Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Film analysis essay
Significance of montage in film production
Comtempt film Essay analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Try to picture a grand stone staircase (made up of 200 steep steps, and divided by just under a dozen landings) built into a hillside in Odessa, Ukraine. Now picture Cossacks descending the steps (in a slow steady march) with weapons drawn and aimed at countless civilians. The Cossacks shoot a young boy who is then trampled by fleeing civilians, while his mother watches, helplessly and hopelessly, in horror. At the first chance, the mother raises her young boy and clenches him in her arms. At this moment, she’s the only one noticeably walking towards the Cossacks. The mother begs the Cossacks for help and they shoot her dead. Few civilians regain the courage of their convictions and attempt to walk toward the descending gunfire of the Cossacks. A young mother attempts to shield her baby that is crying in its carriage, while a grandmother (hiding nearby) rallies her family to try and reason with the Cossacks. The young mother is shot, and as she falls to her death she falls against the carriage, sending her baby down the steps. The grandmother gets shot through her eye (The Battleship Potemkin, 1925). Watching the scene entitled “Odessa Staircase” from Sergei Eisenstein’s, The Battleship Potemkin is more reminiscent of a scene from Coppola’s, The Godfather or Tarrentino’s , Pulp Fiction, not a silent film from 1925.
Sergei Eisenstein was a Russian film director, that was born in Riga (now, Latvia) in 1898 (Hoobler 75). Eisenstein is considered the innovator behind the montage style of movies
("Sergei Eisenstein is Dead in Moscow”, New York Times, 1948). Eisenstein’s more popular works include: Strike, The Battleship Potemkin, October, Alexander Nevsky, and Ivan the Terrible (Hoobler 77-80). To this day, Eisenstein is held in hi...
... middle of paper ...
...s appeared not so much to matter as the fact that he developed new techniques, devised camera approaches and sought always to bring out the potential of a still developing form. That he forgot--or overlooked--to bring the Marxist message to one of his films two years ago brought him that fatal kiss of all--the accusation from the authoritative Soviet magazine, Culture and Life, that his productions had been short on the prescribed Soviet requirement of art and interpretation of history” ("Sergei Eisenstein is Dead in Moscow”, New York Times, 1948) . In film, Eisenstein was known for his development of the montage sequence, his unusual juxtapositions, and his life-like imagery. In life he was known for his propaganda and belief in the plight of the working class. Eisenstein left an inevitable mark on his community, his time, the shape of a sub-culture, and his art.
This film captures this class distinction without subduing the atmosphere through the use of a variety of cinematic devices. “A good film is not a bag of cinematic devices but the embodiment, through devices, of a vision, an underlying theme” (Barnett, 274). The audience can see this theme of the realities of the oppression, poverty and despair of this time period through the use of the things mentioned, but also through the character development that is driven by the character’s hopelessness. Each of the characters associated with the lower class is motivated by the conditions, which are viewed through the cinematic devices mentioned above: color, spherical lenses, long shots, and high angle shots. Sources Cited:.
This point is illustrated by the heated controversy surrounding the director’s Lifetime Achievement Award, which was presented to him at the 1999 Academy Awards. Kazan’s importance to the world of cinema is undisputed, but Hollywood remains divided by a single political affair that took place over half a century ago. The Academy Award was therefore protested by some and supported by others. But should Elia Kazan still be regarded with such contempt by his peers and contemporary members of the Hollywood community? Should his legacy be based on this one transgression, rather than his long history of cinematic achievement? And has Kazan already put the entire subject to rest in On the Waterfront, perhaps the best work of his entire career? I hope to answer these questions in an essay that will discuss the t...
Tucker, Robert C. "The Mortal Danger". Course Reader for World Culture: Russia Since 1917. New York University, Spring 2001.
Modris Eksteins presented a tour-de-force interpretation of the political, social and cultural climate of the early twentieth century. His sources were not merely the more traditional sources of the historian: political, military and economic accounts; rather, he drew from the rich, heady brew of art, music, dance, literature and philosophy as well. Eksteins examined ways in which life influenced, imitated, and even became art. Eksteins argues that life and art, as well as death, became so intermeshed as to be indistinguishable from one another.
Doctor Zhivago portrayed this event very well. They have the march during the winter of 1905, which is the actual time that the “Bloody Sunday” event took place. Also, both the people marching in the movie and the people marching in real life wanted the same things. They wanted bread, better working conditions, and eight-hour days. The setting of the massacre scene in front of the Russian palace is correct because in actuality, the massacre took place in front of the Winter Palace. Doctor Zhivago also uses one of its characters to represent one of the historical figures who was involved in the “Bloody Sunday Massacre”.
A passing moment (like the one involving Verushka) is fickle on the surface, but under the right circumstances, is potentially timeless. Matthew Goulish uncovers this transition in his essay “Criticism.” He explains, “we understand something by approaching it,” and that “we approach it using our ears, our noses, our intellects, our imaginations. We approach it with silence. We approach it with Childhood” (328). In order to truly see something, or rather, to truly know something, Goulish asserts that we have to look at it in the same wide-eyed manner we would in our youth. Though we, as humans, have a tendency to analyze based on preconceived ideas, only through an acknowledgment of the unknown and an acceptance of the absurd can we truly “[liberate the] critical mind to follow whatever might cross its path” (329). In doing so, Goulish recognized the distinction between the literal and the surreal, and similarly understood the effects of embracing one over the other when viewing a subject. Verushka’s state of being was documented with a brief, exhaustively exploitative photo session, and acts as a direct representation of the concept of actually “viewing.” Everything, from her free-flowing hair to her effortless poses, personifies Goulish’s acknowledgement of the the pursuit of liberation. Though she’s the focal point of the image, this “liberation” isn’t her own; it’s the
In 1934, Sergey Kirov a rival to Stalin was murdered. Stalin is believed to have been behind the assassination, he used it as a pretext to arrest thousands of his other opponents who in his words might have been responsible for Kirov’s murder. These purges not only affected those who openly opposed Stalin but ordinary people too. During the rule of Stain o...
