Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Concepts related to The Coquette and The Boarding School
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
After reading the novel “The Coquette and The Boarding School,” I was intrigued in a certain passage written in the novel. Mr. Shelby, Mr. Boyer’s friend writes to him saying “I am quite convert to Pope’s assertion….the result of her education.” (Foster 78) Throughout the novel Mr. Shelby gives Mr. Boyer advice on what to do with his current situation involving his love interest, Eliza Wharton. In this passage Mr. Shelby agrees with the pope’s opinion that “Every woman, is at hear, a rake.” (Foster 78) After the first time reading this I did not know what to think that such a religious icon would say that every women despite their behavior has whorish tendencies. By the pope declaring this statement men have a stereotype on what every women’s …show more content…
Shelby really wanted to prove a point to Mr. Boyer about the actions he witnessed Eliza commit. Mr. Shelby talks about Eliza in a good perspective saying that she is a very cheerful and good humored person. However, Mr. Shelby also talks about how Eliza seems to be seeking sexual pleasures from Major Sanford at the ball they attended. Following that statement Mr. Shelby comments that Eliza almost sounds like she is a tramp committing sexual acts to make a profit. The reason why Mr. Shelby starts off this sentence saying how Eliza is virtuous is because he wants to warn Mr. Boyer that even though she has high morals she can fall a victim to these customs. This statement goes back to the double standard that society has on woman, because if Mr. Shelby was describing a man he would look like a victim in the case. However, since Eliza is the victim in this case scenario she is considered a coquette for these actions which are unfair because they are based on what her gender is. This sentence targets the moral aspect of women in the 18th century. Mr. Shelby writes about the things women should not be doing behind closed doors especially when getting married was the primary goal for women during this …show more content…
I remember I was taught about Aristotle’s views on women which is very similar to how Eliza was treated throughout the novel. Aristotle thought that women were subjects to men, however, Aristotle believed that they were higher in the ranks than slaves. Eliza was treated practically like a slave in the novel and this passage shows her others thought of her. Mr. Shelby writes “How else shall we account for the existence of this disposition, in your favorite fair? It cannot be the result of her education.” (Foster 78) in this sentence Mr. Shelby questions how they are going to treat Eliza due to her coquette tendencies. Which is something that can be concerning since they view her tendencies as a crime in their eye; or so they portrayed. In reality Eliza’s tendencies would not be looked down upon because of her gender. However, because women were looked down on during this time Aristotle’s views on women becomes accurate since during this time women were looked at as subjects to men with few
From the beginning of The Coquette Eliza Wharton is a headstrong, freedom-seeking woman. Having escaped her impending marriage with the death of her fiancé, Eliza is determined to enjoy herself, regardless of the consequences. Eliza disregards the warnings she receives from those around her, she disregards Major Sanford’s past, and she disregards the societal impact her actions will undoubtedly have. Eliza is reckless with her reputation and virtue and she pays the price.
Eliza's assaults against True Womanhood are violations of the virtues submissiveness and purity. When Eliza refuses to ignore the gallantry of Major Sanford in favor of the proposals of Reverend Boyer despite the warnings of her friends and mother, she disregards submissiveness in favor of her own fanc...
The Coquette; or, The History of Eliza Wharton narrates the tribulations of an unmarried woman in post-revolutionary America. The author Hannah Webster Foster uses the story of Miss Wharton as an allegory of female moral decay. The highly patriarchal demands that women be submissive, domestic, and married. However, the protagonist Eliza Wharton has conflicting ideas of her expectations within the society. She is highly intelligent and yearns for self-determination. Though the novel is about seduction, Foster significantly altered the basic structure of novels at the time by relating it from the female perspective. The result is a novel that explores several significant themes in post-revolutionary America among them, the existence, and the need for female education.
The epistolary novel challenges gender roles because in a society where the most accepted form of female writing was letters, the epistolary novel gives a new voice to women. The letters written by the characters especially the women go hand in hand with new republican virtues of society. Women were becoming more educated and their letters became more frequent. The epistolary form gives a sense of realism. It allows the reader to dive head first into the lives and problems of the characters, it is set up in a way where the reader ultimately knows more than the character does. This style of writing allows us to get the story from each character as an individual, which is important because if told from another character, events and emotions might get lost in translation or become skewed. Through reading Eliza’s letters, the audience can get a grasp of her personality, her morals, her humor, and her intentions. Eliza’s voice is strong and as she begins to decline her voice starts to dwindle and become muffled and eventually lost. Through being able to see how her voice gets lost, the reader can get a real sense of her decline as a character. Eliza begins to fade and other characters start to step into the light. Eliza’s letters are what makes her relatable and without these snippets from Eliza, the audience might not want to side with her. William Brown Hill’s preface to The Power of
Eliza Wharton has sinned. She has also seduced, deceived, loved, and been had. With The Coquette Hannah Webster Foster uses Eliza as an allegory, the archetype of a woman gone wrong. To a twentieth century reader Eliza's fate seems over-dramatized, pathetic, perhaps even silly. She loved a man but circumstance dissuaded their marriage and forced them to establish a guilt-laden, whirlwind of a tryst that destroyed both of their lives. A twentieth century reader may have championed Sanford's divorce, she may have championed the affair, she may have championed Eliza's acceptance of Boyer's proposal. She may have thrown the book angrily at the floor, disgraced by the picture of ineffectual, trapped, female characters.
