The Bastard Of Istanbul

825 Words2 Pages

The Bastard Of Istanbul is, at heart, a story about coming to terms with one's identity. Almost all of the characters in this book face an identity crisis of some sort. This can be specifically followed by exploring the connection between the idea of the character's identity and their actual, concrete name. Some characters hide behind pseudonyms, while others have multiple names. The theme of names as a reflection of a character's identity is prevalent throughout the book.

Characters in both the cybercafe and the physical cafe are only ever known by their pseudonyms. In both examples, the names give clues to the character's personality, but by no means tell the whole story. In the cybercafe, we learn that Armanoush goes by “Madame My-Exiled-Soul. She had chosen this name as a tribute to Zabel Yessaian... Zabel was a fascinating personality... She had enjoyed a tumultuous life... ”(Shafak, 113). This certainly offers some idea of what Armanoush sees herself as – a rebel, an intellectual, but also looking to have fun. However, this isn't everything, simply the picture she gives to the world of the cybercafe. We see the same thing in the character of the Dipsomaniac Cartoonist. The initial impression is only reinforced by the name; he is an alcoholic who draws cartoons for a living. Later, however, we find there is significantly more to the character beyond what we see here. He truly cares for Asya, and is willing to change himself for her. “You are my one and only incentive in this life to become a better person”(Shafak, 322).

Many of the characters in the story go by multiple names. Armanoush's internal conflict over her cultural identity is reflected by the names she goes by, Armanoush for her father's family, Amy for her moth...

... middle of paper ...

...er sisters.

The attempts of the characters to resolve their identity problems are a key theme in The Bastard of Istanbul, and can be followed by the multiple names characters assign themselves to represent different aspects of their personality. This is a device used by the author to highlight the different aspects of a character's personality – by naming them, they are made more real for the reader. In a sense, we think of them as distinctly different characters in conflict with each other, a very effective way to communicate the internal conflicts in a way the reader can easily understand. A full analysis of the characters in this story needs to treat each aspect of the varied characters' personalities as a complete character in itself. Only by understanding each motivation behind the actions can we get a complete picture of why the characters act the way they do.

Open Document