Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The disagree of junk food in america
Investigative report on junk food tax
Why taxing junk food can help the people
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The disagree of junk food in america
If your Twinkie costs twenty cents more, would you still eat it? Some people believe that taxing junk food would lower its consumption rate, but in reality, would people be worried if their food costs a tiny bit more? Junk food should not be taxed because it is part of American culture, healthy food is still expensive, and low-income families depend more on junk food. We can choose what kinds of food to put into our bodies, and junk food is part of our culture. For example, according to a food professional and writer of an article called, “Junk-Food Taxes Would Be Unfair and Ineffective,” Pamela Parseghian explains that, “No matter how well funds are invested for improving society, the suggestion of adding federal fat tax is ridiculous. …show more content…
This just would not make sense. For example, Christina Frangou states in the article, “Growing Debate over Fat Tax,” that, “Among the tax quirks in Canada: a tray of cut fruit is taxed but salty caviar, depending on where it’s bought, is not. A premade salad is taxed but six brownies are not”(Frangou 1). Taxing systems are similar in the US and Canada. Junk food is easier and faster than healthy foods. Healthy choices are more difficult and expensive with our lifestyle in today’s world. For example, in Christina Frangou’s article, “Growing Debate over Fat Tax,” she quotes a normal Canadian mom, who says, “Healthy groceries are so expensive-I’d love it if healthier foods were cheaper” (Frangou 1). Parents want their children to grow up healthy, but that is difficult with healthy foods more expensive than the unhealthy junk food. More improvement would be made if the taxes on healthier foods was lowered, or even just eliminated. It is too hard to live healthy in a country and world that taxes good food. In fact, author of the article, “Hard Times for Soft Drinks,” Margot Sanger-Katz says, “Even as anti-obesity campaigners like Mr. Nutter have failed to pass taxes, they have accomplished something larger. In the course of the fight, they have reminded people that soda is not a very healthy product” (Sanger-Katz 1). You do not need a tax to promote healthiness. We can still do a lot to battle obesity and bad nutrition without the tax. Most people who approve of this say that a tax can help promote healthier choices, but those choices are still going to be expensive for poorer people unless we do something about it. Most people want to be healthy, but that is becoming more complicated for us today than at any other time, just because of our
There has been withstanding controversy about whether fast food is easier on the pocket than eating home-cooked meals. Take McDonald’s for instance, they’re notorious for their convenient and affordable dollar and value menus. Since you can get a burger for just $1.19, feeding a family of four should be inexpensive right? Mark Bittman, author of “Is Junk Food Really Cheaper?” argues otherwise. He claims that fast food is not at all cheaper than buying a few groceries and cooking at home. He expresses the different myths about fast food like how it is supposedly cheaper than real food when measured by the calorie, the mentality of people that if it isn’t fast food, it has to be costly organic food, and that there just isn’t enough time to cook at home. These myths followed by genuine factors such as addictions and a cultural impact, help Bittman prove his argument’s validity across to his audience. I have to say that Bittman proved his argument’s effectiveness, for he clearly stated his thesis and provided various reliable
The essay Junking Junk Food written by Judith Warner, brings to the audiences attention the wicked problem of how there has been a decline in Americans health. Warner’s information speaks loudly about being forced into a healthy lifestyle by the Obama administration. The Obama administration tried to enforce a healthy lifestyle among the citizens by focusing on the youth and taking away sugar options for them. Warner, puts her voice into this by mentioning the system during the world war when the soldiers had to eat overseas so there was less food consumption in America, which helped stop over consumption of food. Back then food was also much healthier thought, with less hormones, chemicals and less options of fast food. Again making it easier
“This Article constructively critiques the two arguments that public health advocates have made in support of anti-obesity soda taxes or junk food taxes. Part II discusses and critiques the first argument, an economic externalities argument that government should tax soda or junk food to internalize the disproportionately high health care costs of obesity. Part III discusses and critiques the second argument made by public health advocates, that government should adopt anti-obesity measures to improve population-wide health. Consider possible unintended consequences of anti-obesity proposals. Obesity policy debates present a conflict of fundamental values, such as health, fairness, efficiency, and autonomy. Part TV attempts to reconcile these values and responds to the "personal responsibility" objection to soda taxes and food taxes. Part V considers various factors that would affect behavioral responses to proposed soda taxes and food taxes and addresses concerns that such taxes would be regressive and thus unfair to low-income consumers. Part VI suggests the way forward for public health advocates, including a proposal to enact a tax on nutritionally poor foods and drinks, paired with a salient benefit. This Part also recommends enactment of a federal system of food classification, based on nutrient-profiling methods, along with a federal system of front-of-package nutritional labeling.” (Pratt)
While nobody denies we have a problem with taxation in this country for food, beverages, and everything that we buy in general, I believe that we should have a fat tax to detour people from buying soda and other fattening foods. We should also ban sodas and other fattening foods from vending machines in schools, and replace them with more healthy selections.
