Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gender inequality in the justice system
Gender inequality in the justice system
Gender inequality and law
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Analysis of Solicitors and Barristers
1) Describe the main differences between solicitors and barristers
with regard to work and training.
2) Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of having a single legal
profession.
1)
Background
The legal profession is largely middle class, partly due to the lack
of funding for professional courses.
In 1999, ethnic minorities formed 8.5% of the Bar and 5% of
solicitors. In 1998 ethnic minorities formed 16% of trainee solicitors
and pupil barristers. Ethnic minority candidates find it more
difficult to obtain training contracts, pupilage and tenancies: 7%
succeeded compared to 45% of white students in 1993. Five QCs out of
69 in April 1999 were from an ethnic minority
Women make up 25% of practicing barristers and 33.9% of practicing
solicitors (as at July 1998). Women earn less than men and men reach
higher positions (LCD Report, Without Prejudice, 1994; and a Law
Society survey, September 1999). Women make up 7% of QCs (as at
October 1998); only nine out of the 69 new QCs in April 1999 were
women. The Law Society and Bar Council have issued policies to prevent
sex discrimination.
Solicitors
When people need legal advice, they contact a solicitor. Solicitors
offer skilled advice on all kinds of legal matters, from buying a
house to selling a business. Solicitors can decide whether or not to
take a case. Most solicitors provide general advice and do ‘paper
work’, e.g. writing letters, drafting contracts and tenancies,
conveyancing, wills, divorce petitions.
Solicitors also represent their clients in court, mostly the lower
courts; but some have advocac...
... middle of paper ...
...to
prepare the case and follow it through to the end. Good work has
often been done by solicitors, only to see the case badly argued by a
barrister in court. This is because he is too remote from the issues
and often does not come into the case until the last moment. NOTE:
It is also argued that solicitors are too close to the issues to argue
the case well.
Some people say that the double manning of cases is also responsible
for some inefficiency. It encourages the ‘shrugging off’ of
responsibility. Responsibility can be pushed from one to the other
and standards will fall.
OTHER COUNTRIES
In many other countries the profession is united and the system works
well.
Some protagonists argue that if the barristers are absorbed into firms
of solicitors then experts would still be available to all.
In 1977, Nils Christie wrote the essay, “Conflicts as Properties”, in which he discusses the four problems that occur within the western legal system. The four problems that affect the legal system in four ways is that the courts are always located in areas that people may not have easy access to locate, the courthouses are challenging to find your way around, the parties are irrelevant to much of the proceedings and the proceedings makes conflicts between the actual parties involved turn into conflicts between the State and the parties 2.
Despite legislation for equal opportunities, sexism is still evident in the workplace. Women have made great advancements in the workforce and have become an integral part of the labor market. They have greater access to higher education and as a result, greater access to traditionally male dominated professions such as law. While statistics show that women are equal to men in terms of their numbers in the law profession, it is clear however, that they have not yet achieved equality in all other areas of their employment. Discrimination in the form of gender, sex and sexual harassment continues to be a problem in today’s society.
People are represented in court by two kinds of lawyers, court-appointed lawyers and public defenders, which mean "hired lawyers" (Green, 2001). People that have higher income can hire their own lawyers. The lower and middle-income people are mainly the ones who rely on court appointed lawyers. These people don't have the money to hire a lawyer. Court appointed lawyers are not working in your best interest for many reasons.
* There were two branches of the legal profession - barristers, and attorneys and solicitors. Solicitors usually dealt with landed estates and attorneys advised parties in lawsuits. The two roles combined and the name “solicitor” was adopted (The Law Society). The attorney or solicitor was the general legal adviser and attended to all the paperwork and collected the evidence. He dealt with legal matters on behalf of his client such as the drawing up of wills, trust instruments, marriage contracts, and conveyances of land (Eurolegal Services).
•Solicitors had to serve as an in-between between the barristers and their clients. So they were “in trade” which was less respectful to become solicitor one had to be an apprentice for 5 years to a practicing lawyer
Gaze, G (2009) ‘The Sex Discrimination Act after 25 years: What is its role in eliminating gender inequality and discrimination in Australia?’, Insights, vol.7,p.13-17, viewed 5 October 2011, .
Although the legal profession is a single discourse community, it is made up of many smaller discourse communities. This is so because while all lawyers share the same broad goals of the legal profession and have a general knowledge and expertise in all areas of the law, most lawyers after graduating from law school and passing the bar exam specialize in a particular area of law. This specialization requires the lawyer to go beyond the broad concepts of law as a whole and to become knowledgeable and proficient in the sometimes minute details of a more specific area of law. Even then, some lawyers will go even further to focus on one aspect or another of that particular area of law. This results in most lawyers being members of many even smal...
