Today, designer fashion is very popular amongst Americans’ in all age groups. Head out to the mall on any weekend and it’s sure to be packed with people shopping in upscale stores like Barney’s, Gucci, or Louis Vuitton. Because of peoples yearn for these designer fashions, counterfeiting is a major issue throughout the world. In Dana Thomas’s article, "Terror’s Purse Strings", Thomas discusses how counterfeiting has become a major problem throughout the world; She also points out that the majority of these counterfeit operations are run out of Chinese factories and how many of these factories employ young children who are sold or sent off by their families to go manufacturer these “luxury” counterfeit goods. I chose Thomas’s article because …show more content…
it stood out to me. Counterfeiting is something we all have heard about, but for the most part is never really addressed.
As I read the article very thoroughly looking for appeals to rhetoric I found that it was not only a well addressed call to action, but also had all the aspects of a classical argument. Thomas’s article presents an argument that counterfeiting is not only an issue of unethicality but also linked to much bigger crimes such as terrorist acts or violating adolescent’s wellbeing. She writes a classical article that many can apply to events that unfortunately happen every day around the world, kairos, describing her personal account of young children performing hard labor illegally, pathos, states the need for consumer to know the repercussions of buying counterfeit goods, logos, and demonstrates ethos by keeping an even tone throughout her argument. She never becomes aggressive but instead calmly educates us on what we, the consumers need to know and how to address the …show more content…
issue. Thomas’s article provides the reader with her view and accounts of a major problem in the fashion industry. She educates us with consumer statistics, interviews with elite designers, and her accounts all the way down to the production of these counterfeit goods. In many of these examples, Thomas is explaining how the consumer is the main cause of counterfeit goods being produced. Bringing to light facts such as 2 out of 3 Europeans are proud to tell their family or friends that they purchased a counterfeit item. Dana Thomas is a journalist and New York Times bestselling author; she began her career writing for the Style section of The Washington Post in Washington, D.C. and from 1995 to 2011, she served as a cultural and fashion correspondent for Newsweek in Paris. She has written for the New York Times Magazine, The New Yorker, WSJ, the Financial Times, Vogue, Harper's Bazaar, and Elle Decor and was the European editor of Condé Nast Portfolio. Thomas is a member of the Anglo-American Press Association in Paris and the Overseas Press Club. She taught journalism at The American University of Paris from 1996 to 1999. In 1987, she received the Sigma Delta Chi Foundation Scholarship and the Ellis Haller Award for Outstanding Achievement in Journalism. The kairos in Thomas’ argument is practical being that New York Fashion Week was coming up shortly after the article was published. Also America was right in the middle of the “War on Terrorism” in Iraq and Afghanistan which are two events that appeal greatly to kairos. Originally, this article was posted in The New York Times which is a website/newspaper whose audience is likely an educated, informed, working class sub set. Dana Thomas has been a journalist for many major publications. This gives her much credibility because of her extensive history in the journalism industry. I found Thomas’s article easy to read and to understand, she’s very straight forward with her writing but with great detail. She manages to inform the reader while giving you her argument in a clear, well-structured manor. One can understand where Thomas is coming from in regards to her argument along with her firsthand experience seeing young Chinese children performing hard labor in the act. She goes on to explain how after a raid of a counterfeit factory the children were throwing cans at the police because they put them out of work. This is sad that children even have to worry about things like this, instead of living a normal childhood. These children get paid very small amounts to fund a multimillion dollar business. Throughout this piece Thomas reiterated the different effects of counterfeiting on America.
One comment she makes is “most people think buying a counterfeit bag or wallet is harmless, but counterfeiting rackets are run by crime syndicates that also deal with drugs, prostitution, and weapons”. Her argument against purchasing counterfeit goods is valid. Her statement is pure facts mixed with a common thought and this is hard to debate because it’s simply logic.. Another comment she makes is “if we stop buying fake, the supply chain will dry up and counterfeiters will go out of business. This is a clear call to action, one may debate this and say otherwise but for the most part it still makes sense. Being straight forward could make an audience lose interest in the argument or sway them to an opposing view, but this is dependent on the individual reader. Regardless of all of this it’s up to the consumers to make the decision on what they want to do. Many people just choose to turn a blind eye to the facts, so one may obliterate any point made up in Thomas’s article. The article is mainly one sided but leaves room for opposing
thoughts. Thomas’s article is fair and thought out. A point she brings up is that 11% of the world’s fashion goods are counterfeit. Her response is to have genuine designers educate the consumers on what’s real and is not real, and show the consumers the unethical processes the consumer influencing when they purchase a fake good. This is a strong appeal to ethos and proves to me that Thomas knows her facts and knows what need to be done to fix an ongoing issue in the world. It shows that she’s not only making her point but trying to make a difference in the world. Dana Thomas’s article was well written. Straight to the point with many appeals to rhetoric. The tone of the article is calm and neutral but she still manages to portray her point to the reader in a convincing manner. I feel purchasing counterfeit goods is not only unethical but there are many underlying issues that the common consumer of these goods aren’t aware of. I feel Thomas is a very persuasive writer, one that could appeal to any audience. If one were to try and tear into her about a topic she would stay calm, state the facts, and complete the ultimate goal of successfully persuading the audience.
