Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The geneva convention laws
The geneva convention laws
Geneva convention prisoner of war
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The geneva convention laws
Terrorism has been affecting the world for many years, but most especially since September 11th. Countless amounts of time and money have been spent; many soldiers and American resources have gone out try to stop the problem, but what happens to the terrorists after they have been captured? A basic level of humane treatment needs to be given to all people even those suspected of or convicted of terroristic offences. Using torture to attempt to find more information is not the most helpful or effective method that could be applied. Although the War on Terrorism is different than any war seen before in history, it is still a war against the United States government and the Geneva Convention needs to protect these war criminals. Those suspected of, or convicted of, terroristic offences should receive the same protections under the Geneva Convention that apply to prisoners of war because they are prisoners of war and their basic human rights need to be respected, torture has been proven to be rarely effective, and their roles, as terrorists, fit into the Geneva Convention criterion. A terrorist is someone who uses deliberate violent tactics to attack those who they see to be their enemy, mainly official government like organizations. Terrorists all share many characteristics which include, committing violent attacks, creating an atmosphere of fear, wanting publicity and not wanted to conquer, just harm their enemy (Taylor [Page 11]). Two of the most renowned terroristic organizations are the Taliban and al Qaeda. When a terrorist is captured there are two different routes they can take. The first being, taken into civilian courts and being tried in the United States court systems. But leaves them in a “legal limbo” for some time bet... ... middle of paper ... ...nees. International Committee of the Red Cross, 29 Oct. 2010. Web. 10 Oct. 2013. . Richardson, Neal A., and Spencer J. Crona. "Terrorists Should Be Tried in a Military Tribunal." Criminal Justice. Ed. Jill Karson. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2004. Opposing Viewpoints. Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 15 Oct. 2013. Shapiro, Bruce. "Detainees in the War on Terror Should Be Treated as Prisoners of War." War. Ed. Louise I. Gerdes. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2005. Opposing Viewpoints. Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 15 Oct. 2013. Taylor, Robert. History of Terrorism. San Diego: Lucent, 2002. Print. Winn, Aidan Kirby. "Can Gitmo's terrorists be rehabilitated?" Christian Science Monitor 29 June 2009: 9. Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 30 Oct. 2013.
Through the passing of the USA PATRIOT Act, the government can now search a “suspected” terrorist’s property without their knowledge and even without a warrant. Although this could be a well-needed exception to warrants, as it is the same way drug dealers and organized crime offenders have been investigated, identifying a “suspected” terrorist is not nearly as easy as an active criminal. As shown by the events of September 11, the terrorists that hijacked the planes were part of a “sleeper cell” which stays dormant until tipped off by somebody above them in the organization....
“Torture Is Just Means of Preventing Terrorism.” Securing Liberty. Securing Liberty, n.d. Web. 10 Feb. 2014. .
ICRC. (2014, April 4th). The Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949. Retrieved from International Committee of the Red Cross: http://www.icrc.org/eng/assets/files/publications/icrc-002-0173.pdf
It is critical to US security to hold suspected terrorists in a prison like no other because the prisoners are like no other. Since 2001, the American government and military has engaged in a conflict with jihadists and other extremists, known as the war on terror (Bridenstine). Under the international laws of war, this specific group of people held at Guantanamo Bay is not
Kretzmer, D. (2005). Targeted Killing of Suspected Terrorists: Extra-Judicial Executions or Legitimate Means of Defense. Targeted Killing as Active Self-Defense : Noah Feldman.
...t has come to our attention that there are bombs set all over the country ready to explode. One man knows who these Muslim terrorist is And decides to tell the officials (McCoy 1). Finally officers capture the terrorists and is put in custody. With anything the detectives try to do the terrorist will not give any information whatsoever. For many hours of trying to interrogate the terrorist getting nowhere. Finally the officers get a call that half the country is in pieces. Would the use of torture save millions of lives?
...rigo, Bruce. "Punishment, Freedom, and the Culture of Control: A Review of Torture: America’s Brutal Prisons 1." Contemporary Justice Review 9.2 (2006): 229-33. Print.
Several reasons come into of why political prisoners are categorized as terrorist. Before the tragic events of September 11, 2001, we have had a right to safe society meaning the right to live freely in this America with no interruption with an orderly society free from interference from outside influences. In this case on September 11, 2001 those rights got infringed upon with the attack on America. This showed that for one day in 2001 that America was not so superior. The right of living in a safe society was now a fore gone formality. The right to work was not the same as well meaning in reference to those who were working that morning of the attack. Just when I thought it was safe to go to work I was wrong with one day that changes my life. I wrestled with this profiling of all actions of the political nature.
