Terror's Purse Strings By Dana Thomas Summary

1130 Words3 Pages

Today, designer fashion is very popular amongst Americans’ in all age groups. Head out to the mall on any weekend and it’s sure to be packed with people shopping in upscale stores like Barney’s, Gucci, or Louis Vuitton. Because of peoples yearn for these designer fashions, counterfeiting is a major issue throughout the world. In Dana Thomas’s article, "Terror’s Purse Strings", Thomas discusses how counterfeiting has become a major problem throughout the world; She also points out that the majority of these counterfeit operations are run out of Chinese factories and how many of these factories employ young children who are sold or sent off by their families to go manufacturer these “luxury” counterfeit goods. I chose Thomas’s article because …show more content…

As I read the article very thoroughly looking for appeals to rhetoric I found that it was not only a well addressed call to action, but also had all the aspects of a classical argument. Thomas’s article presents an argument that counterfeiting is not only an issue of unethicality but also linked to much bigger crimes such as terrorist acts or violating adolescent’s wellbeing. She writes a classical article that many can apply to events that unfortunately happen every day around the world, kairos, describing her personal account of young children performing hard labor illegally, pathos, states the need for consumer to know the repercussions of buying counterfeit goods, logos, and demonstrates ethos by keeping an even tone throughout her argument. She never becomes aggressive but instead calmly educates us on what we, the consumers need to know and how to address the …show more content…

One comment she makes is “most people think buying a counterfeit bag or wallet is harmless, but counterfeiting rackets are run by crime syndicates that also deal with drugs, prostitution, and weapons”. Her argument against purchasing counterfeit goods is valid. Her statement is pure facts mixed with a common thought and this is hard to debate because it’s simply logic.. Another comment she makes is “if we stop buying fake, the supply chain will dry up and counterfeiters will go out of business. This is a clear call to action, one may debate this and say otherwise but for the most part it still makes sense. Being straight forward could make an audience lose interest in the argument or sway them to an opposing view, but this is dependent on the individual reader. Regardless of all of this it’s up to the consumers to make the decision on what they want to do. Many people just choose to turn a blind eye to the facts, so one may obliterate any point made up in Thomas’s article. The article is mainly one sided but leaves room for opposing

Open Document