Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Moral heroes in literature
Now and then character analysis
Now and then character analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the thriller short story “The Birds”, by du Maurier, there are many characters and events that occur to separate this story from almost any other story. By examining his characterization, morality, and functions, it becomes clear that du Maurier is characterizing Nat as a hero that takes danger and unexpectedness in a straightforward manner to reveal the certain skill and mindset needed in order to survive in the position that Nat is in.
Nat Hocken is one of the essential characters in the short story. He is presented to the reader as a solitary man, sitting down and watching the birds fly around and over the sea. He is also presented as having been in the war, the story stating that he was working on the farm part time, “... because of
…show more content…
a wartime disability…” (1) After the birds had attacked for the first time, Nat became very protective of his family and tended to them before anything else in the story. Although du Maurier tells us some things directly about Nat, his indirect characterization is plentiful. Nat, although somewhat mysterious at this point, still has some solid personality.
He is very resistant to fear, as he dealt with the birds very calmly and even when he was being attacked or was about to be attacked, he stuck to his mindset and carried out whatever he had planned to do. Using that information and details from many other instances, the reader can infer that Nat will put his family and their protection in front of everything when they are in trouble or need him at all. After the first attack, instead of thinking of it as bad luck, “...He got up and started to work on the kitchen windows…” (10) Nat is also described and inferred to enjoy nature (at least until he was by the birds) and “sitting on the cliff’s edge, he’d watch the birds.” (1) Using all of du Maurier’s indirect characterization, the reader can learn much about Nat’s personality and how he would think and react to certain …show more content…
events. The reader can learn several things about Nat’s moral constitution based on how he handles many situations and the choices he makes.
After the birds attack Nat and his family the first time, Nat tries to warn all of his neighbors that they could potentially be in danger. Nat, realizing he and his family could be in danger, as well, boards up the windows, blocks the doors and does anything that would help keep his family safe. Nat’s character is shown most effectively when he is invited by Mr. Trigg to go shooting with several of his neighbors and instead of going decides to “...get along home…” (15) This shows the conflict in Nat and how his choices affect the story. With the choice of going with his neighbors and having some “fun” after a stressful day and terrifying previous night, he once again chooses to stay with his family and keep them safe. This moral constitution of Nat makes him a very powerful and resistant character to the reader and the characters in the book
alike. Nat is du Maurier’s way of creating a protagonist to step up against all of the other supporting characters and rise to the top of the survivalists. Nat is a static character, with almost no visible changes in the story, disregarding the fact that he might not like nature due to his current situation. He is round, however, with many motivations in the story, such as when he hurried to the bus, in fear of the birds attacking Jill “... although he knew the bus would come to the top of the hill before four o’clock…” (12) and arrived very early. The way of how Nat reacts to the situation at hand sets a thrilling and haunting mood for the reader, as well as giving the bigger picture of how dire the situation is or how calm it is. He also helps suspense and action by giving an insight to his thoughts and what he deals with in the days after and during the bird’s attacks. Nat’s use of purpose in the story is very significant to the plot and helps emit du Maurier’s intended effect. The development of Nat and his creation at all was crucial to the advancement and growing of “The Birds”. He was a fitting protagonist to face off against the birds and truly create a great atmosphere and plot, unusual to most any other story. By using the birds and his family, Nat is developed as a very caring, resistant, and brave many and hero to many people in the story. Everything together creates a realistic fiction piece sure to make any reader fear birds.
Doug Swieteck, from “Okay for Now”, by Gary D. Schmidt, lived a life in anger. At the beginning of the book, he was very hateful of everything. He had spent a long time in anger and disgust, trying to find a way in life. Near the beginning of the book, Joe Pepitone gave Doug his baseball cap and jacket in person, to Doug. But, Doug’s mean older brother took the cap and his dad took his jacket. That added to Doug’s anger even more. But, luckily he turned it around in the middle and end of the book. He ended being a lot happier and was able to control his emotions better.
Tragedy struck Holcomb, Kansas on November 15th, 1959, with the lost of four members of the Clutter family, who were well known in their town. “Of all the people in the world, the Clutters were the least likely to be murdered,” (Capote 85) was what one townsperson said about the widely known family. Their lives were taken by two men named, Richard (Dick) Hickock and Perry Smith. After months of fleeing, Dick and Perry were captured. Over the next couple of years they were through numerous hearings and questioning over the murder they committed. Then the day came where some believed that vengeance was served. Hickock and Smith were both executed by hanging just after midnight on April 14, 1965. Dick and Perry 's mental health was widely discussed
Who was once a hero, was now the villain in many regards; he was the protagonist at first, and after, became the antagonist after his fortune took over his morality. Henry Ford had well-meaning intentions at first. Truly wanting to connect the world, he wanted to create a car that everyone can afford and be able to enjoy. Although he achieved his goal of creating this car, the model T, several unintentional controversial ideologies were established along with it.
ultimately defends the wild in all of its forms. He opens the novel with a narrative story about a
As much as generous and honest Nick Carraway is, he still needs a few important improvements in himself. Nick went to Yale, fought in world war one and moved to East of New York to work in finance. After moving to New York, Nick faces tough dilemmas throughout the story such as revealing secrets, and witnessing betrayal. His innocence and malevolence toward others was beyond his control. He did not have the ability or knowledge to know what he should have done in the spots he was set in. He seemed lost and having no control of what went on- almost trapped- but indeed, he had more control than he could have ever known. Because of the situations he has experienced and the people he has met, such as Gatsby, Tom, Jordan and Daisy, his point of view on the world changed dramatically which is very depressing. Trusting the others and caring for them greatly has put him in a disheartening gloomy position.