Evaluate the view that the only way to reduce the UK’s growing obesity problem is to introduce a tax on fatty and sugary foods.
Obesity in America is a rising situation. The issue keeps getting more controversial and many people are blaming the fast food restaurants for this problem people are facing. Radley Balko the author of “What You Eat is Your Business” explains that no one should have a say on what people eat. The government plays a big role in trying to tell people what they can, and cannot eat. Balko explains how the government should not have any say so on what people choose to eat. David Zinzeko the author of “Don’t Blame the Eater” explains how it is not their fault they are obese. Instead, they are blaming the fast food restaurants for making them obese because of the small options they have are healthy. In my personal opinion, the government should have no choice in what we eat. Fast food companies should not be blamed for making people fat when people make the choice to go there knowing that it is not healthy.
It is sad. People from all races and backgrounds are obese. In a recent survey done at Henry Ford College, 43 percent of students were overweight. Whether it is because they do not follow a healthy diet or they inherited it from their parents. Being overweight is correlated with lacking exercise or physical activity and not watching what is on the plate. Obesity can cause many illnesses, including diabetes, which is very common. As the debate whether soda tax should take effect arises, critics say that the tax will help those with obesity-related illnesses. What about exercising and maintaining a healthy lifestyle? These two factors cannot be forgotten knowing they are the most important. Americans have consumed 12 percent of soda and become less active since 1970. A soda tax aims to stop consumers from buying soda to help those who are obese. This will not be effective. Therefore a soda tax will not be good public policy.
Everyday Americans die from the diseases they carry from obesity. Many Americans over eat because their social problems or because they are hereditary. Many plans have been discussed but finding the solution is the problem. Junk foods and unhealthy beverages have corrupted children’s minds all over the nation and putting a stop on it could lead to other benefits. Unhealthy foods and drinks should be taxed and healthy foods should be advertised more to help prevent American obesity.
Messerli, Joe. "Should Products Which Contribute to Obesity (Such as Big Macs and Krispy Kreme Donuts) Be Taxed?" BalancedPolitics.org - Fat Tax (Pros & Cons, Arguments For and Against, Advantages & Disadvantages). N.p., 11 Aug. 2011. Web. 20 May 2014.
(Nicholas D.). Here Barry Popkin, a nutrition specialist at the University of North Carolina defends her view about taxing sugary drinks. Many people have supported the idea of taxing sugary drinks, and many have argued in opposition to the tax. However, supporters of the taxing argue that it will fight obesity rates by reducing consumption of sugary drinks and purchase. They also argue that it is a good way to raise revenue for the country, which will be used to drive down the health care costs. This revenue are used to pay health cost through Medicare and Medicaid. Some people insist that these drinks should carry a higher tax to keep people from consuming
So far, implementing real life fat taxes has been a lot of trial and error. There have been very few fat taxes implemented in the world, and many have been unsuccessful. An example from Denmark shows how fat taxes fail as a result of improper administration. Denmark initiated the world’s first fat tax, and it has been used for the precedence of many studies. Their tax had an applied surcharge to foods containing 2.3 percent or more of saturated fat (Good Morning America 1). The tax was 16 kroner per kilogram or $2.90 per 2.2 pounds (Good Morning America 1). Even the final proposal for the Denmark fat tax was flawed because people believed the taxes on meat did not match up to the quality of meat
...ng sugar and fats. The junk food companies know this, but they don’t care, because it makes them rich. In summary, this is why by law, all fast-food companies should have forced limitations on distribution which has lead to the rise of obesity in America.
The people of the Philippines have recently elected Rodrigo Duterte as their president. Duterte had a very outspoken campaign that focused heavily on ridding the country of corruption. His plans of eradicating this corruption may seem very unorthodox to many and even immoral to others. During his presidency, Duterte aims to abolish drugs at any cost, at the same time breaking ties with the US while strengthening relations with China.
Manitoba, a place knew for adoring new and high taxes, refused to add junk food taxes because they knew that it was going to be a waste of time and there would not be any positive results (5). The many studies of junk food taxes have soon other countries that it is not going to work. People will find other alternative to get the sugary high they need. A study in a small city showed that soda intake decreased for a small amount of time and then it increased again, as well as the sales on beer increased (Luciani P.