Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gender inequality within stem fields
Women and the STEM fields
Gender inequality within stem fields
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Gender inequality within stem fields
In this week’s engineering community of practice, we had the same attendance of people: David, Shoun, Claire, Esther, and myself. Since we already know each other, there was no need for introductions again, so we hopped right into what we had prepared for this week. We were to watch one Ted Talk about the concept of inspiring the next generation of female engineers then read several online articles concerning racism and sexism in the technology industry, and how they relate to the shortcomings of our field. On one hand, the Ted Talk was especially interesting as it revealed new statistics and analysis that I have not exactly heard before. For starters, the speaker began the Ted Talk by asking the question, “Close your eyes and picture an engineer. What do you see?” I never asked myself this question before, so I never realized just how broad the term “engineer” can be; the crowd revealed that they imagined a nerdy man behind a computer, or a train conductor, but barely anyone imagined the female speaker right in front of them. Furthermore, she brought up statistics on standardized testing among male and females, revealing that women fare better than men in other countries compared to the US, proving that the discourse in technology is not a biological factor. …show more content…
One article stated that there was a specific building constructed for minorities, but Esther pointed out that this would be creating another form of discrimination, creating something that would probably not be preferred. Shoun pointed out a strange discrepancy – at the location he interned last year, he noticed that there were only male Asians and Whites working alongside. However, currently on their website holds two testimonials of interns – a white woman and a black man of which Shoun did not even
Although society claims that we are in the age where there is gender equality, it is clear that women are still not of equal standing than men. In our society, women are of lower status than men. Such as in the workplace, a male employee’s project proposal is favored over a female employee’s proposal because a male superior believes that women cannot construct ideas as well as male employees. This is a result of how our culture has influence our view that women are less superior than men. Our male dominant culture taught us that women are not as capable as men are and that between the two genders, the man is the superior.
Since the Industrial Revolution in the United States of America, working conditions for women and minorities have not been given equal pay or top positions in the work place. Women being degraded by the men in charge, and minorities constantly at odds with one another so they will not form a Union. Such things keep those with low-status in the job in line, and not feel they are equal to the ones in charge. People from other countries are in search for a better life elsewhere, and take the risk of going to the United States illegally to seek out the American Dream. The articles Working at Bazooms by Meika Loe and At a Slaughterhouse, Some Things Never Die by Charlie LeDuff deal with the working conditions for women and minorities. Workers in both articles have to deal with having terrible working conditions, harassment in the workplace, low-status within the job, and the constant fear of job loss.
In brief, this article presents a view that women in engineering must enter the field as “conceptual men”. This means that in order to succeed in a male dominated field, women must essentially “become like men”. The article goes on to interview women in the engineering field. In particular, Ranson (2005) interviews women with and without children. This provides differing views of how women in engineering with and without children in engineering have approached their jobs.
Gender and racism are two of the main topics of “The Talk” by Dana Canedy and “What Goes Through Your Mind: On Nice Parties and Casual Racism” by Nicole Chung. Throughout their essays, Canedy and Chung prove whether it is an African-American boy or an Asian American woman, minorities face racism. Also, all types of racism such as casual racism or intended racism all are extremely hurtful, degrading to any minority. Gender has a lot to do with the severity of racism experienced. Police brutality on an African American woman happens, but is not as frequently and sever as it does to an African American man. Nicole Chung, who is Asian American believes that she has control over her own identity. When placed in an uncomfortable racist situation
In an excerpt titled "The Feminist Face of Antitechnology" from his 1981 book Blaming Technology, Samuel C. Florman explains why he thinks so few educated women in modern society are engineers. The excerpt was written shortly after he had visited an all-female liberal arts school, Smith College in Northampton, Massachusetts, to convince a few young women to become engineers. His mission failed and his essay makes clear why he had such trouble.
Women are faced with extreme pressure and alienation in their career fields, and on average earn less than men. Men, on the other hand, face similar pressure, while underachieving compared to women academically, and facing more dangerous occupations. Clearly, this system benefits no one. Michael Kimmel illustrates this point in “A black woman took my job': Michael Kimmel argues that it is in men's interest to work for gender equality.” The title itself emphasizes how the fight for gender equality will benefit both genders. He discusses how sexism is harming men by narrowing their worldview (2). Slaughter, Ullman, Kaplan, Dorment, Knestaut, and Miller all agree with Kimmel to some extent. They all agree gender equality does not exist. When all these perspectives are brought together, it becomes clear that it is in the best interest of both genders that the fight for equality is still pursued. Hopefully, one day women will earn as much as their male counterparts and be equally represented in both careers and intentional unemployment, and men will be attaining higher education goals and employed in less dangerous occupations, and both genders will be relieved of some of the pressure to dedicate 100% of their time to both a career, and a
The overarching research question presented for this paper is “what is the relationship between perceived social support and levels of self-esteem among Queer Black women?” The articles this paper reviews were chosen after an extensive review of literature on theories conceptualizing what it means to be queer and what it means to be a Black woman, in order to fully understand what it means to be a queer Black woman. The review is broken up into major themes. The first theme, Conceptualizing Homophobia, Heterosexism and Heteronormativity, defines heteronormativity and related terms, and also identifies the impacts of these issues. Next, Gendered Racism explores the intersection of racism and sexism. Untreated depression among Black women is
For women, this topic may be viewed as a confidence boost. Instead of focusing on negatives and the problems that are still apparent in society, it focuses on the achievements and great strides that women have made in the workforce. It will explain success throughout American history, and help motivate the female gender to continue to push forward, innovate and become a force to be recognized as important and necessary in the professional environment.
