Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How inequality affects healthcare for women
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How inequality affects healthcare for women
Tampons, pads and other feminine hygiene products are a necessity for women. These products help control a woman's monthly visitor. These products prices range from $2.69 to $18.99. For a women, on average, her period will last about a week. If she chooses to change her pad or tampon, every eight hours for seven days, she uses about twenty-one pads or tampons. This doesn’t include her “heavy flow” when she needs to change them every four hours or less. There are more important items that are taxed other than these products. Feminine hygiene products shouldn’t be taxed because women have no choice but to buy these products, the products tax is too high and many states are eliminating the tax already. Women have no choice but to buy feminine hygiene products every month. Jeanne Sahadi, author of “ Is the ‘Tampon Tax’ unfair to Women,” argues that “On average according to [Larimer], women in California pay about $7 per month for 40 years of tampons and sanitary napkins” (Larimer 1). Over the years, paying for these products add up. Jordan Gass-Poore, author of “Citing Gender Bias, State Lawmakers Move to Eliminate ‘Tampon Tax,” argues that the tampon tax exist because of gender bias lawmakers. One of the reasons why these products are taxed is because they aren’t intended to be used internally or externally, or for diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or to prevent illness or diseases (Gass-Poore 1). This tax is making periods sound like an illness that all women have instead of a natural cycle that happens to most women. According to Mary Bowerman, author of “The ‘Tampon Tax’ and what it Means for You,” this tax on feminine products generates about $20 million a year. Eliminating this tax would save about $10 millions a year (Bowerman 1). Without the tax or a lowered tax, buyers of these products could be saving so much money. Because the tax is too high, many states are already eliminating the tax on these
They thought that rich women kept contraception a secret. Wardell included that women in poverty had to work longer hours to support their numerous children. Wardell’s article involved a survey that stated that the number of the child deaths grew exponentially in those times, because there was little to no contraception available for women living in poverty. Therefore, less fortunate women were more vocal about their need for birth control, when Sanger went to trail, ninety-seven per cent of the public favored Sanger’s views – a great support for Wardell’s article’s argument
In her article, “Tax on Men,” Ann Thorpe says that a premium should be added to every tax return for every man in Canada. Men should pay a lot more of a share for these services since they are the ones that use them most. The government should follow the example of car insurance companies and tax men at a higher rate. Ann Thorpe’s position is reasonable and should be supported. Three reason why a having a premium added to every tax return for men is a good idea include the idea that men are more reckless than women, men use more of the public services that cost money to maintain and if men know they will be taxed more unless the statistics show that they are no longer reckless, they will begin to change their behaviour.
The customers Playtex seems to go after tend to range from about 15 to 45. The females that buy tampons tend to be from a younger generation ranging from about 16 to 34.
...rothels: a statement that needs to be eliminated from the American mindset. Having birth control available is not going to result in a ridiculous amount of promiscuity; it is very important to acknowledge that this is not a matter of self-control. This is a matter of being able to have freedom and rights, the fundamental theme in the feminist movement.
Internationally, issues revolving around the female body and reproduction are extremely controversial. For a woman, her body is a very private matter. At the same time, however, a woman's body and her reproduction rights are the center of attention in many public debates. Several questions regarding women's reproductive rights remain unanswered. How much control do women have over their bodies? What kind of rules can be morally imposed upon women? And who controls the bodies of women? Although the public continues to debate these topics, certain conclusions can been made concerning women and their reproductive rights. An undeniable fact is that government has a large degree of control over female reproductive organs. All around the world, time and time again, several national governments have implemented policies, enacted laws, and denied women control over their reproductive organs. Several governments have crossed the border between intimate and public matters concerning women's reproductive organs, by making laws about contraceptives, abortion, and family planning programs.
amongst women with respect to the issue of birth control. According to Davis, a woman. viewpoint on the matter was highly influenced by their socio-economic status. She explains that the cost of having a child is much more of a burden for the women of the labor class due to the lack of financial stability. For these women only the most dangerous forms of birth control are available.
