Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on the pros of merit pay for teachers
Essays on the pros of merit pay for teachers
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays on the pros of merit pay for teachers
Teacher merit pay, also known as performance-based compensation for teachers is becoming a widely examined phenomenon in not only the United States but around the world. Merit pay is a system of offering bonuses to workers who perform their jobs at a very efficient level. The history of teacher merit pay has been improving very gradually in the United States. Since the 1800s, there have only been three major changes in teacher merit pay. The first was paying for teachers’ room and board followed by a grade-based salary schedule, where male teachers were rewarded at a higher level than female teachers. Lastly, we arrive at today’s single-salary schedule. A single-salary schedule is one where teachers are awarded bonuses based on years of experience …show more content…
These exams are administered both nationally and at the school level and have two separate graders to avoid score manipulation. Students receive credits based on their scores on these exams. For example, each student must earn twenty credits to matriculate to university. In 1999 and 2000, less than half of all Israeli students earned enough credits to apply for university. In Lavy’s paper, Performance Pay and Teachers’ Effort, Productivity and Grading Level, it is hypothesized that offering incentives to Israeli teachers will increase student achievement. Student achievement will grow by increasing the test taking rate, the conditional pass rate and test scores on math and English …show more content…
After the study, Lavy surveyed the teachers that participated and discovered that offering them performance-based incentives increased the amount of effort they put towards teaching their students by a large amount. 60% of teachers that participated in the study thought they would have a better outcome than anyone else. Lavy concluded that teachers who were involved offered more extra help after school hours to their students than those who were not. English teachers also realized the benefits of small, concentrated group work to increase student ability. It was found that both English and math teachers from the experiment focused on improving the lower-performing students test scores more than the higher-performing students, which could be because the lower-performing students benefitted from a more individualized type of learning. Lavy’s experiment was successful overall. However, one problem he ran into was the concern that Israeli teachers were now “teaching to the test”. Yet this problem exists in the United States as well with standardized testing and is a way for schools and teachers to widen the core curriculum, rather than having one teacher who assigns a semester-long project instead of teaching many subjects. A second limitation Lavy encountered was time. His experiment was only one year long and thus did not show the long-term effects this study had on
It is hard to measure the productivity of teachers and, therefore, it is important to use a single salary schedule in their compensation. In other professions such as engineers,
Miltich, Matthew. "Standardized Testing and Assessment Do Not Improve Education." Education: Opposing Viewpoints. New York: Greenhaven, 2005. 151-54. Print.
If a teacher is honest and fair with all of their students, it will increase
The oversite committee then evaluates the success of their money allocation and incentivize the success of the public school’s education. “Americans do not appear ready to pay the price.” (Barber, p. 215) Money is the most powerful motivator, and if the success of school districts reaps the benefits of more financial resource, educators will fight to be the best. This new desire to be the best, is possible with the equalization of opportunity from the allocation of funds to the poorer schools. The race to the top would already be won by the larger, richer, and more powerful school districts without those foundational funds. “Because we believe in profits, we are consummate salespersons and efficacious entrepreneurs.” (217) Barber’s essay supports the idea of incentivized results. Not only would districts compete with other schools, but their standards would be raised year after year in consequence to the oversite of the
Alfie Kohn, author of The Case against Standardized Testing, recalls a specific incident of how children are being cheated out of valuable class time. He states that a school in Massachusetts used a remarkable unit, for a middle-school class, where students chose an activity and extensively researched it, and reported or taught, it to the class. This program has had to be removed from the course curriculum in order to devote enough time to teaching prescribed material for their standardized tests.
Education in the United States has changed over the last 60 years. It started with President Eisenhower making sure Brown v. Board of Education was enforced. Next, the National Defense Education Act in 1858 was passed to improve math and science. In 1965 Elementary and Secondary Education Act was passed to help the poor succeed in school. Finally, in 2002, President Bush signed into law the No Child left Behind Act (NCLB) (Robbins & Alvy, 2009, pg. 7). The NCLB change the way schools look at student achievement. One of the biggest changes was all teachers and schools are held accountable for student learning (Robbins & Alvy, 2009, pg. 7). Schools are now graded and labeled. Teachers and schools must close the achievement gap among the different groups of students (Robbins & Alvy, 2009, pg. 7). High-stakes tests measure schools, district, and student’s success (Robbins & Alvy, 2009, pg. 7). NCLB has made schools look at better ways to teach students. Schools have turned to using research based teaching practices. Schools are now using data to guide instruction. How does a school effectively assess students to increases student achievement? How does a school use this data to guide curriculum development? This paper will look at the importance of assessment in P-12 schools to improve student achievement. In this paper a critical analysis of backward design and its effect on student achievement. A critical analysis of fact-based practices that teacher can use now to improve student achievement will be discussed. Finally, a discussion of the challenges a teachers will face when creating a culture of learning.