Looking at the Leslie, Cimpian, Meyer and Freeland’s study, it has proving that individuals’ beliefs on what is “required for success in an activity vary in their emphasis on fixed, innate talent” can “account for the distribution of gender gaps across the entire academic spectrum” (Leslie, Cimpian, Meyer and Freeland 262). At a young age, females believe they do not have the talent or skills for computer programming from their beliefs due to the macrosystem. In this case, there are not that many females in the computer-programming field in college. According to Moss-Racusin, Molenda, and Cramer’s study, it has shown there is gender bias in STEM fields when they had “both female and male faculty members viewed the male student as more competent than the identical female student” (Moss-Racusin, Molenda and Cramer 1). Our society has the belief that males are more dominant than females due to the stereotypes they have deal with for the past decades. In the videos, Karlie describes coding as “a creative, innovative and imaginative activity” where it can challenge numerous girls view on STEM fields. At the beginning, young females believe that they cannot pursue in the STEM field because of their incapability to understand the information; however, it presents the idea that coding is possible from listening to the idea that coding is a way of self-expression rather than a task that cannot be
Women have to face problems because of their gender. In the article “Sexism a problem in Silicon Valley, critics says,” LA Times, October 24, 2013, Jessica Guynn mentions that discrimination against women exists in the technology companies because of their gender. Some women that work at tech companies have been sexually threatened and death threats. Some technology companies do not have any senior women because women are not as well promoted as men are. Many women decide not to study to become engineers as result women are not as prominent in the technology workplace. Technology companies have problems with gender.
“Girls go to Jupiter to get more ‘stupider’, boys go to Mars to get more candy bars!” A few of us may have heard this sort of unrefined phraseology during our grade school years, or possibly even uttered something similar (present company excluded, of course). While youthful taunts and jest often play around with and make light of gender superiority or bias, the subject has accumulated a much more serious tone in recent times. In education, academia, and the corporate workforce, the notion of gender differences has been defined, redefined, and defined again, in the pursuit of a single truth; How different are men and women, if any different at all? And if such a difference can be shown to exist, what does that mean for equality and real life experience between the sexes?
STEM is best known as science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. STEM for many years has been primarily seen as and stereotyped into a masculine work field. But as of recent years, while it expands, more and more women have been rising in these fields. However, there is still a tremendous gender gap between men and women in these fields and areas of work. The gender gap between men and women in STEM is alive and well. There is no denying that the gender gap between men and women in STEM is immense. But there instead are many sufficient reasons as to why there is such a huge gap between men and women within in fields. Some probable causes for the lack of women seen in these areas are biased towards women, unconscious bias girls receive
Our first reading, “Why Engineering, Science Gender Gap Persists,” inspired me to design a project that encouraged females to follow their dreams and be persistent in what they want in the future. Code: Debugging the Gender Gap influenced me to highlight different women, as did the film, allowing the 3rd grade students to learn a spectrum of women in different fields to accommodate different interests and experiences. With that being said, while presenting my project to the 3rd graders, there were clear indications of what each student liked. Some girls picked out coloring pages of Sally Ride and Marie Curie and told me information about the women. It was surprising that they’ve already been introduced to women in STEM since I didn’t know what STEM was until I reached about 5th grade or middle school. Another “big hit” that interested them, both girls and boys, was the “Be Your Own Engineer” activities. They were excited to make their own silly putty and wrote down the recipes to take home and created paper airplanes, decorated them, and flew them around our corner. Overall, the hands-on activities grabbed their interest the most and helped them learn more about each woman and her field versus the heavy text pages and straight information. In the end, I even had some students tell me about their own experiences in the STEM field and how they even wanted to be
Within living memory, young women who have wanted to study engineering faced such dissent that in 1955, Penn State’s dean of engineering declared, “Women are NOT for engineering,” asserting that all but a few “unusual women” lacked the “basic capabilities” necessary to succeed in this profession (Bix par. 2). Although the number of women in social sciences and humanities has grown steadily, women remain underrepresented in science and engineering. Bureau of Labor Statistics states that “women remain underrepresented in engineering constituting only 10 percent of full-time employed engineers and 7.7 percent of engineering managers...” Although this is the case, social norms, culture and attitudes play a significant role in undermining the role of women in the aforementioned fields in addition to the gendered persistence and their individual confidence in their ability to fulfill engineering roles.
Emily Warren Roebling is solid proof that women can work alongside men, even their own husbands, in the engineering field. As her husband grew ill during the building of the Brooklyn Bridg...