Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Discrimination of women
Gender Discrimination Against Women
Discrimination of women
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Discrimination of women
The study called the Citizen Political Ambition Study was created to try and figure out why a gender gap still exists between men and women in politics. It offers a first-of-its-kind examination of three study groups with two opposite sexess dividing the groups in two. The focus groups were groups that worked in jobs that were more likely to end up running for office. The three occupations were within law, business, and education. The results were based on 3,765 participants of those were 1,969 men and 1,796 women. The study found that gender does play a role in the decision of whether or not to run for office, which I will also argue determines who wins and loses based on sex.
The theory used in this study is the Gender Socialization Theory.
…show more content…
I think this could have been done a lot cleaner with a mock election. For example, you could take a extremely qualified woman and put her up against an extremely unqualified man and see the results unfold. Obviously, if the woman is not unanimously favored with her lost list of accomplishments, awards, and experience, something must be stopping her success. That something could only be that she is a woman. This study proves that sex does not determine whether or not a person runs for office or not. From this study and the results of a mock election we could find a better understanding of why there is still a gap in …show more content…
I’m not sure what to call it, maybe the ‘double standard’ would work. In bizarre elections, women are criticized on their voice. Some say they do not speak softly enough, some people even say they scream. Other times they criticise their dress, their Librarianesk pantsuits, or the “church heel” shoes they wear at debates. They may be scrutinized for having a bad hair day or using a scrunchie. Maybe they just do not smile enough. I honestly believe image has a huge impact on people, even more so toward women candidates. In my opinion, Hillary would have never won the Democratic Primary if she walked out on stage with as much effort on her hair and pantsuit as Bernie did with his hair and suit (which was none). I would just argue for this that there is a higher or even double standard for women in politics that may turn women off to the idea of public service or cause them their election to a
When questioned about her political career, Clinton quipped, “‘I suppose I could have stayed home and baked cookies and had teas…but what I decided to do was fulfill my profession’” by running for office (237). Clinton continues to further the legacy of Chisholm and other trailblazing women by demonstrating her bravery in running for office. Still, as one Republican official described her, Clinton is often viewed as “‘grating, abrasive and boastful’” (236). Generally, female candidates are expected to be “more caring, compassionate, and emotional than their male counterparts, who tend to be seen as tough, assertive, and decisive” (Bauer). This issue is common among female candidates, and this expectation has certainly impacted Clinton’s campaign. Despite her background as Secretary of State, Clinton is continually questioned by her opponent about her strength. This constant doubt over fortitude is almost exclusively an issue for female candidates – and is one that has plagued Clinton’s political career, especially in this election
Before the 1920s men and women were thought to have two separate roles in life. People believed women should be concerned with their children, home, and religion, while men took care of business and politics. In 1920 there were significant changes for women in politics, the home, and the workplace. When the 19th amendment passed it gave women the right to vote. “Though slowly to use their newly won voting rights, by the end of the decade women were represented local, state, and national political committees and were influencing the political agenda of the federal government.” Now a days it’s normal for women to be involved in politics and it’s normal for women to vote. Another drastic change
Ever since the women’s suffrage movement of the 1920s, there has been a push for eliminating sexism and providing equality between men and women, especially in the workplace. The United States, along with most of the world, has made great strides in gender equality since then. Women can vote, and have careers, and men are able to stay home with the children if they choose to. But are the sexes really equal now? There are three common answers to this question. Some say yes, while the most common answer is no. The debate does not end there, however. It is typically assumed gender inequality is oppressing women and limiting their rights. Regardless, there are those who say the system is harming men instead. So, if gender inequality still exists,
The underrepresentation of female’s interests and values is a global phenomenon as there is no country where women are equally represented on all levels of government. Since most women in the Western World gained the right to vote, there is no area of human life or development sector which is immune from the impact of inequitable gender relations. The central thesis of this paper is that women’s underrepresentation in elected office creates serious problems. This paper begins by analysing the key barriers of women to get into politics, especially into leading positions. It will then go on to the argument that women have special interests and needs, and that male politicians cannot represent those concerns adequately. Additionally, this paper describes further problems in today’s political world, such as women’s identification with
One thousand years go by and an abundant amount of people still view women in a stereotypical type of way. On the opposing view, if women did not overstretch the slightest of things, this wouldn’t be such an enormous issue. Women may be overreacting to what the media has to say about them. It is not affecting everybody but a vast majority of successful women from continuing to moving forward said Marianne Schnall. Important to realize, women are capable of doing jobs men can do. Such jobs as being an engineer, physician, mechanic, lawyer and even top notch business women! Up to the present time there is an ongoing public debate on women suffering from double standards. If it makes a female feel threatened or belittled than it may be sexist. A very interesting article this came to be because the writer had numerous accountants to keep her argument steady. A worthy writer brings up present time activities, statistics, and people being affected by the scenario and provides the reader some closure. With a devastatingly crucial issue such as women being shunned by the media, it’s not okay to have the ideas of other people in your work. In the article, “Controversial Hillary Cover of Time Illuminates Sexism in the Media” by Marianne Schnall, implies that the media is negatively affecting the chances of women becoming successful with all the sexism it is portraying. Marianne Schnall is a published writer and professional interviewer with many influential credentials that she in not afraid to use.
When you think of a CEO of a company or of world political leaders, do you think of a man or of a woman? Many, if not most of us, see these positions as being held by men. In this essay, I will explain why women are still not equal to men. In the first paragraph I will discuss inequalities that happen in the workplace. The second section will show the differences that occur within the athletic world. Thirdly, I will explain the differences in education and home life. Even though we are approaching the twenty-first century, women in our society are still not equal to men.
