Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Prison education research essay
Importance of education in prison
Prison education research essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
What’s my interest in this topic?
Prisons are historically meant to be a place of punishment for those that have committed one or more crimes, but it was not a proper rehabilitation for prisoners that are to be released back into society. The benefit of having an education program can enrich the inmates of their learning experiences and improve their knowledge and ability as an individual to return to society with a chance for future success. This spark of interest for this topic has given me a reason to believe that if prisoners were given an education, there are certain aspects of a person that can be improved and also benefit them to fit back into society which can be a step forward than a step backwards to what they are trying to achieve.
How does this benefit the prisoners?
Most would argue that giving education for prisoners would just be a waste of time and money due to the prisoners being criminals. So why should they have the benefit of free education? In the article, “A College Education for Prisoners,” Doug Brandt explains how the prisoners are “…human beings who have made mistakes, just like the rest of us [and] taking away any possibility of learning, growing, and perhaps changing is a blemish on us as a nation.” Brandt makes it clear that they are criminals, yet they are people that have made mistakes and should be given the opportunity to which they can have an education therefore gaining a learning experience. That was his response to John J. Lennon’s New York Times article, “Let Prisoners Take College Courses,” that aims to transform
Issues that involve prisoners that were brought into prison and are released usually end up returning, but provided with the education then they have an advantage to gaining a job or doing more once they are out of prison (Lennon). This also reduces recidivism, a relapse of criminal behavior that involves a criminal to come out of prison only to end up back in prison again, especially since it would give “positive effects… and on making more ex-prisoners more productive members of our society” (“A College Education for Prisoners”) as mentioned from Brandt. Prison education can be of use for recidivism prevention that gives prisoners the convenience of being a productive member of society and preventing prisons from overcrowding especially with prisoners that end up returning after being released for a certain amount of time. Another man named Stanley Richards, a former prisoner, was given the opportunity to enroll into classes that changed his life drastically and with that he became a tax payer (“A College Education for Prisoners”). This shows that given the education that the inmates in prison that are willing to take up the offer can help improve and change for the better therefore when released, it will give the former prisoners the convenience of a successful future and contributing to society with the education that they’ve gained during the time in
That explains the positive correlation between the amount of education a person receives while in prison and the chance they have of securing a fulltime job following their release. A study published by a prison in Minnesota supports this idea by showing that prisoners who had obtained a secondary degree while in prison increased their chances of securing a job within two years of being released by 59%. These odds were increased even further for younger offenders, which shows that educational programs in prisons are even more pertinent for the younger
In the argument “Let Prisoners Take College Courses,” by John J. Lennon he argues that when incarcerated, if the college programs are not made readily available for more than the select few inmates, they will see more returns than they would otherwise. To support his thesis Lennon uses a variety of researched facts. For example: “In Sing Sing, for example, one forward-thinking educational program, launched in 1998, has a recidivism rate of less than 2 percent”(Lennon, 1). This shows that Lennon did some research on the subject. In addition to the factual evidence presented in the argument, Lennon uses two different human experiences. One experience was of himself. He spoke of what put him in jail and how being able to take college courses helped him discover who he was and feel remorse for his bad decisions of his past.
...ecause they had to pay for their education and receive a high SAT score and other qualifications to be accepted at a college, I think it is important not to let these lives slip away. It would not be of any use to lock them up for many years and then release them into the world with nothing on their hands. It is more expensive for a state to pay for a second imprisonment than to pay for a college education and everyone should have a right to learn. This right is infringed by the college system in itself as it does not give everyone a chance to earn a degree, not by Prison Education. And secondly, the “pains of imprisonment” are hard enough and I think any inmate would trade places with us. Education does not reduce this pain; it should be a matter of course to help these people have a chance at a successful life. It should after all be a rehabilitative punishment.
People that do not take advantage of educational and career guidance programs will come out of prison having a hard time. In the article by Simmons both men had stable jobs and that was because they really wanted to change. Criminals only go back to their ways because there is no other option, when they can find a stable legal income there is no reason to further any criminal acts. Many people come out of prison never wanting to go back and I believe those are the people that I will be able to find that do not recidivate. Even though there may be stable income for these people, it may not be the highest paying job or most education heavy career. These people may get by with minimum wage but there is no luxury or lavishness. I also believe that there are many people that do not take any actions and these are the people that you will hear stories about that are not able to find jobs so they go back to doing what they know how. These people will have a high likeliness of being arrested a second time and will be taken out of society once
Vacca, James S. “Educated Prisoners Are Less Likely to Return to Prison.” Journal of Correctional Education 55.4 (December 2004): 297-305. ProQuest. Web. 2. Nov 2013.
