Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Nostradamus predictions essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Nostradamus predictions essay
The Texas Sharpshooter Fallacy is committed when an individual finds a pattern that leads them to make an assumption. An example of the Texas Sharpshooter Fallacy can be seen when an individual reads Nostradamus’s prophet on “the son of Germany” and assumes that he had a vision of Hitler. This fails to take into account the fact the Nostradamus made more than 1,000 vague predictions, most of which were rubbish. With more than 1,000 predictions, it is logically possible that at least one actually coincided with a historical event. Another example is shown when the makers of a sugar drink present research that shows that of nine countries where the drink is sold the most, five of these countries where rated in the top twelve healthiest countries
in the world. This research leads the makers to think that the sugar drink is healthy since it is consumed most in the healthy countries. The researchers don’t take into account whether the consumers are healthy they instead look at the clusters that appear to indicate that it is a healthy drink because it is being consumed in a country that has a high rating in how healthy the residents are. This fallacy leads us astray because it causes us to ignore the difference and focus on the similarities, which leads us to a flawed conclusion. In committing this fallacy we insert meaning into something that occurred randomly. The Texas Sharpshooter fallacy is the opposite of cause and effect; what happened leads us to make assumptions of why it happened. I commit the Texas Sharpshooter Fallacy when I convince myself that there is meaningful reason to why the clock is always at 1:23 when I look at it. I used to think that these numbers meant something significant but now I realize that I just happen to always look at the clock at the same time each day. We can avoid the Texas Sharpshooter fallacy by looking at information that might disapprove our assumption. We must also stop looking for a deeper meaning and accept the fact that things don’t always happen for a reason, sometimes things just happen.
The Second Amendment of the Bill of Rights granted U.S. citizens the right to bear arms. This amendment was passed by Congress on September 25, 1789. It’s original intent was so civilians could use their household weapons for military duty or for their own defense. Much has changed since 1789. Would our founding fathers enact this amendment if citizens had the guns we have today? Would they consider such an amendment if citizens were killing each other on the street, in schools and other public places? There is strong interest on the issue of gun control. Taya Kyle states her views on the subject in her article 'American Sniper ' Widow: Gun Control Won 't Protect Us. My beliefs on the subject clash greatly with hers because I regard gun control as necessary to preserve our safety.
American Sniper is the movie that I chose to analyze because it is full of moral and ethical decisions that have to be made. The movie starts off with a boy at school that has to go pull a bully off of his little brother and he ends up beating the bully up so bad that blood is all over his face. The boys name is Chris Kyle. The film then skips forward to when he is in his twenties and is riding a bronco at the rodeo since that is his passion. He then decides to join the Navy and become a SEAL after he feels like his purpose was to serve his country. He gets deployed to Iraq and the mental part is hard on him especially when he has to shoot a women and a kid when he sees them trying to throw a grenade at a group of Marines. He tries to help
In the play The Crucible many characters use different rhetorical fallacies, and one of those characters being Reverend Hale. Hale comes is as an expert on witchcraft to help this small village in their new found problem. He interviewed everyone had made an allegation against people in the village and everyone who was said to be involved with witchcraft. When Reverend Parris comes to take Elizabeth Proctor into cusditoy after Abigail Williams says that Mrs. Proctors sprit was sent to stab her, Hale says, “Nonsense! Minister, I have myself examined Tituba, Sarah Good and numerous other that have confessed to dealing with the Devil. They have confessed it” (Miller 68). He is using the hasty generalization by drawing up a conclusion with insufficient
When the professor Greg Hampikian decided to write “When may I shoot a student” He was trying express his own opinion to the Idaho State Legislature about the bill that allows for guns to be on the college campus of Boise State University. Greg tells us why he thinks this bill is really not needed by saying “I think we can all agree that guns don’t kill people, people with guns do.” He goes on to make many different examples of how the bill might be misunderstood and why it would be pointless to add the bill that will allow people to have a gun on campus. Greg is wanting to know why the Idaho State Legislature would create a problem when there is not a problem in the first place. Greg goes on being ironic when he is pointing out that the only crime on the campus is when students cheat on a test or experiment with drugs, he even go as far to say that the campus has a murder rate of zero.