Women of power are treated very poorly. These women of power include politicians, doctors, lawyers and businesswomen. Arguably, female politicians receive the worst treatment of all. Everything they do is constantly under media scrutiny, like what they wear and what they say, much more so than their male counterparts. The difference in the number of men and women congress members is vast, almost 5 to 1. Many women shy away from the political light for these reasons. An article, “Women in Politics”, written by Kenneth Jost, he explains the feats of women in the past 100 years:
A subject that has drawn a great deal of scholarly attention are the burdens of female politicians. Women seeking office have to deal with a host of issues that may affect their political campaign and chances of being elected. There are several theories that address some of the obstacles female politicians face: gender stereotyping by voters have detrimental effects for female candidates (Kahn and Goldenberg 1991), male candidates have access to political resources that just are not as accessible to the female politician (Deber 1982), the portrayal of the female candidates as less than male candidates by the media damages her chances of winning (Cohen 1963), and those differences in turn shape public perceptions with the effect of ruining her fate politically (Heldman 2005). Some of the dialogue centers on the media’s role instilling the image of women politicians and its ability to shape public perception. Consequently, “nor have we escaped the sexist prism through which women in politics are portrayed in the media and viewed by the public” (Potts 2012). I must specify that the media does not control the outcome of elections, more so, directly influence public perceptions. Such a debate becomes important when the media perpetuate gender stereotypes that directly influence voters in a political context. So, the focus of this paper is examine to what extent the role of the media effect the image of women running for power positions by enforcing stereotypes in modern politics.
Another issue is sexism. Hillary clinton wanted to be America’s first president is that not amazing. She is teaching younger girls that you are just the same as men. You are equals. She is setting the standards.
...r president, 42% of respondents favored a man, 31% favored a woman, and women and men were more likely to favor their own sex. Therefore, from what we are shown, women tend to be favored less than men as potential candidates. The reasons behind this are of the associations employers will make between the leadership role and masculine skills and traits. Skill and trait theory however are good tools for employers to assess a potential candidates ability to be a leader. Using this as a recruitment tool gives individuals a clearer image of what they need to undertake to become a leader and fulfill the position. It can also highlight the areas they are lacking in. However when negative stereotype and prejudice is involved in recruitment and selection, then the usefulness of this tool is no longer apparent, lop sided judgments makes this recruitment tool weak and solvent.
Of course, sexism played a role in the very fact that Hillary was ever a serious candidate. Imagine if Hillary Clinton had been the female equivalent of Donald Trump. Imagine that she was an overweight woman with five children by three husbands, had six bankruptcies, and a history of dodging military service. The personal lives of women are always held to higher standards by society and certainly, if Hillary was not acceptable in her role as a woman she would never have made it as far as she did. However, Hillary did qualify as an acceptable woman in the eyes of voters.
One of the main purposes of the United States government is to make policy that is relevant and helpful to the people of the country. To this end, it is important that our leaders understand and reflect the values and concerns of the people they represent. It is important, therefore, that it is comprised of a diverse group of individuals to match the diversity of the nation’s population. It is concerning, then, that, despite the fact that women make up 52 percent of the population, they only make up 17-18 percent of the United States Congress. Not only are they underrepresented, but they also show lower interest in running for office to begin with compared to their male counterparts. It is important to address the causes of and solutions to this gender gap in political ambition and representation so that the government is more reflective of the people it is supposed to govern and therefore better able to tackle the issues of the day in a productive way. The gender gap in political ambition is a pervasive and persistent problem that has its roots partially in the differential coverage of appearance and character traits for women as opposed to political viewpoints for men in the media and the problem is also exacerbated by stigmas related to other identities women candidates have such as those related to their race, sexuality, or gender; the best way to bridge the gender gap in politics is with grassroots activism supported by political organizations and specific policies geared toward gender equality in the workplace and in representation, such as affirmative action.
Women continue to be underrepresented in leadership positions in the public and private sector. Many countries have responded to this issue by implementing gender quotas for political seats and corporate boardroom positions. This paper reviews the stereotype beliefs that women leaders are faced with which serve as barriers for the attainment of high-power leadership positions. There is incomplete information on the identification of qualified women leaders and thus most likely the persistence of the stereotypes against women leaders. Greater exposure to qualified women leaders would reduce the gender bias and provide them with greater access to high-power leadership positions. Studies in France, the United Kingdom, and Argentina demonstrate that quotas increase female leadership and influence policy outcomes. Pros and cons to the implementation of mandatory gender quotas for publically listed companies in the United States are identified. Due to the relatively new initiatives of gender equality through quotas, longer-term effects are still to be determined.
According to the report, women have been running for public offices in ever increasing numbers. Nevertheless, it can sometimes be a daunting task, as women can sometimes encounter violence or prejudice in the field of politics. However, it seems that women’s difficulty in participating in government and politics is an issue which is being tackled in many areas. It seems that it is (or has been) an international issue, which is consistent across many cultures. The types of obstacles women face may vary from are to are, but there usually exist a few obstacles. For example, the report cited an example concerning the 2007 Kenyan general elections where a record number of women sought parliamentary seats, however, there were also unprecedented levels of violence. Women across the world have been grossly underrepresented in government for ages. Of course, certain things are...
women that they could achieve anything. Margaret Smith seemed to have opened the door to the