As far as the benefits to the inmates, this education decreases their risks of returning back to prison and increases their chances of getting and maintaining a job once released. He touches on the funds these programs are getting and how they have been recently decreasing. What he also mentions is how the cost of these inmates’ education is far less than the cost it is to keep them incarcerated. This article will be useful to me in its many stats and numbers on education in prisoners and how the effects it can
This reform idea was first introduced by New York Governor Andrew Cuomo. As an argument for his claim, Woodman shares statistics that show that having a college degree over a high school degree increases a person’s chances of getting hired by 50%. He asserts that if college education were offered to prison inmates, they would gain an edge in the job market, especially since top colleges and universities are not producing graduates for in-demand fields. “[T]hey’re not going to care that your degree is from University of Sing Sing, not University of Phoenix,” he states in relation to North Dakota’s need for engineers. Offering more job opportunities to ex-convicts would give them what Woodman calls an anchor in
Schools inevitably must deal with disciplinary action when it comes to misconduct in students. However, at what point should the courts and law enforcement intervene? “Zero tolerance” policies started as a trend in the school setting during the 1990s in “response to the widespread perception that juvenile violence was increasing and school officials needed to take desperate measures to address the problem” (Aull 2012:182-183). However, national statistics indicated a decrease in juvenile’s share of crime during the influx of zero tolerance policies in schools (National Crime Justice Reference Service 2005).
"It costs the government half a million bucks to keep me in jail and $450 to teach me to read and write" (ex-con cited in Porporino and Robinson 1992, p. 92). The literacy demands of the workplace and society in general are growing in complexity, and recurring linked cycles of poverty and low literacy levels put some people at increasing disadvantage. The prison population includes disproportionate numbers of the poor; those released from prisons are often unable to find employment, partly due to a lack of job and/or literacy skills, and are often reincarcerated (Paul 1991). Add to that the high cost of imprisonment and the huge increase in the prison population and it seems clear that mastery of literacy skills may be a preventive and proactive way to address the problem. However, correctional educators contend with multiple problems in delivering literacy programs to inmates. This Digest sets the context of prison literacy programs, outlines some of the constraints, and describes what factors work.
Studies have shown that in-prison education curriculums decrease recidivism while refining the eminence of life. However, majority of extra-curricular classes in prison have been eradicated, additional customs of job preparation have reduced, and access to exercise equipment and educational resources such as books is progressively limited. In the past five years the Correctional Service of Canada (CSC) has increased the federal budget by 40 per cent to $2.6 billion, majority bei...
The basic concept of educating prisoners while they are in prison is logical and simple. It makes sense to make convicts' time in prison productive. This leads to a person that, when he leaves prison, knows a better way of life than committing crimes which would inevitably send him back to prison. While making perfect sense, this solution drastically changes the concept of prison. The effects of social programs integrated with prisons start with helping direct the taxpayers money to more prolific uses, and expand to making people in America smarter, more educated, less dangerous.
Dodd, Vikram. "Why Prison Education?." . Prison Studies Project, Teaching Research Outreach, 16 Jan. 2010. Web. 12 Apr. 2014. .
The amount th of money that has been spend on prisons is about 49 billion dollars the reason for this is because people are being sent to prison and some re offend and come back. The main purpose of going to jail is to never come back , but in some cases others don 't seem to learn from their mistakes. This is the reason why prison education would come in handy. In the article “Education and Vocational Training in Prisons Reduces Recidivism, Improves Job Outlook” its states that “Researchers found that inmates who participate in correctional education programs have 43 percent lower odds of returning to prison than those who do not”This quote is pretty much saying that the percentage of inmates that has education is less likely to come back. This is good because the amount of money that we would be saving would probably help us with debt that we face a lot in american. Education is the most important form of rehabilitation for
A controversial issue in the criminal justice field is whether or not educational programs should be offered to inmates in jail while they are incarcerated. While some might argue that taxpayers should not be forced to fund these types of programs, others agree that it is extremely beneficial to not only the inmates but also the taxpayers. Not only are the inmates the people in society who need education the most, but studies have shown a significant decrease in the recidivism rate of inmates who participated in educational programs while incarcerated. Jails and prisons should increase educational programs to inmates because inmates need education more than ever, it is more financially efficient to provide educational programs and it significantly reduces the recidivism rate.
... overcome the obstacles that once held them back and had led them to prison in the first place The experiences of prison are enough to make a former inmate “do whatever it takes to avoid a second term” (“Rehabilitative Effects”) This being said, the many religious, therapeutic, and educational proceedings have also given prisoners an initiative to stay out of prison The religious aspect gives inmates hope and courage The therapeutic provides inmates with a safe environment to share their issues and to receive positive encouragement And finally, the educational offers a way to acquire a GED and or occupational skills that will enable the previously incarcerated with skills that will give them an advantage to obtaining a job. The negative side of prisons has become the face of prisons, blinding the public to all of the good that incarceration offers the incarcerated.