Prostik, J. (1996). ‘ History of Teacher Pay and Incentive Reforms’, Journal of School Leadership,6, 3,265-89.
The overall purpose of schooling is to advance one’s knowledge and skill base and through standardized testing the belief is that one’s knowledge and skill base can be assessed and analyzed, but what occurs many a times is a teacher's difficulty to expand upon the learning process due to the confinements that testing has on his/hers ability to teach. In a qualitative study performed by the Morehead State University it was determined that in a particular rural school standardized testing had implemented a limit on the amount of time that teachers were able to instruct, as well as limitations on the “instructional resources and the types of assessments teachers employed” (Thomas, 2005). Even if a teacher was content with teaching the state
Although some people may argue that performance pay is good, performance/merit pay is bad because it will result in teachers doing much less personalizing of the curriculum, and spending that time doing only what things need to be taught in order to keep their student’s test scores up (so they will get paid more). One of the major cons of performance pay is that teachers would have less time personalising the curriculum, teaching the students what they need to be taught, and teaching other important but non-standardized subjects; then using that time teaching only the things they are required to teach to keep student test scores up so they will get paid more(What Do We Know about Teacher Pay-for-Performance?). This in turn will cause the students to have a harder time learning because instead of the teachers teaching what the students need to be taught and more time teaching what the people who don’t know what the students know think the students should be taught.
Strauss, Valerie. "Why teachers’ salaries should be doubled now." The Washington Post. N.p., 25 Mar. 2014. Web. 5 Apr. 2014. .
Reward systems have been evolving and growing throughout the years, but there are many types that have always been there. Base pay is the most common, which is an employee’s base wages and salary that they are paid on hourly, weekly, monthly, or annually (Luthans, 2011, p.94). Merit based pay is another type of incentive, which rewards and motivates an individual to perform their jobs to the standards of their employers. According to the text Organizational Behaviors, by Fred Luthans, there are three other options for paying an employee for their performance: individual incentives pay plans, using of bonuses, and the use of stock options. Individual based pay plans are based on the employees output and/or quality. Some organizations use bonuses as incentives to their employees. These are offered sometimes as op...
In any organization, sometimes, monetary schemes doesnot get people involve to pursue work in a certain way, rather it demoralize and threatens the self-esteem of employees. According to Meyer (1975), “the basis for most of the problems with merit pay plans is that most people think their own performance is above average”. The amount may ...
So even if teachers do their best, some of their students cannot get good grades (Solmon et al., 21-22). Yes, it is true. There will always be a small number of students who are hard to handle. However, merit pay is a salary paid based on employee performance, for a teacher, which is means based on their students’ score. In other words, the teacher whose students get better grades, are the people who can earn a higher salary. So what is the definition of better? If we compare all of the teachers in a country or in a state and choose who is better, this would not be fair. Nevertheless, if we just compare the teachers who are in the same schools and teaching students who are at the same level, this would be more equitable because they are teaching students who have similar abilities. Every class has good students and bad students, we can contradistinguish the average mark of a class for same exams like SAT or AP. Schools can give higher payments to the best teacher at every level. Merit pay is impartial as long as we use it in right
Merit pay is a vehicle for employers recognizing individual performance and motivating employees to reach higher achievement. Competition is a natural human instinct and healthy competition compels employees to perform at their highest level. Employees must have clear, attainable goals and supervisors must provide continuous feedback, publicly praising employees to motivate performance. Additionally, employers that recognize and reward individuals for their exceptional performance in tangible ways, ultimately increase employee’s self-esteem and encourage them to maintain a high level of commitment to the organization. Employees are more apt to stay with a company when they feel that their hard work is appreciated and compensated. When employees are highly driven, it decreases absenteeism, tardiness, and results in a positive work attitude. In fact, employers use merit pay not only to retain highly motivated performance individuals, but also to attract new employees who are motivated by monetary rewards cultivating a productive workforce. Personally, I think merit pay plans are a great incentive if they are implemented fairly, equitable, and based on individual performance. Furthermore, I feel nothing demoralizes a high performing employee faster than knowing that all employees who contribute less to performance will receive the exact pay increase. If merit pay programs are instituted, they must ensure that
students to learn and teachers to teach. At first glance, it may seem problematic, but research has