1. Author: Yatta Pewa 2. Title: Eliminating tantrum behavior in a toddler 3. Participant(s) and setting: The participant of this study is an African American, aged 2.6 years old boy named M (fictitious character). M has a mental aged of five years 4 years old and he is from a middle class family with both parents with masters degrees. The setting for this study would be across all setting with exclusion of M’s daycare. 4. Behavioral definition (only): Tantrum: any instance or attempt M is shouting, whining, throwing things, and slamming doors, crying that accompanied by facial contraction with or without tears for any given period, screaming with occurrence of verbalization above normal conversational volume for ant period of time or …show more content…
Social significance of the target behavior: Tantrum is a behavior that is attention maintained and it is use as attempt to get attention or manipulate a situation. 6. Measurement system (include session length): Frequency will be used to record the number of times the tantrum occurs during a particular time period and timer will be used to measure the duration, how long the tantrums lasted. There will be three sessions a day 10 minutes each with a total of 30 minutes a day. The sessions will be spaced out throughout the day.
7. Reliability (include IOA procedures, formula, computations); Each session will last for 10 min. Interobsever reliability will calculated on interval-interval basis by dividing the total number of agreements between the two observers (mom & dad) for occurrence and nonoccurrence of the targeted behavior by the number of agreements plus disagreements and multiply it by 100. 8. Procedures Baseline: During baseline, all tantrum behavior will be reinforced and attention will be given to M. M will also get access attention or escape a demand. Mom and dad will also record the situations in which M engages in tantrum behavior. Whenever M engages in tantrum, dad or mom will say to M, “come here, what you want, you don’t have to do that.” Mom or dad will record tantrum frequency and duration data. Baseline data will be recorded for 7
Time constraints are common when contact with clients is limited because then there is no way to get repeated measures from them across a prolonged sequence of assessment sessions. Hence, the Brief Functional Analysis was developed for these kinds of situations. Pairwise Functional Analysis (also known as single function test) and trial based function analysis can be used in these time limited situations. Risky behaviors like severe self injury or aggression is hard to assess if they cannot occur frequently and are not very safe for the client. Hence, the challenge faced when conducting an FA is arranging conditions under which problem behaviors may increase while at the same time minimizing the risks. Clients can wear protective devices and equipment to avoid the risks. Therapists can engage in precursor FA or latency FA to reduce the risks of the problem behavior. Therapists can get medical clearance before starting the FA treatment and termination sessions when the behavior is extremely severe and risky for the
Slater, A., and Muir, D., (1998). The Blackwell Reader in Developmental Psychology. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers, Ltd.
In Tommy’s case study there is information provided that describe his behavior and objectives. To start with, on Tommy ‘s case study background information it mentions that he doesn’t like new people. Tommy gets very quiet and fearful. Tommy has been diagnosed with bipolar disorder as it serves severe emotional behavior disorder. There are actually two behavior targets that the team at school is concerned at the time. First one, Tommy has verbal outbursts. For example, when Tommy is done with his assignments he yells at his teacher's letting them know that he is done with his assignment. Tommy calls other students names that are not proper base on the school regulations. Tommy keeps having trouble controlling what he is saying. Tommy’s second behavior is a physical class disruption. By that, Tommy is actually throwing class’ materials across the room. Grabbing papers and throwing them to the floor. (Case Study)
Reynolds, C. R., & Kamphaus, R. W. (2004). BASC-2: Behavior assessment system for children, second edition manual.
Stagman, Shannon, and Janice L. Cooper. "Children's Mental Health." WWW.nccp.org. Ed. Columbia University. Columbia University, n.d. Web. 14 Mar. 2014. .
This case study was undertaken to measure the formal operational thought capacity of AA Mooney (Not his real name). This participant is a twelve year old African American male in the seventh grade who attends middle school in Macon Georgia where he currently lives, but he is originally from Los Angles California. His parents are both educated and they are both in the home and are part of the middle socioeconomic class. This case study has one sibling who is one year younger. During his free time, on weekends or after school, my Case Study enjoys playing video games on his x-box, and shooting hoops at the basketball court with his brother. Overall, my Case Study is a very sociable person who gets along well with almost anyone. He is very considerate
There are different ways that a teacher can deal with a student’s undesirable behavior. Some of these strategies are: positive reinforcement, negative reinforcement, punishment or extinction. The type of r...
Over the years the “time-out” disciplinary technique has become the most popular strategy to manage child’s misbehavior. The effectiveness of this method is not usually questioned by parents because the technique is commonly suggested by family doctors and the variety of advisors in parenting classes for safe and effective use. “Time-out” disciplinary method is generally used to deal with the misbehavior by sending a child to a boring environment where a little “rules-breaker” can think about misbehavior and calm down. The strategy is aimed to cause unpleasant emotional feelings and physical discomfort to the child, thus it has all aspects of punishment. Punishment is an irrevocable collapse of parenting ability
This study was conducted to observe how parents react to their children’s tantrums. Every Participant is a family unit consisting of the caregiver and the child. Children participating in this study were between ages 2 to 4 with a history of throwing tantrums. Once the family registered in the study, parents were asked to record their child’s 4 next tantrums in a public place and the next 4 tantrums at home. The parents’ approach to addressing the tantrums was noted through a brief questionnaire. The options for addressing the tantrums were then coded for as doing “nothing”, putting the child on “time-out”, or “hold”, where the parent holds the child and comforts and calms them down. The main purpose of this study was to examine the difference in the parents’ approach to dealing to the children’s temper tantrums at home. Using an independent sample t-test, it is hypothesized that parents who hold their children and calm them down instead of doing nothing, or putting them in time out, will have shorter durations of temper tantrums.
The child that I selected to observe through the course of this semester is a Caucasian female. Her name is “R.” She was born on April 24, 2013. She is currently 10 months old, but will be turning one year old at the end of the semester. “R” is a child who is very active. She has an independent but outgoing personality. At this stage, she exhibits uncertainty with strangers and other people she recalls but has not physically seen in a period of time. Some of “R”'s favorite activities include tossing objects, mirroring actions and movements, music, a...
Wood, A. E., Wood, E. G., & Boyd, D. (2007). Child development: The world of psychology.
Parental permission has been verbally granted in order to perform this study and in line with the code of ethics and conduct of the British Psychological Society (BPS), with regard to safeguarding the subject in this study will be referred to as Child A. (British Psychological Society, 2009)
In most places, like an office or in a house, the norm is to speak manner tone, not loud or obnoxious. The behavior of shouting or yelling is considered to be rude and offensive. For instance, there are a plethora of viral videos of people screaming and shouting in public places or indoors, which people find entertaining, because the behavior is perceived to be bizarre and unusual. To add to this, these behaviors aren't welcome in person, like if someone is screaming in a restaurant or yelling at strangers. To contrast, the behavior of screaming and loud noise aren’t unusual in some places. For example, kids playing on a playground or backyard, the loud excitement of people at an amusement park, these are all considered norms.
Gelfand, D. M., Jenson, W. R. & Drew, C. J. (1988). Understanding child behavior Disorders. (2nd ed.). Chicago: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.