Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
What would we think about a government that has banned milk? Is it oppressive or is it cautious? Is it overkill or is it necessary in order to prohibit and contain disease? Skyler Reidy, the author of “The Country that Banned Milk”, has the belief that raw milk is better than pasteurized milk for the consumer and the producer, yet the government says otherwise. In this situation, the government wins. According to laws in twenty different states, “Sale of raw milk for human consumption is prohibited” (Procon). Raw milk, while it has some good qualities, also comes with some bad ones. Sometimes, unpasteurized milk contains a lot of very harmful bacteria including, but not limited to, Salmonella, E. Coli and Listeria. The US Government has …show more content…
However, instead of making raw milk sound good, he tries to make pasteurized milk sound bad. Americans always have some kind of “fad” diet and the majority of them desire to better health so Reidy plays at that to interject his opinion. He also mentions religion multiple times throughout the article and says “Real milk comes to us exactly as God designed it” (Reidy, “The Country that Banned Milk”). Religious people wouldn't want to change the ways of God, so Reidy words it so bluntly, almost saying “You are going against God if you drink pasteurized milk”; no Christian wants to go against their God. Religion plays one of the biggest roles in this article and Reidy visits it often. Reidy also uses bible quotes and relates them back to what is going on in the milk industry, making it seem like a much bigger deal than it is. According to him, the government is playing a much too large role in Americans milk purchases. He says “a government that would interfere with this right stepping beyond its natural limits” . He wants his readers to be able to see that a government that is oppressive to the extent that they would regulate perfectly good milk, should be stopped. He also asks his audience questions like “Doesn’t a man have a God-given right to the milk his herd produces?” in order to get a structured response from his audience. Reidy also offers the sentiment of the “Right to Milk” which gives off the impression that our rights are being infringed upon, which relates to every American. When somebody tries to take their rights away, Americans riot. They fight for what they believe in and Reidy hoped that if he got the entirety of America on his side, maybe they would fight for the legality of raw milk. However, he knew he had some convincing to do even
In the story "Pet Milk", by Stuart Dybek, he uses multiple literary terms that are used in everyday life. Like previously stated, setting, theme, irony, style, and figurative language are used in many literature pieces and are extremely common within this piece. We shall break down this story in multiple pieces and review the knowledge and facts that are waiting to be discovered and find the meanings of them. Pet Milk is a great story to use as it has many of these elements and is a story not man...
Regulating what the government should control and what they should not was one of the main arguments our founding fathers had to deal with when creating our nation, and to this day this regulation is one of the biggest issues in society. Yet, I doubt our founding fathers thought about the idea that the food industry could one day somewhat control our government, which is what we are now facing. Marion Nestles’ arguments in the book Food Politics: How the Food Industry Influences Nutrition and Health deal with how large food companies and government intertwine with one another. She uses many logical appeals and credible sources to make the audience understand the problem with this intermingling. In The Politics of Food author Geoffrey Cannon further discusses this fault but with more emotional appeals, by use of personal narratives. Together these writers make it dramatically understandable why this combination of the food industry and politics is such a lethal ordeal. However, in The Food Lobbyists, Harold D. Guither makes a different viewpoint on the food industry/government argument. In his text Guither speaks from a median unbiased standpoint, which allows the reader to determine his or her own opinions of the food industries impact on government, and vise versa.
In addition, the USDA is exposed for promoting products such as cheese, milk, and high fructose corn syrup in a fictional way. They provided no information that they were unhealthy in the
The essay establishes the existing United States regulations, which is a huge result of many medical incidents which the federal and state government analyzes for the safety of the people, whom have many concerns that are placed upon raw milk cheese. Bilger also reflects upon the growing market of raw milk products, as well as the potential re-appearance for upcoming dairy farms and artisanal cheese manufacturers, which will at least justify the government cost-charge and cost-benefit analysis examining the safety of all the raw milk
Since the beginning of time, people have been drinking milk. Even today you will find a gallon of milk in almost every refrigerator in America. Milk is, and has always been, a staple of our diet. Because it contains essential proteins, carbohydrates, fats, minerals and vitamins, milk is considered one of nature's perfect foods. Unfortunately, throughout the last century milk has been subjected to many forms of modern processing practices, which deprive milk from many of its natural qualities and benefits. Therefore many essential vitamins and enzymes are lost. Processing milk has altered one of nature’s perfect foods and changed it into something nature did not intend. Because of the abundant health benefits in raw milk, this report will explain why it should be made legal for consumers to buy throughout the United States.