Even when Jim is in this awful war-stricken place, one thing that he can still find comfort in, and which reminds him of his peaceful home is the birds, which are everywhere, still living their lives unaffected by mans war. This shows how nature is unaltered by mans cruel antics against other man, and how life and nature must, and will go on through all circumstances.
We are introduced to the protagonist and main character, Sanger Rainsford who is a big game hunter and a WW1 veteran. The story starts off with a conversation between Whitney and Rainsford discussing the island, so we can understand the reputation it holds.
Conflict is an important part of any short story. The short story, “On the Sidewalk Bleeding,” contains three major conflicts: man vs. man, man vs. nature, and man vs. himself. In this essay, I intend to explain, prove, and analyze these three struggles.
The story explains that mongooses are curious, so Rikki spent his time exploring everything in the house. When exploring outside, Rikki meets a bird that explains to him that one of his babies fell out of the nest and was eaten by Nag, the cobra. That night, Rikki overhears the cobras’ plans to kill the family, so that Rikki would leave and they could take over the garden. Nag sleeps in the bathroom overnight, planning to kill Teddy’s dad in the morning; Rikki attacks him, causing the father to wake up and shoot Nag, saving the family. Rikki also helps save the family by distracting Nag’s widow, Nagaina, as she was about to attack, eventually killing her as well. The family was very thankful, as he had saved all of their lives.
The play “A Raisin in the Sun” by Lorraine Hansberry has many interesting characters. In my opinion, the most fascinating character is Ruth because of her many emotions and captivating personality. She goes through extreme emotions in the play such as happiness, sadness, anger, stress, and confusion. Ruth is very independent, firm, kind, witty, and loving.
Authors’ Steven Crane and Jack London are known for their stories using naturalism, the struggle between man and nature. Naturalism is like realism, but it explores the forces of nature, heredity, and the environment on human beings, who are faced with the forces of nature. Both “The Open Boat” and “To Build a Fire” demonstrate how inferior and small humans’ really are to nature. Humans cannot control nature or determine its outcome. In both stories nature is the antagonist constantly challenging the humans’ ability to survive. I chose the topic over naturalistic elements because I enjoyed reading these stories. Both stories have a strong since of naturalism in it and both authors’ are known for naturalistic features existing in their writings. In this paper I will give you more of an insight to what naturalism is and what naturalistic elements are present in the two stories listed above.
The cast of animals that Wilbur meets in the farm serves as a collective word of advice of sorts. Although the advice that they offer isn’t always correct, such as when the goose suggests that Wilbur run wild and wreak havoc (page 17), they appear to be well-meaning and benign all things considered. They are also very fond of gossip, which is demonstrated by the rapid spread of the news of Wilbur’s escape (page 19). However, while most of them are kind-hearted, there is a singular nasty exception. This exception is a rat named Templeton, who is as self-serving and inconsiderate as they come. He blatantly expresses this by straightforwardly and rudely telling Wilbur that he will eat the latter’s food because he “hasn’t got sense enough” to eat
How can people be so similar and different at the same time? In the novel The Pigman by Paul Zindel both the protagonists John and Lorraine have different characteristics.John and Lorraine are both best friends who are sophomores in high school. Although they are very close friends they have different personalities.At the beginning of the Novel, John is more of a troublesome kid whereas Lorraine is calm, sensitive and compassionate.Overall the novel The Pigman by Paul Zindel demonstrate how different good friends can be.
The creature’s personality, or actions toward society, was displayed as being very calm and compassionate in the novel. He made many attempts to converse with society, but society feared and mistreated...
If he would walk into a room and see people laughing he would walk up and punch whoever was laughing right in the gut. 75% of the time this was a justified course of action for nick. At the same time if there’s one thing Nack loved it was to make people laugh, he was always doodling small little comics. At lunch, on brakes at work, even in the in the bathroom. Every Friday he would set up a small table by the entrance of the school and sell his comics for 50 cents and every Friday the principal would tell him he couldn’t sell his doodles on school grounds, so he moved his stand right outside of the main building. Seth had purchased on of the comics once and found it very perplexing it was titled “ghost jokes” and below the title were three panels all of which were blank. Nack would usually sit right outside the main building, even in the snow, from seven to eight in the morning before packing