What effect does a question about a chicken crossing a road have? The question of why a chicken crossed a road appears to have first been posited in the New York periodical, Knickerbocker in 1847. Written then, as follows, “There are 'quips and quillets' which seem actual conundrums, but yet are actually none. Of such is this: 'Why did the chicken cross the road? Because, it wants to get to the other side” (Anon). The question seems valid, the answer seems apparent. Suggesting a futility of effort in pondering what should be obvious. If the question, and not the chicken, actually causes effect, then the question stands alone and does not need a chicken at all. The chicken could easily be replaced by a cow and the effect of the question would remain the same.
But what is the effect and is correlation valid? A sorrowed individual cries, “Oh Lord, why me?” He surely expects no immediate and vocal response from his deity; the exclamation serves only as a prompt to begin an analysis of his situation, just as the chicken question prompt’s us all to examine our decisions and consequences. So does the chicken question cause inwardness? For the answer one must look for evidence to support the effect. The humanistic psychologist Abraham Maslow in his “Hierarchy of Needs” stated that when needs such as: food, safety, love and esteem are met, man has an instinctual need for self-actualization; he needs to fulfill his potential by: work, music, art or whatever he loves to pursue, to achieve “His upper level of capabilities” (Maslow). Most might agree that growth and success require analysis of past success, or failure. The chicken question seems to function as a vehicle for that analysis therefore, causing the effect of inwardness
Alternati...
... middle of paper ...
...? Is the effect valid? The evidence has been presented, the decision is yours. But one must conclude that the questions effect does not need the Chicken. The question needs you.
Works Cited
Anonymous. "Why did the Chicken Cross the Street." Knickerbocker [New York NY] 1847. Print.
Burnham, Peter Burnham. Capitalism: The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics.(Marx). Ed. Unk. Oxford UK: Oxford University, 2003. Print.
Hotherstall, David. History of Psychology. (B.F. Skinner). Ed. Ukn. New York: McGraw Hill, 2003. Print.
Simons, Janet A., Donald B. Irwin, and Beverly A. Drinnien. Pshycology-The Search for Understanding (Maslow). Ed. Unknown. New York NY: West, 1987. Print.
Ukn. "Lyrics to Paul Soman's "Slip Sliding Away."" Lyrics. Lyrics Freak. Ed. Ukn. Yahoo.Com, 2011. Web. 1 Apr. 2011. .
Holding: No the word chicken alone is questionable. Frigaliment had to prove that its definition of chi...
Skinner, B.F. A Brief Survey of Operant Behavior. Cambridge, MA: B. F. Skinner Foundation. 1938
D. Brett King, Wayne Viney, & William Douglas Woody, (2013). A History of Psychology, Ideas & Context. 3rd ed. United States: Pearson.
Simons, Janet A., Donald B. Irwin, and Beverly A. Drinnin. "Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs." Psychology: the Search for Understanding. St. Paul: West Pub., 1987. Print.
The Communist Manifesto was published in 1848, a period of political turmoil in Europe. Its meaning in today’s capitalistic world is a very controversial issue. Some people, such as the American government, consider socialism taboo and thus disregard the manifesto. They believe that capitalism, and the world itself, has changed greatly from the one Marx was describing in the Manifesto and, therefore, that Marx’s ideas cannot be used to comprehend today’s economy. Others find that the Manifesto highlights issues that are still problematic today. Marx’s predicative notions in the Communist Manifesto are the key to understanding modern day capitalism.
The development of psychology like all other sciences started with great minds debating unknown topics and searching for unknown answers. Early philosophers and psychologists such as Sir Francis Bacon and Charles Darwin took a scientific approach to psychology by introducing the ideas of measurement and biology into the way an indi...
The study of psychology began as a theoretical subject a branch of ancient philosophy, and later as a part of biological sciences and physiology. However, over the years, it has grown into a rigorous science and a separate discipline, with its own sets of guidance and experimental techniques. This paper aims to study the various stages that the science of psychology passed through to reach its contemporary status, and their effects on its development. It begins with an overview of the historical and philosophical basis of psychology, discusses the development of the various schools of thought, and highlights their effects on contemporary personal and professional decision-making.
century. In G. A. Kimble & K. Schlesinger (Eds.), Topics in the history of psychology (Vol. 2,
Rieber, R. W. (2001). Wilhelm Wundt in history: the making of a scientific psychology. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
Kimble, G. A., Wertheimer, M., and White, C. L. (1991) Portraits of Pioneers in Psychology, Volume I. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Karl Marx, in the Capital, developed his critique of capitalism by analyzing its characteristics and its development throughout history. The critique contains Marx’s most developed economic analysis and philosophical insight. Although it was written in 1850s, its values still serve an important purpose in the globalized world and maintains extremely relevant in the twenty-first century.
Hergenhahn, B.R. (2009). Social and Theoretical Psychology: Conceptual and Historical Issues 1. An introduction to the History of Psychology. 1 (1), p1-28.
With satisfaction of both the physiological and the safety needs respectively, the needs for love, affection and belongingness come into view. Abraham Maslow suggested that at this level, one incapacitates the emotional state of aloneness and estrangement. With this need, one gives and as well receives Love, Affection and Belongingness.
In this essay I am looking at where Psychology as a discipline has come from and what affects these early ideas have had on psychology today, Psychology as a whole has stemmed from a number of different areas of study from Physics to Biology,
...r he explained the right answer I was still confused. After looking at the question over and over I could not see the answer he got. This made me question this specific experiment. If I was not able to understand whether I was truly right or wrong, how would the participants feel?