Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The law and legal system
The law and legal system
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The law and legal system
The Change in Work of Solicitors and Barristers
Many changes have taken place in the work of solicitors and barristers
in recent years and there is still pressure for many other areas to
change. These recent changes have led to much discussion about whether
the professions of solicitors and barristers will eventually become
one.
Solicitors used to have the monopoly on conveyancing, but in the
1980’s the conveyancing monopoly was lost when an Act of parliament
was passed allowing ‘licensed conveyancers’ to conduct conveyancing as
well. The loss of conveyancing did not have the huge impact that
solicitors expected, yet there may be further changes ahead. The OFT’s
report asked whether banks and building societies should be able to
provide conveyancing and probate services to their clients. Small
firms of solicitors worried if they lost too large a portion of their
conveyancing and probate work that they would go under; it is small
firms that often acts for the most vulnerable in society and provide
access to justice in unfashionable parts of town or areas of law. The
OFT’s report also raised the issue of whether the right to conduct
litigation should still operate through a solicitor. In it’s follow up
review the OFT was disappointed that no further steps had been taken
to allow barristers to conduct litigation, and is currently pressing
for a change.
Before Calsa 1990, solicitors only had rights of audience in the
Magistrates and county courts and barristers had a monopoly on rights
of audience in the higher courts. For practically all other hearings
in higher courts they had to instruct a barrister to do the advocacy.
Ca...
... middle of paper ...
...re
dealt with justly.
It seems that solicitors and barristers currently have the power to
narrow the differences between the professions further with the new
rules and Acts, solicitors in particular. Yet solicitor do not seem
keen on doing advocacy work and barristers are not welcoming them into
it, and if this is the way that those who practice the law at current
times want it then it should be left alone. As times change, those
coming into the legal profession may take advantage of the
opportunities to practice law from both angles granted to them by the
higher powers and it will gradually becomes acceptable and the legal
professions will fuse in a natural way. But it would not be fair if
the current practising solicitors and barristers are forced into
altering their profession because the legal system says so.
Peter Paralegal is employed by Honest Law Firm and has been instructed by his supervising attorney to prepare and conduct initial interviews with two potential clients to see if a conflict of interest is present. Big Box and Value Mart are competitors and are requesting representation by Honest Law Firm on matters that are unrelated to one another. Peter Paralegal was also asked to perform tasks related to the cases such as; prepare questions and conduct initial interviews, explain legal fees arrangements, establish the attorney-client relations, draft initial pleadings and responses, interview witnesses, draft and sign initial case evaluation letters.
people in these 21st century society wonder, “When is Justice to be done?” For district attorneys,
...ps have access to the law making machinery, but that access comes at a price and it by no means assures success.
The Law is always changing and it reflects today’s society. However, the Law is not perfect because it is made by humans. The Law does not always coincide with Justice and Morality, for example, Carroll has lawfully been acquitted, but justice hasn’t been served, because everyone knows that he has been acquitted on a technicality. Also, abortion is legal, but many people feel that it is immoral. Because of laws in need of repealing and the inconsistencies between Law, Justice and Morality, it is not surprising that the Law can often be seen as an ‘ass’.
... decision also brings suspiscion about whether or not if things go south is he going to take any accountability. In conclusion, this case truly represents the use of unauthorized practice of law.
Lawyers. In today's culture, just the word alone is enough to inspire countless jokes and endless sarcastic comments. Far from being the most loved profession, lawyers have attained a very bad image despite the importance of their work and the prestige and wealth that usually accompanies it. Were lawyers seen in this fashion when Charles Dickens was writing his magnificent pieces of literature? The image of lawyers of that time may not seem so different to the people who are about to enter the twenty-first century.
My major is Paralegal Studies and I expect to graduate with an Associates of Arts degree in December of this year. Many years ago, as an investigator for both a private company and a county agency, I was introduced to the legal field. Recently, I was awarded the opportunity to attend college, so I decided I wanted to reenter the legal profession as a paralegal. The paralegal profession appeals to me, because I enjoy the processes of developing a case, as well as its legal aspects. A paralegal is involved in a case from the beginning to the end; from the initial client interview to assisting the attorney during the client’s trial or the settlement process. My goal is to become a paralegal for a solo practitioner or a small firm in my local area who represent clients in different areas of the law.
However, individuals’ abstract idea of how the law works can be contrary to the actual workings
Today in American there are millions of people who enter the legal system due to different kinds of
It is no secret that the American legal system is distinct from other developed Western nations in its practices and laws. This variation, termed “adversarial legalism” by Professor Robert Kagan in his book, Adversarial Legalism, has two salient features: formal legal contestation and litigant activism. In civil and criminal law, jury trials and a specific lawyering culture exemplify these traits. Though adversarial legalism responds well to the American desires of justice and protection from harm while simultaneously respecting the societal fear of a government with too much power, it leads to extremely costly litigation and immense legal uncertainty. To reconcile the American view of justice and the undesirable outcomes of formal contestation and litigant activism, the legal system has gone so far as to reform large parts of the system, including bureaucratic regulations and the plea bargaining process. However, as Kagan states, rather than reduce the costliness or uncertainty of the legal process, these procedural changes have merely lead to an increase in litigation and, therefore, an increase of adversarial legalism in criminal and civil law.
and provide means for future inequalities. The US legal system will always adapt to allow for inequalities.
The Analysis of Solicitors and Barristers 1) Describe the main differences between solicitors and barristers with regard to work and training. 2) Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of having a single legal profession. 1) Background The legal profession is largely middle class, partly due to the lack of funding for professional courses. In 1999, ethnic minorities formed 8.5% of the Bar and 5% of solicitors.
Today, we see it everywhere. On reality tv, court tv, and even on the news. We are constantly required to judge peoples actions as just or unjust.
The American Court System is an important part of American history and one of the many assets that makes America stand out from other countries. It thrives for justice through its structured and organized court systems. The structures and organizations are widely influenced by both the State and U.S Constitution. The courts have important characters that used their knowledge and roles to aim for equality and justice. These court systems have been influenced since the beginning of the United State of America. Today, these systems and law continue to change and adapt in order to keep and protect the peoples’ rights.
Since decisions are predicated on previous rulings, it is much easier to pursue this procedure. There is an expectation on the part of people, as there is conformity in terms of the outcome to expect. The procedure is far more flexible and much more realistic as there no set, long drawn rules but real scenarios that have already been dealt with. This is a clear advantage over the codified system where the judges have follow and apply the rules of the code exactly.