Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gender equality in the films industry
Sexism in movies essays
Feminism in media essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Gender equality in the films industry
Most people know the basic concept of the Bechdel Test, if not by name. Having more than one developed female character whose arc does not rely on a male character is indeed a great thing to strive for in cinema. However, no matter how good it is in principle, there are flaws in the Bechdel Test itself; just because a movie passes does not give it a feminist thumbs up. Just the same, a movie that does not pass the test is by no means automatically a bad or misogynistic movie. Many say that 2015 was a good year in cinema. Star Wars: The Force Awakens broke plenty of records in the box office, and fans were immensely pleased with the female lead character not distracted by a petty romantic interest. Other recognized movies that came out …show more content…
Having seen both of these movies, I want to point out why passing the Bechdel Test alone does not make a female lead more “badass” or more of a strong feminist icon. Jurassic World definitely did well in the box office on its release week of June 12, 2015. The fourth installment of the Jurassic Park series takes place on an unpopulated island off the coast of Costa Rica. This installment is a resort including room and dining, as well as rides and exhibits aimed at all age groups. This movie switches things up a bit by introducing a species that they created with stem cell research. This new creature resides on the restricted side of the island while scientists continue to do research on this new species, the Indominus Rex, before opening it up to the public. Bryce Dallas Howard plays the parks operations manager, Claire. The typical Jurassic Park story includes Claire treating her nephews to an all-inclusive visit to the park. Chris Pratt plays a navy veteran, Owen, who has specialized in training velociraptors for shows at the park. As in most Jurassic Park movies, nothing goes as planned pretty early in the movie. Jurassic World technically passes the test because there are at least two named female characters (Claire and her sister Karen) who speak with each other about something other than another male character. However, the idea of it being a movie that is not sexist stops right about …show more content…
Jurassic World passing the Bechdel Test does not mean that it is immune to sexism and objectification by gender. Passing the test does not automatically make Claire as much of a feminist icon as Elle Woods in Legally Blonde. This goes for Ex Machina in the same sense. Yes, Ex Machina fails the Bechdel Test, but that does not mean that the female character is automatically dependent on and revolving around her male characters. Failing the test does not mean that Ava is a weak, underdeveloped character with no importance to the story. In Ex Machina, the movie would be weaker without Ava than without her supporting male characters. Women should not have to pass a test to be recognized as what they are. Women can be weak underdeveloped characters, or strong mind-breaking characters regardless of the male characters with whom they
Movies are a new edition in today’s culture. They are a new form of art medium that has arrived in the late 1900s and were a new way to express ideas and viewpoints of the time. A good example of this is the movie The Manchurian Candidate. The movie had a simple plot a man is kidnapped after the Korean war and is hypnotized to work for the communists and take down the U.S. This movie showed the American public’s fear of communism at the time. If a movie like this can easily portray the fears of the American people at the time then it can easily portray stereotypes of gender. There have been thousands of movies where the male protagonist is a rough tough dude but there is one movie that has that stereotype is broken. That movie is none other than Napoleon Dynamite.
Led by Laura Mulvey, feminist film critics have discussed the difficulty presented to female spectators by the controlling male gaze and narrative generally found in mainstream film, creating for female spectators a position that forces them into limited choices: "bisexual" identification with active male characters; identification with the passive, often victimized, female characters; or on occasion, identification with a "masculinized" active female character, who is generally punished for her unhealthy behavior. Before discussing recent improvements, it is important to note that a group of Classic Hollywood films regularly offered female spectators positive, female characters who were active in controlling narrative, gazing and desiring: the screwball comedy.
Feminism is evident throughout the typical gender stereotypes such as the ‘perfect’ girls are the blonde, skinny ones. When students are asked about their thoughts on ‘the plastics’ in the beginning of the movie, they tell that they are preppy and attractive. The stereotypes in this movie cause hurt feelings and discrimination towards all of the females. Girls were also viewed as sex symbols based on their looks and physical appearance, not their ability and intelligence. In the movie, most of the girls are known for copying ‘the plastics’ look which is usually short skirts and tank tops making the outfit look provocative. Another example is on Cady’s first day of highschool, she is asked if ‘her muffin is buttered’ which is a sexual question. Feminism is definitely shown throughout the female characters personalities and
The most important events of this film all revolve around the female characters. While there are some male charac...