What has our society classified as a prisoner of war? A prisoner of war is someone who is a member of regular or irregular armed forces of a nation at war held by the enemy. After two years of war with the Middle East our society wonders what happens to the prisoners in jail. The other conflicts of prisoners of war is how they are treated in jail, also what did they do to be detained as a prisoner of war? In most situations, there is a legitimate reason why these people are taken captive. So many might ask what is happening to the Iraqis detained under Coalition forces custody, and do the prisons comply with standards set fourth in the Geneva Conventions? This subject is very controversial to the U.S and other nations. The controversial part of this subject is the alleged abuse of prisoners in jail in custody of U.S soldiers. There are many cases of prisoners dying in prison but is it because of abuse by American soldiers. This subject of abuse upon prisoners of war has reach all over the world especially to the United States. Our president George W. Bush, along with Congress, has arranged investigations on the events that happen inside the prisons. He has addressed to the nation that such things have not occurred, but what a U.S soldier knows may be a little different. This kind of action toward prisoners of war is illegal according to US law, which is dictated by the Geneva Conventions. If a soldier is found guilty of abuse, or other forms of mistreatment, that soldier will be recommended for court-martial. The other issue about this subject is that there are so many different opinions on this matter. One opinion is that U.S personnel really did cause the death of many prisoners of war. The other question i...
On September 11, 2001, the world realized the tragedy and destruction caused by terrorism. Marwan Abu Ubcida, a terrorist in training, said, “Yes, I am a terrorist. Write that down: I admit I am a terrorist. [The Koran] says it is the duty of Muslims to bring terror to the enemy, so being a terrorist makes me a good Muslim.”(Friedman) That enemy happens to be anyone against what they believe. One such enemy meaning the US because we are against terrorism. There is no justification for terrorism and no reason for the government to try to justify it. According to Seifeldin Ashmawy in a meeting for the Committee on Foreign Affairs, Subcommittee on Near East and South Asian Affairs, “The mask of religion must be torn from their [extremist] face and they should be recognized for what the stand for, greed and power.”(Ashmawy) and Ashmawy was right. The government’s reaction is usually that of after the fact; to arrest a suspected terrorist after they prove they are a terrorist by an act of death or destruction. Why should the government have to wait to arrest those who have a great and reasonable suspicion of terrorism against them, while the country unknowingly waits for the worst? The government should be able to detain suspected terrorists without trial for the following reasons: the Protection of our nation and prevention of terrorism; the prevention of nuclear proliferation; the learning of new methods of terrorism; and the prevention of future attacks on US citizens.
certain area of freedom, thereby both acknowledging and protecting personhood. The terrorist can't show this type of respect. For if you have any basic rights at all, surely the right not to be killed or maimed for a terrorist cause is one of them” (4). Each human needs respect and their own rights and terrorism obliterates those two basic principles. Treating human lives as a means to an end is hardly the proper way to go around things, and that is one of the largest consequences of terro...
The success, or lack thereof, of the anti- terrorism measures which the United States adopted deserve attention. Over $1.6 trillion dollars and six thousand American lives later , the ‘War on Terror’ is a war with no foreseeable conclusion in sight. It is also a war in which the conduct of the United States Military has departed from conventional- if not morally acceptable- practices. There is a corollary between the acceptance of torture which occurred almost immediately after 9/11 and through the Bush years and the proliferation of drone strikes that has occurred under President Obama.
Keeping American prisoners on foreign land has proven to be ineffective. Experts say “that many high-level terrorists have long been imprisoned on U.S. soil without incident (Marshall 797). Mr. Alberto J. Mora believes “the federal prison system has demonstrated that it can successfully and safely hold terrorists as dangerous as
It is in the latter use that the prison system has become highly contested, especially after witnessing the extreme atrocities from World War II compounded by the perverse use of prisons and detention facilities as means of oppression--- thousands being persecuted on the basis of racial, religious and political terms (Roberts). Combat zones were no exception, as prisoners of war were exploited for their labor and subjugated to both mental and physical abuse (Roberts). From this arrangement of prisons as systematic institutions of violence, a broad consensus emerged at the worldwide level demanding the international community create protections for in...
“Since September 11, the Bush Administration has refused to release the names and whereabouts of hundreds of persons detained as "special interest" immigration detainees, various persons detained as material witnesses, and thousands of persons detained without trial as alleged security threats here, at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and elsewhere”(Paust 1352). Because of the staggering amount of suspected terrorists detained without trial since 9/11, some people have started to question President Bush’s right to detain these people indefinitely. These questions have led to open debate on what rights these people get, and if these people deserve the right to a trial. The controversy over how the United States should treat terrorists that have been captured