The first way that Herzog’s film could be considered good art is that it balances the mean between form and function. Without a doubt, the composition and mise-en-sence of this film has elegant form and beauty. Yet, unlike some artistic films I have seen, this the film’s mise-en-sence and filming techniques not only have beautiful form, but function to enhance the overall function of storytelling as well. The mise-en-sence is well ordered and follows the proportions as represented by the rule of thirds. Herzog elegantly balances beauty and form with a functional and interesting plot that keeps the audience engaged in the film. Furthermore, Hertzog’s film never forgets its purpose or aim that it is being directed to. The primary purpose of this film is to build empathy for the characters that we might ask ourselves, “what would we do in such a situation?” The subordinate arts of this film (lighting, scene composition, make-up, costuming etc.) do not detract from its definite purpose, but rather they elevate the chief theme and purpose of this film. Finally, this film is extremely symmetrical. Not only in the individual shots, but in symmetry can be found in the plot structure as discussed in my interpretive analysis
Fay, Laurel E. ‘Shostakovich vs. Volkov: whose Testimony?’ The Russian Review (October 1980), pp. 484-93.
The Alfred Hitchcock film; Vertigo is a narrative film that is a perfect example of a Hollywood Classical Film. I will be examining the following characteristics of the film Vertigo: 1)individual characters who act as casual agents, the main characters in Vertigo, 2)desire to reach to goals, 3)conflicts, 4)appointments, 5)deadlines, 6)James Stewart’s focus shifts and 7)Kim Novak’s characters drives the action in the film. Most of the film is viewed in the 3rd person, except for the reaction shots (point of view shot) which are seen through the eyes of the main character.(1st person) The film has a strong closure and uses continuity editing(180 degree rule). The stylistic (technical) film form of Vertigo makes the film much more enjoyable. The stylistic film form includes camera movements, editing, sound, mise-en-scene and props.
However, in stark contrast to The General, other films were being made around the world that did not follow a simple Hollywood structure, but rather were more experimental with what a movie could be. Man With a Movie Camera (1929), a very ahead of its time, utilized a completely different style of filmmaking that resonated strongly with the ideals of the Soviet Union. Thus, Man With a Movie Camera sought out to make the everyday people of the Soviet Union the stars of the film. This idea was completely revolutionary as well, and almost by necessity, introduced a new style of editing to fit the story—or rather the documentation—that director Dziga Vertov was trying to tell.
In the presented essay I will compare the style of work of selected artists in the montage of the film. I will try to point out some general regularities and features of Soviet cinema. At the same time I will try to capture especially what is common in their systems and similar or conversely what differ. For my analysis, I will draw on the feature films of the Soviet avantgarde, namely these are the movies - The Battleship Potemkin (S. Eisenstein, 1925), Mother (V. Pudovkin, 1926) and The Man with a movie camera (D. Vertov, 1929).
Art has been always seen as a form to express self emotions and ideas; an artist creates an idea and shapes it by culturally known objects and forms to send encrypted message. Through the times both, ideas and materials used, separates art in to different periods and movements. In late 40’s and late 50’s two art and culture movements emerged, one from another. The first one, Lettrism, was under the aspiration to rewrite all human knowledge. From it another movement, Situationism, appeared. It was an anti-art movement which sought for Cultural Revolution. Both of these movements belong to wide and difficulty defined movement of experiment, a movement whose field is endless. Many different people create experimental films because of the variety of reasons. Some wishes to express their viewpoints which are unconventional. But most of them have an enthusiasm for medium itself. They yearn to explore what prospects the medium has and wishes to open new opportunities to create and to explore, as well as to educate. Experimental filmmaker, differently from mainstream filmmakers, wishes to step out from the orthodox notions. The overall appreciation is not the aim that the experimental filmmakers would seek for. Experimenters usually work on the film alone or with a small group, without the big budget. They intend to challenge the traditional ideas. And with intention to do so Lettrism tries to narrow the distance between the poetry and people’s lives, while Situationism tries to transform world into one that would exist in constant state of newness. Both of these avant-garde movements root from similar sources and have similar foundations. Nonetheless, they have different intentions for the art and culture world and these movements...
1-27. The 'Standard' of the 'Standard'. Dragomirov, M.I. & Co., Ltd. "Dragomirov on Prince Andrey and the Art of War". Tolstoy: The Critical Heritage.
Classic narrative cinema is what Bordwell, Staiger and Thompson (The classic Hollywood Cinema, Columbia University press 1985) 1, calls “an excessively obvious cinema”1 in which cinematic style serves to explain and not to obscure the narrative. In this way it is made up of motivated events that lead the spectator to its inevitable conclusion. It causes the spectator to have an emotional investment in this conclusion coming to pass which in turn makes the predictable the most desirable outcome. The films are structured to create an atmosphere of verisimilitude, which is to give a perception of reality. On closer inspection it they are often far from realistic in a social sense but possibly portray a realism desired by the patriarchal and family value orientated society of the time. I feel that it is often the black and white representation of good and evil that creates such an atmosphere of predic...