Mainstream movies are about men’s lives, and the few movies about women’s lives, at their core, still also revolve around men (Newsom, 2011). These female leads often have male love interests, looking to get married or get pregnant. Strong independent female leads are still exist for the male view, as they are hypersexualized, or the “fighting fuck toy,” (Newsom, 2011). This depiction has created a culture where women are insecure and waiting for a knight on a horse to come rescue and provide for her as well as the acceptance of women
Man has always said that women are an entirely different species. As humorous as it sounds, no single gender cannot exist alone and are not depicted as superior to another. In Steven Spielberg’s film Jurassic Park (1993) the gender politics in the film associate the female gender to nature and the dinosaurs as well, but at the same time it deems the female gender as an enigma. While the film presents only two female characters, Dr. Ellie Sattler [Laura Dern] and Lex Murphy [Ariana Richards], they present feminist ideologies that not only present them as modern women but seem to contrast Ellie to nature and dinosaurs as a commentary on the changing roles of women. Despite the gender politics regarding equality, the film notes the typical female traits that are associated to nature such as the nurturing quality of mothers and the female association with the dinosaurs. The female gender can also be compared to the monstrous, in addition to the idea of birth over the institution of marriage. Ellie takes on the role of the heroine who is “characterized as “modern women” —capable, intelligent, and employed” but is still in need of help from her male counterparts (Belmont 350). The association with women, nature and dinosaurs is critiquing the change of gender roles and the rise of feminist ideologies.
In Michael Crichton’s novel Jurassic Park the amount of technological advances is outstanding, but they are not better for the society. Bringing the dinosaurs back from extinction may have been a ground-breaking advance for science, except the engineers of the park were unaware of how to handle these animals that had lived millions of years ago, when the world had a drastically different environment. (quote). This means that the new technology is not always better; the people of the society are often not ready to deal with drastic changes in relatively short periods of time. Firstly, this can be related to multiple wars, as with every war there is new technology and much of it is not better, at least not in the beginning. For instance, there
For example, when the documentary showed the band members and how they were symbolizing women. The band members had the woman against the wall with either no clothes or just undergarments on and throwing slices of meat at her. A lot of films and music portray this message that women are just a piece of meat and that they are only good for sexual experiences. Another example was Snoop Dog’s lyrics in his film, Diary of a Pimp, “you gotta break these hoes for Snoop” learning the lifestyle of a rapper and a pimp illustrating prostitution of women. Dreamworlds documentary also mentioned this when talking about the lives of women when a man is not present in their life. It illustrated scenes of sadness and loneliness. Women are not creatures who desire sex all the time and the purpose of the film was to teach us that how women are presented in music videos is not right. Women are more than just their bodies and do not need to continue to be objectified. Every media production should follow the Bechdel Test in communication of women and their actions. Women in music and films should not always be talking about men or living their life under the control of a man. Media acts as if women can’t be independent. If media continues to show women getting treating as objects and knowing that media influences society, then in society people will continue to think as if treating a woman as such is acceptable. Treating women as objects is not acceptable at all. However, what we see from media shows
Throughout time, women in movies and other similar texts are shown to be generally focused on men. This might make sense if every movie ever made was set in a time where women had absolutely no rights but of course, that is not the case. Older and more modern depictions of women in media, both show women whose lives revolve around men. Even movies that market their female characters as strong and powerful are still shown to be dependent on the male leads and puts them first. Also, since women in movies have more of a focus on men, female to female relationships suffer in the same films. There are very few exceptions to this unfortunate truth.
Because this film is just about thirteen years old, most viewers would not expect to hear that Finding Nemo can easily be ripped apart with a feminist critique. Many people assume that male dominance is a thing of the past and that females are valued equal to men, but when watching Finding Nemo as a feminist critic it became apparent these statements are utterly false; and not just in this one Disney movie, but also in multiple other Disney produced movies as well. It is incredibly sad to learn a movie so popular to children really truly continues to promote the difference between genders and all each of the informed viewers can do is hope that children do not catch on to this nonsensical way of thinking. The film Finding Nemo contains many different scenes, characters, and dialogues which continue to promote male dominance over women and identify women as a lesser being when being compared to their male
I personally feel like the subtle forms of sexism that are especially prevalent in the media are far more dangerous to women. I find that I struggle far more with this kind of sexism that some douchey guy calling out “nice tits” as I pass him on the subway. I struggle more with subtle sexism, because I fall more easily into it’s traps. I find myself actively putting woman down in my mind without meaning to. In fact, just the other day I went to see a movie with my friends, when the movie was over we researched the director. It turns out it was directed by a woman. One of my male stated this information with excitement, and I simply responded with “so?”. I honestly didn’t see why that was something to get excited about. Women directed movies right? My friend then asked me to name five female directors off the top of my head. I could name two. Defiantly I stated that it was only because I didn’t have great grasp on directors as it was. I asserted that I probably couldn’t name five male directors. I could name seven. I am telling this story because to me this illustrates perfectly how I put down my own gender by just assuming that the problem isn’t so bad, instead of educating myself on the reality of sexism in film. I let myself stay ignorant to a problem by choice. I have seen enough interviews with directors and
In her essay, “Women's Cinema as Counter-Cinema”, Claire Johnston proposed a path to creating Women's cinema to counter the numerous dominant male-oriented mainstream films. In it, she argues that you must first understand the ideology that is found in mainstream movies, and the ways that women are portrayed within it. She determined that there were two principle concepts to understand: how women are visually represented, and the effect that women have upon the creation of meaning within the film. The how refers to all the film techniques used in the creation of the image: lighting, hair, makeup, choice of lens, choice of wardrobe, and the framing of the camera shot are some examples. These are often done to increase the attractiveness of the female character, and creates a sign for the audience to accept and decode. The effect of the female character is limited to her physical traits and the impact that her presence has on the male protagonist, typically to send him off on an Oedipal journey.