Americans buy clothes in a huge quantity each year, but afterward, many people like Susie Bayer don’t know where their old clothes go after they lug them off to the thrift shops. According to the various estimates by the ABC news reporter Mike Lee, the charitable institutions keep only 10 percent donations, and the remaining 90 percent is sold by the charitable institution to textile recycling firms. Packer also proved this point in his essay. In Packer’s essay, he traced back to the thrift shop. People who run the shop only choose the clothes based on their personal preference. In order to get rid of the “junk” clothes, they use the Trans-Americas Trading Company, and sell the clothes they do not like for three cents a pound. George Packer points out that Americans donate 2.5 billion pounds of clothes each year, but 80 percent gets trucked off to places like Trans-Americas. People are not aware that their donations had been devalued so much, and there is no way they can
In the Time of the Butterflies is a historical fiction novel by Julia Alvarez based on events that occurred during the rule of Trujillo in the Dominican Republic. This book shows the hardships the Mirabal Sisters had to go through while being part of an underground effort to overthrow the dictatorship of Trujillo. It also shows that ultimately, it was their courage that brought upon their own death. Alvarez wants us to understand anyone and everyone has the potential to be courageous.
“The Onion’s” mock press release on the MagnaSoles satirical article effectively attacks the rhetorical devices, ethos and logos, used by companies to demonstrate how far advertisers will go to convince people to buy their products. It does this by using manipulative, “scientific-sounding" terminology, comparisons, fabrication, and hyperboles.
For instance, they claim that MagnaSoles are “popular among consumers” (52-53). This use of luring pathos is creating a situation where the reader recognizes themselves as a consumer and that they should be conforming to also like the product. This is exactly what the speaker wants the reader to feel. This need to conform is a clear highlight to The Onion’s purpose of exposing how easy it is for advertisers to make a consumer buy in to the product. Additionally, the speaker puts the reader in a vulnerable position when a user of the product says to “try to prove that Magnasoles didn’t heal me!” (61-62). This is used to make the reader feel like this user of the product. The user thinks the product is great and he even goes as far to challenge the reader to find problems with his claims. If he is challenging the reader than more often than not the reader will just accept what is said and believe it. Once again The Onion mocks how consumers often feel when addressing a product’s claims. The seductive pathos allows for proof that consumers believe anything when they are tested to conform and believe
In “Terror’s Purse Strings”, Dana Thomas successfully persuades her target audience of general consumers to not purchase counterfeit products. Thomas’s purpose is to inform her audience that the notion of consuming counterfeit products being a victimless crime is completely false and the true harmful effects of consuming counterfeit products. In “Sweatshop Oppression”, Rajeev Ravisankar successfully persuades his target audience of general college students that they should take measures against corporations who knowingly use inhumane sweatshops to produce their products. Through the analysis of each writer's rhetorical strategies, the establishment of credibility, and stylistic techniques, I am going to compare and contrast Dana Thomas’s “Terror's
Heinrichs begins by explaining the art of rhetoric and laying out the basic tools of argument. He emphasizes the importance of using the proper tense to avoid arguing the wrong issue. Furthermore, he introduces logos, ethos and pathos and shows how to “wield” each rhetorical tool. In Part 2, Heinrichs discusses common logical fallacies as well as rhetorical fouls. He remarks rhetoric’s single rule of never arguing the inarguable and demonstrates how ethos helps to know whom to trust. In Part 3, Kairos becomes an important tool for knowing the right time to persuade one’s audience. In Part 4 of the novel, the author provides examples of how to use rhetorical tools previously introduced in the
According to the Webster Dictionary, rhetoric is defined as the art of speaking or writing effectively. Rhetoric is made up of three separate appeals that can be used individually or collectively in an attempt to persuade a reader. Ethos is the credibility and qualifications of the speaker or author. Pathos is the author's use of emotions and sympathy to urge the audience to agree with his or her standpoint. And lastly, logos is applying sound reasoning (logic) to attract the typical ideas of the audience and to prove the author's point of view. "Lockdown" by Evans D. Hopkins is a fine example of an author using these appeals to persuade his audience. Hopkins uses of the three appeals are easy to locate and relate with throughout the entire passage. He undoubtedly uses rhetoric to try and keep his audiences focus and to persuade them to feel the way he does about the treatment of prisoners. We can identify and trust that he is making reasonable assertions because he was a prisoner and went through actual lockdowns. The fact that Hopkins was an actual prisoner proves his credibility to provide evidence for his thoughts.