The paralegal profession developed as legal secretaries assumed additional duties to help attorneys with their workload. The paralegal performs legal tasks under the supervision of an attorney that maximizes attorneys' productivity and cost efficiency in the delivery of legal services. Paralegals work in many different types of law firms, corporations or government agencies in many areas of law (Hollingshead). All duties performed by a paralegal are under the supervision of an attorney who is responsible for the paralegal’s conduct. In fact, the American Bar Association Standing Committee on Paralegals define paralegals or legal assistants [used synonymously] as a person qualified by education, training or work experiences, who is employed or retained by a lawyer, law office, corporation, government agency, or other entity who performs specific delegated legal substantive work for which a lawyer is responsible (ABA). In class, we learne...
The statement made above is true to a certain extent. The legal system in the United Kingdom is mainly based on The Doctrine of the Separation of Powers, which is written in the 18th century by a French philosopher called Montesquieu. Montesquieu, believed that in order to have a ‘fair’ legal system, the functions should be divided into 3 different bodies of power in a state. This was to prevent absolute power in either one person or a body of people. He believed that by giving one person or a body of people absolute power the state would be in danger of people having the ability to abuse this power and it would eventually lead to a dictatorship. To ensure that this would not happen, he suggested to separate the functions into three different bodies; the executive (government), legislature (parliament) and the Judiciary.
The idea behind fusion or is developed on the idea of the merging or collaboration of a key element. In relevance to this essay, this would be the merging of solicitors and barristers to be a part of one profession. There is a lot of debate on whether or not the jobs that are completed by the two professions are actually different. Solicitors are generally the people who provide clients with information and support regarding their case. This can be provided to a wide variety of people, whether they are individuals, groups, private companies or public sector organisations. Barristers are people who generally specialise in a certain area of law and can provide specialist legal advice to clients and can be the form of representation for that
A predominant one are “legal advice clinics” set up by law schools which present an excellent opportunity to gain experience working on cases whilst also developing their key legal skills, supervised by an experienced practitioner. One example is the Northumbria Student Law Office, a successful clinical legal education scheme by Northumbria University [8], where students take part in a legal advice and representation scheme as part of academic development, covering a wide range of legal areas such as housing, family and employment [9]. Others include “Streetlaw”, where links are built with schools or community groups to assist students in researching certain areas of law, then prepare and deliver interactive workshops on them; volunteering with legal organisations (eg. Citizens Advice Bureau) to give advice or assist them in their services; work on cases involving potential miscarriages of justice (“Innocence Project”); and enhance advocacy skills through the Free Representation Unit (FRI), among others [10].
Professionals are people who have equipped themselves with the knowledge and skills in a given field. The interest of improvement of the professional identity is an evidence of how high standards are placed upon the professionals in the community (Johnson et al., 2012). Each profession creates its norms, values and scope of practice that distinguishes it from any other profession. Different legal ethics are upheld and everyone needs to work as per the stipulated ethics in the field to be part of the profession. People in the field are expected to be knowledgeable and independently use decision
Torres-Spelliscy et al. (2010) encouraged diversity in the American court system and provided ten practices to attract the brightest female and minority candidates for the judiciary, and they are as follows: (1) grapple fully with implicit bias; (2) increase strategic recruitment; (3) be clear about the role of diversity in the nominating process in state statutes; (4) keep the application and interviewing process transparent; (5) train commissioners to be effective recruiters and nominators; (6) appoint a diversity compliance officer or ombudsman; (7) create diverse commissions by statute; (8) maintain high standards and quality; (9) raise judicial salaries; (10) improve record keeping (p. 3). Appointing minorities and females to the U.S. bench will increase public confidence, and it will also bring important value towards the representation of women and ethnic
Generally speaking, the Florida Bar Exam comprises two assessments: the General Bar and the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination (MPRE). The General Bar, a bi-annual examination administered by the Florida Board of Bar Examiners, evaluates the candidate’s acumen of general and Florida law after graduating from an ABA-accredited college of law. In contrast, the MPRE from the National Conference of Bar Examiners (NCBE), administrated three times per year by the LSAC, assess an applicant’s knowledge and understanding of established standards related to professional conduct. Eligibility for the MPRE, unlike the General Bar, does not require graduation and therefore recommended for third-year law students. Nevertheless, our prospect
Office of National Statistics (2004), Education, Ethnicity and Identity, Available from: http://www.statistics.gov.uk/cci/nugget.asp?id=461 [accessed 28 September 2010], Cite as (office of National Statistics 28 September 2010)