians,” hoping this would justify the first Holy Crusade. However, Foss identifies the creativity of the Pope’s language to persuade the knights and army of the people to embark on the Holy Crusade based on the Muslims cruel actions turned onto their fellow Christians. Claiming the Muslims “Killed captives by torture…poor captives were whipped…and others were bound to the post and used as a target for arrows.” Foss examines the Popes words as an effective effort of persuasion in creating an army of crusaders to help clean “…Holy places, which are now treated with ignominy and polluted with Filthiness” and any sacrifice in Jerusalem is a “promise of a spiritual reward… and death for
The First Crusade was called in 1096 by Pope Urban II. The reasons for the First Crusade was to help obtain Jerusalem known as the holy land. During this time period the Muslims were occupying Jerusalem. First Crusade contained peasants and knights’ whose ethnicities consist of Franks, Latin’s, and Celts which were all from the western part of Europe. To get peasants and knights to join Pope Urban II objectives in return of a spiritual reward called “remission of all their sins” which was to be redeemed of any sins the individual has committed. When sins are redeemed Crusaders believed that they will escape the torment of hell. When lords and knights joined the crusade they were known as military elites. Crusaders were known as soldiers of Christ.
The First Crusade is often cited as one of the most damnable consequences of religious fanaticism. A careful inspection of the circumstances and outcomes, however, will reveal a resultant political restructuring of Europe under the banner of Christendom. The purpose of this investigation is to investigate Pope Urban II’s motives in initiating the First Crusade, with a particular focus on the consolidation of the Western Church’s influence in Europe. Among the primary sources that will be consulted are the letter sent by Patriach Alexios of Constantinople to Urban, and an account of Urban’s speech at Clermont. Relevant excerpts from both of these primary sources, as well as contextual evidence and a wide array of historiography, will be taken
The Crusades took place in the Middle East between 1095 and 1291. They were used to gain a leg up on trading, have more land to show hegemony, and to please the gods. Based upon the documents, the Crusades between 1095 and 1291 were caused primarily by religious devotion rather than by the desire for economic and political gain.
The Crusades were the first tactical mission by Western Christianity in order to recapture the Muslim conquered Holy Lands. Several people have been accredited with the launch of the crusades including Peter the Hermit however it is now understood that this responsibility rested primarily with Pope Urban II . The main goal of the Crusades was the results of an appeal from Alexius II, who had pleaded for Western Volunteers help with the prevention of any further invasions. The Pope’s actions are viewed as him answering the pleas of help of another in need, fulfilling his Christian right. However, from reading the documents it is apparent that Pope Urban had ulterior motives for encouraging engagement in the war against the Turks. The documents and supporting arguments now highlight that the Pope not only sought to recruit soldiers to help but also to challenge those who had harmed the Christians community and annihilate the Muslims. He put forth the idea that failure to recapture this lands would anger God and that by participating, God would redeem them of their previous sins.in a time of deep devoutness, it is clear this would have been a huge enticement for men to engage in the battle. Whether his motives were clear or not to his people, Pope Urban’s speeches claiming that “Deus vult!” (God wills it) encouraged many Christians to participate and take the cross.
Late Medieval Europe was a very different time from what Europe is today. It was a time where social mobility was unthinkable; people lived in fear of their creator, and were always trying to please their creator. In addition, Medieval Europe was an unhealthy and unhygienic state, where sickness and disease was rampant. It was a place where women had little to no rights, and minority groups were frequently falsely accused of many problems that were out of their control. For example, they were blamed for drought, which usually resulted in their unjust persecution because they “angered” God. Overall, Europe was the last place one would want to live unless you were of the nobility. On the other hand, Europe was also a major trading power, engaging
The Crusades were a bloody time period. They were a military campaign by the pope and the Roman Catholic Church to take back Jerusalem from the Muslims. They lasted from the 11th- 13th century. They were catastrophic and left Europe in ruins. Although the Crusades were such a violent period of time, they had a positive impact in history because of their role in the renaissance and exposing the Western world to the Eastern.
The First Crusade from 1095 to 1099 has been seen as a successful crusade. The First Crusaders carefully planned out their attacks to help promote religion throughout the lands. As the First Crusade set the example of what a successful crusade should do, the following crusades failed to maintain control of the Holy Land. Crusades following after the First Crusade weren’t as fortunate with maintaining the Holy Land due united forces of Muslims, lack of organization, and lack of religious focus.
