The Crucible Historical Accuracy

546 Words2 Pages

Is “The Crucible” historically accurate? While “The Crucible” is loosely based on the Salem Witchcraft Trials it is historically inaccurate. However it does have many things that are parallel to what happened in 1692.
In “The Crucible” Tituba was first blamed and then Tituba blamed others, “She made me drink the blood!” stated Abigail. Tituba is the only person who is accused of anything. “You beg me to conjure! She beg me to conjure-” is Tituba blaming someone else after being called a witch. Another example being “Mister Reverend, I do believe somebody else be witchin’ these children”(Miller 847). “Historically speaking, three people were accused at once, one of which was Tituba, and from there those three did the blaming” says Michael O’Neal for WRRL Ed. The sources provided show sufficient proof that the order of blame in “The Crucible” is incorrect, which contributes to why I think “The Crucible” is inaccurate. …show more content…

Proof can be found in the text when John Proctor says to Abigail “Child-,” she lashes out saying “How do you call me child!” The writers of American Eras Vol. 2 puts it into simpler terms “How would a child successfully control, threaten, and abuse a mob of girl for her being merely 11 years of age, not to mention the affair with John Proctor” (Miller 839). I think that is true, an 11 year old doesn’t have the mental capacity to take advantage of a mob mentality.
In conclusion, the above examples help support my thesis; “The Crucible” is loosely based on the Salem Witchcraft Trials, but in many aspects it falls short in terms of being historically accurate. Maybe Miller didn’t want to be historically accurate, but that doesn’t change that many things didn’t match up with history. The order of the blame, the death of Giles, and Abigail’s age are a few of the many things that prove that

Open Document