After watching all three films Million Dollar Baby, In a world…, and The other Boleyn Girl my first impression was that these three movies had multiple things in common between one another. These movies showed the mere fact how women were treated unfairly based on their gender. Women weren’t seen fit as good enough compared to men to be accomplished and powerful. The movie Million Dollar Baby and In a World were more in common with each other because it shows how women are pursuing a passion they love to do that they are good at but men are usually the ones to say you can’t do this or do that because you’re a female. Maggie and Carol did not let these stereotypical myths stop them from doing what they love to do. They actually proved men wrong showing them that women are not just going to sit down and just be part of the norm men created women to fall in. The movie The Other Boleyn Girl is more about how Anne and Mary are looked at as King Henry’s mistresses and they are basically competing on who can give him a son. The king obviously believed that if he had a son he would be able to rule and govern his empire better than a female would. That is why he kept pushing for a son and he was desperately doing whatever was possible to have a son with any women he could find. This shows how demeaning men are towards women in this movie and the women in the movie have to deal with because people in a higher power or just men in general usually have authority over women as a whole. However, Mary show how she can manipulate and get King Henry and Henry Percy to do whatever she pleases because her personality in the movie was she more blunt and forceful. King Henry and Henry Percy could not help how weak they get when it came to love and rom...
Feminism is a movement that supports women equality within society. In relation to film, feminism is what pushes the equal representation of females in mainstream films. Laura Mulvey is a feminist theorist that is famous for touching on this particular issue of how men and women are represented in movies. Through her studies, she discovered that many films were portraying men and women very differently from reality. She came up with a theory that best described why there is such as huge misrepresentation of the social status quos of male and female characters. She believed that mainstream film is used to maintain the status quo and prevent the realization of gender equality. This is why films are continuously following the old tradition that males are dominant and females are submissive. This is the ideology that is always present when we watch a movie. This is evident in the films from the past but also currently. It is as if the film industry is still catering to the male viewers of each generation in the same way. Laura Mulvey points out that women are constantly being seen as sexual objects, whether it is the outfits they wear or do not wear or the way they behave, or secondary characters with no symbolic cause. She states that, “in traditional exhibitionist role women are simultaneously looked at and displayed, with their appearance coded for strong visual and erotic impact so that they can be said to connote it-be-looked-at-ness.”(Mulvey pg. 715). Thus, women are nevertheless displayed as nothing more than passive objects for the viewing pleasure of the audience. Mulvey also points out through her research that in every mainstream movie, there is ...
Women have made progress in the film industry in terms of the type of role they play in action films, although they are still portrayed as sex objects. The beginning of “a new type of female character” (Hirschman, 1993, pg. 41-47) in the world of action films began in 1976 with Sigourney Weaver, who played the leading role in the blockbuster film ‘Aliens’ as Lt. Ellen Ripley. She was the captain of her own spaceship, plus she was the one who gave out all the orders. Until then, men had always been the ones giving the orders; to see a woman in that type of role was outlandish. This was an astonishing change for the American industry of film. Sometime later, in 1984, Linda Hamilton starred in ‘The Terminator’, a film where she was not the leading character, but a strong female character as Sarah Connor. She had a combination of masculine and feminine qualities as “an androgynous superwoman, resourceful, competent and courageous, while at the same time caring, sensitive and intuitive” (Hirschman, 1993, pg. 41-47). These changes made in action films for female’s roles stirred up a lot of excitement in the “Western society” (Starlet, 2007). The demand for strong female characters in action films grew to a new high when Angelina Jolie starred in ‘Tomb Raider’ in 2001 and then in the sequel, ‘Tomb Raider II: The Cradle of Life’ in 2003 as Lara Croft. Her strong female character was not only masculine, but was also portrayed as a sex object. Most often, strong women in these types of films tend to fight without even gaining a mark. At the end of each fight, her hair and makeup would always be perfect. The female characters in these action films, whether their role was as the lead character or a supporting character, had similar aspects. I...