In 1095, Pope Urban II called the first crusade. Happening between 1096 and 1099, the first crusade was both a military expedition and a mass movement of people with the simple goal of reclaiming the Holy Lands taken by the Muslims in their conquests of the Levant. The crusade ended with the capture of Jerusalem in July 1099. However, there has been much debate about whether the First Crusade can be considered an ‘armed pilgrimage’ or whether it has to be considered as a holy war. This view is complicated due to the ways in which the Crusade was presented and how the penitential nature of it changed throughout the course of the Crusade.
A major turning point in Medieval history were the Crusades. The Crusades were a series of wars fought between the Christian Europeans and the Muslim Turks, which occurred between the years of 1096 to 1272. In this Holy War the Christians goal was to obtain the Holy Land from the Turks, in which they did not succeed. Although the Christians did not meet their goal, many positives did come out of their attempt. Due to the reason that they did not meet their goal, yet numerous positives came out of their effort, many refer to this as a successful failure.
Definition: The medieval "Crusade" was a holy war. In 1095, Pope Urban II proclaimed the First Crusade with the goal of restoring Christian access to holy places in Jerusalem.
In 1071, the Byzantine Army was destroyed by the Turks who also captured their emperor, which led up to the mercenary conquering Syria and Palestine, Leaving the City of Jerusalem left to be taken by more oppressive leaders. The new leaders of Jerusalem hated the Christians and committed a widespread genocide of over 3000 Christians along with destroying churches or using them as stables. But what they didn’t realize was that it would throw their economy way out of balance which is what the old leaders had realized. This genocide of the Christian people is what sparked the need for crusades and the Rise of Christian Soldiers wanting to avenge their deaths. Emperor Alexius I sent an ambassador to Pope Urban II regarding the atrocities in Jerusalem
Crusading, much like Imperialism in the 20th century, was all about expansion. During the middle ages however, it was more about the expansion of religion rather then power, or at least that’s the way it was preached. Crusading by definition is; “ a holy war authorized by the pope, who proclaimed it in the name of god of Christ. It was believed to be Christ’s own enterprise, legitimized by his personal mandate” (1). This essay examines the background of the crusades to offer a better understanding as to why they occurred. It also examines the effects that the crusades had on the world. It is easy to look at the crusades as a violent meaningless act, but one must understand the type of setting this movement occurred during. This was a time when if you took part in the crusades, you were seen as a warrior of god, recruited by the pope. Any man who fought in the name of god would be rewarded in heaven. Popular belief in the 10th and 11th centuries was that the more you did for god, the less accountable you were for you’re past sins. The more deeds you did, the better your credit in the ‘Treasury of God’ (2). The Treasury of God is a summarization of the good deed outweighing the bad deed principle of the time. Acts of violence in the name of god are far less common in the world today. But, as seen with September 11th, jihad or holy war is still occurring. This essay gives a basic timeline and underlying principles behind the crusading missions. Justification for these acts remains unclear and is simply opinion based.
Spanning from 1095 to 1212 C.E, the Crusades were an effort made by medieval Christians to regain their holy lands back from the Muslims. There were five crusades in total going in order from the First Crusade to the Children's Crusade. A few were effective in their own respects although these Crusades proved costly to the European Kingdoms as a result of large losses of life. This paper will explore these crusades and explain why some succeeded whereas others failed.
In order for the crusades to begin, the Christians needed to gather an army to travel and fight the forces of Muslims. With all the power being held by monarchies at this time, the church needed to be cleaver in order to gain troops to put their lives on the line. To gain the support of these warriors and dedication of men, Pope Urban II (1088-1099) challenged those morals of men by telling them to grab their weapons and join the holy war to recover the land of Jerusalem. It was not the challenge that convinced men to take part in this war. The promise of “immediate remission of sins” attracted the men to stand up for their religion and beliefs while at the same time, promising them a trip to heaven when life comes to an end. With this statement, men instantly prepared for battle which in a very short period of time gave the church power which has been held by the monarchies. Men of rich and poor prepared for battle, some wearing ...