“I don’t know anyone who has a period that thinks of it as a luxury,” states Youtuber Ingrid Nilsen during an interview with president Obama. Most women would agree with this statement, yet it has recently become a controversial issue in the world of paying taxes. Menstrual products are taxed as a luxury item, which has women advocating for the removal of the nicknamed “pink tax”. This pink tax perpetuates an unjust taxation on medical products necessary for the public health and dignity of American women. First, there must be clarification as to what the pink tax is to understand why menstrual products are subject to a sales tax.
My Sustainability Assessment will address the effects of the using Tampons ecologically, socially, and economically. According to the new book Flow: The Cultural History of Menstruation, an average woman will dispose of 250 to 300 pounds of tampons in 38 years. (Kim & Stein, 2009) Tampons are undeniably important in a female's life. It is affordable and convenient to use. Tampons are also readily available in every groceries and convenient store. I am relatively new in using tampons, as I usually use menstrual pads. However, most of my friends use them because they can carry them discretely. They can also move freely without worrying about the blood leakage. Although, the question is: What's wrong with Tampons? Most of the tampons end up in landfills which takes a long time to decompose. (Bridle & Kirkpatrick, 2004, p. 24) These will hugely impact the environment, as well as the people around them. Regular tampons contain chemicals that can harm the sensitive
Clayton-Dye, Amanda. “The Political Economy of Gender.” Lectures at University of Washington, Seattle, 8 April, 2014.
By 1938 the industries annual sales exceeded $250 million and was one of the most prosperous new businesses of the decade. Four hundred companies competed in the market. (485) Aggressive advertising for contraceptives appeared in many women’s magazines and catalogues. Contraceptive products were easily purchased at department stores, through catalogues and even from door to door saleswomen. Ads falsely claimed that their products were “scientifically proven” and recommended by women physicians who “knew” about women’s fears of pregnancy. In an article by Andrea Tone titled Contraceptive Consumers: Gender and the Political Economy of Birth Control in the 1930s, Tone states, “ Many women, spurred on by public attention to birth control but unable to secure the assistance needed to make informed contraception choices, took contraception- and their lives- into their own hands.” (491) The mass marketing of contraceptive devices turned many women on to the idea of being able to decide how often and how many children they
With all the work put into finding ways to prevent pregnancy and help the pain of menstrual cycles, it is a shame to see it denied to women working for big companies. The amount of girls and women who use any type of birth control is very high and continues to stay this way because of the benefits and the percentage of birth control working for these women. Taking away working women’s access to affordable birth control is unacceptable and I hope that one day soon all women will have access to affordable birth
... black packaging that depicts a man ever so chivalrously allowing a women to enter the protection of his manbrella. These products, while seemingly innocent, are constant reinforces of gender stereotypes. A choice between the Dude Wipes brand and the Playtex Wipe is not just about splitting consumers into male and female buyers. This process bears implications of what it means to fall under the category of the male box and the female box. These products reinforce the gender related characteristics that our society has labeled as masculine and feminine. Men are not to show compassion or empathy, and women are not to be tough, or in charge. Beyond the inappropriate societal reinforcement of gender norms, the products targeted at women are often more expensive then similar products aimed at a male consumer. In a world of blue and pink packaging, women loose every time.
There are nearly as many women as there are men working, yet, as it was discovered in 2011, on average, a woman will only earn seventy-seven cents for every dollar that a man earns. Women owned businesses make up for over a quarter of all national businesses and earn more than one point two trillion dollars (“Assessing the Past, Taking Stock of the Future” 6). Since many women are now becoming are the primary sources of income in the household, making less that a man does not only negatively affect families, but also the overall economy suffers as well. These women, among many others, are the ones who end up purchasing the supplies that go toward improving communities and stimulating the economy. There is no reason that the general public should stand for this. Women should be treated equally to men in today’s American society based on their biological compositions, psychological profiles and contributions to history.
Armand, Lione, Kapecki, Jon. 1975. ¡§Testing Tampons in Rochester: just what can you Rely on?¡¨ Jul23-Aug5. Rochester Patriot. Vol.3, No.14
in a month, and she cannot buy diapers for her baby. The clerk tells her that