Peter Paralegal 's Legal Arrangements

998 Words2 Pages

Peter Paralegal is employed by Honest Law Firm and has been instructed by his supervising attorney to prepare and conduct initial interviews with two potential clients to see if a conflict of interest is present. Big Box and Value Mart are competitors and are requesting representation by Honest Law Firm on matters that are unrelated to one another. Peter Paralegal was also asked to perform tasks related to the cases such as; prepare questions and conduct initial interviews, explain legal fees arrangements, establish the attorney-client relations, draft initial pleadings and responses, interview witnesses, draft and sign initial case evaluation letters. Would it violate the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct for Peter the Paralegal to perform the tasks assigned by his supervising attorney? Would Peter Paralegal be practicing UPL if he performed the work? Can the Honest Law Firm ethically represent both clients on unrelated matters without a conflict of interest? A Paralegal is defined by the American Bar Association as a person, qualified by education, training or work experience who is employed or retained by a lawyer, law office, corporation, governmental agency or other entity and who performs specifically delegated substantive legal work for which a lawyer is responsible. Paralegals work under direct supervision of an attorney and follow the same ethical rules of the ABA as a lawyer does. ABA Rule 5.3, states that a lawyer must give such assistants appropriate instruction and supervision concerning the ethical aspects of their employment, particularly regarding the obligation not to disclose information relating to representation of the client, and should be responsible for their work product. Per the State B... ... middle of paper ... ...fter the lawyer has explained the conflict. 2 Within the meaning of this rule, direct adversity exists when a firm represents two clients who are engaged in litigation against each other. Under 1.7(a), direct adversity does not exist in these two scenarios. If a situation in the future occurs where the competitors may file lawsuits against each other, the attorney could not ethically represent either business due to information learned while representing the businesses on cases prior. A lawyer is required by Rule 1.6, not to use information secured from the representation of one client for the benefit of another client. Positional conflict is when an attorney represents two clients on unrelated issues with the outcome of one case possibly being adverse to the other. An issue conflict occurs when an attorney represents two clients on opposite sides of an issue.

Open Document