Teleological Argument Analysis

695 Words2 Pages

There are four major arguments for the existence of God; teleological, cosmological, ontological and morals. None of which do a convincing job of God’s existence. Every argument is going to have a counter, one always being stronger. The most devastating of the arguments is the ontological argument. Taking two things that are based on believing and imagining and putting them together to prove each other’s existence isn’t proving anything. For God to exist he has to be omnipotent, omniscient and omnipresent. All three of these core qualities have contradictories. An omnipotent God would be able to create an absolutely immovable object, yet be able to move it ( “How to Prove that God Doesn’t Exist”. Comments), so, therefore, it is not absolutely …show more content…

William Paley tried to explain and strengthen this argument with the analogy of the watch. A complex watch is produced by a watch-maker so much that a complex world is created by a world-maker, God (“William Paley, “The Teleological Argument” Philosophy of Religion”). An unknown maker doesn’t mean one doesn’t exist. A complex object must come from a complex creator, so that brings to question who created the complex creator. What is complex? How do we know the world is so complex when we have nothing to compare it to? If an all good God created a world with such order, why is there so much disorder? The world is different in the way that we don’t know how it got here or how we did so a made up God was created to fill that void. This argument doesn’t prove that God exists, but its …show more content…

If nothing were to exist, there is no existent nothing, but nothing cannot be. If there is nothing, then something exists. If nothing exists, then there is something. Nothingness is the absence of existence, so if nothing were to exists, how could a something recall nothing? This is the strongest argument for the existence of God, but there is still a question on whether the uncaused cause is probable. If there is no beginning and no end, how necessary is a necessary being? Necessity depends on how much it is needed, but with the limited knowledge people obtain of the concept of space and time it is impossible to tell whether or not what

Open Document