Almost every angle of the food industry can be considered dangerous. It is dangerous to make the food, as a meatpacking job is one that is viewed as having abnormally high risks; however when the food is handed over a counter on a tray or prepared in a family of four’s kitchen, it poses a huge risk to humankind. Foodborne illnesses are all too common and almost everybody has the possiblity of contracting a foodborne illness. These are life threatening diseases that need to be monitored and regulated; therefore the enforcement of government regulations in the fast food industry could potentially save many lives that are lost annually due to the numerous factors that need regulation.
The idea of pasteurizing milk bagan in the 1920s, and later became an aspect of everyday life in the 1950s. Milk that has undergone this process is normally prefered since it is sterilized, therefore lowering the chance of human illness. However, it’s not the 1950s anymore, and the idea of pasteurizing milk has lost its luster for the people that now prefer raw milk. Unlike the milk that most Americans consume, raw milk has not been pasteurized, or quickly heated to a high temperature to kill harmful bacteria. In raw milk, these bacterias haven’t been removed, leaving people at risk. E. Coli, salmonella, and listeria are only some of the bacteria that raw milk carries, all of which can cause sickness, or even death. Common affects of consuming raw milk are diarrhea, stomach cramping, and vomiting, but it's the rare ones: kidney failure,paralysis, and death that causes raw milk to be illegal in half of the states and illegal to carry over state lines in its final form. Nevertheless, people still actively seek out and consume raw milk because they believe its nutritional values to be greater. Controversies surround this topic on whether organic food
Chocolate milk is a worldwide debate of whether it should be served in schools or be an at home treat. Many schools have already gotten rid of chocolate milk but what about Nickels Intermediate school. They should keep chocolate milk to keep kids on a beneficial and healthy diet. To begin with chocolate milk gives kids a nutritional drink. It also improves their diets by giving them a drink that will not later cause obesity. Finally kids enjoy the drink way more than white milk. Read on to explore the greatness of chocolate milk.
... The routine conversation that is usually conducted when we gather together is concerning the inflated price of milk of which has transpired within the last ten years. With possessing a small child the need for the consumption of milk is not considered an optional luxury but a necessary commodity for small children and their overall development. With inflated prices on necessary commodities, such as milk, for many young families produces an enormous financial burden with monthly demands of milk. Dealing with this issue of inflation is an extremely difficult issue to bring a conclusive solution towards however, the article makes a good point in sharing that there is a vital need to reexamine the present system.
“Would You Eat Breast Milk Cheese?” (Hamm, 2010). I have shown this headline to multiple people and have received the same reaction from everyone. Most of these people I work with at a daycare. We all handle and serve breast milk on a daily basis. Also we watch mothers nurse their infants. Yet, the reaction did not surprise me, even with this comfort level with human breast milk. This reaction falls along the line of disgust and shock. One person even reacted with a sharp reply of “I DID NOT NEED TO SEE THAT!” There is something about the thought of consuming human breast milk that makes people squirm.
In the American school system, most elementary schools require students to take either Skim milk, Two-Percent milk, or Chocolate milk, and expect children to drink that milk before being excused from the lunchroom. “Not surprisingly, American kids, whether pressed for time or just grossed out, leave much of their meals
As shocking as it sounds, citizens find it simpler to read an entire novel than making healthier food choices. These choices have impacted the success industrial agriculture has had and how it continues to work. The public supports industrial agriculture by responding to their food products, in favor of continuous production. It has also become one of the most successful partnerships the federal government has had in years, making up to a billion dollars a year in massive food production. With the production of many foods, this country is successfully able to run due to the demand people want. As a result the government has agreed to support and defend its partner, because of the economic effect it has on the United States. Keep in mind that the government is supporting the
First off, The government of the United States of America is ultimately responsible for keeping our foods safe. Many of the Presidents of the major food companies also obtain government jobs. When a problem occurs with food and a food has to be recalled a change has to be made. Someone comes up with a law to make sure that the problem does not occur again. The government evaluates the law and either passes or denies it. The type of foods that we buy from the grocery store were pre evaluated by the government. I think the reason why most foods are unsafe and are still being obtained by local residents is because the major food companies work and make deals with government so
Be careful when we are buying powdered milk, we all want our babies healthy and happy. This article tells us how China’s food safety problem is serious and how toxic the food is. The government should pay more attention to food safety issues. Kids are the future of this world, if they are living in a toxic world, our country is probably becoming nothing. I wish we could eat healthier and live in a better world.
The packaged milk category was originated in 1981 by (quaintly named) Milk Pak, which pioneered tetra pack milk in Pakistan. The supply chain involved collecting milk from rural areas across Punjab, processing the milk through UHT (Ultra-High Temperature Processing) treatment, and selling it to consumers in uniquely colored triangular and rectangular packs designed to prolong the milk’s quality. Milk Pak’s “Milk Packs” were very well-received and the brand soon became synonymous with quality milk. Its first real competition came in the form of Haleeb, which introduced distinctively blue tetra packs to the market in 1986.