An example is “For instance, swine and humans are similar enough that they can share many diseases” (Dicke and Van Huis 345). The authors create a Hasty Generalization fallacy by concluding that because humans and swine are similar, they share diseases. Furthermore, this makes the audience feel lost because the authors do not provide evidence of how “swine and humans are similar” (Dicke and Van Huis 345). Similarly, the author says that “Because insects are so different from us, such risks are accordingly lowered” (Dicke and Van Huis 345). Again, the author fails to provide a connection between how the risk of getting an infection is lowered because humans and insects are different. The authors also create a Hasty Generalization fallacy because they conclude that the risk of humans getting infected is lowered just because insects and humans are different. In summary, the use of fallacies without providing evidence and makes the readers feel
A straw man fallacy, in its most lucid form, is executed when a person not only disregards an opponent’s counterarguments, but also distorts them into exaggerated versions of themselves in the interest of making them easier to refute. In many cases, the adversary’s arguments are skewed to such a severe point that they wind up being completely different than what the adversaries were actually fighting for; however, this is all for the convenience of the proponent. An innumerable amount of politicians and authors are infamous for using this problematic method of disproving opposing arguments, even notable celebrities like George W. Bush. The straw man method of persuasion is a proficient way to make a personal stance sound factual, but it
Michael Moore created the documentary Bowling for Columbine to investigate why shootings like the Columbine High School massacre happen, and, in general, why America has the killing rates it does. He strategically does this by walking the viewers through what many believe to be reasons for gun violence in America, and he shows how they are just fallacies. Even though it may not be apparent at first, it seems that Moore has created a list of fallacies. For example, Moore shows that some believe our violent history, violent games and movies, racial diversity, or easy accessibility to firearms is responsible for the killings in the United States. Like a process of elimination he crosses each one off of his list, demonstrating their implausibilities
Confirmation Bias: A perfect example would pertain to when the victims of sexual assault from the University of North Carolina stuck together, they bonded when no one else would listen and believe them. They sought out each other and many others around the United States as the film continued until they had proven their point. The two women, Andrea and Annie just kept moving forward while avoiding those that
The implementation of gun control in the United States is a large problem as it will take away the 2nd Amendment rights of citizens, while preventing law abiding citizens from protecting themselves from criminals.( Noyes, 3) The right to bear arms is promised to citizens of the United States. Crime is very high in states that have loose gun control laws. The state of Texas is known to have the most lenient gun control laws of any state in America.( Noyes, 6) However, the solution of taking guns away from people who are registered and licensed to carry them with no criminal record is not the answer to the problem. Americans have never responded well historically to prohibitions. (Baldauf, 7). Public concern about gun control has grown in Texas in the last two years due to the constant violence caused by Mexican drug cartels on the Mexico and Texas border. People in Texas have different beliefs when it comes to gun control, there are those who believe gun control laws are effective in reducing crime, those who believe that gun control laws are ineffective against crime, and those who believe that private owner ship of guns reduces crime.
The first topic of discussion is the self-imposed, or self-inflicted, self-fulfilling prophecy. This idea follows that if one has a preconception or notion of an outcome, then chances are that person will raise the possibility of making it so. Take for example these cases-in-hand that Channing Grigsby, teacher of self-esteem speaks of:
Just in the US there are over 100,000 people shot each year. 72 perecent of all violent killings use guns as the weapon. 40 percent of US homes have guns, 57 percent of people in which do have guns believe there should be major restrictions or a ban on guns. In January 2016, Obama announced new actions on gun control, these actions include an update and expansion on background checks. The Supreme Court held a collective right that to own guns is a purpose for maintaining a militia. There should be more gun control laws because it would help reduce the high rate of violent crimes. More laws need to be made to protect oneself from harm of others.
Many assault rifles that we conclude are not really weapons of war and should not be banned in Texas. Assault rifles aren't machine guns if that's what you're thinking. Automatic and Machine guns firearms were banned in 1986, policies by congress so to clear up people's vision on what assault rifles are think of AK 47, STG 44 and etc. Automatic rifles don't shoot multiple rounds, they're really designed for beginners, they have the look of many military designed weapons but don't serve the purpose of being used in the military. The technical term to call these rifles are semi automatic, and many other simple guns like a handgun are also semi automatic. So what makes these guns so dangerous that society proposes?
Jacqueline T. Fish, L. S. (2014). Bullets and Cartridge Casings. In Crime Scene Investigation (p. 181). Waltham: Anderson.
What would happen if we changed our Second Amendment? The right to bear arms; would our nation go mad, or become safer? Arguing about gun control is like arguing about who should be our next President. Both sides have their pros and cons, and whatever you go with, someone out there will always disagree with you. Having the right to bear arms comes with a large amount of responsibilities.
In their essay, ‘The Intentional Fallacy’ (1946), William K. Wimsatt Jr. and Monroe C. Beardsley, two of the most eminent figures of the New Criticism school of thought of Literary Criticism, argue that the ‘intention’ of the author is not a necessary factor in the reading of a text.