Myrtle’s ambition proves to be her fatal flaw in being the tragic hero. The goal of her ambition is to lead her to a higher social status. In pursuit of her ambition she expresses that her husband, George Wilson, serves as an obstacle since he is in the opposite direction of where she wishes to be. She expresses disgust in George for committing actions that are considered lowly by her standards. She was particularly unenthused with her husband after it is revealed that “he borrowed somebody’s best suit to get married” without telling her. (35) She expresses her marriage as regretful, which illustrates her ambition to strive for better, being Tom. Essentially it illustrates that she would rather be treated with little respect to achieve status, rather than to be treated with respect without status. Myrtle not only exudes her ambition through her pompous attitude, but also in the manner in which she carries herself. She is a young woman in her “middle thirties, and faintly stout, but (carries) her surplus flesh sensuously,” and although she is not attributed with beauty she is somewhat charismatic. (25) The way in which she carries herself may be considered sexual, and her persona is alluring for men such as Tom. Her seducing persona illustrates her ambition in being a temptress in order to move up the social ladder.
Margaret is an intelligent, articulate, and ambitious woman who desires to rise up in social status by marrying a man of higher social rank. She attends to those above her, in hopes of elevating her status as she becomes closer to the upper-class. As a minor character, she plays a small yet crucial role in advancing Don John’s plot to slander Hero and spoil her wedding. As a lower-class character, Margaret serves as a foil to the rich girls, particularly Hero, who embodies every attitude and mindset Margaret does not. But she also offers an alternative perspective on the upper-class characters in the play. Because Margaret is victimized because of her social ambitions, punished for wanting to rise above her ...
In the stories “The Boarding House” by James Joyce and “Desiree’s Baby” by Kate Chopin, it’s ironic how different these two stories plots are, yet they are dealing with the same problem. The protagonists let their social status and the opinions of others come between their relationships instead of basing their decisions on modesty and love. In “The Boarding House,” Mr. Doran is one of the boarders and he is having an affair with a young woman named Polly, the owner of the boarding house’ daughter. He has to decide whether or not to marry Polly in order to save this perception people have of him. In “Desiree’s Baby” Armand marries an orphan woman, “She was nameless… What did it matter about a name when he could give her one of the oldest and proudest in Louisiana?”
Higgins only considers Eliza as his academic achievement not a woman herself. He transforms Eliza into a completely different person and eventually no one realize Eliza. Eliza never wanted this transition but the ultimate desire that Eliza wants is to be an independent woman.
The Gender roles in society have greatly changed throughout the years of America from puritan women who thought that showing skin was undoubtedly a sin from the flapper era in american history that welcomed the idea of women showing more of their sexuality. In the novel To Kill a Mockingbird which depict the events that occur when a white man who defends an african american man during the era of the great depression and what results from the story. Gender roles are a prevalent theme in the story. Through the characters dialogue and Scout's narration, Miss Maudie is characterized as a modern women while aunt Alexandra is characterized by her adherence to tradition.
...ve been suffering mental abuse by their husband. This play presents the voice of feminism and tries to illustrate that the power of women is slightly different, but can be strong enough to influence the male dominated society. Although all women are being oppressed in the patriarchal society at that time, Glaspell uses this play as a feminist glory in a witty way to win over men. Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters solve the crime by reflecting on Minnie Wright’s unhappy marriage that leads her to murdering. Using the relationship between female and male characters throughout the play, Glaspell speaks up to emphasize how the patriarchal society underestimated women’s rights and restricted women’s desires.
Besides the female characters’ perspective of personal freedom, the readers can also see how Major Sanford denotes the customary patriarchy that demoralizes his female counterparts. Throughout the novel, Major Sanford is a character that typically exhibits the social characterization of patriarchy and an ominous oppression of class. He superimposes various critical judgments upon Eliza Wharton as he devises ways to approach her and to win her over Reverend Boyer. Mr. Boyer, on the other hand, represents the appropriation of a male individual in this society, who allows societal pressure to mold him into a hypercritical person. He fears that Eliza’s expressive femininity can deter him from socially sustaining his prestigious status, so he shuns and avoids her. Both characters dissuade Eliza from regaining her female
Everyone has heard it said, “it is not the beauty on the outside, but the beauty on the inside that counts.” However, it is a common practice for most people to judge someone on the outside, long before they will take the time to see what is on the inside. Eliza Doolittle and Gracie Hart find this out the hard way.In the texts My Fair Lady and Miss Congeniality there is unmistakable intertextuality between the two text dispite utterly different setting and circumstances. The intertextuality is built throughout Miss Congeniality referring back to My Fair Lady, by illustrating comparisons between the conflict, character motives, and protagonist.
...e one support themselves and bears everything without asking anything in return. Racheal goes as far as to tend Stephen’s wife for the only purpose to help the one she loves. Both the care they impart and the way in which they behave both inside and outside the home are remarkable. Sissy goes as far as to confront Mr. Harthouse, who plays the role of the temper and seduction. This action may infer that a proper Victorian woman must be above the earthly temptations of the flesh.
In the end, a story that appears to poke fun at the carefree lives of upper class women actually gives great appreciation to the subtle powers women hold over men. It could be argued that one of the most important powers of women is that of controlling men with their trivial problems and needs. Perhaps Pope was demonstrating women's skill in controlling men by simply playing the part of the vain shallow debutant. Whatever his intentions were it is clear that Alexander Pope did not in fact find the women of his time to be completely powerless, instead they were the driving forces of the household and of society.