Ann Rinaldi has written many books for young teenagers, she is an Award winning author who writes stories of American history and makes them become real to the readers. She has written many other books such as A Break with Charity, A Ride into Morning, and Cast two Shadows, etc. She was born in New York City on August 27, 1934. In 1979, at the age of 45, she finished her first book.
Berry, Hannah. “The Fashion Industry: Free to Be an Individual.” The Norton Field Guide to
...o engage in destructive rhetoric are held to task, rhetoric cannot simply be attributed to some state of affairs, while the rhetorician from whose lips the rhetoric emerges is held to no ethical standard. Certainly it is conceivable that rhetoric can have destructive consequences. Rhetoric seems to have played a central role in the deterioration of people’s faith in their systems of government, or the electoral process by which they choose their representatives. A view of rhetoric in which the rhetorician is accountable for the effects of the change they inflict upon the world could lead to less destructive rhetoric and a society which operates on the solid ground of personal responsibility.
During the debate, we covered all three elements of the rhetorical appeals: pathos, logos and ethos. In the beginning, Jiale talked about the Second Amendment, stating that United States citizens have the right to keep and bear arms. She then applied this concept with a historical event of the independence war with Britain. From referring to the history, this established the ethos of our group. Audience knew that we have done research about the topic and our arguments are reliable. During the debate, we paid close attention to other
In China, Kelsey Timmerman spent time with a couple who worked at the Teva factory, traveled to the countryside to meet the couple’s son, insert name, who hasn’t seen his parents in three years due to his parents working long hours and it being expensive to take a train ride. In the US, the author visited one of a few clothing factories in the US to talk to the workers about his shorts, and the decrease of American garment factories. Timmerman wants the consumer to be more engaged and more thoughtful when mindlessly buying clothes. By researching how well the brands you want to buy from monitor their factories and what their code of ethics details, you can make a sound decision on if this is where you would want to buy your clothes. The author writes about brands that improve employers lives like SoleRebels, a shoe company who employs workers and gives them health insurance, school funds for their children, and six months of maternity leave. Brands like soleRebels that give workers benefits most factory workers have never even heard of help improve the lives of garment workers and future generations. From reading this book, Timmerman wants us to be more educated about the lives of garment workers, bridge the gap between consumers and manufacturers, and be a more engaged and mindful consumer when purchasing our
This is a compare and contrast rhetorical analysis paper focusing on a print billboard advertisement and television commercial. The billboard advertisement is centered on a smoking death count, sponsored by several heart research associations. In addition, the television Super Bowl commercial illustrates how irresistible Doritos are, set in an ultrasound room with a couple and their unborn child. The following paragraphs will go in depth to interpret the pathos, logos, and ethos of both the billboard and the television advertisements. Clark (2016) suggests that rhetoric isn’t limited to oral communication, but currently has a permanent foothold in written works: magazine or newspaper excerpts, novels, and scientific reports.
Gardner, Marilyn. "Fast Fashion Is a Problem." The Fashion Industry. Ed. Roman Espejo. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2010. Opposing Viewpoints. Rpt. from "Fashion Industry Gives Rise to a 'Disposable Culture, '." The Christian Science Monitor. 2007. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 22 Nov.
Do you ever wonder when you go into certain shops how a handmade t-shirt can be so cheap? Or on the other hand, products which are sold to us at extremely high prices and we assume they are expensive to produce when we do not realise child labour is behind it.... ... middle of paper ... ...